NMC Report header
March 23, 2010  
Greetings!

 

Nancy MarshallOur list of subscribers for this e-newsletter has grown dramatically, and I feel an increasing sense of responsibility to provide you with informative content that will keep you engaged. I think this issue will do just that. Our strategic partner, Ross Lasley, also known as "The Internet Educator," has provided an article about judging a Web site. I watch so many clients and prospects look at Web sites and immediately judge their effectiveness by the graphic design. But design is just one measure of a Web site's effectiveness. A Web site must be effective on the inside as well as the outside. Ross will explain more about that.

 

I've written about a topic I am intimately familiar with because I live and breathe it every day: Public Relations. Just as you can't judge a Web site by its home page design, you can't judge a PR program by the press releases a company puts out. Public Relations is so much more than just press releases. Read on and you will find out what I mean.

 

Another thing that has become obvious to me over the past several years is that your Web site is vitally important to your Public Relations program, and can either improve your organization's goodwill or drastically take away from it. Web sites must serve as a repository for all your PR materials, including Fact Sheets, current events, current news, biographical backgrounders, and downloadable photos and logos. So take a look at your Web site as if you were a journalist looking for background for a feature story. Would that journalist find what they need? It's a good litmus test.

 

As always, email me if you have further thoughts, questions, comments or complaints. We'll reward you by sending you one of our very-famous "Things To Do" pads...just be sure to include your snail mail address!



Jay Sig B&W
www.marshallpr.com


Judging a PR Program: Beyond Press Releases 


By Nancy Marshall
 
 

PR may just be one of the most misunderstood professions in the world today. Some people think PR is simply the goodwill that surrounds a company (think of how people feel really good about Google, for example, because they provide a much-needed service for free), or that PR is simply putting out press releases (some people think PR stands for press releases, not public relations!)

I think that a great PR program, like a great Web site, lies in the strategy behind it. In order to assess the value of your PR program (or a competitor's), you should consider:

1.       The message - Do you have clearly defined messages? Do you have a key message that can be stated in exactly seven seconds? A seven-second sound bite is critical as the foundation of your PR program, with supporting messages surrounding it. Think about creating a 'message map' which is something that professional PR people do for their clients.

2.       The medium - How do you deliver your messages? Do you take into consideration how your targeted audience prefers to receive their news? If you are targeting teenagers, you might want to consider text messages since they think that even e-mails are so "1990s." If you are targeting senior citizens, you might want to use snail mail. Ask your audience how they prefer to be contacted then segment your list accordingly.

3.       The target - Who is your most important audience? Your secondary audience? Draw a diagram showing all the different audiences you want to communicate with, and then connect the message to your targets.

4.       Press releases alone do not a PR program make - Well-qualified PR professionals know that just issuing press releases does not mean you are implementing a comprehensive PR program. It is critical to create relationships with the media based on mutual trust and respect so you can suggest story ideas as part of ongoing conversations over time. If the media people know the person contacting them is a real person, they are more likely to like and trust them. Like many PR professionals, my staff and I have relationships with the media based on 20 years of our agency's history in the business. Our media contacts know and trust us. We covet these relationships and would never jeopardize them.

5.       Measure and assess - Just as you need to track the analytics of your Web site traffic, you need to track the results of your PR program. Are your messages resonating with your target audiences? Are you getting your stories out in the right media outlets? It might be more effective to have a story in a local weekly paper with a circulation of 1000 than in the New York Times if all of your targeted audience reads that weekly paper.

So a public relations program needs to be grounded in a well-planned strategy, just as your Web site needs to have a Web strategy plan. We spend our time helping our clients with these plans, and it is extremely rewarding when we hear comments like this from our clients:

"The Maine Children's Home has quietly gone about the good work that we do for the past 111 years. Recently, our Board and staff decided through a strategic planning process, that we needed to develop a marketing plan to promote the work that we do state-wide. We contacted several marketing consultants and ultimately decided to work with Nancy Marshall Communications. What a great decision that was. Even before the decision was made, Nancy was offering suggestions that could easily be implemented. Once the process of developing the Marshall Plan and Web design began, we had the good fortune of meeting the amazing team that work with Nancy. What an incredible team they are! They are personable, intelligent and so competent in their areas of expertise. They also exude enthusiasm which kept our board and staff energized throughout the process. The first actual project they provided following the development of the Marketing Plan was a press release. I have to say it was like a miracle how quickly their connections worked for us. Within less than 24 hours, we had two TV interviews, a radio interview and eight printed articles in various newspapers. I can't speak highly enough about this marketing team. I only wish we had made this decision a long time ago."

-Sharon Abrams, Executive Director, Maine Children's Home for Little Wanderers


Judging a Web Site: Beyond Pretty

By Ross Lasley, The Internet Educator


Ross Lasley, The Internet EducatorI've spent an awful lot of time looking at Web sites in the last 20 years and I have always been fascinated by the process of evaluating them.

A common point of confusion for entrepreneurs is that Web sites - unlike many other marketing projects - are never done. As a result, evaluation is an ongoing process and decisions must be made in a different way. Most folks update their brochure when they "run out of them" and it is time to print more, but Web sites have a shelf life and the clock begins ticking the second you launch.

For the third year in a row I have been asked by Editor and Publisher to judge the prestigious EPpy awards. Winners of this international competition will be announced at an awards ceremony at the Interactive Media Conference and Trade Show at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas this summer.

I have always had a great time determining whether The New York Times, or CNN, or USA Today did the best job with their Web site - not to suggest that we haven't seen lots of small outfits win out over these big names in the past. It is a lot of work for the panel to review each of these sites in detail and here are some of the things we consider as we determine who the winners are.

1.       Look and Feel - As Nancy mentioned, this is the place where many people begin and end their own Web site reviews. They tend to use a subjective opinion about whether or not they "like" a site to determine if it is "good."  The real question here is whether or not the site is reflective of the business being represented; does it cause prospects to easily understand what the company is about? Does it have the right "image"?

2.       Navigation - The buttons and links that lead us around a site are often badly organized. Your navigation needs to be clear and consistent and it is a bad idea to mix and match a variety of styles here. In addition, you want to be very aware of the possibility of what folks call "mystery meat" - buttons where it is not at all clear what they represent or what they mean.

3.       Usability - Lots of site owners are under the impression that usability is a subjective question; it really isn't - it is quite scientific these days. Usability has 5 components: Learnability, Efficiency, Memorability, Errors, and Satisfaction. The important thing for site owners to be aware of is that because the Web is improving all the time, the expectations site visitors have for how "usable" a site is, are always increasing.

4.       Content - In many ways the most important factor, content is the area that gets the least attention when people are judging sites. Visitors tend to have very specific questions in mind and most sites don't do well in making the important things clear - have you answered every common question about your products? Have you made it clear why people should use your business and what it will be like to buy from you?

5.       MDR & SDR - MDR stands for most desired response and SDR is Secondary desired response. For many Web sites, the MDR is that visitors buy something and the SDR is that a visitor sign up for the company E-Newsletter. Exactly what you are trying to get people to do is a lot less important than making sure you have defined "conversions" (when folks at your site do what you want) and that you have a way to measure them over time.

 

When reviewing a Web site the most important thing to keep in mind is balance - Web sites are only as strong as their weakest part. If you have a gorgeous visual design but lousy content, the site won't work very well. If you have amazing search engine optimization but your functionality makes it difficult for people to buy things, that won't make you happy either.


 

Ross Lasley, The Internet Educator

 

Ross publishes his E-Newsletter "Web Enlightenment" every two weeks; it focuses on giving you practical, interesting insights into how to successfully use technology as a tool to improve the way you do business. Bridging the gap between knowledge and understanding that all entrepreneurs have will help you make money online. You can sign up by clicking here.


Nancy Marshall Communications Donates Computer to Rangeley Region Chamber of Commerce
 


Jim Jannace and Nancy MarshallPictured are Jim Jannace, president of the Rangeley Region Chamber of Commerce, and Nancy Marshall, president of Nancy Marshall Communications (NMC), with the Dell computer that Marshall has donated to the chamber.

 

Executive Director Evelyn McAllister stated, "Our Rangeley Chamber membership is top-notch. Just as when we were constructing our new building three years ago, if we needed anything, all we had to do was contact our members. This time, we had no funds to replace a computer lost to water damage. We put the word out, and Nancy Marshall of Nancy Marshall Communications answered the call with a donated, top-of-the line computer. The machine is installed and working, and we are sincerely grateful to Nancy for her generosity.

"I had a spare computer at our office, and when I saw that the chamber needed one after their recent flood, I thought it might be a good way for me to help the chamber and the businesses in the region," stated Marshall.

Nancy Marshall Communications is a marketing communications agency that handles clients statewide, including the public relations and Web site for Saddleback. NMC has been a member of the Rangeley Chamber for the past year. "I love this region of the state and would like to play a  part in helping the chamber help its members."



Copyright © 2010. Marshall Communications, Inc. Feel free to reproduce any of this content, but we ask that you include this notice and a link to www.marshallpr.com. We would also love to know about it, so please drop us an email to let us know at info@marshallpr.com. Thanks!