Quotable Quote
"You can never change things by fighting
the existing reality. To change something,
build a new model that makes the existing
model obsolete"
- Buckminster Fuller
A Good Book
Three Cups of Tea
An awesome read. Pakistan. Afghanistan. 9/11.
Humans at their very human best. Read to be
informed, uplifted, and inspired to serve or
provide support to those who do.
A Good Flick
Pray the Devil Back to Hell
Winner of the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival. A
documentary on the Liberian Women's Peace
Movement. "The women held the men hostage
until they made peace." To be released in
November 2008.
A Future Without War
Believe in it.
Envision it.
Work for it.
And we will achieve it.
|
|
|
The theme of this newsletter is ECONOMICS
"We seem always ready to pay the price for
war. Almost gladly we give our time and our
treasure-our limbs and even our lives-for
war. But yet we expect to get peace for
nothing."
- Peace Pilgrim
One of AFWW's 9 cornerstones is SHIFT OUR
ECONOMIES. An essential of any campaign to
abolish war is that we shift from economies
based on war (or at a minimum, ones that
greatly facilitate wars) to economies that
will serve to abolish war. The logic
underlying this cornerstone is that we can't
seriously propose to create a just,
sustainable, and peaceful (or non-warring)
future if we continue to tolerate war because:
- War uses up limited resources urgently
needed to build our vision of a just and
peaceful future.
- War is a toleration of the rule of some
over others ultimately enforced by violence,
a direct violation of what we claim we want
to create.
This newsletter provides:
- a meeting notice - devoted to business
and a better future - abstracts due November
1, 2008,
- examples of outrageous financial wastes
of war,
- a gut sense for how much money a trillion
dollars really is,
- fun and informative websites on things
economic,
- a summary of research on the relationship
between "moral sentiments" and economic
incentives,
- four books on economics; Birdsall,
Shermer, Toffler, and Eisler,
- links to 19 organizations working on
economic issues as these relate to shaping a
more just, sustainable, and nonviolent
future.
|
|
|
Your Help Needed
Seeking Books on the HOW of Economic
Transformation
Do you know of a good book on how to shift
our economic systems? These can be on any
aspect of economics, but we're looking NOT
for books that explain why we need to shift,
or what the problem is-there are plenty of
those books. We need ideas about how to
produce the desired economic shift. Please
send titles to jlhandmail@aol.co
m
and put "Recommended economic book for AFWW"
in the subject heading. AFWW would like to
make a good reading list available on the
website.
|
Global Forum
Case Western's Global Forum 2009 - Call
for Papers. 500 word abstracts
due Nov 1, 2008.
The Case Western "Center for Business as an
Agent For World Benefit" is pleased to invite
you to join in another landmark event to be
hosted at Case Western Reserve University's
Weatherhead School of Management June
3rd-6th, 2009. The Forum will bring together
leading executives, designers, management
scholars, civil society leaders, government
policy makers, and visionary students to
identify and leverage new solutions with the
potential to change 21st-century society for
the better. The format and content will
encircle the globe and include both
face-to-face and virtual venues. The first
Global Forum-building on the convening
capacity of the Academy of Management
and UN
Global Compact - included well over one
thousand leaders and scholars from 57
countries; that number is expected to increase.
|
Waste of War
Outrageous Financial Waste of
War Cost examples:
- $5.8 Trillion spent on the U.S. Nuclear program as
of 1998
- Ultimate U.S. Projected costs of Afghan
and Iraq wars--between $1 trillion and $1.4 trillion
- U.S. costs of the wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq as of 2005--$300 billion
- U.S. costs (in 2005 dollars) for WW
I and the Vietnam War - $613 billion and $623
billion, respectively
- F/A-22 Raptor - $64 billion - $100
million/plane
- Central Intelligence Agency Budget (2005)
- $ 44 billion
- Homeland Security, U.S. (2003) - $ 38
billion
- Anthrax Vaccine development - $5.6
billion
- One U.S. Nuclear Submarine - $ 1.6
billion. The U.S., in 2004, had fifty
- Two new 4,000-bed prisons in Iraq
(requested by U.S. administration) - $400
million
- One U.S. M1 Tank - $4.3 million - the
U.S. had a 2004 inventory of 403
- Perchlorate cleanup in San Bernardino,
California - $6.5 million
To quote Congressman Everett Dirksen: "A
billion here, a billion there, sooner or
later it adds up to real money." Real money
that, in the case of war and its weapons,
should be better spent elsewhere.
|
How Much is a Trillion Dollars?
If you tried to count to $1 trillion at $1 a
second it would take almost 12 days to reach
$1 million, nearly 32 years to reach $1
billion, and 31,709 years to reach 1
trillion. If you tried to count to $5.5
trillion, it would take about 174,400 years.
Steven Schwartz (the source of these
values), in his book Atomic
Audit, writes that taking into
account spending since 1996 and making
further adjustments for inflation, the total
the United States has sunk into its nuclear
weapons program as of 2006 was $7.5
trillion and counting.
|
A Graphical View
Oreo Cookies, Beebees, A War Money
Counter, and The Budget Pie, Oh My
A Picture Can Be Better than a Thousand
Words. The following websites have
visuals or interactive graphics that relate
to the costs of war and to the apportionment
of the U.S. Annual Budget.
Beebees and the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal -
A video depicting the number of Missiles in
the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal and the cost of
maintaining them:
truemajority.org/
fun/
(no endorsement of True Majority.org is
implied)
An entertaining video comparison, only
slightly outdated, of Pentagon Budget with
other U.S. Budget items:
truemajority.org/
fun/
Click on Oreo video
(no endorsement of True Majority.org is
implied)
The War Counter - an animated counter
of the costs of the Iraq war compared to
spending in the U.S. on pre-school, kid's
health, public education, college
scholarships, public housing, world hunger,
the AIDS epidemic, and world immunization.
This site is a trove of financial
information. National Priorities Project: nationalpriorities.
org
Playing with the U.S. Budget - an
interactive site that let's you see the U.S.
allocation of taxes and lets you change the
values and then compare YOUR ideal budget
with the actual U.S. budget.
benjerry.
com/americanpie/
(no endorsement of the site or it accuracy is
implied)
|
Moral Sentiments vs. Material Interests
"Science," the journal of the American
Association of Science, published in their 20
June 2008 issue a review by Samuel
Bowles of the Santa Fe Institute. The
author summarizes results from 41 economic
studies. The title: "Policies designed for
self-interested citizens may undermine 'The
Moral Sentiments': evidence from economic
experiments."
This scientific review paper throws light on
the relationships-positive and
negative-between economic incentives used to
motivate citizens to act in the common good
and our innate moral sentiments. It's a paper
to cite when writing or discussing the
practical issues of how best to shift our
economies.
In addition, its clear finding that
individuals do not always act in selfish
self-interest lends further support to our
growing understanding of the nature of what
can be called "innate human goodness."
Dr. Bowels cites Bruno Frey who warned that
"a constitution for knaves may produce
knaves."
The review's conclusions are as follows:
- Humans do have innate "moral sentiments,"
the basis upon which all commerce is built.
- Economic incentives intended to foster
behavior that serves the common good by
appealing to selfish self-interest may fail
when they undermine the moral values that
lead people to act altruistically or in other
public-spirited ways.
- Economic incentives may be counter
productive when they signal that selfishness
is an appropriate response; they constitute a
learning environment through which over time
people come to adopt more self-interested
motivation; they compromise the individual's
sense of self-determination and thereby
degrade intrinsic motivations; or they convey
a message of distrust, disrespect, and unfair
intent.
- Many of the (negative) unintended effects
of incentives occur because people act not
only to acquire economic goods and services,
but also to constitute themselves as
dignified, autonomous, and moral
individuals.
- Good organizations and institutional
design can channel our material interests for
the achievement of social goals while also
enhancing the contribution of the moral
sentiments to the same ends.
To obtain a copy of the article write: samuel.bo
wles@gmail.com
|
The White House and the World
A Global Development Agenda for the Next
U.S. President.
The Center for
Global Development is a gold
mine of literature and ideas relating to
problems of development. CGD president
Nancy Birdsall edited The White
House and the World and wrote the
lead essay, "Why Development Matters for
Americans and What the Next President Should
Do about It." At this site she discussed the
book's themes on the eve of the 2008
Democratic and Republican conventions.
|
Evolutionary Economics

Human Nature and Resources
In Women, Power, and the Biology of
Peace (pp. 43-44) (FREE download at afww.org)
evolutionary biologist Judith Hand
explains why no social edifice can persist
over time if it conflicts with a fundamental
(evolved) aspect of human nature. Over time,
no social or economic edifice is stronger
than human nature itself.
To shift our economies, we need to understand
how human nature relates to economics (the
acquiring and distribution of resources).
Only then can we know what sort of economic
system can be sustained over time-what we can
and can not do. What policies will get us
where we want to go. How to avoid
self-defeating policies.
Hand provides the following as one example of
how innate human (evolved) characteristics
limit our possible plans: "You might convince
goodly numbers of the members of a society to
allow children from impoverished, dangerous
neighborhoods to be bussed into their own,
safe neighborhood to attend school-providing
you convince the adults that such an effort
serves some very great good. But you would
never convince any significant number of
people to bus their children into an unsafe
neighborhood, no matter how hard you might
try or how worthy your cause (p. 44)."
Michael Shermer, editor of "Skeptic
Magazine," monthly editor for "Scientific
American," and President of the Skeptics
Society, has written The Mind of the
Market: Compassionate Apes, Competitive
Humans, and Other Tales from Evolutionary
Economics. NY: Times Books/Henry Holt.
2008.
This book presents an extensive review of
behavioral and neurophysiological research
relating human nature to economic (and other)
choices we make. Unless with work with our
biology, not against it, we can't create
sustainable change. Hence the need to
understand our biology.
The key conclusion is that the idea of humans
making economic decisions only selfishly,
rationally, and efficiently, as has been
assumed by most economists until recently, is
fundamentally incorrect. An economics built
on those incorrect assumptions is going to be
in error.
He reviews studies on what makes people
happy, and explains and ultimately recommends
an economic system called libertarian
paternalism (from Cass Sunstein and Richard
Thaler) that maximizes freedom while using
the best knowledge from biology to determine
the minimum restrictions needed to shape
interactions in complex societies.
For a sample of reviews see:
Reviews
on Shermer's Website
|
Toffler's Economic Insights

The brilliant and classic books by Alvin
and Heidi Toffler, Future
Shock and The Third
Wave, are an absolute MUST READ for
anyone serious about social change and our
future.
In chapter 20 of The Third
Wave, the Tofflers address the future
of economic change. They include discussion
not only of traditional areas of concern to
economists, but non-traditional areas that
are hugely important to fully understanding
how humans use and exchange resources but
areas which were, and for the most part still
are, virtually ignored.
Toffler divided economic elements into two
parts he called Sector A and Sector B. Here
we quote from the book (pp. 252-253):
"Sector A comprises all that unpaid work done
directly by people for themselves, their
families, or their communities. Sector B
comprises all the production of goods or
services for sale or swap through the
exchange network or market." In the First
Wave economies (the period of time after
the Agricultural Revolution and before the
Industrial Revolution), "Sector A-based
on production for use-was enormous, while
Sector B was minimal. During the second Wave
(after the Industrial Revolution) the reverse
was true. In fact, the production of goods
and services for the market mushroomed to
such an extent that Second Wave economists
virtually forgot the existence of Sector A.
The very word 'economy' was defined to
exclude all forms of work or production not
intended for the market, and the prosumer
(someone who produces and consumes what he
or she produces) became invisible.
"This meant, for example, that all the unpaid
work done by women in the home, all the
cleaning , scrubbing, child-rearing, the
community organizing, was contemptuously
dismissed as "non-economic," even thought
Sector B - the visible economy - could not have
existed without the goods and services
produced in Sector A - the invisible
economy."
"Today ... politicians and experts still bandy
about economic statistics based entirely on
Sector B transactions ... Yet so long as they
continue to think in Second Wave categories,
so long as they ignore Sector A and regard it
as outside the economy - and so long as the
prosumer remains invisible - they will never be
able to mange our economic affairs."
The chapter is 22 pages long ... and should be
read and studied by anyone who needs to
understand economics while working to shape a
better future.
|
Real Wealth of Nations
Riane Eisler's The Real Wealth of Nations:
Creating a Caring Economics
If we are to shift our economies, we are led
to ask, shift them to what? This 2007 book by
social historian Riane Eisler is an
answer to that question. She reviews the
essentials of socialism,
communism, and capitalism, all
of which result in and emerge from a
dominator model of living that is enforced,
ultimately, by violence.
She urges us to set our sights on a shift to
an economic system she calls
partnerism - a caring economics that
includes financial value for the work of
care-giving. She is essentially putting great
stress on and calling for attention to an
important part of what Toffler included in
his "Sector A." (see the preceding newsletter
entry)
As Eisler notes, it will take time and
intense effort by many experts to fully shape
the actual economics of partnerism. It
will, she further notes, take an equal or
greater effort to implement the changes. But
she provides of vision of what a new
economics can look like. It would place more
stress on cooperation than competition.
Skeptics will say that humans are too selfish
to ever make the paradigm shift she
describes. An ever growing weight of research
on human nature indicates that, to the
contrary, humans have evolved to be
cooperative when their environment favors
cooperation (for examples and references
supporting this cooperative view of human
nature see the Shermer book mentioned above.
See also the short essay on "Essential
Human Goodness" at www.afww.org.
|
Organizations Seeking to Shape our Economic Future
AFWW provides links to 19 Organizations
Working on the "Shift Our Economies" Cornerstone
|
|
|
|