Teaching Emotional Intelligence - is it worth it? 
Anyone listening to Analysis on Radio 4 on March 13 would be forgiven for thinking that teaching Emotional Intelligence in the classroom is an aberration. Fran Abrams, a self-confessed "sceptic", appeared to be on a mission to burst the "New Age" bubble and discredit it for a load of waffle, as she interviewed a number of people from all walks of educational life. "I have problems with it," she told us. She interviewed Professor Katherine Weare, the instigator of SEAL in schools; Richard Layard, Professor Roger Weisberg - CASTLE - and Dr Neil Humphrey of Manchester University, among others, in an effort to find "hard evidence" that teaching Emotional Intelligence works. And Abrams was fair. It's true; much more research needs to be done to find out exactly how effective these lessons are. But listeners were left in no doubt that they are effective. Roger Weisberg, when hearing the suggestion that EI lessons are similar to a "Tesco training school", disagreed. He said that the beauty of these lessons is that they "teach kids how to think; not what to do." The overall feeling of the programme was that SEAL has made a good beginning but is too large and unstructured to make a national impact. More rigour is needed. Richard Layard is adamant that "we need more of these lessons but better ones." So what we really need, I was left thinking, is a clear, structured programme that teaches students to be resilient, self-confident, empowered and empathic. Ideally the programme will consist of lessons that build on each other to create a comprehensive whole. Which is what VisionWorks is designed to provide . . . |