Therefore, the understanding as presently clarified by this communication is that DCA Trust has applied for the same 'Africa' geographical name string as UniForum and this will be confirmed by the outcome of the Independent String Similarity Panel who will review "applied-for gTLD strings against other applied-for gTLD strings".
During the geographic names review, it would also be shown that DCA Trust applied for the 'Africa' gTLD - an ASCII 6-character string.
It is ridiculous for anyone to suggest that DCA Trust has applied for .dotAfrica as a geographic name without seeing the exact details of the underlying application which is yet to be evaluated by ICANN or considering the stipulations of the Guidebook regarding String Similarity Reviews and how String Contention Sets are arrived at.
However, since the AfricaInOneSpace news item has already mentioned DCA's application for DotAfrica gTLD, we believe it is important to highlight at this early stage that it would not be smooth sailing for UniForum; whose application for 'Africa' is already quite problematic, and will probably be disqualified by ICANN for lacking the necessary documents presented in the correct manner. For example, the purported letter of appointment from the AU addressed to UniForum's Neil Dundas references 'dotAfrica gTLD' (See link to UniForum's letter of appointment).
Does this mean that UniForum got a letter of appointment from the AU to apply for 'dotAfrica gTLD' and has now applied instead for 'Africa' string? Does this imply that UniForum has no letter of appointment from the AU for 'Africa' which it applied for?
Uniforum should really be worrying about the more serious problem it has on its hand, to wit: the agreement signed with the AU is with Uniforum SA/ZA Central Registry, yet the putative registry operator/applicant for 'Africa' is UniForum SA trading as Registry.Africa. Where is UniForum SA trading as Registry.Africa's letter of endorsment for 'Africa' gTLD? Is it the specious letter of appointment to apply for "DotAfrica gTLD" noted above, or the purported agreement between the AU and Uniforum SA/ZA Central Registry? DCA Trust will be watching closely to see how UniForum will try to correct these documentation problems to ensure that no illegal acts are committed.
Given these very grave problems that have now been highlighted, it is possible UniForum will not be able to pass even the initial ICANN evaluation.
It is only one day since the ICANN 'Reveal', and it would be rather premature for anyone to draw any hasty conclusions whilst the Initial Evaluation by ICANN has not even commenced.
We think that any self-congratulatory gestures at this time by AfricaInOnespace - a loose amalgam of an organization that has been hastily put together without any legality to hijack .africa (DotAfrica)' - would be both foolhardy and self-delusional.