|
|

|
Greetings!
Our list of subscribers for this
e-newsletter has grown dramatically, and I feel an increasing sense of
responsibility to provide you with informative content that will keep you
engaged. I think this issue will do just that. Our strategic partner,
Ross Lasley, also known as "The Internet Educator," has provided an article
about judging a Web site. I watch so many clients and prospects look at Web
sites and immediately judge their effectiveness by the graphic design. But
design is just one measure of a Web site's effectiveness. A Web site must
be effective on the inside as well as the outside. Ross will explain more about
that.
I've written about a topic I am intimately
familiar with because I live and breathe it every day: Public
Relations. Just as you can't judge a Web site by its home page design, you
can't judge a PR program by the press releases a company puts out. Public
Relations is so much more than just press releases. Read on and you will find
out what I mean.
Another thing that has become
obvious to me over the past several years is that your Web site is vitally
important to your Public Relations program, and can either improve your
organization's goodwill or drastically take away from it. Web sites
must serve as a repository for all your PR materials, including Fact Sheets,
current events, current news, biographical backgrounders, and downloadable
photos and logos. So take a look at your Web site as if you were a
journalist looking for background for a feature story. Would that journalist
find what they need? It's a good litmus test.
As always, email me if you have
further thoughts, questions, comments or complaints. We'll reward you by
sending you one of our very-famous "Things To Do" pads...just be sure to include
your snail mail address!
www.marshallpr.com
|
Judging a PR Program: Beyond Press Releases
By Nancy Marshall
PR may just be one of the most misunderstood professions in
the world today. Some people think PR is simply the goodwill that surrounds a
company (think of how people feel really good about Google, for example,
because they provide a much-needed service for free), or that PR is simply
putting out press releases (some people think PR stands for press releases, not
public relations!)
I think that a great PR program, like a great Web site, lies
in the strategy behind it. In order to assess the value of your PR program (or
a competitor's), you should consider:
1. The message - Do you have clearly
defined messages? Do you have a key message that can be stated in exactly seven
seconds? A seven-second sound bite is critical as the foundation of your PR
program, with supporting messages surrounding it. Think about creating a
'message map' which is something that professional PR people do for their
clients.
2. The medium - How do you deliver your
messages? Do you take into consideration how your targeted audience prefers to
receive their news? If you are targeting teenagers, you might want to consider
text messages since they think that even e-mails are so "1990s." If
you are targeting senior citizens, you might want to use snail mail. Ask your
audience how they prefer to be contacted then segment your list accordingly.
3. The target - Who is your most important
audience? Your secondary audience? Draw a diagram showing all the different
audiences you want to communicate with, and then connect the message to your
targets.
4. Press releases alone do not a PR program
make - Well-qualified PR professionals know that just issuing press
releases does not mean you are implementing a comprehensive PR program. It is
critical to create relationships with the media based on mutual trust and
respect so you can suggest story ideas as part of ongoing conversations over
time. If the media people know the person contacting them is a real person,
they are more likely to like and trust them. Like many PR professionals, my
staff and I have relationships with the media based on 20 years of our agency's
history in the business. Our media contacts know and trust us. We covet these
relationships and would never jeopardize them.
5. Measure and assess - Just as you need
to track the analytics of your Web site traffic, you need to track the results
of your PR program. Are your messages resonating with your target audiences?
Are you getting your stories out in the right media outlets? It might be more
effective to have a story in a local weekly paper with a circulation of 1000
than in the New York Times if all of your targeted audience
reads that weekly paper.
So a public relations program needs to be grounded in a
well-planned strategy, just as your Web site needs to have a Web strategy plan.
We spend our time helping our clients with these plans, and it is extremely
rewarding when we hear comments like this from our clients:
"The
Maine Children's Home has quietly gone about the good work that we do for the
past 111 years. Recently, our Board and staff decided through a strategic
planning process, that we needed to develop a marketing plan to promote the
work that we do state-wide. We contacted several marketing consultants and
ultimately decided to work with Nancy Marshall Communications. What a great
decision that was. Even before the decision was made, Nancy was offering
suggestions that could easily be implemented. Once the process of developing
the Marshall Plan and Web design began, we had the good fortune of meeting the
amazing team that work with Nancy. What an incredible team they are! They are
personable, intelligent and so competent in their areas of expertise. They also
exude enthusiasm which kept our board and staff energized throughout the
process. The first actual project they provided following the development of
the Marketing Plan was a press release. I have to say it was like a miracle how
quickly their connections worked for us. Within less than 24 hours, we had two
TV interviews, a radio interview and eight printed articles in various
newspapers. I can't speak highly enough about this marketing team. I only wish
we had made this decision a long time ago."
-Sharon Abrams, Executive Director, Maine
Children's Home for Little Wanderers
|
Judging a Web Site: Beyond Pretty
I've spent an awful lot of time looking at Web sites in the last 20 years and I have always been fascinated by the process of evaluating them.
A common point of confusion for entrepreneurs is that
Web sites - unlike many other marketing projects - are never done. As a result, evaluation is an ongoing process and decisions must be made in a different way. Most folks update their brochure when they "run out of them" and it is time to print more, but Web sites have a
shelf life and the clock begins ticking the second you launch.
For the third year in a row I have been asked by Editor and Publisher to judge the prestigious EPpy awards.
Winners of this international competition will be announced at an awards ceremony at the Interactive Media Conference and Trade Show at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas this summer.
I have always had a great time determining whether The New York Times,
or CNN, or USA Today did the best job
with their Web site - not to suggest that we haven't seen lots of small outfits
win out over these big names in the past. It is a lot of work for the panel to
review each of these sites in detail and here are some of the things we
consider as we determine who the winners are.
1. Look and Feel - As Nancy mentioned, this
is the place where many people begin and end their own Web site reviews. They
tend to use a subjective opinion about whether or not they "like" a site to
determine if it is "good." The real
question here is whether or not the site is reflective of the business being
represented; does it cause prospects to easily understand what the company is
about? Does it have the right "image"?
2. Navigation - The buttons and links that
lead us around a site are often badly organized. Your navigation needs to be
clear and consistent and it is a bad idea to mix and match a variety of styles
here. In addition, you want to be very
aware of the possibility of what folks call "mystery meat" - buttons where it
is not at all clear what they represent or what they mean.
3. Usability - Lots of site owners are
under the impression that usability is a subjective question; it really isn't - it
is quite scientific these days. Usability has 5 components: Learnability, Efficiency, Memorability,
Errors, and Satisfaction. The important
thing for site owners to be aware of is that because the Web is improving all
the time, the expectations site visitors have for how "usable" a site is, are
always increasing.
4. Content - In many ways the most
important factor, content is the area that gets the least attention when people
are judging sites. Visitors tend to have very specific questions in mind and most
sites don't do well in making the important things clear - have you answered
every common question about your products? Have you made it clear why people
should use your business and what it will be like to buy from you?
5. MDR & SDR - MDR stands for most
desired response and SDR is Secondary desired response. For many Web sites, the
MDR is that visitors buy something and the SDR is that a visitor sign up for the
company E-Newsletter. Exactly what you are trying to get people to do is a lot
less important than making sure you have defined "conversions" (when folks at
your site do what you want) and that you have a way to measure them over time.
When reviewing a Web site the most important
thing to keep in mind is balance - Web sites are only as strong as their weakest
part. If you have a gorgeous visual design but lousy content, the site won't
work very well. If you have amazing search engine optimization but your
functionality makes it difficult for people to buy things, that won't make you
happy either.
Ross
publishes his E-Newsletter "Web Enlightenment" every two weeks; it focuses on giving you practical,
interesting insights into how to successfully use technology as a tool to
improve the way you do business. Bridging the gap between knowledge and
understanding that all entrepreneurs have will help you make money online. You
can sign up by clicking here.
|
Nancy Marshall Communications Donates Computer to Rangeley Region Chamber of Commerce
Pictured are Jim Jannace, president of the Rangeley Region Chamber of Commerce, and Nancy Marshall, president of Nancy Marshall Communications (NMC), with the Dell computer that Marshall has donated to the
chamber.
Executive Director Evelyn
McAllister stated, "Our Rangeley Chamber membership is top-notch. Just as
when we were constructing our new building three years ago, if we needed
anything, all we had to do was contact our members. This time, we had no
funds to replace a computer lost to water damage. We put the word out,
and Nancy Marshall of Nancy Marshall Communications answered the call with a
donated, top-of-the line computer. The machine is installed and working,
and we are sincerely grateful to Nancy for her generosity.
"I had a spare computer at our office, and when I saw that the chamber needed
one after their recent flood, I thought it might be a good way for me to help
the chamber and the businesses in the region," stated Marshall.
Nancy Marshall Communications is a marketing communications
agency that handles clients statewide, including the public relations and Web
site for Saddleback. NMC has been a member of the Rangeley Chamber for
the past year. "I love this region of the state and would like to play a
part in helping the chamber help its
members."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|