Congressional
Climate Bill Tracking
|
|
Video Of The Day
|
 | | Senator Reacts to Bin Laden Pictures |
|
|
Greetings!
Please enjoy today's issue of the Congressional Climate newsletter, brought to you by Lobbyit.com!
|
|
Today's Hill Action:
THE SENATE:
No meeting scheduled for today.
SENATE COMMITTEES:
No meetings scheduled for today.
No meeting scheduled for today.
HOUSE COMMITTEES:
House Energy & Commerce (9:00 a.m.): Energy & Power Subcommittee - Hearing on discussion draft of H.R. ___ - The Jobs and Energy Permitting Act. 2322 RHOB.
House Energy & Commerce (9:30 a.m.): Communications & Technology Subcommittee - Hearing to examine the Federal Communications Commission process reform. 2123 RHOB.
House Education & The Workforce (10:00 a.m.): Early Childhood, Elementary, & Secondary Education Subcommittee - Hearing to examine the costs of federal outreach into school meals. 2175 RHOB.
House Financial Services (10:00 a.m.): Oversight & Investigations Subcommittee - Hearing to examine the alleged ponzi scheme operated by the Texas-based Stanford Financial Group. 2128 RHOB.
House Foreign Affairs (10:00 a.m.): Africa, Global Health, & Human Rights Subcommittee - Hearing to examine China's action on dissent. 2172 RHOB.
House Judiciary (10:00 a.m.): Constitution Subcommittee - Hearing to review whether the Constitution should be amended to address the federal deficit. 2141 RHOB.
House Natural Resources (10:00 a.m.): Hearing to examine oversight of wind and solar energy roadblocks on public lands and waters. 1324 LHOB.
House Oversight & Government Reform (10:00 a.m.): Government Organization, Efficiency, & Financial Management Subcommittee - Hearing to examine financial management at the Dept. of Homeland Security. 2247 RHOB.
House Science, Space, & Technology (10:00 a.m.): Investigations & Oversight Subcommittee and Energy & Environment Subcommittee - Joint hearing to examine nuclear risk energy management. 2318 RHOB.
House Veterans' Affairs (10:00 a.m.): Health Subcommittee - Hearing to examine the Federal Recovery Coordination Program. 334 CHOB.
House Appropriations (10:15 a.m.): Military Construction & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee - Hearing to conduct markup of pending legislation. H-140 Capitol.
House Appropriations (11:00 a.m.): Homeland Security Subcommittee - Hearing to conduct markup of pending legislation. HC-5 Capitol.
|
|
Boehner says he 'struck a nerve' on cuts
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) says he "struck a nerve" with Democrats in a speech this week in New York City when he called for "trillions" in spending cuts in exchange for raising the debt limit.
"Clearly we struck a nerve. The response from the White House, Democrats and the left has been panic and hysteria," Boehner said in a Thursday news conference at the Capitol. "For years, Washington has gotten away with kicking the can down the road on the debt and deficit without ever having to face the realities of the government's spending addiction. While this may be hard for the Washington crowd to accept, those days are over."
Boehner also forcefully rebutted claims that a delay in raising the $14.3 trillion federal debt ceiling would rattle the markets and threaten the economy. The markets, he said, would react more negatively if Washington failed to rein in spending.
"If we don't act boldly now, the markets will act for us very soon," he said. "Remember, Standard & Poor's warned several weeks ago that it may downgrade its U.S. debt rating, not over the debt-limit fight, but because Washington has no plan to tackle its massive debt. The greatest threat to our economy, to job creation and to our children's future is doing nothing. Doing nothing is not an option. The American people won't tolerate it, and neither will we."
Boehner said lawmakers will have ample time to discuss ways to cut spending in the coming weeks in the lead-up to a debt-limit vote. But he ruled out attaching what he called spending-cut "gimmicks" to a hike in the borrowing authority.
"There are going to have to be a bunch of budget process reforms. ... I don't want phony caps, phony targets," Boehner said. "We know what the challenges are, why don't we go tackle the problem?"
Asked if he supports a bipartisan Senate measure that would cap spending at certain levels, he said he didn't want to tie himself to that, reiterating that the cuts must "be real."
"All the gimmicks that have been used in the past have never worked, Congress has found a way to wiggle out of all of them. The only way to do this is the right way - and that is to go in and make real program changes that would put these entitlement programs on a much stronger foundation where they can be preserved for the tens of millions of Americans who count on them," Boehner said.
But he refused to expand on the details or timeframes regarding the potential cuts.
"When it comes to savings in this effort to increase the debt limit, I think it's a little too early to lock myself into what kind of timeframe, but I clearly believe it's time to bend the cost curve and to get America headed toward a solid fiscal foundation which we do not see today," Boehner said.
|
|
Joe Barton: Don't call them Big Oil
Joe Barton doesn't like labels. At least not when it comes to "Big Oil."
"I don't think it should be a pejorative," the Texas Republican said Thursday during a C-SPAN interview. "We've got this mentality on the liberal side of our political debate: Big Oil, Big Insurance, big this, big that."
The term has gotten a lot of use this week as Senate Democrats hauled in the top executives of the five biggest U.S. oil companies Thursday to testify on efforts to repeal the industry's tax incentives.
Besides, Barton argued, U.S. oil companies aren't even the biggest.
"The biggest oil company, ExxonMobil, is only the fifth-largest oil company overall because the other four are run by governments," Barton said. "So it should be something of a badge of honor that we still have companies that can compete internationally, and so it's a little upsetting that we try to at the very beginning make it a pejorative."
He also took umbrage with Senate Democrats' efforts to strip those tax incentives.
"If you want to reform the tax code generically and have a debate about taxes and businesses and manufacturing in the United States generically, that's one thing, but I think it's wrong to just pick out any industry - whether it's the oil industry or the automobile industry -and say, 'You know, we shouldn't give them the tax credits or tax advantages that we give other companies that do business in America.'"
Barton has already taken a lot of heat for his defense of Big Oil, most notably for his apology last year to BP for what he dubbed a $20 billion "shakedown" by the White House after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Barton later apologized for his apology, and he said Thursday that he thinks BP will be held liable and punished under the law.
"I thought that it was inappropriate to do it somewhat in a cloak of secrecy with no due process and that was my point, not that BP hadn't done anything wrong," Barton said of his apology last June.
"They had - and they're going through the legal process now - the appeals process, and I think ultimately they're going to be held liable for all the damage that that oil spill did."
|

The special counsel hired by the Senate Ethics Committee concluded that there is "substantial credible evidence" that former Sen. John Ensign violated federal civil and criminal laws, as well as Senate rules, during the disintegration of an extra-marital affair with the wife of an ex-aide and close family friend.
In a report released Thursday, the Ethics Committee reported the findings and referred the matter to both the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission, which could choose to take further action.
Both Senate Ethics Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Vice Chairman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) took the unusual step of speaking on the Senate floor Thursday afternoon about what Boxer called an "extensive" 22-month investigation into the embattled Nevada lawmaker's actions that required 32 subpoenas, the testimony of 72 witnesses and the review of more than a half million pages of documents.
Had Ensign not resigned from his Senate seat May 3 - on the eve of the day he was scheduled to testify before the Ethics Committee - the Nevada Republican's actions would have warranted expulsion from the Senate, the harshest penalty the Ethics Committee could recommend, the special counsel concluded.
"While Senator Ensign's resignation ended our investigation before the next phase ... it did not end our profound responsibilities," Boxer said on the floor. "This Ensign case was a sad chapter for the Senate."
Ensign's legal team said the former Senator is "confused and disappointed" that the committee chose to issue its report without giving further consideration to Ensign's written submission, which it received yesterday.
"Given his resignation and announcement that he was not running for re-election, there does not seem to be any real reason for a rush to create a report," said Robert L. Walker of Wiley Rein and Abbe D. Lowell of Chadbourne & Parke in a joint statement.
Ensign began his affair with Cynthia Hampton, wife to ex-aide Doug Hampton and an one-time employee of the former Senator's campaign committee and leadership PAC, in 2007 following a break-in at the Hampton family home. After the Hamptons moved in with the Ensigns in their house outside Las Vegas, Ensign began pursuing Ms. Hampton aggressively, and the two began an affair. Several months later, Ensign told Mr. Hampton he could no longer work with him, as he was in love with his wife and wanted to marry her, the special counsel's report shows.
Shortly thereafter, Ensign began "pressuring contributors and constituents to hire Mr. Hampton even though he had no public policy experience or value as a lobbyist other than access to the Senator and his office" and his personal journal entries revealed that the Hamptons received a $96,000 severance payment via Ensign's parents, according to the report.
Mr. Hampton was indicted in March for lobbying Ensign during a mandated cooling-off period after leaving the Hill. Ms. Hampton has since filed for bankruptcy and divorce.
"The committee believes that every Senator should read this report very carefully because it is a cautionary tale. It shows that our actions - all of them - have consequences for ourselves, our families, staffs and for our nation," Boxer said.
The report also raises questions about the role Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) played in the matter. Coburn is said to have reached out to Ensign's father in an effort to stop the affair and then tried to broker a monetary settlement between Mr. Hampton and Ensign, according to Hampton's lawyer. Coburn testified that he did not propose any solutions and merely passed information between the two parties. His office declined to comment on his role in the aftermath of Ensign's affair.
Though the Justice Department has not indicated whether it will investigate Ensign further, Boxer seemed confident that the committee's findings will result in legal action.
"The Justice Department will look at it, they have to," Boxer said to a group of reporters.
|
|
|
Until tomorrow,
Lobbyit.com |
|
|