|
Oak Harbor Urban Growth Area
I attended the Planning Commission Meeting last November where they were deciding whether or not to accept the Revised Oak Harbor Urban Growth Area. Being at that meeting aided in my decision to go against my counterparts on this issue.
The OHUGA was revised by the Planning Department earlier that year because Commissioners Dean, Homola and Price-Johnson rejected the plan by the Citizen's Committee. It had sat idle for some time because lengthy SEPA appeals from Angie Homola and friends had stopped the progress.
At the meeting in November, an advocate of the revised plan gave a powerpoint presentation about how much available land there was for development in Oak Harbor. While I was impressed with her research, I could not agree with her logic. It appeared she would have nothing to do with expansion until all available occupancy was filled.
I personally don't feel there are many that move to a rural county such as ours to reside in multi-family dwellings. There are exceptions of course, but I believe those who seek the rural beauty while desiring the urban infrastructure want and deserve, low-density development.
Frankly, I believe that high-density development that she would have for Oak Harbor, is much more destructive to the Environment. It takes away all opportunity for Aquifer recharge and compounds the pollutants.
One last note, I'm pretty sure that all those against the expansion live in either low-density or rural development. I wonder why they don't desire mulit-family units.
|