PiggyBankWriting

 

Special Edition Money 101:

Personal Money Planning's Newsletter

 

In This Issue
America's Tarnished Credit Rating
 Quick Links
Find Us On Facebook!
Find us on Facebook
Join our Facebook page for interesting and helpful information about finance, business, and more.

 

Join Our Mailing List
Money 101 
AUGUST 8, 2011
Gary Silverman, CFP

 

   

 

We just recently mailed a letter to our clients that dealt with the volatility of last week's market. Then, just around the time they were opening that letter, S&P downgraded U.S. government debt. This was not at all a surprise to investment managers...we've been assuming that would happen for many months-some for many years. It's also not surprising that folks are looking at the downgrade and selling off their stocks (and interestingly, buying the bonds that had been downgraded). Stuff happens. When it does people either panic or get euphoric. Neither is a recommended way of making money.


Figuring that many of you out there are wondering what's going on, I thought we'd send out this special newsletter with the article below. It's written by our friend, Bob Veres, and knowing Bob's contacts, his thoughts and ideas were inspired by some of the leaders in the investment community.


But before we get to Bob's commentary, I thought I'd share some of my own (after all, this is my newsletter).


First, I believe it was Congress who raked S&P and other bond raters over the coals for not figuring out the credit crisis ahead of time. Who then can blame S&P for downgrading the debt of an organization where many of its voting members say that a default is not that big of a problem-and whose leaders use the threat of default as a bargaining chip? Was revenge part of the downgrade? I doubt it was what caused it, but I'm sure it was a pleasant side-effect for S&P.


While interest rates on government bonds actually went down (the exact opposite of what a downgrade tends to cause), long-term the downgrade will cause rates to be higher. No, let me take that back. It's not the downgrade that will cause rates to go higher; it's the never-ending use of debt without the balance of revenue to back it up that will cause U.S. debt payments to increase over time.

 

This "problem" our country is having is decades old and by now should be a surprise to no one.

 

--Gary 

 

America's Tarnished Credit Rating
 

By now, you've probably heard that the Standard & Poor's debt rating agency has downgraded all U.S. government debt with more than a year of maturity, from the top AAA rating down to AA+.  To put that in perspective, now only 17 countries enjoy the AAA rating on their government bonds.  Typically, that means that they are considered the safest havens for cash, and therefore are able to pay the lowest interests rates on their borrowing.

 

Here's the list, and we've included the current yields on each country's 10-year government bonds in parentheses.  This lets you see what the top-rated countries pay on their debt, compared with the 2.34% interest our government has to pay on its 10-year U.S. Treasuries:

 

France (3.41%), Germany (2.83%), Canada (2.93%), Australia (5.75%), Finland (3.19%), Norway (3.29%), Sweden (2.82%), Denmark (3.06%), Austria (3.30%), Switzerland (1.53%), Luxembourg (NA), Guernsey (NA), Hong Kong (2.29%), the Isle of Man (NA), Liechtenstein (NA), the Netherlands (3.17%), and Great Britain (3.11%).

 

The first thing to notice is that our U.S. government is still borrowing at very attractive rates compared with the triple-A nations, and Treasury rates actually got better during the angry debate in Washington, as investors continued to beat down our doors to lend money to our government.  Why?  The downgrade and recent weakness in the stock market have made bond investors nervous, which usually causes them to buy the safest paper they can find.  As an Associated Press report notes, the U.S. still offers the deepest and most liquid bond market in the world.

 

The second thing to understand is that, despite the high levels of government debt, there is really no crisis in the government finances or in the economy.  S&P officials made it clear that they were more influenced by the recent messy debate in Congress than the fundamentals of government finance.  They may have been particularly rattled by public statements by key members of Congress that it might not be a bad thing if the U.S. government defaulted on its sovereign obligations to its global lenders--sort of like one of us telling the bank that we're thinking seriously about not making any more mortgage payments.  David Beers, global head of ratings at S&P, said in a supporting statement that the agency was concerned about "the degree of uncertainty around the political policy process."  A separate statement by the rating agency said that policymaking and political institutional control had weakened "to a degree more than we envisioned."

 

Long-term, our government faces some difficult choices.  The question now is whether we'll get action from Congress or more political posturing.  We'll get an early look between now and Tuesday, as a new Congressional committee, made up of Democrats and Republicans, will be looking for $1.5 trillion in deficit cuts that have not yet been specified through the debt ceiling compromise.   (A total of $917 billion in cost reductions has already been earmarked).

 

What does all this mean for investors?  The investment markets were clearly rattled by the tone and uncertainty of the debt ceiling debate, with the S&P 500 losing 10.8% of its value over the ten trading days of the Congressional standoff.  But a Money magazine report points out that just because a country loses its AAA rating it does not necessarily mean terrible news for the nation's stock market.  Canada, for example, was downgraded from AAA status in April of 1993, but the country's stocks gained more than 15% the following year.  The Japanese government's bonds were downgraded in 1998, and the Tokyo stock market climbed more than 25% in the next 12 months.

 

The awful nature of the debt ceiling debate, plus the downgrade, has clearly added fear and uncertainty to an already sluggish economic recovery.  The Treasury debt downgrade is a blow to U.S. pride, and a warning to Congress--particularly those representatives who think the U.S. can simply walk away from its obligations without consequences. 

 

However, as the decline in Treasury rates made clear, the downgrade is largely symbolic.  Congressional gridlock and partisan posturing could leave us with a long 15 months until the next time we have a chance to vote on their job security.  But it might be helpful to think back to last summer, when a mild panic and concerns about a double-dip recession sent the S&P 500 down a long unhappy slide to a low of 1022.58 on July 2, with a few additional bounces along the bottom until the September rally.  Investors who sold out of the markets at that time missed significant--and largely unexpected--gains through the fall, winter and spring, as people gradually realized that the world was not coming to an end.

 

In the short term, emotions rule the market, and they are visibly tilting toward alarm right now.  Longer-term, the market prices always tend to return to fundamentals, and it's helpful to remember that corporate profits remain strong, new jobs are being added, and the economy is still growing.  The U.S. markets weathered much worse than this in 2008, in 2000, during the first and second world wars and a lot of panic-stricken times in between.  Without the ability to see the future, our best prediction is that the sun will continue to rise each morning and the U.S. will emerge from this crisis like it has all the others--and reward those who managed not to succumb to the panic like so many did last summer and so many other inevitable periods of anxiety when things don't go exactly as we'd hoped.  

 

--Bob Veres

 

Sources:

 

Country by country 10-year bond rates: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/bonds-list-by-country

 

Associated Press analysis: http://news.yahoo.com/us-downgrade-raises-anxiety-not-interest-rates-212346775.html

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/SP-officials-defend-US-credit-apf-685948715.html?x=0

 

Market decline and market impact: http://news.yahoo.com/p-reconsidering-u-downgrade-cnbc-001207261.html

 

Money Magazine analysis: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/SP-Rating-Your-money-in-a-hmoney-388856032.html?x=0

 

My clients know that when they get concerned, nervous, or just plain scared of what's going on in the markets or the economy, they can call or e-mail me to talk though the issues. Yet I realize that not all of you reading this are clients. Still, if you want to talk, and we can keep the time reasonable, then give me a call. It's better to hash things out then to react due to the hype or panic of the moment. If I can help you stay rational in this time of irrationality, I'll be happy to do so. My number is 940-692-6885.

Sincerely,

 


Gary Silverman, CFP®
Personal Money Planning
©2011 Personal Money Planning . All rights reserved by Personal Money Planning and content may not be reproduced, disseminated, or transferred in any form or by any means, except with the prior written permission of Personal Money Planning unless specifically noted. (Permission is not difficult to obtain.) The one exception is for downloading and printing information from this newsletter for general education by the original recipient. 
DISCLOSURE

This newsletter is produced by Gary Silverman, dba Personal Money Planning, a registered investment advisor located in Wichita Falls, Texas. 

Information in this newsletter is believed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regards to the subject matter covered. However, the accuracy, timeliness, or applicability of the information is not guaranteed and is provided with the understanding that we are not rendering legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice or services.

This publication should not be construed by any consumer and/or prospective client as Personal Money Planning's solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect transactions in securities, or the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, over the Internet. Nor should links provided to other sites be construed as the recommendation of the services or products mentioned on those sites. If such services are required, the help of a competent professional should be sought.Remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, you should not assume that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to (directly or indirectly) on this Website will be profitable or equal to indicated performance levels. Different types of investment involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will either be suitable or profitable for your investment portfolio.

Historical performance results for investment indexes and categories generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results.

A copy of Personal Money Planning's current written disclosure statement discussing Personal Money Planning's business operations, services, and fees (known as an ADV Part II) is available from Personal Money Planning upon written request (and can be downloaded from our web site).

Personal Money Planning does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to Personal Money Planning's web site or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility therefore. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.