Journal of Consumer Research
January 31, 2012
Follow us on Twitter

Featured Media
Mentions


Journal of Consumer Research
Current Issue Highlights

Social Information in the Retail Environment: The Importance of Consumption Alignment, Referent Identity, and Self-Esteem

Darren W. Dahl
Jennifer J. Argo
Andrea C. Morales

This research focuses on understanding when low body esteem consumers are most likely to engage in negative social comparisons and examines how this process influences product evaluations. In a series of three studies, the authors find that two pieces of social information are needed for negative comparisons in a retail environment to occur: (1) an attractive social referent must be actively consuming (i.e., wearing) the product and (2) the consumer must also be actively consuming (i.e., wearing) the product. If only one of these conditions holds, there is no alignment in consumption, and a negative comparison does not occur. Importantly, the authors also show that the identity of the social referent is critical to these effects. By identifying key factors that determine when comparative information will influence consumers, this research highlights how marketing strategies impact the consumer inside and outside of the retail environment.

 

Volume 38, Number 5, February 2012
DOI: 10.1086/660918

 

Selected Media Mentions

  

How Attractive Clothes Shoppers Affect Our Buying Habits  

TIME Moneyland

 

Save Money By Shopping Near Hot People So You Buy Less
The Consumerist

 

Pretty People Make Ugly People Self-Conscious, Says Science

New York Press

 

For a Happy Shopping Experience, Avoid Dressing-Room Comparisons

DailyFinance

  

Consumer self-esteem while shopping: Maybe good-looking clerks shouldn't wear the store brands?

EurekAlert! 


Danit Ein-Gar
Baba Shiv
Zakary L. Tormala

This research uncovers a counterintuitive effect of negative information, showing that under specifiable conditions people will be more favorably disposed to a product when a small dose of negative information is added to an otherwise positive description. This effect is moderated by processing effort and presentation order, such that the enhanced positive disposition toward the product following negative information emerges when the information is processed effortlessly rather than effortfully and when the negative information follows rather than precedes positive information. Four studies demonstrate this blemishing effect in both lab and field settings and explore the proposed mechanism and boundary conditions.  

 

Volume 38, Number 5, February 2012
DOI: 10.1086/660807

 

Selected Media Mentions

 

Something for the weekend

The Financial Times

 

Good news about bad news

The Australian

 

Restaurant Reviews: Can Negative Information Have A Positive Effect?

RedOrbit

 

Restaurant reviews: Can negative information have a positive effect?

EurekAlert!


On the Dangers of Pulling a Fast One: Advertisement Disclaimer Speed, Brand Trust, and Purchase Intention

Kenneth C. Herbst
Eli J. Finkel
David Allan
Gráinne M. Fitzsimons

Two experiments demonstrated that fast (vs. normal-paced) end-of-advertisement disclaimers undermine consumers' purchase intention toward untrusted brands (both trust-unknown and not-trusted brands), but that disclaimer speed has no effect on consumers' purchase intention toward trusted brands. The differential effects of disclaimer speed for untrusted versus trusted brands were not due to differences in consumers' familiarity with the brands (experiment 1). Consistent with the hypothesis that fast disclaimers adversely affect purchase intention via heuristic rather than elaborative processes, the disclaimer speed × brand trust interaction effect remained robust even when the disclaimer presented positive information about the advertised product (experiment 2).  

 

Volume 38, Number 5, February 2012
DOI: 10.1086/660854

 

Selected Media Mentions

 

Consumers Distrust Quick Disclaimers in Ads  

ConsumerBehavior.org   

 

Pulling a fast one: How do consumers react to zippy disclaimers?
PhysOrg.com

  

Pulling a fast one: How do consumers react to zippy disclaimers? 

EurekAlert!


Unpacking What a "Relationship" Means to Commercial Buyers: How the Relationship Metaphor Creates Tension and Obscures Experience

Christopher P. Blocker
Mark B. Houston
Daniel J. Flint

Scholars apply the relationship metaphor as a default conceptual lens to understand commercial interactions. Yet whereas the relationship paradigm sheds light on how the socially embedded structure of these interactions impacts their outcomes, the relationship metaphor can also obscure scholarly understanding of business buyers' experiences. Results of an interpretive study drawing on depth interviews demonstrate that buyers' colloquial use of "relationship" language is ubiquitous. However, buyers' narratives reveal instrumentally saturated emic meanings and felt tensions for the notion of expressive relationships with suppliers, which manifest deep conceptual friction with the constellation of etic relationship properties and constructs used by scholars to explain business interactions. Using Bauman's sociological commentary on liquid modernity, analyses indicate that framing these interactions as "connections" is a more theoretically congruent lens for viewing buyers' experiences. Implications for understanding buyers' desire for relational bonds and recasting ironic "dark side" research findings offer challenges for relationship marketing research.  

 

Volume 38, Number 5, February 2012
DOI: 10.1086/660916

  

Selected Media Mentions

  

Time to Admit It: The Sales 'Relationship' Is Over

Business News Daily 

  

New study says it's time to stop assuming buyers and salespeople are in 'relationships'

PhysOrg.com

  

New study says it's time to stop assuming buyers and salespeople are in 'relationships'

EurekAlert!  


The Attribute Carryover Effect: What the "Runner-Up" Option Tells Us about Consumer Choice Processes

Wendy Attaya Boland
Merrie Brucks
Jesper H. Nielsen

The process used to differentiate a top choice from a runner-up can result in a preference reversal among nonselected alternatives, which the authors term the attribute carryover effect. A series of three experiments demonstrate that a phased choice process can shift attribute preferences. If the top choice is unavailable, consumers with weak attribute preferences are likely to reject their explicitly identified second choice (the runner-up option). Instead, these consumers choose an option that may not meet the initial screening criteria but that does share a desirable, "differentiating" feature with the unavailable top choice. Judgment data indicate that this preference reversal is due to increased salience of the differentiating attribute during the last phase of the original choice, which "carries over" into the subsequent choice. These findings augment the understanding of consumer choice processes and heighten the ability to predict choice outcomes under situations in which a chosen option is unattainable.  

 

DOI: 10.1086/660749

Selected Media Mentions

 

When The First Choice Isn't Available, Why Don't Consumers Choose The Obvious Second Choice?
RedOrbit
  
PhysOrg.com 
 
EurekAlert!

All "Ahead of Print" Articles



The Journal of Consumer Research is sponsored by: