Congressional_Climate_logo
Lobbyit.com Logo
Table of Contents
THE AT&T, T-MOBILE MONEY TRAIL
BOEHNER'S JOB SPEECH 1 WEEK AFTER OBAMA'S
NY SPECIAL ELECTION NOT A LOCK FOR DEMS
Congressional 
Climate Bill Tracking 
Keyhole Image H.R.658 - FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011
Keyhole Image H.R.164 - Damaged Vehicle Information Act
Keyhole Image H.R.514 - FISA Sunsets Extension Act of 2011
Keyhole Image H.R.1 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2011
Keyhole ImageH.R.4 - Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act of 2011
Keyhole Image H.R.96 - Internet Freedom Act
Keyhole Image H.R.605 - Patients' Freedom to Choose Act
Keyhole Image S.244 - State Health Care Choice Act

Video Of The Day

Gulf Coast Braces for Tropical Depression

Gulf Coast Braces for Tropical Depression


Join Our Mailing List
Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook
View our profile on LinkedIn
 
2010 constant contact allstar

 

Greetings!  
Please enjoy today's issue of the Congressional Climate newsletter, brought to you by Lobbyit.com!
Today's Hill Action: 

 

THE SENATE:

 

The Senate will convene at 10:00 a.m. for a pro forma session.

SENATE COMMITTEES:

 

No meetings scheduled for today.

 

THE HOUSE: 

 

No meeting scheduled for today.

 

HOUSE COMMITTEES:

 

No meetings scheduled for today

Pay to say? Campaign cash offers clues on AT&T, T-Mobile merger

 

9-2atmobile

Lawmakers reacted sharply this week when the Justice Department went to court to block the AT&T/T-Mobile deal.

 

But in most cases you didn't have to wait for their statements to know what they'd say.

Campaign finance reports would have served as a remarkably prescient crystal ball:

 

Lawmakers who've taken big bucks from AT&T and T-Mobile's deal tended to be the most outspoken
 expressing "disappointment" in the DoJ decision. Lawmakers who shunned AT&T's largesse were generally pleased.

 

But in a few instances, ideology trumped dollars: Several Democrats who've taken in thousands from AT&T and Sprint sided with DoJ.

 

Here's a look at who said what this week - and how much they've taken from the AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint PACs since 2000, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics's opensecrets.org. The totals include contributions from SBC, which bought AT&T in 2005 and kept the AT&T name.

 

Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas): 

"I am disappointed that the Department of Justice has announced they are officially trying to block this merger. I am concerned that the impact of this deal falling through will be severe for our nation's job market."

 

AT&T: $64,000 

T-Mobile: $2,000

Sprint: $3,000

 

Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas):  

"With over 2.8 million jobs lost since January of 2009 and 30 consecutive months of unemployment over 8 percent, President Obama's administration should focus on improving the American economy by growing jobs and expanding the free-enterprise system - not on blocking a merger that has the potential to create tens of thousands of jobs for American workers."

AT&T: $60,000 

T-Mobile: $0

Sprint: $2,500

 

Rep: Joe Baca (D-Calif.): 

"At a time when job creation should be our No. 1 priority, I am disappointed to see that the DoJ is intending to block a plan that has great potential to create more good paying jobs here at home, expand wireless access and increase broadband speed for businesses and consumers across the nation."

AT&T: $66,500 

T-Mobile: $4,000

Sprint: $500

 

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas): 

"I am disappointed in the Justice Department's decision, particularly in light of AT&T's announcement this morning of the significant job creation that could result from the merger."

AT&T: $23,000 

T-Mobile: $0

Sprint: $2,000

 

Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.):  

"I researched this [deal] extensively, and read everything I could read, and met with the parties involved and I came to the conclusion that it would create jobs."

AT&T: $25,500 

T-Mobile: $7,000

Sprint: $6,000

 

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), ranking member of Senate antitrust subcommittee:  

"The Senate antitrust subcommittee received significant evidence that the transaction could benefit consumers through enhanced service quality, expanded network capacity, increased data speeds, and continued innovation of data-rich handset devices and applications."

AT&T: $5,000 

T-Mobile: $0

Sprint: $1,000

 

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.):  

"The Justice Department has stood up for competition and fairness. ... The action will protect American consumers and American jobs, the very purpose of our antitrust laws."

AT&T: $41,500 

T-Mobile: $21,500

Sprint: $23,500

 

Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.): 

"The Department of Justice's decision today to block the merger of AT&T and T-Mobile based on antitrust concerns reflects my own views of the need for true competition and value to consumers."

AT&T:$17,000 

T-Mobile: $26,000

Sprint: $6,000

 

Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.): 

"It is appropriate to ensure that consumers are not harmed by this merger, and jobs are not needlessly lost. I've asked AT&T to answer some pertinent questions about the merger, and thus far I have not been satisfied with their responses."

AT&T: $16,500 

T-Mobile: $28,500

Sprint: $8,000

 

Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.): 

"The Justice Department's decision to take action to block AT&T's purchase of T-Mobile is a victory for competition, consumers and choice.

AT&T: $21,500 

T-Mobile: $24,00

Sprint: $30,000

 

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.): 

"The Department of Justice should be applauded for its efforts to stop corporate conglomeration from stifling a competitive marketplace that is necessary to promote innovation and growth in this important sector of the economy."

AT&T: $8,000 

T-Mobile: $9,000

Sprint: $7,500

 

Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.): 

"We applaud the Justice Department for their action to protect consumers in a powerful and growing industry that reaches virtually every American."

AT&T: $0 

T-Mobile: $0

Sprint: $0

 

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.): 

"This merger would also hurt competition and concentrate enormous power in the hands of just two companies - AT&T and Verizon - who would control more than 80 percent of the wireless market."

AT&T: $0 

T-Mobile: $0

Sprint: $0

Boehner to give his own jobs address one week after Obama  

 

9-2boehner

The lone Republican member of the Congressional Black Caucus said Wednesday he's thinking of quitting the group over fellow members' comments trashing the tea party.

 

"I think that we heard the president talk about some of this over-the-top rhetoric and we should move away from that," Florida Rep. Allen West said on "Fox & Friends."

 

"When you start using words such as lynching, I was born and raised in Georgia and my folks were from southern Georgia, born in the '20s and '30s, that's a very reprehensible word and we should move away from using that type of language. And I have to tell you, one of the things I'm starting to think about is reconsidering my membership in the Congressional Black Caucus because I don't think that they're moving towards the right manner in which we're going to solve the problems not just in the black community but all across the United States of America."

 

West's comments come after Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.) told a CBC gathering in Miami that "some of them in Congress right now of this tea party movement would love to see you and me ... hanging on a tree." Last week, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) told Los Angeles constituents that "as far as I'm concerned - the tea party can go straight to hell."

 

West, a tea party favorite, said his Democratic CBC colleagues are failing to recognize problems in African-American communities.

 

"To try to all of a sudden have a scapegoat called the tea party, which is what you saw after the S&P downgrade, that became the liberal media talking point, that's just a distraction," West said.

 

"The tea party really stands for some basic core constitutional principles and that means efficient constitutionally mandated government, fiscally responsible government, national security and our free market and free enterprise and I can't see why anyone would not want to agree with that and align themselves with those principles."

9-2race

Panic is starting to set in among Democrats who were expecting an easy win in the Sept. 13 special election for Anthony Weiner's old congressional seat.

All the ingredients for an upset in the race between Democrat David Weprin and Republican Bob Turner for an overwhelmingly Democratic New York City district are coming into place: a Democrat who's made a series of mistakes, a Republican who's tapped into unrest over President Barack Obama's policies and unease over the local machine politics at play. And though the race still seems like the Democrats' to lose, exasperation is building from the amount of energy and money being sapped by what should have been a no-effort race by almost any measure.

"It's frustrating and annoying that a race that should be a slam-dunk has become so competitive that resources are being used that should be going to other congressional races," said Scott Levenson, a New York City-based Democratic consultant. "It's still a winnable race. But given the effort to date, no one is going to bet on it."

"'Nervous' is the word I would use," said Evan Thies, a Democratic consultant in Brooklyn. "Unless something suddenly shifts significantly, this is a crapshoot. I don't think either side knows what is going to happen."

Turner's traction is creating an embarrassing prospect for Democrats: Losing a seat on prime Democratic turf that until just a few months ago was held by an outspoken liberal regarded as a rising star and potential future New York City mayor.

The latest log on the fire: an internal poll released by Turner's campaign Thursday showing a tie at 42 percent each, which followed a Siena Research Institute poll released last month that showed Weprin leading Turner by a surprisingly narrow 48 percent to 42 percent.

Weprin spokeswoman Elizabeth Kerr pushed back hard on the new poll Thursday evening, citing the Democrat's endorsement by The New York Times this week and cash lead as evidence that her candidate's still coasting.

"Sham polls and hyped-up coverage can make a race look more competitive than it really is, but when you look at the action on the ground, it's clear that voters will reject Bob Turner's radical plan to end Medicare and raise taxes on the middle class," Kerr said.

But Weprin's campaign has been in overdrive the past week, flooding reporters' inboxes with a seemingly endless series of press releases hawking endorsements from Democratic figures and labor groups. And in a signal of how intense and far-reaching the Democratic fear has gotten, the president's political operation got involved Thursday.

 

Jeremy Bird, Obama for America's national field director, sent out an email to supporters inviting them to phone bank for Weprin. "The calls you make could be the ones that put him over the top," Bird wrote.

 

Weprin - a state assemblyman given the nomination by the Queens Democratic Party after Weiner resigned from the seat in June - has made a series of recent missteps that have jeopardized his candidacy. This week alone, Weprin told the New York Daily News that the national debt is $4 trillion, rather than $14 trillion, and unexpectedly bowed out of a scheduled debate, blaming the already passed Hurricane Irene - errors that have earned days of ribbing in the New York City tabloids.

Weprin has also had trouble navigating his connection to Obama, who's facing his own dipping numbers in the district. At a press conference last month, Weprin declined to answer whether he planned to vote for Obama. The next day, he released a statement clarifying that he would, in fact, support the president. Then, in an interview this week with the Jewish Press, Weprin hedged, saying, "I will probably not refuse to endorse him because I think I will be more effective by supporting him but at the same time, being very strongly against him on some of his policies."

That's provided an opening for Turner, who's waged a vigorous effort to tie Weprin to Obama. The Republican has gone so far as to air TV ads slamming Obama and Weprin for their support of the construction of the so-called ground zero mosque, which show a picture of the president next to an image of the burning World Trade Center and a follow-up mailer expanding on the argument.

To some extent, Weprin has also been hobbled by his image as the product of the Queens Democratic machine that nominated him. While Turner has painted himself as an independent-minded businessman, he's portrayed his Democratic foe as a puppet of party higher-ups - all with an eye toward tapping into voters' lingering anger at incumbents.

For all the Democratic nervousness, the district has long favored Democrats - most recently in November, when Weiner beat Turner convincingly. While Turner has scored a few points, Democrats monitoring the race say, numbers still strongly favor a Democrat.

That said, there's concern that even a close race would establish a negative story line for Democrats heading into 2012. After a string of upset wins in upstate New York special elections over the past few years, a narrow Democratic win in a liberal-oriented district would be read as a sign of the party's dimming fortunes.

"In a district that has an overwhelming Democratic registration, with polls this close, it's frustrating and concerning," said Michael Tobman, a New York City-based Democratic consultant and former aide to Sen. Chuck Schumer. "It's concerning because it speaks to larger trends, and you have to be aware that special elections are often bellwethers."

Until tomorrow,


Lobbyit.com