|
Fair Claims Regulations and Training: Advising Claimants About Statutes of Limitation
Under the California Fair Claims Regulations, insurance companies are required to notify claimants about applicable statutes of limitation when the claimants are not represented by counsel and partial payments have been made. We can help with drafting appropriate notification language. Click here to read more.
|
|
Quick Strike Response for Catastrophic Trucking Claims
Trucking accidents can cause fatalities, significant injuries and extensive property damage - and California is one of the top states in the U.S. for these types of claims. Time is of the essence in investigating the scene because a quick response can make all the difference in resolving the claim properly. Our firm has been part of quick strike programs for many years. Click here to read more.
|
| SB 800: A Ten-Year Perspective on California's Right-to-Repair Statute
When the California Legislature enacted Civil Code § 895 in 2002, it was heralded as a much-needed response to the statewide explosion in construction defect litigation. Ten years later, its effect has generated mixed reviews. Whether it will still be successful remains to be seen. Click here to read more.
|
California Caselaw Highlights
Nevada courts have not issued judicial opinions that we believe are relevant to our clients' interests this month, but California courts have done so and we report on them here. Click here to read more. |
|
Supreme Court Watch
The California Supreme Court has granted review of DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa Clara (Case No. S194501) . The issue is whether a Notice of Intent to Sue under Code of Civil Procedure § 364 delivered to a county hospital's risk management department substantially complies with the requirement under Government Code § 915 that a claim be presented to a public entity before filing suit. |
|
Recent KDEK Wins
Partner Kathleen A. Stosuy persuaded the court to grant a Motion for Summary Judgment for her hospital client in an elder abuse lawsuit.
When a plaintiff expert recanted his prior opinions, Associate Jason E. Lagas used the threat of a Motion for Summary Judgment to secure the dismissal of a complaint against a physician client.
In a construction defect case, Partner Mark C. Phillips settled a $220,000 indemnity cross-complaint against a subcontractor for $13,500 after having the file for one month.
|
Legal Quote
"And do as adversaries do in law -- Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends."
William Shakespeare
Taming of the Shrew, Act I, Scene ii |
This newsletter is provided for informational purposes only. Its contents are not intended and should not be construed as legal advice.
© Kramer deBoer Endelicato & Keane, LLP, all rights reserved
|
