|
Taxes Continue to Mount

It's that time of year again, when we get our annual tax statement from the County. Some of you may have noticed an addition and some slight modifications to your bill.
Yes, that's right, the new Clean Water Utility Fee has finally made its way onto the statements. That, however, is only one of the six increases that the County added to your share of the burden this year.
That burden, after all, is what it is all based on. You see, the County is allowed by law to collect at least what it did the year before. So even if nothing changed at all... no levy increases, no properties bought or sold, the decline in your property's value, (we have all seen about 25% decline) would not reduce your taxes at all.
The assessed value really only has to do with divvying up the individual burdens and determining the rate the County will need to charge. A higher assessed value, means a lower rate.
Example:
County collects $20M from 1,000 identical homes, $20,000 each
- The homes are valued at $500,000, the rate is .04 (500k x .04 = 20k)
- The homes are valued at $250,000, the rate is .08 (250k x .08 = 20k)
So even though the home value declined by 50%, the homeowner still pays the County it's $20,000. The County did have to double the rate in order to get their share. (There in lies the reason Angie Homola runs around the County claiming fiscal restraint and government deprivation, due to our low rate.)
Now let's say things did change. Let's say the County helped to take an over 600 acre parcel out of the tax roll, (2-1 vote, I opposed). Well who do you suppose is going to make up that difference? The County still gets the established amount even now with less taxpayers to collect it from.
Example:
County collects $25M
- (1) 600 acre lot pays $5M, 1,000 homes pay $20,000 each = $25M
- Lot restored to wilderness, 1,000 homes pay $25,000 each = $25M
(These are examples only and do not reflect any actual payments.)
So back to the 6 levy increases. Okay the Clean Water Utility was one. What were the rest?
- 1% on Current Expense Levy
- 1% on Roads Levy
- 1% on Conservation Futures (fund used to restore wilderness, etc.)
- The increase on the Conservation District (I tried for middle ground)
- An increase on the Sno-Isle Libraries (we are fiduciary)
With my middle ground offer on the Conservation District turned down, I voted NO on all six of these increases.
So there you have it... the reason your taxes went up even though your property value went down.
There are opportunities to reduce your taxes somewhat, but knowing I couldn't get there with this Board, I went in trying for middle ground. I said, "let's just keep things as they are now and not increase on the people during this crisis." I was voted down, 2-1.
|