Nova Data Testing Newsletter
Summer 2010
Flow Accelerated Corrosion
Flow Accelerated Corrosion
Positive Material Identification
Where in the world?
Quick Links
 
 
 

Welcome to our Summer Newsletter. I hope that our Spring edition was informative to you.

 

 Along with an increase in the number of boiler surveys conducted this spring, Nova Data has been gaining international eperience working with a Finnish company on the inspection of large rail cranes in shipping ports throughout the Carribean.
 
Flow Accelerated Corrosion
 
 

 

Flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC) also called erosion-corrosion (E-C) is a well know mechanism that affects carbon steel pipes and tubing carrying hot water. Flow-accelerated corrosion and cavitation are significant and costly damage mechanisms that are common to many types of utility and industrial steam boilers and hot water cycles.

 

FAC is a relatively slow damage mechanism but it can lead to a quick and catastrophic leak of expanding steam and hot water flashing into steam. Carbon steel pipe thinning typically occurs in the feedwater lines, return condensate and other wet steam components of the cycle.

 

The FAC problem is most pronounced in carbon steels. This mechanism results in the thinning of carbon and low alloy steel components. In FAC the protective coating of oxide (which is mostly magnetite) is removed from the steel surface into the flowing water. The wear rate of this material is determined by the steel composition, temperature, flow velocity and turbulence. Other factors include the pH, dissolved oxygen and the level of certain trace elements. Temperature has a dramatic effect on the FAC wear rate and components in the 250° to 400° F should receive the highest priority. Flow velocity also has a strong effect on thinning and wet steam systems are very susceptible to FAC because the steam flow velocity is usually greater then the water flow velocity.

 

Water chemistry effects are strong and often not well understood. The pH of feedwater and steam droplets needs to be kept above the 9.5 threshold and this depends on the types of chemical agents used. Frequent start ups and low load operations can result in substantial changes in the boiler water chemistry and this can also increase the risk for FAC.

 

Any carbon or low-alloy steel piping system can experience the effects of Flow-accelerated corrosion. The history of this phenomenon suggest that steam generators and boilers, feedwater piping, steam piping and return condensate lines are all  at risk for FAC. Other equipment to consider would be deaerators, condensers and other heaters, tubes and vessels. The area down stream of flow meters, control valves, thermowells and sampling nozzles are all sites where extra care and inspection points should be evaluated.

 

An effective program for controlling FAC should include assessment of the different plant systems to attack by FAC, the use of available software for water and steam chemistry analysis and the performance of periodic inspections.

 

Following this analysis, the most at risk components and areas should be selected for inspection. The nondestructive (NDT) methods typically used for these inspections include ultrasonic thickness measurements of pipe walls and profile radiography of the smaller sections with geometries that can cause turbulence.

 

FAC Software is available within a number of software packages. However, some of the predictions of these computer based analysis have been mixed. The main reasons for some erroneous results have been poor representation of the water chemistry in the software, over simplification of the history of the water chemistry by the user and using the wrong steel composition for the piping systems.

 

Cavitation (cavitation/erosion) is the repeated growth and collapse of bubbles (cavities) in a flowing liquid because of the changes in the local static pressure. These changes are usually caused by increases or decreases in flow velocity. When the pressure in a flowing liquid decreases to below its vapor pressure because of these changes in flow velocity, vapor bubbles are nucleated. The bubbles are transported downstream and when they reach a region of higher pressure they collapse suddenly and can erode the solid material in the piping system that is in their vicinity.

 

These types of piping systems that are susceptible to flow accelerated corrosion and cavitations should be inspected after all orifices, sampling nozzles, thermowells and leaking valves. Also to be considered are blow down lines, steam separator lines, feedwater drain valves and piping, condensate return and boiler feed pump recirculation lines. Inspection methods should include methods for analyzing wall thinning using ultrasonic wall thickness measurements, radiographic inspection of piping, pulsed eddy current and magnetostrictive sensor techniques.

 

 

 

 
Positive Material Identification
 

There has been an increased need in recent years for the accurate identification of alloy materials used in industry, especially in the power generation and petrochemical arenas. The use of positive material identification (PMI) equipment has been gaining more interest as the technology has reduced the cost and size but significantly increased the efficiency and reliability of the PMI instruments.

 

X-ray fluorescent (XRF) technology has been used for over forty years to analyze and identify different alloys in materials. The basic idea behind XRF involves exposing each individual element in the sample to external X-rays. These X-rays are of a sufficient strength and energy that the individual elements will produce a unique set of characteristic fluorescent X-rays which will then identify the specific element. Each element has its own unique fingerprint and the XRF system uses its internal software to categorize and then identify that element. Quite simply it does detective work on metal and knowing what metal is in the system can save money and improve efficiency.

 

As we all know, the consequences of using the wrong material in a process type environment can range from an extra expense to a catastrophic failure involving loss to property, production and even severe injuries and loss of life. Since 1992 OSHA has reported 52 deaths and over 250 injuries as a direct result of using the wrong alloy materials in process equipment.

 

The good news is that materials already in service can be tested and replaced if necessary before or during the next scheduled outage. The replacement parts can be ordered in the meantime saving needed turnaround time and preventing catastrophic failures. New advances in the technology even allow for materials to be testing at or over1000° F

 

Risk based inspection practices will continue to grow in the 21st century. A recent study by Marsh and McLennan (risk consultants and property protection) indicated that the two equipment types that accounted for the largest percentage of loss was piping systems (30%) and storage tanks (15%). The staff at Nova Data Testing adhere to the philosophy that NDT inspections are an important and fundamental tool to utilize in any industrial environment. 
 
Summer Quiz  
 
 

In the Spring newsletter there was an article about biofuels being used to power a 747 Boeing on a commercial flight (the first of its kind). The question was what country promoted this use of biofuels. The answer was the Netherlands. Now for our next quiz.

 

In October 2003 during the inspection of a railway bridge built in the 1870's, an inspector was so alarmed about the severe corrosion that he immediately called his supervisor. The inspector was concerned with the condition of the main girder. On the external surface he found a series of corrosion holes.

 

At the end of his shift the inspector issued an urgent defect report describing six defects, five of which related to corrosion and severe thinning of the web plates.

 

On January 27th 2009 just over five years later a train carrying 10 full tankers of oil, diesel and kerosene crossed over the old rusty bridge and it finally gave way and collapsed. The tankers derailed and spilled over 55,000 gallons of fuel into the local rivers. The disaster killed fish and wildlife and caused one of the tankers to catch fire and explode.

 

Where did this preventable accident occur?

 

1. Brazil

2. South Africa

3. Scotland

4. Canada

5. China

 
Thanks for your continued interest in the Nova Data Testing Newsletter. I hope you will continue to enjoy it and get some good information from our articles.
 
Sincerely,
 
John Taylor
Nova Data Testing