HORSE SENSE
Periodic updates about issues and actions concerning New York City's Carriage Horses +
Coalition to Ban Horse-Drawn Carriages
www.banhdc.org
Horses Without Carriages International
www.horseswithoutcarriages.org
PLEASE FORWARD TO LISTS, FRIENDS & COLLEAGUES ** Mayor signs carriage horse bill ** ASPCA missing ** Media ** Volunteers needed ** What you can do
MAYOR SIGNS INDUSTRY BILL
advocates offer testimony in opposition
On Tuesday, April 27th, Mayor Bloomberg
signed the industry bill, Intro 35A, into law.
Many members of the carriage industry came
to the signing, which was expected. But the
carriage horse advocates, never willing to
miss an opportunity, showed up also and gave
excellent testimony -- directly to the
Mayor -- at least we knew that the Mayor
heard it.
Click
here to see
a sample. About 10-12 people testified for
the horses.
Driver Conor McHugh, wondered aloud why the
activists were there -- to him, we had lost.
Intro 86 and 92 are still viable bills and
we are in this to win. Sorry Conor.
ASPCA NOT REPRESENTED AT THE BILL SIGNING
making it seem that they supported the bill
The ASPCA did not support Intro 35A.
However, it was very unfortunate that they
did not
send someone to the hearing to speak directly
to Mayor Bloomberg. Because they did not,
the Mayor and Council Member Gennaro spoke
for them, clearly making it seem that they
were supportive of Intro 35A. As the moderate
animal organization of record in NYC and the
organization that continues to do humane law
enforcement, we feel strongly that the ASPCA
should have taken this opportunity to
politely tell the mayor that they did not
support the bill. There is no room for this
kind of passiveness since it greatly hurts
this cause.
We are sorry that it has become necessary to
publicly criticize the ASPCA about this
issue. But their actions greatly hurt and
interfere with all the
work we and others have done over the last
four years. They are the animal organization
of record in
NYC even though they are often inactive on
many issues and do not act quickly enough on
others. Nevertheless because they do humane
law enforcement and are an old and
conservative organization, it is thought that
the City Council would listen to them. This
is not a criticism of any one person at the
ASPCA but about their policies.
NEW YOUTUBE VIDEO BY DONNY MOSS
ASPCA Fails NYC Carriage Horses
The ASPCA was opposed to Intro 35A and they favor
a ban of the carriage industry in NYC. But
their actions often defy their words. See
this new Youtube
video by Donny Moss, director and
producer of Blinders: The truth Behind the
Tradition, an award winning documentary about
the NYC carriage industry. In the video,
notice how the
Mayor and CM Gennaro imply that
the ASPCA supported the bill and the
industry. And there was no one from the
ASPCA present to dispute this.
WHAT YOU CAN DO!
Please do not give up - We're not!
Please write a polite letter to Mayor
Bloomberg and let him know how dissatisfied
you are with his signing
Intro 35A into law. This bill is only about
giving the drivers a raise. It does not
improve humane standards. I cannot tell you
that the mayor will read your
correspondence, but I do know that his office
keeps
records of it. Contact the mayor online.
Click
here.
Write letters to the editor. See the
list of neighborhood newspapers and the
e-mail addresses on our web site. Click
Here. Scroll to the bottom for the
list. (you can comment on my letter in the
Riverdale Press -- see below)
IN THE PRESS
letters to the editor; blogs; NPR radio interview
Letter in Riverdale Press - 4/22/10 - Horse-drawn
carriages should be banned - by
Elizabeth Forel. Huffington Post: small
minded article 4/29/10 - Protection
for Horses but Not Sick Workers - and
comments by Elizabeth Forel
NPR radio in Philadelphia interviews Edita
Birnkrant from Friends of Animals and Midge
Leitch, an equine veterinarian. Should
Horse-Drawn Carriages Be Banned? 4/27/10
CINDY ADAMS & THE ASPCA PRESS RELEASE
harmful article but excellent press release
CINDY ADAMS - Daily News gossip columnist
and ASPCA board members got it 100% wrong in
her recent column, dated 4/21/10 Guilty
of Writing on the Go. She
mistakenly assumed that the new bill was good
for the horses, congratulating the ASPCA,
Christine Quinn and herself. Yikes!!! This
is very bad because while
several of us commented on line, the paper
version just showed her very harmful column.
The ASPCA issued this press release, dated
April 23rd about the bill. Click
here. Some excerpts:
The ASPCA and NYCLASS (New Yorkers for
Clean, Livable and Safe Streets) submitted
amendments to Intro. 35, including requiring
stables to be equipped with operational
sprinkler systems; setting higher veterinary
care standards for the horses; and
restricting the use of cell phones,
headphones and other distracting devices that
interfere with the driver's ability to safely
operate the carriage. None of these
amendments were incorporated into the final
version of the bill. .... While the
carriage horse industry is trumpeting the
bill as a piece of humane legislation,
publicizing its provisions for minimum stall
size and time off for horses, they have
managed merely to codify conditions that are
already the norm for New York City's working
horses.
VOLUNTEERS NEEDED
We only ask for two hours of your time per month
We are continuing with our campaign to ban
horse-drawn carriages in NYC and support a
combination of Intro 86 with Intro 92. We
have a presence on the street near the hack
line educating people about this issue.
If you can volunteer and commit to only
two hours on Saturday each month, please
contact volunteerforthecoalition@gmail.com.
We are counting on you.
SPECIAL VOLUNTEER NEEDED
to help me with Freedom of Information requests
I am looking for someone to work with me to
gather information from various city agencies
about the carriage horse industry. I have
been doing this for years but am
overwhelmed now and cannot keep up with it all.
You should have a committed interest in this
issue, have a computer, be detailed
oriented, keep online records, be interested
in the legal process, know something about
city agencies (this can easily be learned),
do follow up -- but mostly have a
focused and responsible nature. I
will explain everything. E-mail me at
coalition@banhdc.org
OUR ADVICE TO THE ASPCA
if they are reading this...
Our Advice: I have been personally
involved with this issue for many years -
longer than many of the people who currently
work at the A on this issue. I have seen
history. I
witnessed what Peggy Parker/Carriage Horse
Action Committee went
through in the late 1980s and 90s trying to
get limited improvements for the horses. An
hour here, a degree there. Total
frustration. The bill of 1989
provided modest improvements for the horses
and restricted them to the park -- but mostly
everything else remained the same. It seemed
to be all that could be done at the time. It
also
included a provision for a humidity index and
wind chill factor. But somehow, when the
bill passed, this provision was removed and a
sunset clause was added to the bill causing
it to expire in 1993. Nevertheless, in
retaliation, the
industry sued Parker, the ASPCA and
Holly Cheever. The
suit was eventually dropped. The law was
weakened and all of the modest improvements
were lost when the new bill was signed into
law by Mayor Giuliani in 1994.
I have paid my dues many times over and while
I do not wish to appear arrogant, I ask
that the ASPCA seriously consider these points:
- Money: The main purpose of this
industry is to
make money. It is not to show off pretty
horses.
- Money: Any provision that will
negatively affect
their earning ability, will not be accepted.
This includes adding a windchill/humidity
factor; reducing hours worked, keeping the
horses in the park, reducing the area
worked, requiring NYS drivers' license
- Money: The drivers will cheat on
the street as
much as
they can possibly get away with since it is
all about money. This means double shifting,
overloading carriages, cheating customers,
doing the bare minimum for their horses,
working in off limits areas because there is
no one to enforce the law.
- Unholy Alliance: CM Gennaro and
the Council asked for your
suggestions on changes to Intro 35A. By
participating in this alliance, a partnership
from hell was created, making you complicit.
You were used.
The industry has never, ever negotiated in
good faith. Do not negotiate with them --
it does not work. History has confirmed that
you will lose every time.
- Why?? You knew that the
"improvements" in the
bill were simply codifying what already
existed - such as small box stalls or doing
simple things that were hardly improvements
and did not cost them anything. Why didn't
you come to the bill signing to say this?
- Speak out for a ban of this industry.
Tell the mayor publicly that there is no way
this industry can be made to live up to
humane standards. Tell him that it
represents a deadly human accident waiting to
happen.
- Get Cindy Adams to write a
retraction to
her very harmful piece in the Daily News,
which makes you look like you are in cahoots
with the industry.
- Your Image: You are often so
concerned with your
image that you appear paralyzed. You do not
speak out adequately when you are opposed to
something -- such as just posting press
releases on your web site rather than trying
to get them into newspapers. But most
everyone else does speak out, including the
mayor, which makes you appear to be weak and
emasculated. You do not have to do stunts
like "I'd rather go naked than wear fur" but
you must develop a new stronger image - an
image that can be respected. The Mayor
needs a worthy adversary.
- Your Image? You continue to take
the "white gloves"
approach not wanting to align yourselves with
us or any other animal rights group -
thinking that this is a good thing
to do and you will win in the long run.
Wrong! I doubt very much if Henry Bergh
would have approved of your lack of will and
"cream puff" position on issues. The ASPCA
was the only animal organization that did not
participate in the Tony Avella press
conference when the ban bill was introduced -
December 2007. Instead you sent a statement
for Tony to read. What was that all about?
- In the two years that Intro 658 - the
bill to ban the industry - was active, the
ASPCA did not once make a public appearance
with CM Avella, even though they said they
supported the ban.
- Remember that we - the Coalition to Ban
Horse-Drawn Carriages - are a totally all
volunteer group and do this in our spare
time. We are David to your Goliath. Yet we
made this an issue in NYC and
around the world. Our coalition began the
campaign to ban the carriage industry in NYC
although we were told it would never happen.
The other organizations only joined the
campaign after we made it an issue and it was
safe to go into the water.
We got the Comptrollers' office to issue the
first ever audit, which made history - then
we got the NY Times to run the story; we got
Council Member Tony Avella to introduce the
first ever bill to ban the carriage industry
in NYC. This was historic. We helped to
expose the issue of
the lack of water in Central Park during the
cold months by an opinion piece in Metro. We
have the most comprehensive web site about
this issue in NYC and we keep people around
the world
informed; we continue to fight this good
fight because we know it is the right thing
to do for the horses. We have the will!
- You must do more. If we could
have done all of this with no
salaries and a minimum shoe string budget,
surely the ASPCA - with all of your resources
- can do a lot more.
And lastly -- Don't you every
wonder why so many people who care about
animal issues in NYC - (from rights to
welfare) often criticize the ASPCA's policies
or lack thereof? Are we all wrong?
JOIN US ON FACE BOOK & SIGN ONLINE PETITION
"Never doubt that a small group of
thoughtful, committed citizens can change the
world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever
has." Margaret Mead.
|
|
 |
Thank you for caring about the horses,
Elizabeth Forel - Coalition to Ban
Horse-Drawn Carriages - a standing committee
of The Coalition for New York City Animals,
Inc.
Please DONATE
to our campaign to ban
the inhumane and unsafe carriage horse industry.
|
|
|