banner
Welcome to HSPH Nutrition Source Update, an e-newsletter to help you cut through confusing information and find practical strategies for healthy eating.  

August 2011 

Deciphering media stories on diet


Sensational headlines don't always tell the whole story. Look at how nutrition news fits into the bigger scientific picture.

microphones

What should I eat? How much exercise should I get? We all expect that science--specifically, health research--will provide answers to these very important and personal questions. 

 

Unfortunately, it's often hard to get a straight answer. One day the "experts" say one thing. The next, they seem to say another. Then it all appears to switch back again. This can be maddening when you're making your best effort to live a healthy lifestyle. Why go to the trouble of making big changes when today's highly recommended choice may be tomorrow's bad example?

 

Science is a painstaking, deliberate process. Recommendations are made based on the best science available at the time. With new research and new results, these recommendations may be revised.

 

Yet health news reports often provide little information about how new results fit in with other evidence on the topic, leaving the public to assume that, once again, the scientists screwed up and are now backtracking.

5 questions to keep in mind when reading or watching a news story on health

 

TV remote closeup

In many cases it only takes a few questions to get at the heart of a research-related news story and see how important the results are for you personally. With these tips and a better understanding of the world of health research, you can look at health information with a more discerning eye. While this won't be a guarantee against frustration, it should help you embrace health recommendations--and the healthy lifestyle they promote--with more confidence.    


Is the story simply reporting the results of a single study? If so, where does it fit in with other studies on the topic?
Only very rarely would a single study be influential enough for people to change their behaviors based on the results.

 

How large is the study? Large studies often provide more reliable results than small studies.    


Was the study done in animals or humans? Mice, rats, and monkeys are not people. To best understand how food (or some other factor) affects human health, it must almost always be studied in humans.


Did the study look at real disease endpoints, like heart disease or osteoporosis? Chronic diseases, like heart disease and osteoporosis, often take many decades to develop. To get around waiting that long, researchers will sometimes look at markers for these diseases, like narrowing of the arteries or bone density. These markers, though, don't always develop into the disease.


How was diet assessed? Some methods of dietary assessment are better than others. Good studies will have evidence that the methods have validity.

 

Read more about nutrition research and the mass media.  

  

photo: iStockphoto.com/Terraxplorer