Alternative Dispute Resolution |
|
Faster, Leaner Jury Trials Laura C. Hess
The Expedited Jury Trials Act (AB 2284) goes into effect on January 2, 2011. The idea behind the Act is to provide a way for parties to completely try a civil case from start to finish within one day, thereby reducing litigation expenses. It strikes a middle-ground between mediation or arbitration on the one hand, and a full-blown jury trial on the other hand. California is the third state to adopt this process, following the leads of New York and South Carolina.
Participation is optional. It will only occur if all parties agree. The jury in the streamlined trial consists of eight instead of twelve people. Each side gets three peremptory challenges to strike potential jurors, instead of the normal six. Each side only gets three hours to put on its case, including opening statement and closing argument. Six out of the eight jurors must agree on a verdict. There is limited right to appeal or file post-trial motions. There is, however, no limit to how long the jury may deliberate.
In order to elect the one-day trial, the parties must enter into a "high/low agreement." This means they must agree upon a minimum and maximum amount the plaintiff will recover, regardless of the jury's outcome. This agreement is not disclosed to the jury.
The Judicial Council of the State of California will issue new rules and forms for consent orders, pretrial exchanges and submissions, and pretrial conferences by January 1, 2011.
Cases involving damages of less than $100,000 are most likely to use this new procedure. However, the process is available to all types of civil cases, with no maximum dollar amount at issue.
If you are interested in this or other types of Alternative Dispute Resolution, please call us to discuss your options.
Laura C. Hess is a partner with Kring & Chung, LLP's Irvine office. She can be reached at (949) 261-7700 or lhess@kringandchung.com. For additional topics, visit www.hessbizlaw.com. |
A Safe and Sober Message About Workplace Parties
Workplace parties typically mean lots of music, food and drinks. If the drinks include alcohol, the potential for unfortunate consequences greatly increases. Opinions vary regarding the appropriateness of making alcoholic beverages available at workplace parties or other company-sponsored events. Ignoring the possibility that some employees or guests may drive home "under the influence" invites trouble, according to the U.S. Department of Labor's Impaired Driving.
Improper use of alcohol may expose employers to liability under tort, workers' compensation or other laws. California courts have held employers liable for personal injuries caused by employees who drive home from company sponsored holiday parties in a state of intoxication. Some employers have been held liable because negligent acts by employees under the influence of alcohol consumed at employer-sponsored events were found to be within the scope of their employment. In other cases, individuals have been held liable merely because they provided alcohol to social guests.
For example, in Harris v. Trojan Fireworks Company, the Court found a sufficient connection between an employer's holiday party and an employee's auto accident to justify holding the employer financially responsible for the injuries that occurred during the employee's accident (120 Cal.App.3d 157 (1981)). The Court stated, "although the accident occurred away from the employers premises and presumably after work, we believe that the operable factors giving rise to the subsequent accident at least make a prima facie showing that the accident occurred in the course of [the employee's] employment . . . ." Id. at 164.
In Harris, it was alleged that the party occurred during working hours, and the employee was paid to attend and encouraged to drink excessively. The Court explained that its decision was not based upon the fact that the company furnished alcohol to the employee as a basis of negligent conduct on the part of the company. Instead, the furnishing of the alcohol by the company was merely one of the facts that were considered in determining if the employee's intoxication occurred within the scope of his employment at the Company. Id. at fn. 7.
All employers run a risk if they serve alcoholic beverages at workplace celebrations and other company-sponsored events because they may be held liable if a person causes a crash subsequent to consuming alcoholic beverages at such an event. However, if an employer does decide to provide or allow alcoholic beverages at an office event, state laws regarding their use and resulting employer legal responsibilities should be consulted and addressed.
The U.S. Department of Labor provides several measures employers can take in attempt to minimize any negative consequences of alcohol consumption:
- Be honest with employees. Make sure your employees know your workplace substance abuse policy and that the policy addresses the use of alcoholic beverages in any work-related situation and office social function.
- Post the policy. Use every communication vehicle to make sure your employees know the policy. Prior to an office party, use break room bulletin boards, office e-mail and paycheck envelopes to communicate your policy and concerns.
- Reinvent the office party concept. Why have the typical office party? Try something new like an indoor carnival, group outing to an amusement park or volunteer activity with a local charity.
- Make sure employees know when to say when. If you do serve alcohol at an office event, make sure all employees know that they are welcome to attend and have a good time, but that they are expected to act responsibly.
- Make it the office party of choice. Make sure there are plenty of non-alcoholic beverages available.
- Eat...and be merry! Avoid serving lots of salty, greasy or sweet foods which tend to make people thirsty. Serve foods rich in starch and protein which stay in the stomach longer and slow the absorption of alcohol in the bloodstream.
- Designate party managers. Remind managers that even at the office party, they may need to implement the company's alcohol and substance abuse policy.
- Arrange alternative transportation. Anticipate the need for alternative transportation for all party goers and make special transportation arrangements in advance of the party. Encourage all employees to make use of the alternative transportation if they consume any alcohol.
- Serve none for the road. Stop serving alcohol before the party officially ends.
Helpful tips are available through the U.S. Department of Labor website at www.dol.gov. Kring & Chung, LLP can answer questions about these or other employment related issues.
|
|
|
|
Attorney Advertising. This client newsletter is a periodical publication of Kring & Chung, LLP and should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult a lawyer concerning your own situation and any specific legal questions you may have. Any tax information or written tax advice contained herein (including any attachments) is not intended to be and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. | |
|
Lawyers Available for Consultation
(949) 467-9164 |
|
Our Offices
Orange County 38 Corporate Park Irvine, CA 92606 (949) 261-7700
Sacramento 2620 J Street #1 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 266-9000
San Diego 11622 El Camino Real, Ste 100 San Diego, CA 92130 (858) 436-0268
Inland Empire 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Ste A120 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 941-3050
Westlake Village 200 N. Westlake Blvd., Ste 207 Westlake Village, CA 91362 (805) 494-3892
Las Vegas 7040 Laredo Street, Ste K Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 260-9500
Los Angeles 3600 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 1220 Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 384-1905
Our Attorneys
Partners Kyle D. Kring Kenneth W. Chung Paul T. McBride Robert P. Mougin Kathleen Elder-Blakely Timothy J. Broussard David P. Ramirez Suzanne M. Rehmani Ronald J. Skocypec Ted A. Connor* Shane Singh Laura C. Hess Han Joo Kim* Robin C. Huggins
Associates Roland J. Amundsen Alyssa L. Andersen
J. Christopher Bennington Scott M. Bonesteel Min K. Chai Brendan J. Coughlin June Yang Cutter Monica R. Dean Merielle R. Enriquez Anna Greenstin Richard C. Hatem Julie C. Kim Matthew A. Reynolds Allyson K. Thompson Michelle L. Wiederhold
Of Counsel Timothy J. Schafer David M. Griffith Paul A. Rianda
*A Professional Corporation |
 |
 |  |  |
www.hessbizlaw.com (Business Law Blog)
|
 |  |  |
|
Kring & Chung
Welcomes New Partner
Kring & Chung, LLP is pleased to welcome Robin Huggins to the firm's Irvine office. Huggins has been practicing family law for the past thirteen years and has worked in the field of law for more than 28 years. She has previous experience in family law, personal injury, medical malpractice and business litigation. Her wealth of experience has made her an aggressive and capable lawyer. Huggins attended both California State University at Fullerton and Santa Monica City College and earned her Juris Doctor from Western State University College of Law. In addition to being admitted as a member with the California State Bar, Huggins is a member of the Orange County Bar Association and the Los Angeles County Bar Association. Huggins has served as a member of the Orange County Chapter of Court Appointed Special Advocates and continues to volunteer in areas involving protecting and improving the lives of children. |
|
|