RGL "PIPELINE"

 

  

RGL Group Pic Alt 

 

 

 13724 Venetian Court

Orland Park, Illinois 60467
Office 708-301-6425 
 Fax:  708-301-6455
  
 

Providing Human Resources Consulting for Small to Mid-Size Organizations

 

May, 2011

 
Top 

Greetings!

  

A number of our clients utilize what is known as a Fluctuating Work Week methodology for the payment of overtime to non-exempt employees working variable workweek schedules or on flex time work arrangements.  These may include workers within funeral service, retail, emergency medical/healthcare, service repair, insurance claims, golf courses, landscaping industries, etc.

 

Recently amended Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations which dramatically impact on these arrangements were released April 5th, with an effective date of May 5, 2011. This issue focuses on the implications of the revised rules.  

 

FINAL RULE - FLSA REVISIONS RE: FLUCTUATING WORK WEEK OVERTIME

 

On April 5, 2011, the Wage and Hour Division of the U. S. Department of Labor published a "Final Rule" in the Federal Register amending the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations which will almost certainly have a significant impact on employers utilizing the Fluctuating Work Week method of payment to compensate non-exempt workers for overtime.  As these new rules become effective May 5, 2011, employers relying on these pay methods should take immediate action to ensure compliance.

 

The Fluctuating Work Week method is specifically permitted by the FLSA rules as outlined in CFR [29 CFR 778.114].  To utilize the fluctuating work week overtime payment rules, the non-exempt employee must be paid a fixed salary for all hours worked, regardless of whether the employee works less than 40 hours or more than 40 hours in a given workweek (emphasis added).  In weeks in which the employee works more than 40 hours, the employee is then paid an overtime premium for the extra hours at the rate of just 50% of the employee's regular rate of pay.  This arrangement has the potential of saving the employer money while also providing a more predictable income expectation for the employee.  (NOTE:  The Fluctuating Work Week method has been prohibited by Wage and Hour laws and the Courts in the states of California and Missouri; Pennsylvania courts have taken the position that this method cannot apply to workers paid a weekly salary.) 

 

To use this method of payment, certain requirements must be satisfied:

  1.  There must be an understanding between the employer and the employee that the employee will be paid using the fluctuating workweek method and how it works (we have always advised our clients that this "understanding" should be documented in a written communication, obtaining a signed acknowledgement by each impacted employee);
  2.  The workweek of the employee must be a fluctuating one (some weeks when the employee works fewer than 40 hours as well as some weeks when the employee works more than 40 hours - - -however, the frequency of this "fluctuation" remains undefined in the regulation);
  3.  The employee must be paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of hours worked each week (this is the area impacted most by the amended regulation and will be addressed below);
  4.  The salary must be sufficiently large enough so that the regular rate of pay will never drop below the minimum wage (Federal or State, whichever is greater);
  5. In addition to the fixed salary, the employee must be paid overtime premiums for any hours worked over 40 in the workweek.  The overtime premium rate is 50% of the regular rate of pay for that workweek (can be tricky since the "regular rate of pay" may vary week to week, decreasing as the employee works longer hours).

Looking at the above requirements in light of the revised FLSA regulations in more detail:

  1. The employer and the employee must have a clear understanding that the fluctuating workweek method will be used for paying the employee and how that method works.  It has to be made clear that the salary is meant to pay for all hours worked.  Regarding "On-Call" status, in most cases, an employee who is free to go about his/her own activities (waiting to be engaged) is not entitled to payment for this time until called or engaged.  An employee required to be on-site or otherwise significantly restricted from his/her own personal activities (engaged to be waiting) would be considered working and therefore entitled to payment for such time. Although the CFR does not require that the understanding be in writing, a written statement with signed acknowledgement of its having been communicated, provides the employer with a sound defense for the use of this method and satisfaction of this particular requirement.
  2. There is no specification as to the frequency of fluctuation or degree of fluctuation that must exist; only that there must be instances of the employee working more than and fewer than 40 hours in a workweek for this requirement to be met.   
  3. An attempt to use this pay arrangement without guaranteeing the "fixed salary"( i.e., the salary cannot be docked in short weeks, for tardiness, etc. - unless under a specific disciplinary action) will result in back wage liability.   In defining "fixed salary", the revised regulations specifically prohibit receipt of bonuses (other than purely discretionary bonuses such as a Christmas Bonus), commissions, or any other compensation in addition to salary stating that such payments are inconsistent with the concept and would invalidate the fluctuating workweek methodology. This narrow definition was adopted in spite of the Department of Labor's own statement that "employers sometimes pay employees other types of compensation in addition to salary as incentive compensation or for certain activities (such as working undesirable hours) and that this practice is a beneficial practice for employees".  More revealing of its disfavor of the fluctuating workweek method, the DOL made clear that its decision to not allow additional payments was intended to deter the expanding use of the fluctuating workweek method of computing overtime beyond the scope of the current regulation.

Given the new rules, employers should:

  • Review current Fluctuating Work Week methodology against the revised rules;
  •  Consider the option of immediately eliminating bonuses, commissions or other compensation in addition to salary for employees and continue utilizing the fluctuating workweek methodology;
  • Consider the option of re-evaluating the "fixed salary" amount being paid to employees to incorporate an "educated assumption" of the typical additional compensation currently being paid and continue utilizing the fluctuating workweek methodology;
  • Consider the option to keep bonus, commission or other types of compensation in your compensation model and stop using the fluctuating workweek method, returning to the traditional overtime method for non-exempt employees.  If not already in place, consider adding alternative forms of compensation that contemplate an employee receiving incentive or bonus payments in addition to normal pay.
  • Create and distribute a carefully crafted communication to those employees currently working under the Fluctuating Work Week methodology, explaining the changes you are making and the reasons (DOL imposed) necessitating those changes.

 

RGL Consultants would welcome the opportunity to assist you in evaluating your options, developing your go-forward strategy, and creating and implementing an effective communication to your affected staff.

 

 

 

Issue:23

 
 
 

We encourage you to forward this Newsletter to colleagues or others whom you feel would be interested in receiving the RGL Pipeline
  
 

Legislative Update

 

On Thursday, April 14th, President Obama signed into law the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, which repeals the expanded Form 1099 information reporting requirements mandated by last year's health care legislation.

 

This repeals the requirement for any business to issue Form 1099-MISC for payments of goods or property in excess of $600 and repeals the requirement of any business to issue Form 1099-MISC for payments made to corporations.

 

Note however, that The Small Business Jobs Act increased the fines for issuing 1099-MISC forms late.  Most of the penalties were doubled.  The penalty increase has not been repealed, and the higher penalty amounts are already effective for 2011.

 

If you have been forwarded this email and would like to continue to receive our Newsletter, please "Click" the button below to be added to our mailing list.Join Our Mailing List 

 

Regards from,
  Dave                       Rich                        Jim
  Dave Slivinski                           Rich Lehr                                    Jim Kacena

    Consultant                               President                            Consultant/Coach

VIsit us on the web at www.rglconsultants.com