Goodfunds Wealth Mgmt: Sustainable and responsible investing since 1986
Eric Smith b&w

             

,

 

An effective, but underutilized, tool for influencing corporate policy is investor proxy voting. Every year, shareholders of public companies and in mutual funds are presented with the opportunity to sponsor or just vote on timely environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) proposals. These proposals, or resolutions, may be presented to management via shareholder ballots. Such resolutions are usually just part of an ongoing dialogue on these topics, between our managers and the companies invested in.

 

Most clients of Goodfunds Wealth Management have their proxy ballots diligently voted by our aligned portfolio managers and consultants according to policy, and generally reflect our progressive ESG criteria. Please see the story below that we pulled together for you today.
 
When you're done reading, send us an email and let us know what's on your mind these days. It is our pleasure to serve you and we look forward to speaking with you soon!

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Eric Smith, CFP®, AIF®

 

SRI in the News

Environmental and Political Spending Resolutions Lead the Way Proxy_Porposal_2011

 

With more than 350 sharehold resolutions filed with companies around the world, 2011 has proven to be as active a proxy season as any in recent memory.

 

As the chart to the right demonstrates, more than half of all proposals filed in 2011 fall into either environmental or political spending categories, a consistent trend in recent years.

 

Environmental Proposals

Many of the environmental proposals focus on asking companies to adopt goals to cut Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), or manage natural resources more  effectively. 

 

 

A couple prominent northwest companies are featured in this category including:

  • Amazon.com  - asked to report on their climate change assessment.
  • Starbucks - asked to adopt a recycling strategy with goals.

 

High impact sectors such as oil and gas, construction and real estate, and utilities all were the subject of similar resolutions asking companies to adopt quantitative goals for reducing the GHG associated with their products and operations. ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, AMB Property, Berkshire Hathaway, and First Energy are just a few of the many companies facing resolutions in this category.

 

Political Spending

The US Supreme Court's Citizen's United decision in January 2010 increased focus on a proxy resolution category that was already receiving significant attention from sustainable and responsible investors. With corporations now effectively having free reign to fund political broadcasts in political campaigns, increased disclosure and transparency on political spending has become an even more important issue. 

 

The Center for Political Accountability has filed its standard spending disclosure proposal with 45 different companies so far this year. The resolution requests semi-annual reports on the following:

 

  1. Policies and procedures for political contributions and expenditures (both direct and indirect) made with corporate funds.
  2. Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used to participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, and used in any attempt to influence the general public, or segments thereof, with respect to elections or referenda. The report shall include:
    • An accounting through an itemized report that includes the identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each recipient of the Company's funds that are used for political contributions or expenditures as described above; and
    • The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company who participate in making the decisions to make the political contribution or expenditure.

 

Five of the proposals are resubmissions from 2010 that received substantial support - at Charles Schwab (33.2%) Regions Financial (33.4%) Sprint Nextel (41.2%), DTE Energy (31.6%), Coventry Health Care (46%) and WellCare Health Plans (23.3).  

 

Some of the other companies receiving similar politcal spending resolutions include: Comcast, ConocoPhillips, Eastman Kodak, Goldman Sachs, Haliburton, JPMorgan Chase, Massey Energy, and Pfizer.

 

Stay tuned to future editions of SRI in the News where we will be sure to cover the results of the 2011 proxy voting season.

 

Eric Smith, CFP®, AIF®, Senior Wealth Officer
Alice Smith, CRPC®, Financial Planning Specialist
Ryan Jones-Casey, MBA, AAMS®, Financial Services Specialist

Goodfunds Wealth Management
GreenBusinessSealofApprovalTINY
Sustainable and responsible investing services since 1986
206.782.1205 | 800.940.1747 | www.goodfunds.com | Seattle, WA

Member, First Affirmative Financial Network
Securities & investment advisory through KMS Financial Services, Inc.


Although the materials referenced in this email may contain investment advice or recommendations, they are the opinions of the author, fund, or manager and do not necessarily reflect our opinions or recommendations.

E-mails to and from this address are subject to archiving and to review by regulating authorities and supervisory personnel. E-mail is subject to transmission failures or delays so please do not rely on it for time-sensitive matters. Such orders or instructions are best conveyed, or at least confirmed, in a two-way telephone conversation to clarify important details and confirm our ability to act within the relevant time frame. This message may contain material protected under privacy policies and is intended only for the use of the individuals and entities named as recipients. If you are not an intended recipient you are required to notify the sender immediately and delete the material.