|
CEO's message: don't dilute arguments with explanations
After presenting a strong argument, you may want to continue explaining your rationale--but don't! It can get you in trouble, as this father discovered on a walk to the community pool one Saturday in the summer.
Daughter: Daddy, can I please get ice cream?
Dad: It's 11 in the morning. No dessert before lunch!
Daughter: But I really want ice cream! Please, Daddy?
Dad: Mom would be very upset if she found out.
Daughter: OK, I promise I won't tell her!
Dad should've stopped after, "No dessert before lunch." So don't dilute arguments with explanations that can be picked apart, in your personal or professional life. Stop explaining and move on or make a proposal, like this:
Dad: So what I propose is after lunch and a swim, we get ice cream.
Marty Finkle, CEO, Scotwork (NA) Inc. |
|
Ad Age features Sandy Sbarra's article on agency-client negotiations | |
Sandy Sbarra, lead tutor with extensive experience in the marketing industry, had his column, "A Fresh Approach to Agency-Marketer Negotiations," published in Ad Age.
Read article |
|
Negotiation, step 5: package | |
Packaging makes the proposal more acceptable by adjusting the variables without increasing the offer. If those on the other side reject a proposal because it fails to address their needs or it inhibits them, you'll need to modify the package. If they say the proposal isn't enough, it's a bargaining issue.
To reach a deal without making further concessions, re-package the proposal. Identify the other party's inhibitions and interests and take a cooperative, not a competitive, stance. And before responding to a proposal, look for a lower-cost solution.
Next month, we'll explore other facets of package.
Eight Steps
1. Prepare, 2. Argue,
3. Signal, 4. Propose,
5. Package, 6. Bargain,
7. Close, 8. Agree |
|
Tutor's corner: get more by asking
Under what circumstances? | |
"Under what circumstances?" can be a great question to ask after you've faced a "no" and have thoroughly explored the other side's position. See how below.
Customer: I bought this guitar three months ago but the neck is twisted, a workmanship issue. I'd like you to replace it or provide a refund.
Store rep: Sorry, but our policy is that returns need to be made within one month of purchase. After that, we'd normally need you to bring it to the manufacturer.
Customer: (interpreting signal) Okay, thanks. You said you'd "normally" need me to go to the manufacturer. What would give you the flexibility to replace the guitar?
Store rep: Sorry, I can't do that.
Customer: Okay, thanks again, but this is a workmanship issue for a guitar I bought this year, and I need your help. You said you can't do it. Under what circumstances can the store give me a new guitar?
Store rep: I'll check with my manager (disappears and then returns). Okay, we'll do it, just this once. |
|
Competitive bids can control price hikes | |
Use requests for quotes (RFQs) to learn what competitive suppliers are offering, says Darryl Smith of Modernfold. Congrats, Darryl, our March contest winner!
Highlights of Darryl's winning analysis
RFQs remind suppliers that they could be replaced, discouraging price hikes. Be sure agreed-upon increases are warranted. For example, a 4% rise in resin costs doesn't justify a 6% increase in the price of an extrusion.
Enter the contest below on stadium parking, and you could win a bottle of wine or a seat at our course! |
|
Stadium parking dispute: you decide | |
Though he sold the Texas Rangers in bankruptcy proceedings last August, Tom Hicks retained control of about 11,000 stadium parking spaces. On Apr. 13, the Rangers filed a lawsuit to prevent him from raising parking fees. The arguments:
Ballpark Real Estate (Hicks)
-We can charge whatever we want for parking.
-Rangers kept prices artificially low ($5 to $10) to boost attendance.
-Parking rights are more valuable than the team believes.
Texas Rangers
-Hicks wants to squeeze fans with high parking fees.
-Hicks broke the current agreement (where Rangers didn't pay rent to Hicks, but divided parking revenues with him).
-Ballpark Real Estate wants to charge us an "unconscionable" $3.5 million to lease the land.
Give your opinion, win a bottle of wine...

Who has the balance of power and why? If you were the judge, how would you rule?
Email us (wine in subject line) by May 9. We'll publish the best answer next issue and send the author a bottle of fine wine.
...Or win a seat at our course!

Your entry (win or lose) will be placed in a drawing later this year for a free seat at an Advanced Negotiating Skills course for you or the person of your choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|  Marty Finkle
| |
Sandy Sbarra
Bio Email
Rich Waldrop
Bio Email
See Simon Letchford's bio and email in Tutor's Corner.
-David Boucher
-Jill Campen
-Al Green
-Jerry Langlois
-John Leehman
-Gaetan Pellerin
-Johnna Wellesley |
Register for open courses |  Register here for the Advanced Negotiating Skills course on May 23-26 or on any of these dates: Parsippany, NJ -May 23-26 -June 20-23 -July 11-14 -Aug. 22-24 ("Next steps") -Sept. 12-15 -Sept. 26-29 -Oct. 10-13 -Nov. 7-10 -Dec. 5-8 Other sites -June 6-9 (IL) -Aug. 8-11 (CA) |
|
About Scotwork
North America | |
Scotwork (NA) Inc. is the North American division of Scotwork Negotiating Skills, the world's largest independent provider of negotiation skills training and consulting with offices in 31 countries.
Its seasoned negotiators offer consulting and training in 17 languages to more than 9,000 executives and managers worldwide. Scotwork's clients receive an average return of 10 times the course fee within three months.
|
| Contact us |
Scotwork (NA) Inc. 400 Lanidex Plaza Parsippany, NJ 07054 973.428.1991 usa@scotwork.com www.scotworkusa.com If you're not on our list, click here and enter email. |
|
|