Congressional
Climate Bill Tracking
|
|
Video Of The Day
|
 | |
New FAA regulations call for more sleep
|
|
|
Greetings!
Please enjoy today's issue of the Congressional Climate newsletter, brought to you by Lobbyit.com!
|
|
Today's Hill Action:
THE SENATE:
No meeting scheduled for today.
SENATE COMMITTEES:
No meetings scheduled for today.
No meeting scheduled for today.
HOUSE COMMITTEES:
No meetings scheduled for today.
|
|
First 100 days of Congress foreshadow political slog
If the first 100 days of the country's latest experiment in divided government is any indication, the next two years will be a brutal political slog with short pit stops for legislative progress only on the most basic functions of government.
President Barack Obama had signed just eight bills sent to him by the 112th Congress into law by Friday. Besides the 2011 spending measure and six short-term extensions of existing laws, only a courthouse naming measure has made it through both the GOP-controlled House and Democratic-run Senate.
On the big spending bill, it took marathon negotiations and a last-minute deal between Obama, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to keep the government from shutting down. Even then, the agreement was sealed so late that the White House had to issue guidance to allow operations to continue past midnight - after starting to print furlough notices for hundreds of thousands of federal employees - because Congress couldn't complete action until after the official zero hour.
Yet for all the talk of tea party intemperance - and even though Republicans have succeeded in forcing Democrats to fight on GOP turf on the long-term spending bill and a pending increase of the limit on the national debt - neither party holds a firm upper hand.
"It's like the early rounds of a heavyweight fight, where they circle each other and throw a few punches," said former Rep. Martin Frost, a moderate Texas Democrat. "You don't expect a knockout in the first round."
After three-plus months of a new governing paradigm, there's still hope in some corners that the political stalemate - the inability of either side to make progress on its own partisan goals - will lead to major progress on national priorities such as bringing annual and long-term budgets closer to balance.
The slow pace is not for lack of effort, at least not on the House side of the Capitol. Boehner and his anxious new Republican majority are steadily churning out conservative favorites, including a bill that would eliminate funding for the Democratic health care law enacted last year and a budget resolution that would slash taxes, Medicare and Medicaid.
But those measures are dead on arrival in a Democratic Senate that isn't willing to act on its own agenda, much less the House's. Reid is doing his best to avoid tough votes because 23 Democratic-held Senate seats are on the line next November. Months of floor time have been taken up by ho-hum reauthorizations of aviation and small business laws.
And Boehner has been forced to work hard to find his way since being sworn as speaker on Jan. 5. Not only does he face a challenge controlling his 87-member, tea-party inspired freshman class, but conservative lawmakers such as Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Mike Pence (R-Ind.) and Steve King (R-Iowa) have also been vocally critical of the 2011 budget deal the Ohio Republican hammered out with Obama and Reid, causing Boehner headaches with the GOP base. Bachmann is considering a White House run in 2012, while Pence may run statewide in Indiana.
During a members-only, closed-door Republican Conference meeting on Friday, several lawmakers - including Reps. Virginia Foxx (N.C.) and Geoff Davis (Ky.) - "called out" Bachmann for taking a veiled shot at Boehner by criticizing the budget deal he helped craft. Freshman GOP Rep. Jon Runyan (N.J.), a former lineman for the NFL's Philadelphia Eagles, compared "some" in his conference to star wide receiver Terrell Owens, a brilliant but controversial player who was slammed for dividing Runyan's old team with divisive public comments.
Bachmann defended herself from the criticism, and Republicans later came out of the session with overwhelming support for a 2012 budget proposal from Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) that cut $5.8 trillion in government spending over the next decade. No Democrats backed the measure, while four House Republicans voted against it. That was a dramatic improvement from Thursday's vote on the 2011 budget package, when 59 Republicans defected, leading to questions about Boehner's strength within the GOP Conference.
"Mr. Boehner has done a good job of reorganizing the House, establishing his leadership, organizing his committees with his committee leadership," said Rep. Bill Young (R-Fla.). "I give him really high marks for finalizing the fiscal year 2011 appropriations, not only for the fact the we are getting it done ... but then the other consideration is that Mr. Boehner has never been an appropriator, he's never been on the Budget Committee, yet still he was able to manage those appropriation and budget issues, I think, very successfully."
"I think he did an admirable job with regards to the battles that he had recently," added Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.), who along with members of the Republican Study Committee pushed a budget proposal even more hard-line than the Ryan plan.
"Now he's going to have to be focused on the next one," Garrett noted, referring to the tough fight ahead over boosting the nation's $14.3 trillion debt limit, a vote that will come later this spring.
Despite Friday's Republican unity, Boehner and other top GOP leaders, including Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) and Majority Whip Kevin Mccarthy (Calif.), have "yet to jell," said one Republican lawmaker, meaning Boehner has had to tread carefully to avoid being outflanked by either one of them, especially Cantor.
"Look, they are all trying to figure out how this works, who does what exactly and how it gets done," said the Republican lawmaker, speaking on the condition of anonymity. "He doesn't trust Cantor, so he has to move slowly."
Boehner ducked a question this week on the hundred-day mark, sarcastically telling reporters: "Thanks for reminding me."
So far, House Democrats have retained a reservoir of personal good-will for Boehner, despite their intense opposition to his policy decisions. "Great guy. There's no animus," said Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), the assistant minority leader and an occasional golfing partner. "I don't feel about him like a I felt about [former Speaker Newt] Gingrich."
However, across the Capitol, Senate Democrats have spent much more energy ripping House Republicans than legislating.
"The Republicans have made a major mistake in turning a debate over the budget into a debate over whether to keep or eliminate Medicare," New York Sen. Charles Schumer, the top Senate Democratic message man, said after House Republicans adopted the Ryan budget on Friday. "The House Republicans have let tea party zeal get the better of them, and this vote will reverberate for a long time."
There's no indication that Senate Democrats have plans to write a budget this year, despite the fact that House Democrats were hammered in last year's election for failing to produce one for the first time since the 1974 Budget Act became law.
An aide to Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said that he did not know when the panel might consider a budget resolution.
"The last two years were offense. These two years are defense," said a senior Democratic aide on Capitol Hill. "Defense that will result in presidential reelection, hopefully picking up some House seats and holding steady in the Senate."
To the extent Senate Democrats plan to be on offense, it's in the political arena.
"You get to have more fun now because Republicans have to be constructive. Bridge building is more difficult than bridge breaking," the aide said. "You pick your spots, you launch grenades."
Right now, there's a political clusterbomb on the horizon. The government is about to hit a $14.3 trillion cap on the debt, and Congress and the president must agree to prevent a catastrophic default on national obligations.
Republican conservatives made clear early in the process that they wouldn't compromise unless Democrats are willing to institute spending caps or cuts. Some congressional Democrats, including House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), have moved in that direction, and Hoyer was able to deliver 80 critical votes for Boehner on the 2011 budget deal during Thursday's floor vote.
And Obama, who had said repeatedly that he wanted a "clean" debt-ceiling vote, now is willing to attach deficit-control legislation to the measure.
"I think [Boehner's] absolutely right that it's not going to happen without some spending cuts," Obama told the Associated Press on Friday.
In a speech earlier this week, Obama said he wants to convene a 16-member congressional task force to negotiate a deficit-reduction package. Before Friday, he had not linked it to the debt-ceiling vote. But a political reality sure to energize conservatives and frustrate liberals has taken hold; the president simply can't afford to let the nation plunge into default on his watch, and that fact is going to cost him.
While some believe the new task force is destined for deadlock - particularly because of its size - others say all ends of the political spectrum must be represented to reach a debt deal that can be sold to all sides in Congress.
"You really need to have everyone in the room to get something done," Frost said. "You have to have strong partisans around the table."
|
|
Boehner visits Iraq, assures support for US mission
House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner visited Iraq over the weekend to express U.S. commitment to the country's postwar success, despite a rancorous Washington budget debate over spending cuts.
The Ohio Republican lawmaker's office said on Sunday that Boehner led a delegation including four other House Republicans and a House Democrat. The group met with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, U.S. Ambassador James Jeffrey and senior military officials. It provided few other details.
The delegation focused on future cooperation between the U.S. and Iraqi governments and the need to protect both Iraq's sovereignty and U.S. interests.
"Our first priority must be ensuring that the remaining 46,000 U.S. forces and their civilian counterparts that are working with the government of Iraq and advising and assisting the Iraqi security forces have the resources and support they need to complete their mission," Boehner said in a statement.
"We must protect the economic, political, and security progress that has been made," he added.
The U.S. force in Iraq, which once numbered more than 150,000 troops, was reduced last year as part of a bilateral agreement under which the remaining military presence would withdraw by year's end.
But Washington has recently stepped up pressure on Iraq to decide whether troops should stay to help fend off a still-potent insurgency.
Boehner's statement did not mention the budget debate in Washington, where the threat of a government shutdown two weeks ago briefly raised concerns about delayed paychecks for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
On Friday, the speaker presided over House approval of a Republican plan for fiscal year 2012 that would slash spending by nearly $6 trillion over the next decade. The plan would increase Pentagon funding by $5 billion and includes $158 billion for U.S. military missions abroad. But it cuts $504 million for diplomatic efforts overseas.
U.S. forces invaded Iraq in 2003 on faulty intelligence suggesting that former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction that could endanger U.S. security after al Qaeda's September 11, 2001, attacks. U.S. officials found neither the weapons nor any credible al Qaeda link. But an anti-American insurgency later took shape, fueled in part by militants who became aligned with al Qaeda.
Accompanying Boehner were Republicans Mac Thornberry of Texas, Mike Conaway of Texas, Tom Rooney Florida, Joe Heck of Nevada and Democrat Dan Boren of Oklahoma.
|

Millions of gallons of potentially hazardous chemicals and known carcinogens were injected into wells by leading oil and gas service companies from 2005-2009, a report by three House Democrats said Saturday.
The report said 29 of the chemicals injected were known-or-suspected human carcinogens. They either were regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act as risks to human health or listed as hazardous air pollutants under the Clean Air Act.
Methanol was the most widely used chemical. The substance is a hazardous air pollutant and is on the candidate list for potential regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
The report was issued by Reps. Henry Waxman of California, Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Diana DeGette of Colorado.
The chemicals are injected during hydraulic fracturing, a process used in combination with horizontal drilling to allow access to natural gas reserves previously considered uneconomical.
The growing use of hydraulic fracturing has allowed natural gas production in the United States to reach levels not achieved since the early 1970s.
However, the process requires large quantities of water and fluids, injected underground at high volumes and pressure. The composition of these fluids ranges from a simple mixture of water and sand to more complex mixtures with chemical additives.
The report said that from 2005-2009, the following states had at least 100,000 gallons of hydraulic fracturing fluids containing a carcinogen: Texas, Colorado, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Wyoming, North Dakota, New Mexico, Montana and Utah.
States with 100,000 gallons or more of fluids containing a regulated chemical under the Safe Drinking Water Act were: Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Oklahoma, Mississippi and North Dakota.
The report said many chemical components were listed as "proprietary" or "trade secret."
"Hydraulic fracturing has opened access to vast domestic reserves of natural gas that could provide an important stepping stone to a clean energy future," the report said.
"Yet, questions about the safety of hydraulic fracturing persist, which are compounded by the secrecy surrounding the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids. This analysis is the most comprehensive national assessment to date of the types and volumes of chemical used in the hydraulic fracturing process."
The investigation of chemicals used in fracturing was started in the last Congress by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which then was controlled by Democrats. The committee asked the 14 leading oil and gas service companies to disclose the types and volumes of the hydraulic fracturing products they used between 2005 and 2009 and the chemical contents of those products.
|
|
|
Until tomorrow,
Lobbyit.com |
|
|