Congressional_Climate_logo
Lobbyit.com Logo
Table of Contents
SPENDING STILL UP IN THE AIR
DHS TO TESTIFY ON FREEDOM OF INFO. ACT
OBAMA WON'T KILL QADHAFI
Congressional 
Climate Bill Tracking 
Keyhole Image H.R.658 - FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011
Keyhole Image H.R.164 - Damaged Vehicle Information Act
Keyhole Image H.R.514 - FISA Sunsets Extension Act of 2011
Keyhole Image H.R.1 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2011
Keyhole ImageH.R.4 - Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act of 2011
Keyhole Image H.R.96 - Internet Freedom Act
Keyhole Image H.R.605 - Patients' Freedom to Choose Act
Keyhole Image S.244 - State Health Care Choice Act

Video Of The Day

Al Jazeera speaks to Syrian presidential adviser

Al Jazeera speaks to Syrian presidential adviser

  
Join Our Mailing List
Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook
View our profile on LinkedIn
 
2010 constant contact allstar

 

Greetings!  
Please enjoy today's issue of the Congressional Climate newsletter, brought to you by Lobbyit.com!
Today's Hill Action: 

 

THE SENATE:

 

The Senate will convene at 2:00 p.m. for morning business. Afterward, they will consider S.493 - the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011.

SENATE COMMITTEES:

 

No meetings scheduled for today.
 
THE HOUSE: 

 

No meetings scheduled for today.

 

HOUSE COMMITTEES:
 
No meetings scheduled for today.

After Break, Still No Deal on Spending  

 

3-28spending

Lawmakers return to Washington this week with the threat of a government shutdown revived because staff-level talks on a long-term spending bill have made little headway.

 

Democratic and Republican leaders are hoping discussions between staff from the White House and the offices of Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) - which continued throughout the weeklong recess - will lead to a deal that averts a government shutdown when the current spending bill expires April 8.

 

According to aides, those talks have involved the spending reductions to be included in the final six-month bill, as well as the politically thorny issue of policy riders. Conservatives in the House have demanded a host of riders, ranging from abortion limits to the zeroing out of President Barack Obama's health care law.

 

On Friday, Senate Democratic Conference Vice Chairman Charles Schumer (N.Y.) said he believes the talks have been fruitful.

 

"We are making progress on the budget right now," Schumer said during an interview on MSNBC. "The good news is there's been progress made on the number. We've moved up ... they're moving down."

 

Schumer said that there is still a dispute over what will be cut, and he suggested there could be cuts from mandatory spending programs, such as payments to drug companies, other Medicare and Medicaid suppliers, and agriculture subsidies, instead of limiting the cuts to the 12 percent of the budget represented by domestic discretionary accounts.

 

Democratic aides said progress had been made between the Boehner and Reid camps, but things hit a snag Wednesday when House appropriators insisted on using H.R. 1, the original long-term CR, as the starting point for negotiations instead of the cuts in the already passed CRs.

 

And on Friday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney dismissed GOP complaints, sticking to the administration's weeks-old position that Obama has met Republicans "halfway" on the spending dispute.

"We've come more than halfway toward the Republicans. And negotiations are ongoing at many levels," Carney said.

 

Republicans, however, have downplayed the success of the talks so far.

 

In a statement, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) argued Schumer's claims of progress "are completely farfetched.

 

"Leader Reid, Senator Schumer and the White House continue to abandon their responsibility to get our fiscal house in order by negotiating off of the status quo and refusing to offer any sort of serious plan for how to cut spending."

 

In an interview with Fox Business News late last week, Cantor said things looked bleak: "So right now, we're saying look, if they want to shut the government down because they have got to protect every last dollar and cent of federal spending, then that will be on their hands."

 

Democratic and Republican aides also downplayed the amount of movement the talks had made so far.

 

In particular, Republican aides disputed Schumer's suggestion that they were getting close on an overall level of cuts, and Democrats and Republicans alike said it would take several more days at least before a deal is in place - if a deal can be made at all.

 

And even if party leaders strike a deal, it's not immediately clear whether they can get the rank-and-file to go along.

 

Boehner faces pressure from tea party activists to hang firm on demands for a full $61 billion in midyear budget cuts as well as on a host of riders that would defund Planned Parenthood, the health care law and other hot-button issues - any one of which could provoke an impasse and, indirectly, a shutdown.

 

Schumer called it "a good sign" that Republicans did not insist on policy riders for the short-term CRs but acknowledged that resolving the policy elements is "still a little bit of trouble down the road."

 

Democratic and Republican leaders have also both expressed distaste for the potential for another short-term spending bill, raising the pressure to get a deal now.

 

And after $10 billion in cuts from last year's spending already enacted, there is less low-hanging fruit to pluck that would satisfy Republican demands for cuts Democrats would accept.

 

One wild card, however, is the Defense budget. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell suggested before the break that he could accept another short-term CR, but only if the full Defense Department budget for the rest of the fiscal year was attached.

 

"I can say with total confidence that we're not - the House and Senate are not going to be passing another continuing resolution without the funding for the Defense Department for the remainder of this fiscal year," the Kentucky Republican said before the break.

 

Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said last week that he personally supports moving forward with the Defense budget regardless of whether there is an overall deal, although he said he's not sure what Democratic leaders will do.

 

Democrats have so far resisted moving forward with Defense separately. Such a move could diminish their leverage in a final showdown because they could no longer claim a shutdown might keep soldiers from getting paid or getting the supplies they need on the battlefield.

 

But proceeding with a full Defense bill in a short CR could buy some time, at least in the Senate. House Republican leaders, however, are facing a surge of opposition to any more short-term spending measures from within their caucus, conservative pundits and tea party activists. 

 

Some 54 Republicans voted against the most recent CR negotiated by GOP leaders, after several prominent conservative groups and Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (Ohio) came out strongly against it despite its $6 billion in cuts, while others said they would back the latest bill but insisted they would not support any more short-term CRs.

DHS officials to testify on 'Freedom of Information' process

 

3-28 freedomofinfo

The Republican chairman of the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will get his first crack this week at publicly grilling Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials about the agency's FOIA process.

 

Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.) has doggedly sought to find out whether DHS allows political appointees to play a role in prioritizing or censoring information it is required to release under the agency's Freedom of information Act (FOIA) guidelines.

 

When Issa took over control of the committee in January, his first major request for documents was for DHS to turn over thousands of copies of records and emails between agency officials. But Issa was not satisfied with DHS's response, and last month he subpoenaed two of the department's career employees, forcing them to give transcribed interviews before the committee.

 

DHS officials have repeatedly stated their willingness to cooperate with his requests and point to the thousands of documents the department has turned over to the committee so far and the more than 20 staff members - 15 lawyers and at least six others - who are dedicated to fulfilling his requests.

But Issa's office has said that a whistleblower from within the agency has come forward with information that contradicts what DHS officials and documents are telling him.

 

On Thursday Issa will get his chance to publicly address his concerns with Mary Ellen Callahan, the department's chief privacy officer, and Ivan Fong, the DHS's general counsel. Both Callahan and Fong are political appointees.

 

Issa's inquiries about the role that political officers at DHS play in the FOIA process stems from a report last July by the Associated Press. The report found that top DHS officials had instructed career employees to turn over sensitive FOIA requests to President Obama's political advisers before releasing them to the person who had requested them.

 

One month later, Issa and Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, requested that the inspectors general from nearly 30 agencies investigate what limitations, if any, the FOIA offices in the various departments were placing on the information requests.


3-28ghaddafi

President Barack Obama told congressional leaders there are no plans to use the U.S. military to assassinate Libyan strongman Muammar Qadhafi - despite the administration's policy of seeking regime change in the North African country - according to sources familiar with a Friday White House Situation Room briefing.

"There was a discussion of how we have other ways of regime change," Maryland Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee told POLITICO. "It's not our role to do anything at this point from a kinetic point of view. It is our goal for regime change, but we're not going to do it from a kinetic point of view."

Another source briefed on the one-hour meeting confirmed that account.

"It's not just military efforts that can force his removal," the source said.

The hastily arranged briefing came amid fierce criticism from Capitol Hill of the president's decision to strike Libya's defenses. The stakes of Obama's communication effort with leading lawmakers on foreign policy are high because liberals, conservatives and some moderates have questioned his strategy, the costs of the engagement and the appropriateness of deploying U.S. forces without the consent of Congress.

The president, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen and Gen. Carter Ham, commander of U.S. Africa Command, were among the administration officials briefing lawmakers involved in the Friday meeting and conference call.

In addition to Ruppersberger, who was in the meeting, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.), Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.) the Foreign Relations Committee's ranking Republican Richard Lugar (Ind.), House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and the chairwoman and ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) and Howard Berman (D-Calif.) were either in attendance or on the call.

The top lawmakers on the Appropriations committees were also on the call, including Sens. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), as well as Reps. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) and Norm Dicks (D-Wash.). Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the Intelligence Committee, also participated in the briefing.

Obama is already dealing with a skeptical congressional audience, and clearly wanted to get out in front of the controversy before Congress returns next week.

 

"Senator McCain supports the decision to intervene militarily in Libya, but he remains concerned that our actions at present may not be sufficient to avoid a stalemate and accomplish the US objective of forcing Qaddafi to leave power," said McCain spokeswoman Brooke Buchanan.

The president told lawmakers that NATO has begun proceedings against Qadhafi at the international court at The Hague, according to a GOP aide briefed on the call. He also said that the U.S. mission has always been humanitarian - to stop Qadhafi from slaughtering his own people - the aide said.

Because secure phone lines couldn't be arranged for lawmakers who didn't have time to get to the White House Situation Room, certain classified information could not be shared, sources told POLITICO.

"You can't say certain things," Ruppersberger said, noting that he couldn't get an answer to one of his own questions. "I raised an issue about the intelligence information inside [Qadhafi's] own group: Have there been people who have left toward the opposition?"

Ruppersberger said the president offered no timeline for how long U.S. forces would be involved in an operation that has been turned over to the control of NATO.

"You can't anticipate the duration, as far as once the first phase is over," Ruppersberger said. "He emphasized that we won't be a part of that second phase in terms of boots on the ground or attempting kinetic change" with regard to Qadhafi.

Though many lawmakers have complained bitterly about the president's decision to strike Libyan defenses in support of a "no-fly" zone without prior congressional approval, Ruppersberger praised Obama's handling of the situation.

"He took decisive action. He took action that was focused, and he did it pursuant to a world coalition," Ruppersberger said.

Boehner, who has taken issue with what he says is a lack of solid information about the goals, scope and duration of the mission, is still looking for more from the president.

"The speaker appreciates the update today, but still believes much more needs to be done by the administration to provide clarity, particularly to the American people, on the military objective in Libya, America's role, and how it is consistent with U.S. policy goals," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said.

Until tomorrow,


Lobbyit.com