Michael L. Buckner Law Firm


February 15, 2012

Campus Green 
College Athletics Best Practices Alert

 

Greetings! 
  
Welcome to the February 15, 2012, issue of College Athletics Best Practices Alert, a complimentary publication of the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm.

Division I Column:

Trends and Compliance Strategies from the 2011 Decisions of the NCAA Division Committee on Infractions

 

Author: Michael L. Buckner, Esquire (Shareholder)
  

  

The decisions of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions during the 2011 calendar year provided a unique snapshot of enforcement trends that can be used by institutions to improve athletics compliance programs in 2012. The Michael L. Buckner Law Firm analyzed the findings of major rules-violations listed in the 15 infractions reports released by the Committee on Infractions from January 1-December 31, 2011. This article summarizes the firm's review in two areas: (a) enforcement trends; and (b) compliance strategies.

 

2011 ENFORCEMENT TRENDS
 

The firm's analysis of the 2011 public infractions reports produced the following enforcement trends:
 

1. The Committee on Infractions imposed: (a) an average probation period of 2.267 years; (b) an average post-season ban of .133 years; and (c) an average show-cause order of 2.18 years.
 

2. The Committee on Infractions processed eight (8) summary disposition cases. [Note: The NCAA describes the summary disposition process as "a more streamlined method to process major violations when the institution, enforcement staff and involved individuals are in agreement about the findings. When successful, it avoids the need for an in-person hearing before the Committee on Infractions, eliminates the costs associated with such a hearing and reduces the amount of time needed to bring the case to closure."]
 

3. The bylaw categories cited the most by the Committee on Infractions in findings of major rules-violations were: Bylaw 13: Recruiting (80 occasions); Bylaw 14: Eligibility (21 occasions); Bylaw 10: Ethical Conduct (18 occasions); and Bylaw 16: Awards, Benefits and Expenses (12 occasions).
 

4. The top 16 bylaws cited by the Committee on Infractions in findings of major rules-violations were:
 

18 Citations
 

Bylaw 10.1 (Unethical Conduct)

  

16 Citations


Bylaw 13.2.1 (General Regulation)
Bylaw 13.2.1.1 (Specific Prohibitions)

 

8 Citations

 

Constitution 2.8.1 (Responsibility of Institution)

 

6 Citations
 

Bylaw 10.01.1 (Honesty and Sportsmanship)

 

5 Citations
 

Bylaw 13.4.1.2 (Electronic Transmissions)
Bylaw 13.11.1 (Prohibited Activities)
Bylaw 19.01.3 (Responsibility to Cooperate)
Bylaw 32.1.4 (Cooperative Principle)

 

4 Citations

 

Bylaw 11.1.1 (Honesty and Sportsmanship)
Bylaw 11.1.2.1 (Responsibility of Head Coach)
Bylaw 13.1.3.1.2 (Exception -- Football)
Bylaw 13.1.3.4.1 (Institutional Coaching Staff Members -- General Rule)
Bylaw 13.15.1 (Prohibited Expenses)
Bylaw 14.11.1 (Obligation of Member Institution to Withhold Student-Athlete from Competition)
Bylaw 16.11.2.1 (General Rule)

 

BEST PRACTICES AND SOLUTIONS 

 

Presidents/chancellors, general counsel and athletics administrators should consider implementing the following best practices, strategies and tactics to minimize the rules-violations identified by the Committee on Infractions in the cases decided during the 2011 calendar year [Note: Contact Michael L. Buckner (954-941-1844; mbuckner@michaelbucknerlaw.com) for additional compliance strategies.]:

 

1. Monitor trends from the decisions of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions and, thereafter: (a) develop relevant compliance strategies; (b) emphasize emerging enforcement trends in rules-education activities; and (c) devote sufficient staff and resources to the athletics compliance office.

 

2. Enhance the athletics compliance office's monitoring activities by purchasing and implementing commercial software programs to facilitate a more accurate and comprehensive review of various compliance-related issues (e.g., text messages, recruiting telephone calls, social-media).
 

3. Schedule annual or semi-annual, in-person meetings for each head coach with the president, director of athletics, administrator with sports oversight and faculty athletics representative to review the institution's expectations concerning: (a) compliance; (b) ethical conduct; and (c) a head coach's monitoring responsibility.
 

4. Diversify the rules-education program with a variety of education and training methodologies, techniques and activities, including, but not limited to: on-campus workshops/seminars; small group discussions; outside speakers; webinars; video presentations (followed by small group or one-on-one discussions); attendance at off-campus meetings and seminars (e.g., NCAA regional rules seminars, conference meetings); newsletters; e-mails; memoranda; websites; social-media (e.g. blogs, Twitter, Facebook); and examinations.

 

5. Videotape workshops and seminars conducted on-campus. The recorded sessions can be presented to persons who were unable to attend the live activity or to new employees at a later date.
 

6. Include all athletics employees, senior campus leadership, governing board members, campus constituencies (e.g., faculty senate), employees external to athletics with athletically-related duties and outside groups (e.g., booster and alumni organizations, local merchants) in the rules-education program.
 

7. Establish protocols for spot-checks of compliance-related documentations and records (e.g., telephone logs, eligibility-certification determinations).
 

8. Provide quarterly or annual compliance reports to the president/chancellor and director of athletics containing: summary of the athletics compliance office's strategies; review of the rules-education activities; detailed analysis of all reported rules-violations, as well as the implementation of self-imposed penalties and corrective actions; status on any investigations of alleged rules-violations; discussion of future plans or activities concerning athletics compliance; briefing on important compliance-related trends and issues; and any other relevant information.
 

9. Conduct a strategic review of the compliance needs of the institution and, thereafter, ensure the athletics compliance office possesses the necessary staff and resources to maintain compliance with NCAA legislation.

 

10. Review the institution's NCAA eligibility-certification process to ensure the system: includes a team approach to certification decisions; provides for check-and-balance procedures regarding the eligibility determination of each student-athlete; requires all persons with eligibility-related duties are regularly and thoroughly trained on applicable NCAA legislation; and mandates the adequate documentation of all eligibility-related decisions.

 

11. Require all new full-time athletics employees, as well as staff external to athletics with athletically-related duties, to participate in a mandatory compliance orientation session within a reasonable time of the employees' date of initial employment.

 

12. Enhance recruiting policies and procedures to require detailed monitoring and documentation of prospective student-athletes' lodging, transportation and meal arrangements during unofficial visits. For example, compliance records should document prospects' residence, specific travel arrangements, and the names and contact information for any persons who provided prospects with lodging, transportation and/or meals during unofficial visits.


Sources: NCAA LSDBi database; NCAA Committee on Infractions, A Guide to the Summary Disposition Process (September 1, 2006), at 4.
 
  

 

Contact Michael L. Buckner (954-941-1844; mbuckner@michaelbucknerlaw.com) for recommendations on enhancing your institution's compliance program.

 

Division I Column:

Implementing a Professional Sports Counseling Panel


Author: Justin P. Sievert (Of-Counsel) 

 

 

This article is intended for use by NCAA Division I institutions. NCAA Division II and III institutions should review their division-specific NCAA Manuals for the appropriate legislation. (NCAA Division II: Bylaw 12.3.4; NCAA Division III: Bylaw 12.3.3).

 

The conclusion of the National Football League's Super Bowl begins another phase in the football calendar: the NFL Draft. As student-athletes without remaining eligibility begin to sign with sports agents and other professional advisors, it is important for institutions to be reminded that NCAA legislation permits the establishment of a professional sports counseling panel. A professional sports counseling panel is designed to assist exiting student-athletes with transitioning into professional sports. A professional sports counseling panel also can assist the institution's athletics compliance office with ensuring consistent application of NCAA legislation in several ways, including: to maintain student-athletes' eligibility at the institution; and to provide education and guidance to student-athletes without remaining eligibility.

 

NCAA Bylaw 12.3.4 permits an institution's professional sports counseling panel to provide the following services:

 

1. Advise student-athletes about a future professional career;

 

2. Assist student-athletes with arrangements for securing a loan for the purpose of purchasing insurance against a disabling injury or illness and with arrangements for purchasing such insurance;
 

3. Review a proposed professional sports contract;
 

4. Meet with the student-athlete and representatives of professional teams;
 

5. Communicate directly (e.g., in person, by mail or telephone) with representatives of professional athletics teams to assist in securing a tryout with that team for a student-athlete;
 

6. Assist student-athletes with selecting an agent by participating with the student-athlete in interviews by agents, by reviewing written information player agents send to the student-athlete and by having direct communication with those individuals who can comment about the abilities of the agent (e.g., other agents, a professional league's players' association); and
 

7. Visit with player agents or representatives of professional athletics teams to assist the student-athlete with determining his or her market value (e.g., potential salary, draft status).
 

In light of NCAA Bylaw 12.3.4 and recent NCAA enforcement cases involving amateurism and awards and benefits rules-violations, the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm recommends institutions take the following steps when establishing a professional sports counseling panel:
 

1. Per NCAA Bylaw 12.3.4.1, an institution's panel should consist of least three persons. The panelists should be appointed by the institution's president or chancellor (or his or her designated representative from outside the athletics department).
 

2. Per NCAA Bylaw 12.3.4.2, the majority of the members of the panel should be full-time employees outside of the institution's athletics department. Further, a maximum of one panel member should be a representative employed in the institution's athletics department.
 

3. A sports agent or a person employed by a sports agent or agency cannot be a member on the panel.
 

4. The institution's senior compliance administrator (or his or her appropriate designee) should identify all panel members to the NCAA national office on an annual basis or when the panel membership changes.
 

5. The panel should provide educational workshops for student-athletes. The topics of the workshops should include relevant NCAA legislation, professional sports opportunities, the operation of professional drafts, any applicable state laws regarding sports agents or other professional advisors, the selection process of a sports agent or other professional advisors and real-world experiences of current and former professional athletes.
 

6. The panel should provide customized services for student-athletes, including: individualized consulting services for evaluating career potential; guidance regarding participation in professional combines, tryouts and camps; a "Sports Agent Program", which provides student-athletes an opportunity to meet with sports agents or other professional advisors in a structured environment; a program providing assistance in interviewing and selecting sports agents or other professional advisors; individualized services regarding personal financial planning upon exit from the institution; and individualized advice regarding the components of a professional sports contract.

 

7. The panel should make available resources that include agent information (including registration status, current clients, credentials, services offered), sample contracts, draft and salary reports, sport-specific information, professional sports directors and other pertinent information.
 

 

Contact Justin P. Sievert (954-941-1844; jsievert@michaelbucknerlaw.com) for more recommendations on creating a professional sports counseling panel at your institution

Divisions I, II and III Column:

Investigation Best Practices: Encouraging and Receiving Complaints of Alleged Violations

  

Author: Michael L. Buckner (Shareholder) 

 

 

Anonymous charges, tips and complaints are the leading method of detecting alleged fraudulent activity (which includes NCAA rules-violations). Fraud investigator and author Stephen Pedneault notes the "high percentage of detection by anonymous tips emphasizes an organization's need to educate employees regarding their fiduciary duty to provide information, as well as implement a means or process for individuals to provide such information". Pedneault recommends that an "organization must implement a system to collect, screen, and process complaints and information when it is received". Based on Pedneault's advice, the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm recommends NCAA member institutions revise internal investigation processes and procedures to: enhance the rules-education program by reminding (orally and in writing) institutional employees and representatives of their obligation to report alleged rules-violations on a timely basis; ensure the institution possesses secure and confidential methods (e.g., anonymous hotline or e-mail) for persons to report allegations; and maintain an effective and efficient methodology to investigate reported allegations.

 

Source: Stephen Pedneault, Anatomy of a Fraud Investigation (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010), at 3.
 

Contact Michael L. Buckner (954-941-1844; mbuckner@michaelbucknerlaw.com) for more recommendations pertaining to conducting internal investigations of alleged NCAA rules-violations. 

Find us on Facebook

 

View our profile on LinkedIn

 

 Follow us on Twitter

 

View our videos on YouTube

 

Visit our blog

About the Firm

 

The Michael L. Buckner Law Firm is a boutique law firm that assists college and university presidents, general counsel, and athletic administrators with addressing NCAA enforcement investigations, infractions appeals and rules-compliance issues. The law firm website can be found at www.michaelbucknerlaw.com.

Issue: 29

Basketball
In This Issue
2011 NCAA Enforcement Trends and Compliance Strategies
Professional Sports Counseling Panels
Investigation Best Practices: Encouraging and Receiving Complaints of Allegations

 

Text-to-Join Our Newsletter Mailing List

It's easy to join the MLBLF mailing list!

 

Just send your email address by text message.


Text
MBUCKNERLAW
to 22828 to get started.

 

 

YouTube Channel

The Michael L. Buckner Law Firm's "Information Nuggets" video newsletter series, which provides in-depth analysis on pertinent NCAA compliance and enforcement issues, can be viewed at the firm's YouTube channel.

 

 

Join Our Mailing List

 

 

Resources for You 
 

Prior issues of the Best Practices Alert newsletter, as well as other complimentary articles, checklists, toolkits and resources, can be located on our website.

 

MLBLF Media Center    


Insight and commentary on college and high-school sports issues can be found on the Media Center page of the law firm website . The online resource contains links to law firm press releases, media articles and Michael L. Buckner's published books, as well as Mr. Buckner's radio and TV interviews.

Michael L. Buckner Law Firm
Telephone: 954-941-1844
Facsimile: 954-941-1846
E-mail: mbuckner@michaelbucknerlaw.com
Website: www.michaelbucknerlaw.com
Blog: http://michaelbucknerlaw.wordpress.com
Twitter: @mbucknerlaw 
LinkedIn: @michaelbucknerlawfirm
Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/michaelbucknerlaw

YouTube: @michaelbucknerlaw

 

This electronic newsletter, including the information contained therein, is not endorsed or published by the National Collegiate Athletic Association, National Association of College and University Attorneys or the organizations' representatives, but is a legal advertisement from the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm (which is not affiliated with the NCAA or NACUA). Any questions concerning this communication should be directed to Michael L. Buckner (954-941-1844; mbuckner@michaelbucknerlaw.com).

 

This publication is offered only for general informational and educational purposes. It is not offered as, and does not constitute, legal advice or a legal opinion. This information is not intended to create, nor does the receipt of it constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. This publication contains hyperlinks to other resources on the Internet. These links are provided as citations and aids to help you identify and locate other Internet resources that may be of interest, and are not intended to state or imply that the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm sponsors, is affiliated or associated with, or is legally authorized to use any trade name, registered trademark, logo, legal or official seal, or copyrighted symbol that may be reflected in the links.


The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send free written information about our qualifications and experience.