|
Subscribe to myADHD.com
Transmit rating scales electronically
Over 100 Treatment Tools for kids and adults
with ADHD
Child and Adult ADHD History Forms
ADHD slide presentation
Subscribe Today
|
Book of the Month
Attention Research Updates An online newsletter written by Duke University child psychologist, Dr. David Rabiner
|
| |
Greetings!
This issue of myADHD.com News features a
medical updates article by Richard L. Rubin,
MD. Dr. Rubin explains the new policy put
forth by the US Department of Justice Drug
Enforcement Administration allowing doctors
to prescribe 90 days of Schedule II controlled
substances at one time. This is an important
decision for those who treat patients with
ADHD and for those affected by ADHD.
Review the ADHD Research Abstracts column
featuring research articles on ADHD provided
by Dr. Sam Goldstein, editor of Journal of
Attention Disorders.
Also in this issue find free myADHD.com Tools
for career decision-making written by Wilma
Fellman, M.Ed., LPC, author of Finding a
Career That
Works for You.
Thousands of myADHD.com subscribers use our
Subscriber Administration Page to send and
receive assesssment tools and tracking tools.
These tools can be electronically deployed by
health care
professionals in the assessment of ADHD and
co-morbid conditions (history forms, rating
scales, etc) and for tracking symptoms during
the course of treatment.
Cordially,
Harvey C. Parker, Ph.D.
and the myADHD.com Team
|
| |
| |
| |
| Medical Practice Update |
| |
Applying the New Multiple Prescription
Rule to Practice
by Richard L. Rubin, MD
Beginning December 19, 2007, the US
Department of Justice Drug Enforcement
Administration allows doctors to prescribe 90
days of Schedule II controlled medicines at
one time. This covers both forms of
stimulants used for ADHD: the methylphenidate
medicines such as Concerta, Daytrana,
Focalin, Metadate, and Ritalin, and the
amphetamine medicines such as Adderall,
Dexedrine, and Vyvanse. During the past
year's public comment period, much of the
controversy over this rule change involved
abusable pain medicines, while the consensus
viewed better availability of stimulants to
ADHD patients as a significant benefit. In
addition to relief from the logistics of
obtaining a new written prescription each
month, this 90 day time period between office
visits is more consistent with current
medical care guidelines for stable patients.
It also allows doctors flexibility to
prescribe medicine amounts matching coverage
by payment programs.
However, the new procedure is quite specific,
as detailed in 17 pages of description on the
DEA website.
- Multiple prescriptions are allowed to
total 90 days, but they all must be dated the
day written and include a statement "Do not
fill before (date)". Post dating the script
or writing refills on one script is not
allowed.
- The duration of medicine provided must
still conform to good medical care. The
practitioner should consider needs such as
more frequent visits for initial medicine
titration or monitoring of less stable
patients. "Nothing in this section of rules
shall be construed as mandating or
encouraging individual practitioners to issue
multiple prescriptions or to see their
patients only once every 90 days when
prescribing Schedule II substances. Rather,
individual practitioners must determine on
their own, based on sound medical judgment,
and in accordance with established medical
standards, whether it is appropriate to issue
multiple prescriptions and how often to see
their patients when doing so."
- The practitioner should "properly
determine there is a legitimate medical
purpose for the controlled substance
prescription." With ADHD, this means after an
appropriate diagnostic evaluation. The
practice of trying a stimulant as a
diagnostic test is wrong, both clinically and
legally.
- Screening for drug misuse is required.
"The individual practitioner should conclude
that providing the patient with multiple
prescriptions in this manner does not create
an undue risk of diversion or abuse."
- These Federal rules do not preempt
State laws. The prescriber needs to follow
more restrictive state regulations, such as
an individual prescription expiring 10 days
after written. If this rule change is not
accepted by a doctor's state, the multiple
prescriptions will not be allowed by local
pharmacists. While considered in the public
commentary, the DEA rejected possibility of
less restrictive rescheduling or refill
allowances for these Schedule II ADHD
medicines.
|
| |
Learn more about Richard Rubin, MD |
| |
| February's Free Teleconference |
| |
Next month's teleconference features
psychologist, Thomas Phelan, Ph.D. who will
be speaking about 1-2-3 Magic! to help
manage children's behavior at home and in
school.
Join this free teleconference on
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 from 8:30 - 9:30 pm
Call: (646) 519-5883 Pin: 2648 at 8:30 pm EST
to join the teleconference.
|
| |
Read Dr. Phelan's Book, 1-2-3 Magic! |
| |
| ADHD Research Abstracts |
| |
The following ADHD research abstracts were
provided by Dr. Sam Goldstein, editor of the
Journal of Attention Disorders
Pliszka, S.R., Glahn, D.C., Semrud-Clikeman,
M., Franklin, C., Perez, R., & Xiong, J.
(2006). Neuroimaging of inhibitory control
areas in children with ADHD who were
treatment naive or in long-term treatment.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 163,
1052-1060.
Fifteen healthy comparison subjects and 17
children with ADHD Combined Type completed
fMRI studies while performing a stop signal
task. Eight subjects with ADHD were
treatment naive. The remainder had a history
of long-term treatment with stimulants but
they were medication free at the time of the
fMRI. No individual had a learning
disability or comorbid psychiatric condition
other than oppositional defiance. Both the
ADHD and comparison subjects activated the
right dorsal lateral pre-frontal cortex on
stop trials relative to go trials. This
increase was greater in subjects with ADHD.
When inhibition was unsuccessful relative to
successful inhibition, healthy comparison
subjects strongly activated the anterior
cingulate cortex and the left ventral lateral
prefrontal cortex. In contrast, subjects
with ADHD did not show these differences.
Activations in treatment-naive and ADHD
subjects treated in the long-term did not
differ significantly in any brain regions.
The authors concluded that in relation to
comparison subjects, those with ADHD failed
to activate the anterior cingulate cortex and
left ventral lateral pre-frontal cortex after
unsuccessful inhibition. Of importance is
the finding that these differences appear in
treatment naive individuals and are unlikely
to be an artifact of long-term treatment with
stimulants or the abrupt termination of
stimulants before imaging.
Pliszka, S.R., Matthews, T.L., Brasow, K.J.,
& Watson, M.A. (2006). Comparative effects
of methylphenidate and mixed salts
amphetamine on height and weight in children
with ADHD. Journal of the American Academy
of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45,
520-526.
These authors sought to determine whether
methylphenidate and mixed salts of
amphetamine had different effects on growth
in children with ADHD in patients treated for
a year with either substance. A linear
aggression was performed to determine the
effect of stimulant type, patient gender,
cumulative stimulant dose and length of time
in treatment on change in Z score for height.
A subset of patients was identified who had
three years of consistent treatment with
either preparation as well. The linear
regression showed no effect of stimulant
type, drug holidays or length of time of
treatment on changes in height Z score. For
patients treated for three years, there were
no effects of stimulant or time on height Z
scores. Mixed salts of amphetamine produced
more decrease in weight and body mass index Z
scores than methylphenidate. All subjects
were heavier than average at baseline. The
authors concluded that these substances did
not differ in their effects on height. Mixed
salts of amphetamine had more of an effect on
weight with than methylphenidate although the
effect was modest in magnitude and suggested
to be of limited clinical significance.
Pressman, L.J., Loo, S.K., Carpenter, E.M.,
et al. (2006). Relationship of family
environment in parental psychiatric diagnosis
to impairment in ADHD. Journal of the
American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, 45, 346-354.
These authors sought to identify and
understand how family environment factors as
well as parental ADHD status were associated
with variability in ADHD. They set out to
examine the links among family environment,
parental psychiatric diagnosis and childhood
impairment within a sample of ADHD effected
sibling pairs, ages five to eighteen years.
Parents of children with ADHD rated their
families as higher in conflict and lower in
achievement and organization than the
normative sample. High family conflict was
significantly associated with impairment in
ADHD. Parental psychiatric diagnosis
revealed no significant direct link to
sibling impairment but rather a significant
indirect link to impairment mediated by
family conflict. Direct associations with
parental diagnosis appear dependent upon
birth order. The authors suggest that there
were strong links between impairment in
children with ADHD and family environment.
They note that different processes and
mechanisms may contribute to impairment in
different children, even within the same
family.
|
| |
Learn more about the Journal of Attention Disorders |
| |
| Free Tools from MyADHD.com |
| |
Below are some Treatment Tools developed by
Wilma Fellman, M.Ed., LPC in her book,
Finding a Career That Works for You.
These myADHD.com tools can help those making
career decisions and applying for new jobs in
2008.
For more information on the second edition of
Wilma's book visit:
|
| |
Need help in finding a career that works for you. Check out Wilma's book. |
| |
|