MGA Header
November 2009
Welcome to MGA Research Corporation
Greetings!

Thank you for subscribing to our monthly newsletter.  If at any time you wish to contact us regarding any of our articles, please feel free to do so by calling (888) MGA-LAB1.  Once again, thank you for your subscription. 
 
If you have trouble viewing this e-mail or to download a copy of our newsletter please click here.
Featured Article...
Conformity of Production: A Perfect Match!
Mark Nowakowski, Greer, SC (mark.nowakowski@mgaresearch.com)
 
Airbag Deployment"Quality is not an act, it is a habit," Aristotle.  Many manufacturers agree with the famous Greek philosopher. Quality is something that every manufacturer strives for, whether it is in the automotive, aerospace, textile, or consumer product industries. Quality is the bottom line. Companies must be sure that their products conform to their initial design. Does the 10th, 1,000th, 1,000,000th product match the approved design? Quality affects virtually every aspect of the production process. Component suppliers have established thorough procedures to ensure that the supplied parts conform to the design. Conformity of Production (COP) checks the product to a given specification, performance, or other requirement to ensure that the production process is producing the part or assembly correctly. COP checks are done at regular, pre-defined intervals throughout the lifetime of a produced part.

Many automotive manufacturers produce cars in three basic versions; a left hand drive, right hand drive and a right hand drive version designed specifically for the US market. Around the world there are various legal requirements related to automobiles. In the US there are the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), while in Europe there are the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) regulations. With many of these requirements, the characteristics of a particular component will be the basis as to whether the part meets the legal specifications for a particular region of the world. This is where COP testing comes into effect. In order to maintain the appropriate level of quality and verify compliance to specific regulations, whether they are ECE, FMVSS, due-care, or strictly quality/functionality related, COP testing is often utilized. There are significant risks involved if COP testing is not completed or not conducted correctly which could include possible recalls, problems in the field, a lower supplier quality rating from the OEM, higher production cost due to non-conforming parts, etc.
 
NHTSA Moves Forward with Seat Belts on School Buses 
Fern Gatilao - Troy, MI (fern.gatilao@mgaresearch.com) 
 
The debate on whether or not school bus seats should beFMVSS 222 Quasi Static equipped with seat belts has been argued over for many years. However, an upgrade to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 222 for school bus passenger crash protection might change that. Published in October 2008 and put into effect on April 20, 2009, the upgraded final rule includes several major changes in the way future school bus seats will be built and tested.  
The FMVSS 222 final rule includes 4 major changes:  
 
- Small school buses (weighing 10,000 lbs or less) are required to include shoulder belts in addition to the lap belts that are already required.  
- State and local jurisdictions may voluntarily add seat belts to school bus seats in large school buses (weighing 10,000 lbs or more); however, the seat belt must perform according to the quasi-static test specifications written in the final rule.  
- Seat back height in school buses will be increased from 20 inches to 24 inches.  
- Seat cushions that are meant to flip up or be removed must include a self-latching mechanism.  
 
The addition of the shoulder belt to school bus seats has prompted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to publish an additional test procedure in order to test the performance of the seat belts. This quasi-static test combines similar elements from the existing FMVSS 222 forward load procedure and the FMVSS 210 standard for seat belt anchorages. The test setup utilizes the upper and lower bars to apply a load to the rear of the seat back and torso blocks to apply a simultaneous forward load through each of the shoulder belts. Throughout the loading sequence, the seat back displacement is measured at several locations around the seat back and belt anchors. The criteria for passing this test include a combination of force, energy, and displacement measurements.

Read More...
MGA-South Carolina Goes "Live" with New Website
Natalee (Ramsden) Small - Greer, SC
(natalee.small@mgaresearch.com)
 
We are proud to announce that our South Carolina branch website, www.mgasouthcarolinatesting.com, was launched on September 1, 2009.  This website was created in an effort to keep all of our current and potential customers up-to-date with our newly added capabilities at our laboratory. The website allows us to highlight new testing capabilities through weekly updated scrolling news articles as well as featured videos of selected tests.  
 
Since opening just over a year ago, a vast number of testing capabilities including:
- FMVSS 207 - Seating Systems
- FMVSS 210 - Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages
- FMVSS 225 - Child Restraint Anchorages
- FMVSS 209 - Seat Belt Assembly
- FMVSS 302 - Flammability upgrade
- Head Injury Criteria Impact
 
FMVSS 222 Quasi StaticOur South Carolina location is surrounded by a number of industries including automotive, textile, aerospace, consumer products, and military suppliers. Each of these industries have been highlighted on our new site. We have also added an extensive list of test specifications to make it easier for suppliers to find the exact test that they are looking for.
           
We hope you enjoy our new site, feel free to download our technical brochures and our A2LA Scope of Accreditation. For more information regarding a specific test, please contact Natalee Small (natalee.small@mgaresearch.com) at (864) 848-3088.
Up Close & Personnel
Meet Fern Gatilao
 
Fern has been a part of the MGA family since 2006. She Fern Gatilaograduated from Michigan State with a Bachelor's of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering. She works as a test engineer in the Structural Safety Business Unit at MGA-Michigan. Fern is a very dedicated associate, spending most of her time working on customer projects and bringing new equipment on-line. She has been training in the hydraulic test area and specializes in many FMVSS safety tests including 216a (Roof Crush), 214 (Side Door Intrusion), 206S (Sliding Door), and 223 (Underride). Fern is just beginning her career here and she has already proven her ability to look beyond testing. Just last month, Fern was the presenter at MGA's Technical Workshop on FMVSS 216a and IIHS Roof Crush. She gave a presentation and demonstration to over 100 attendees.
           
Fern recently was engaged while on vacation, and is planning a wedding for early September 2010. She enjoys playing with her dog Bailey, and spending time with her family. Fern is also an avid sports fan, and likes to attend Tiger baseball games and Spartan football games.
Volume 23 No.: 11
Grp_Mtg
Join Our E-Mailing List 
MGA Websites:
 
For more information on our capabilities please visit one of our following
websites:
 
In This Issue
Featured Article: Upcoming Events at MGA-MI
Child Restraint System Appendix A
MGA-SC Goes "Live" with New Website
Heads Up on Head Impact Criterion
Touching Base
Touching Base
with Dr. Patrick Miller - Akron, NY
 
The Nebraska Tractor Test Laboratory
 
In 1916 Wilmont Crozier, a farmer near Osceola, Nebraska, purchased his first tractor. Mr. Crozier found the tractor did not perform as advertised and that it was virtually useless in his farming operation. He later purchased a different tractor and it performed much better.

In addition to being a farmer, Wilmont Crozier was a representative in the Nebraska legislature. In 1919, with the help of Professor L.W. Chase, Chairman of the Agriculture Engineering Department at the University of Nebraska, and a fellow farmer, state Senator Charles Warner, he drafted legislation establishing the Tractor Test Law. The bill was passed unanimously by both houses of the legislature. Nebraska currently has a unicameral legislature, but in 1919 it had two legislative branches.

It is my understanding that the original bill was less than one page long and basically established a test laboratory at the University of Nebraska. It also required manufacturers to test models of tractors sold in the state at the University and that these test results be provided to the public. It might be said that his law was one of the first to provide "consumer protection" for the buyer.

Initially, it was felt that the program would be short lived. A test laboratory building was constructed on the campus. Various pieces of equipment were assembled and tractor testing began in 1920. The initial fee for testing was $250 per tractor. Over the years, the Nebraska test results became recognized throughout the nation and indeed, the world, as the standard by which tractor horsepower and fuel economy are measured.

During the 1920's, tractor power was in the 20-40 horsepower range. Today, the laboratory has equipment to test tractors up to 700 horsepower. Early tractors were on steel wheels. Experiments began with rubber tires in the 1930's. The laboratory was the first to quantify the power advantages of rubber tires for the farmer. By 1950 virtually all tractors used rubber tires. To make testing more uniform, in 1956 the laboratory developed a concrete track for drawbar testing. In 2007, the track was upgraded to test much larger tractors and the new track will likely last for another 50 years.

Read More...
Natalee Ramsden
MGA Research Corporation
(888) MGA-LAB1