Reames Financial

General Motors, the United States, and Predatory Lending

No BS Weekly Update  7/30/2012

In This Issue
Looking in the Mirror
Cool Stuff
Secret Lives of Links
Good Eats

QOTD

 

"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them." - Mark Twain

 

 

Like us on Facebook

 

Follow us on Twitter

 

View our profile on LinkedIn 

 

Dear  ,

 

General Motors, the United States, and Predatory Lending

 

We hear the term Predatory Lending all the time but I'm not sure many people could actually tell you the definition so let's start there.
 
 "But what is predatory lending? And what are the conditions that make it flourish? "Predatory lending is a term that is used a lot now, but people mean different things by it," says David K. Musto, a finance professor at Wharton and co-author of a paper titled, "Predatory Lending in a Rational World,"with finance professors Philip Bond and Bilge Yilmaz. The paper is an analysis of the theoretical incentives for lenders to issue predatory loans.
 

"What we take it to mean is [a situation where] I make a loan to you that reduces your expected welfare," Musto says. "That is an example of me being a predatory lender.... I, the lender, know something extra about how this loan is going to play out.""
(Source: Victimizing the Borrowers: Predatory Lending's Role in the Subprime Mortgage Crisis)


To put it another way, predatory lending usually means a loan that is bad for the borrower.


OK, now that we are clear on the definition, let's take a look at why I am even talking about this.

 

GM
(Click to read article)

 

I find this very troubling on several levels.  First and foremost, it is just another example of the fact that nothing has changed.  Making loans to people that couldn't really afford them didn't work last decade and I don't think that it will turn out well this decade either.


But there is something else that I find troubling on a deeper level.  Take a look at this chart. 

 

GM


As you can see from this chart, 78.5% of the loans generated by GM's financial arm have been "extreme subprime", meaning those with a FICO (credit) score of 540 or less.

 
"Predatory lending usually means a loan that is bad for the borrower"


 

Why would someone have a FICO score of 540 or less?  Would it be because they don't make much money?  Not necessarily.  Let's say you are just starting out, you live at home, don't make much money, but you get a small loan to buy a stereo or something.  Because you have very few expenses and you make all of your loan payments on time, you would have a pretty good FICO score even if you don't have much money.
 
What does the FICO score actually measure?  It gives your history of how well you have paid back previous loans and bills, it shows how much of your available credit you are using, and it gives some insight into whether you can pay back any additional debt.  One other thing about the FICO score.  It helps establish what interest rate you will be charged.  The lower your credit score, the higher the interest rate you will be charged because of the extra risk the lending institution is taking in loaning you the money.
 
A FICO score of 540 or less tells us that that person probably can't realistically take on more debt and pay it off successfully.  So let me ask a question.  Do you think giving a high interest loan to someone with a FICO score of 540 or less is really in that person's best interest?  Will their life be made better with the burden of another bill that they can't pay?
 

"Predatory lending usually means a loan that is bad for the borrower"


Now to the point that makes this so troubling to me.  Who is the biggest shareholder in GM?  That's right, the US Government.  According to the Treasury Department, the government still owns 26% of GM.  So while the government doesn't tell GM how to run the company, the government certainly has to know that this is going on because that chart came right from GM company reports.   

Why is the government allowing GM to victimize its customers like this?  Isn't it the governments job to protect its citizens from predatory lending practices like this?  


Can you say "conflict of interest?"


 

This is what happens when you have the same entity involved in ownership and regulation of that ownership.  On the one hand the government is supposed to protect its citizens.  On the other hand, the government needs GM stock to get over $50 a share (currently $19.67) so the government can get its money back without a loss.
 
And lest you think this is just a one off, let me give you another quick example.  Leading up to and throughout the financial crash there have been a myriad of allegations of wrong doing.  Not just petty stuff but outright fraud, things like the Robo-document signing controversy, etc.  And yet three to four years later, hardly anyone has been prosecuted.  The government's response when asked is that while all these folks made "mistakes" none of those mistakes rose to the criminal level.

Yet with the Libor Scandal in Europe, the US government is already preparing indictments of foreign banks just weeks after the scandal came to light.  Why couldn't they do that with our financial scandals?  What could be the difference?  Could it again be that conflict of interest between owner and regulator?  The government has such a financial stake in the US banks now that they can't take a chance on having the banking system made any weaker by a bunch of prosecutions, can they?  They can't perform their number one role as regulator because it would harm their financial interests!
 
Now let me be very clear here.  I'm not aiming this criticism at one particular party or the other.  It's the inherent conflict of interest between financial interest and regulator here that I want to spotlight.  I think it is unrealistic to expect the government to be able to fill both roles at the same time and so the sooner they get back to their number one role of governing instead of owning the better in my opinion!

Looking to the Future in Manufacturing

Would you like some good news for a change?  As we play defense (from an economic stand point) right now it can be easy to get discouraged.  One of the things I do to try and combat that is to start planning strategies now for when things do finally start to improve, because I have no doubt that eventually they will.
One of the ways I develop those strategies is by reading a lot and doing a lot of research.  I look for articles about interesting things going on in different industries.  Those articles help me to see what companies are leading the innovations and therefore most likely to benefit in our changing world.  Doesn't mean that all of those companies will be a great investment but it gives me a place to start analyzing.
 
Anyway, I ran across this article the other day from ForeignPolicy.com. 
FP
(Click to read article)
The future of manufacturing is in America?  How can that be?  Folks, this is a really interesting article and well worth reading.  Let me give you one example.

"A type of manufacturing called "additive manufacturing" is now making it possible to cost-effectively "print" products. In conventional manufacturing, parts are produced by humans using power-driven machine tools, such as saws, lathes, milling machines, and drill presses, to physically remove material until you're left with the shape desired. This is a cumbersome process that becomes more difficult and time-consuming with increasing complexity. In other words, the more complex the product you want to create, the more labor is required and the greater the effort.
 
In additive manufacturing, parts are produced by melting successive layers of materials based on three-dimensional models -- adding materials rather than subtracting them. The "3D printers" that produce these parts use powered metal, droplets of plastic, and other materials -- much like the toner cartridges that go into laser printers. This allows the creation of objects without any sort of tools or fixtures. The process doesn't produce any waste material, and there is no additional cost for complexity. Just as, thanks to laser printers, a page filled with graphics doesn't cost much more than one with text (other than the cost of toner), with 3D printers we can print a sophisticated 3D structure for what it would cost to print something simple. "

I would encourage you to give the whole article a read.  If even half of the stuff in this article pans out the future is going to be very exciting! 

 
Until next week , Protect Your Wealth! 

 

Sincerely,
Phil's signature in blue

 

 

 

 

Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedIn

Week In Review
GM Ramps Up Risky Subprime Auto Loans To Drive Sales(IBD)

RF: So GM is going to start financing the sale of cars to people that really don't qualifiy and probably really can't afford them to begin with. How many of you think this will turn out well?

Banking Titans Call for Break Up of "Too Big to Fail"(TBP)

RF: You have all of these people from the banking industry that say break them up. Then you have Sen. Chris Dodd the financial genius with a Bachelor's degreee in American Lit, saying not a good idea. Who you going to listen to?

Evidence Of Coming Recession Is Overwhelming(Comstock Partners)

RF: Ignore the evidence at your own risk folks.

New-Home Sales Drop 8.4% as Weak Growth May Slow Housing Recovery(Reuters)

RF: As we've said repeatedly, the housing slump isn't even close to being over.

Fed Strives to Replenish Depleted Toolkit(Reuters)

RF: Good luck with that. I personally think the Fed is starting to grasp at straws.

Laughter

  

cod
(www.chartoftheday.com)

Growth 

Im Dong-hyun Sets World Record At London Olympics: Blind South Korean Archer Breaks 72-Arrow Mark
Im Dong-hyun Sets World Record At London Olympics: Blind South Korean Archer Breaks 72-Arrow Mark

 

 

Link 
 
Dare to take the mystery link challenge? 

 

We can't be held responsible for the time you waste or the knowledge you gain by clicking this link!

 

CLICK HERE IF YOU DARE!

Good Eats
Fact #1-Bacon is awesome. Fact #2-Everything tastes better cooked on the grill.  Idea-find a reason to cook bacon on the grill.  Here's a great recipe that gives you that reason!
recipe
(Click for rest of recipe and to print)

If we're worth reading we're worth recommending.

That's no BS.

Please let others know about us!

 

Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedIn

Securities offered through Foothill Securities, Inc.  Member FINRA/SIPC
Reames Financial is not an affiliate of Foothill Securities, Inc.

Investing involves risk including the potential loss of principal. No investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect against loss in periods of declining values.

The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a price-weighted average of 30 significant stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq. The DJIA was invented by Charles Dow back in 1896.

The MSCI EAFE Index was created by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) that serves as a benchmark of the performance in major international equity markets as represented by 21 major MSCI indexes from Europe, Australia and Southeast Asia.
 
The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

Google Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You cannot invest directly in an index.

Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

Fixed income investments are subject to various risks including changes in interest rates, credit quality, inflation risk, market valuations, prepayments, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors.

These are the views of Reames Financial and not necessarily those of Foothill Securities, Inc., and should not be construed as investment advice. Neither Phil Reames, Reames Financial, nor Foothill Securities, Inc. gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Please consult your financial advisor for further information.

By clicking on these links in the No BS Weekly Update, you will leave our server as they are located on another server. We have not independently verified the information available through this link. The link is provided to you as a matter of interest.

Phil Reames

Reames Financial

1856 Skyler Dr.

Kalamazoo, MI 49008

269-349-3966

[email protected]