Congressional
Climate Bill Tracking
|
|
Video Of The Day
|
 | | Obama to visit tornado destruction |
|
|
Greetings!
Please enjoy today's issue of the Congressional Climate newsletter, brought to you by Lobbyit.com!
|
|
Today's Hill Action:
THE SENATE:
No meeting scheduled for today.
SENATE COMMITTEES:
No meetings scheduled for today.
No meeting scheduled for today.
HOUSE COMMITTEES:
No meetings scheduled for today.
|
|
House Republicans mull plan to hike debt ceiling every two months
House Republicans are considering a plan to grant only incremental increases to the federal debt limit in a bid to extract more concessions on spending cuts and budgetary reform from the Obama administration.
The idea has a champion in Grover Norquist, the conservative activist and president of Americans for Tax Reform, who says he is "building allies" in the House Republican Conference to push for extending the debt limit every two months.
"My argument is, you give them two months at a time, because each time you could get something reasonable," Norquist told The Hill in an interview this week at his downtown offices.
The proposal has gained traction with some members of the conservative Republican Study Committee, who plan to bring it up in "listening sessions" scheduled by party leaders for after the Easter recess.
"It is the only leverage that we have over a Senate and a president that is seemingly unconcerned about the over-spending," said freshman Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.), who said he would not support any bill that allows borrowing past Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year. "I would support a much shorter time-frame."
A push for short-term debt-limit increases is likely to face a wall of opposition with Senate Democrats and the administration, but it would set a significant marker for Republicans as they begin negotiations. The Treasury Department has not specified how high it wants the debt ceiling raised - though Treasury Secretary Timonthy Geithner recently suggested a ballpark of $2 trillion - saying it is up to Congress to decide.
Republican leaders have given little indication of their thinking, beyond suggesting that the level of the debt ceiling would be linked to the extent of spending reforms in the bill.
"Leadership is listening," Norquist said.
GOP leaders are insisting that an increase in the $14.3 trillion borrowing limit be paired both with immediate spending cuts and structural reforms. They have described the debt-ceiling vote as one of three "bites at the apple" Republicans have on spending, along with the 2011 spending bill and the 2012 budget. The Treasury Department has said the ceiling must be lifted by July 8 to avoid a first-ever default by the U.S. government.
Asked about the idea for short-term increases, a House GOP leadership aide said: "All options are under consideration, but the bottom line is that we will not raise the debt limit without immediate spending cuts and binding budget-process reforms."
Norquist's proposal would multiply the bites at the apple, under the thinking that winning a number of "reasonable" concessions from Obama and Senate Democrats would be easier than a single major reform. The message, he said, is that "Obama is so undisciplined that he needs a very short leash."
Yet Republicans might find a limited political upside to the incremental approach because it would force lawmakers to repeat several times an unpopular vote that many are already dreading. Democrats would surely escalate their accusations that the GOP is holding hostage the "full faith and credit of the U.S. government." And the prolonged political fight over the debt ceiling would consign the financial markets to an extended period of uncertainty, which Republicans have warned against in the past.
"If the Republicans say, 'Here are the 20 things we want ... and we will trade them for every two months we give you of debt ceiling,' I think the markets would look at those things and say, 'Every one of them makes for a stronger America,' " Norquist said.
A key question for both Republicans and Democrats is whether the size of the upcoming debt-limit increase would force Congress to approve another one before the 2012 elections. Huelskamp argued that an extension past 2012 would be a nonstarter because it would represent "the single largest expansion of debt in the history of the world."
He said he did not know where the leadership stood on the incremental approach, but predicted it would be "very popular with many of my freshman colleagues."
An aide with the Republican Study Committee said a series of short-term increases is one idea the panel's members are considering but there is no consensus on a proposal yet. The RSC membership constitutes about two-thirds of the Republican Conference. The committee's chairman, Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio), has also not settled on a preferred approach, the aide said.
The Treasury Department declined comment on the Norquist plan, and a spokesman for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, "Democrats are committed to reducing the deficit responsibly and ensuring America's economic stability, but we will not engage with an organization dedicated to ending Medicare as we know it."
Top Republicans have avoided specifics in discussing what they are likely to demand from Obama, but a GOP leadership aide said the debt-limit increase must include "real, actual cuts that get enacted into law ... not the promise of future cuts by a future Congress."
That could include a hard cap on discretionary spending in conjunction with cuts to mandatory programs, the aide said. One possibility is reductions to Medicaid outlined in the GOP-passed budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), which have generated somewhat less opposition than the proposed reforms to Medicare. Another option is reducing the size of the federal workforce, through attrition rather than layoffs, the aide said.
The proposal is likely to include a Republican version of a trigger that, the aide said, "would ensure that real reforms are enacted by a date certain and that the size of the debt-limit increase will be directly tied to the amount of real savings that are actually enacted within that period." Obama and Senate Democrats have also advanced a trigger proposal, but theirs would be tied to the deficit, rather than spending, and could lead to tax increases that Republicans oppose.
Some conservatives are pushing for a balanced-budget amendment to be attached to the debt-ceiling bill, but GOP leaders have been cool to the idea because ratification through the state legislatures would take years. Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) has said the GOP needs to achieve "something that gets done this year."
The Club for Growth is one conservative group advocating the balance-budget amendment, but its vice president for government affairs, Andrew Roth, said the club is open to the idea of short-term increases in the debt ceiling paired with spending cuts "if consideration of the balanced-budget amendment in the Congress needs more time."
|
|
Virginia Attorney General drops DOMA firm
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has ended his office's relationship with the law firm that earlier this week said it would not represent the House of Representatives in its case supporting the Defense of Marriage Act.
In a letter to Atlanta-based King & Spalding, the state's top law enforcement official, a Republican, says that the firm's willingness to drop the House as a client in the DOMA case "was such an obsequious act of weakness" that he sees the need to terminate Virginia's ties with the firm.
Cuccinelli's office had worked with King & Spalding since 2009. But that relationship needed to end after the firm's decision to drop the House on Monday, Cuccinelli said "so that there is no chance that one of my legal clients will be put in the embarrassing and difficult situation like the client you walked away from, the House of Representatives."
Soon after the firm said it was dropping the House's DOMA case, Paul Clement, the lawyer leading the firm's efforts on the issue offered his resignation. Rather than abandon his client, Clement, a former George W. Bush solicitor general, decamped to Bancroft PLLC, a small D.C. firm.
Cuccinelli's letter was first obtained by the Washington Examiner, which published excerpts from it on Friday morning. His office did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment.
The attorney general said that while his office is willing to have professional relationships with people and groups with whom he may disagree, "it is crucial for us to be able to trust and rely on the fact that our outside counsel will not desert Virginia due to pressure by an outside group or groups."
Les Zuke, King & Spalding's director of communications, said Friday morning that POLITICO's request for comment was the first he had heard of Cuccinelli's decision to end Virginia's ties with the firm. He declined to comment, saying the firm's policy is not to discuss client matters.
|

A GOP lawmaker will introduce legislation in the coming weeks to require any candidate running for president to file a copy of his or her birth certificate with the Federal Election Commission.
"It's the right thing to do and it's long overdue," Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.), the bill's sponsor, wrote in an email to The Hill.
Posey insisted the legislation is not directed at President Obama, who has battled charges that he was not born in the U.S. and is ineligible to serve as president since before he entered the Oval Office.
"This legislation has never been about one candidate," Posey wrote. "It's been about addressing something that's come up at least seven times before. With its passage, this won't be a distraction for anyone in the future."
Posey previously introduced the legislation in 2009, when Democrats held the House, but it could have a better chance of moving forward now that Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio) is Speaker.
Obama this week sought to put to rest questions about his birthplace by releasing his long-form birth certificate, which shows he was born in Honolulu. He said the country should move on from the "silliness" of the birther controversy and cease paying attention to "carnival barkers" like Donald Trump.
Trump, who is considering a run for the presidency, has repeatedly questioned whether the president was born in the U.S. This seemed to have an impact on opinion polls, which showed an increasing number of Republican voters harboring doubts about where the president was born.
Republican strategists worry their party could be hurt by talk about Obama's birthplace, which many in both parties see as a fringe issue. At the same time, many Republican officeholders are loath to criticize the birther movement.
Posey said his legislation would put an end to controversies about whether a candidate is eligible to serve as president, sparing the nation from the sorts of distractions surrounding Obama.
If his bill became law, Posey said, the firestorm over whether Obama was born in Hawaii and can serve as president would have been "resolved discreetly" prior to the 2008 campaign.
Posey's bill, first introduced in March 2009, would amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. It would require a presidential candidate's principal campaign committee to include a copy of the candidate's birth certificate with the committee's statement of organization.
The bill would also require that a candidate for president establish that he or she is a citizen eligible to serve as president by providing documents proving he or she has been a U.S. resident for 14 years, and that he or she is at least 35 years of age.
When Posey's bill was introduced in 2009, Democrats held the House, and it subsequently languished in the Committee on House Administration. It was co-sponsored by a dozen members, including Reps. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.).
Asked if he thought the bill would have a better chance in the GOP-led 112th Congress, the lawmaker hedged: "I think Congress should deal with it and move on."
In arguing his bill is not directed toward Obama, Posey said eligibility questions also came up with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who was born in the Panama Canal Zone.
"A number of major media outlets were happy to make Sen. McCain's eligibility a serious issue for him in 2008 just after he won the Republican nomination," wrote Posey. "The issue hung over McCain's head for months during the campaign and it could have been resolved when he filed for office."
"It says to me that we have no process in place to verify a candidate's eligibility before jumping into a campaign," he added.
Posey hopes to make the bill bipartisan, but declined to comment on which lawmakers will co-sponsor the reintroduced legislation.
|
|
|
Until tomorrow,
Lobbyit.com |
|
|