600 Image
"TRUST, SERVICE, PERFORMANCE"
QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER                                                                               2011 Q-3    
In This Issue
From Our Investment Team
Limit Chances of DOL Visit
What Now
Bank Fees
Quick Links


Trent Capital Management, Inc.
In today's economic environment, investors want and need advisors they can trust.  Trent Capital's professionals are focused on the best interests of our clients.  Trent harbors no self-interest that creates conflict within the investment decision process.  Our structure eliminates bias, restriction and negative influence in the pursuit of achieving each client's objectives in a prudent process. 
Note & Quote

"In the long run, digging for truth has always proved not only more interesting but more profitable than digging for gold."

George R. Harrison

_____________

"Study without reflection is a waste of time; reflection without study is dangerous."

Confucious




From Our Investment Team

An unprecedented downgrade of U.S. government debt and disappointing economic data in the U.S. and Europe have shaken investors and contributed to one of the most volatile periods in stock market history. Recurring concerns about the European sovereign debt crisis and uncertainties surrounding the U.S. debt downgrade have contributed to extreme market volatility and heightened risk aversion over the past several weeks.  However, we believe that current economic fundaments do not warrant fears of 2008-style downturn. In addition, the extreme market reaction to recent events offers an opportunity for long-term investors to add exposure to high quality equities selling at attractive valuations.

 

Although fixed income securities have benefited from their perceived "safe haven" status in a risk-averse environment, investors are accepting very low yields on long-term high quality bonds in return for that safety.  We believe that risk is currently mispriced and that equities offer more attractive risk-adjusted returns for long-term investors. Share prices in cyclical sectors such as industrials and financials have been hit particularly hard in the recent volatility and may be oversold.

 

The economy continues to face a number of headwinds amid struggling consumers, a mediocre housing market, and profound fiscal challenges at the federal state and local levels.  Although the current environment is not without risk, it is different than the massively overleveraged environment that existed in 2008. Banks have recapitalized, Wall Street and consumers have reduced their debt, the housing market has stabilized, and corporate balance sheets are vastly improved.  As a result, we believe that a "growth recession" characterized by low economic growth and persistent unemployment is more likely than an outright return to negative growth, or a so-called "double-dip" recession.

 

Although investors are understandably concerned about the markets and the economy, we believe that current fundamentals do not warrant some of the extreme risk aversion and we expect markets will return to normal conditions in the next 12 to 24 months.

 

 

 

 

Ways To Limit Your Chances Of A Visit From The Department Of Labor (DOL)

 

 

The DOL is responsible for investigating and enforcing reporting and disclosure requirements of employee benefit plans.  In 2010 they conducted 3,112 investigations resulting in almost 75% of which had one or more violations.  Presently the DOL is adding hundreds of new investigators to its staff, meaning the number of investigations will increase.

 

If your company has an employee benefit plan, you may not be able to escape a visit from the DOL, but the following should assist you with a positive report should your company be audited?

 

1. Deposit Participant Contributions as Soon as Possible.

The DOL requires that participant contributions (including loan repayments) be deposited into the plan's trust on the earliest date that they can be reasonably segregated from the employer's general assets.  While it is the DOL's position that the "earliest date" is determined on a case-by-case basis, it is therefore not acceptable to rely on the maximum time permitted under the regulations (the 15th business day of the following month) because most companies have the ability to transfer funds electronically, and some can even effect the transfer from company assets the same day as the contributions are made. 

 

2. Make Sure Your Plan Has a Proper Fidelity Bond.

While a company often has a fiduciary policy covering officers and directors, too often it fails to provide the required Fidelity Bond which should be at least 10% of the amount of the plan assets (not less than $1,000, nor more than $500,000 for each plan covered). 

 

Form 5500 requires Plan Sponsors to state if there is a Fidelity Bond and the amount of such bond.  Should a Fidelity Bond not be in place, or the coverage is inadequate relative to the plan's assets, the Plan Sponsor can expect to hear from the DOL.  One good tip is to review the amount of the Plan's Fidelity Bond at least annually to ensure that the coverage is adequate.

 

3. Promptly Respond to Participants' Inquiries or Request for Information.

The DOL requires that specific plan related documents be provided to participants and their beneficiaries upon request.  These documents include the latest Summary Plan Description (SPD), latest Form 5500, Trust Agreement, and Adoption Agreement or Plan Document.  Upon receipt of a written request for any of these documents from a Participant or their Beneficiary, the Plan Administrator must provide the document(s) within 30 days of the date of the request.  Not providing copies of the requested documents within the required time frame may result in a penalty of up to $110 per day.

 

4. Distribute Regular, Accurate Participant Statements.

Plans are required to distribute regularly benefit statements to plan participants.  The requirement for Defined Contribution Plans is for statements to be provided quarterly if the plan allows participant investment direction, and at least annually if the plan does not allow for participant investment direction.  The requirement for Defined Benefit Plans is to provide participant statements at least once every three years.  It is important to note that a participant or their beneficiary may request a statement once during any 12 month period.

 

5. Ensure that Fees Charged by Plan Providers are Reasonable for Services Provided.

Form 5500 requires the disclosure of all service provider fees paid by the plan.  Excessive plan fees have become another top investigative issue for the DOL, and a careful review of Schedule C of the Form 5500 may identify potential red flags. 

 

DOL Regulations 408, (b), (2) which is scheduled to become effective in April of 2012, requires that the Plan Sponsor disclose to participants all fees and expenses paid from plan assets to plan service providers.  In most cases, this will be the first time that participants have seen fees and Plan Sponsors can count on a lot of queries as to the reasonableness of plan fees.

 

6. Respond Promptly to DOL Letters Requesting Information

Ignoring inquiries will do the opposite of making them go away.  It is critical that a thorough and timely response be made to an inquiry from the DOL.

 

Form 5500 is the primary source of information to trigger a DOL investigation.  Red flags surface for plans that have a significant percentage of assets in real estate, limited partnerships, non-cash contributions, loan defaults, low diversification ratios, unreasonable low investment rates of return, or an adverse accountant's opinion (for plan's requiring audits).

 

Additional sources of information that can trigger a DOL investigation include bankruptcy filings and media reports that a company is in financial trouble.  Unfortunately, plans sponsored by employers having severe financial problems are vulnerable to inappropriate behaviors, including delaying deposits of participant contributions, loans to the company, or other illegal activities.

 

 

 

 

So What Now?!

"If it was easy, everyone would be doing it!" This adage has likely been used by most when attempting to describe the difficult nature often faced within one's own profession during times of duress.  It is particularly timely for those of us who are managing the investment assets of our clients through the pitfalls of the volatile economic world within which we all navigate today. 

 

Such a triteness and truism - "If it was easy...." - is perfectly suitable when one struggles to make sense of a market that responds in huge swings upon the issuance of each hot-off-the-press data point; every economic soothsayer being relentlessly showcased 30 minutes apart; or when each uprising occurs and every heralded event portends [confirms!] the 'boom or bust' coming tomorrow.  A better continuum by which one could describe today's struggles to cope within this investment cauldron might be:  'salvation to Financial Armageddon' .  Certainly it is much easier on one's nerves to remain in a blindly neutral "stay-the-course" mode and simply try not to pay attention, but then this tactic would be equally as dangerous as affecting knee-jerk reactions to unexpected events.  

 

It looks rather nasty out there if one absorbs only the results of each day's emotional response to an economic stimulus - sorry about that phrase!  So now what? How does one determine some acceptable level of risk - which is unavoidable - and at the same time view it as prudently tolerable as well? The pathway to answering this [nearly!] impossible-to-answer question is to put blinders on to anything but an informed assessment of the business one is looking at a particular investment opportunity moment.  

 

If you find a business that has paid out [and raised] dividends for 37 straight years, increased earnings growth on an average of 11.2% annually for the last 15 years during volatile times, and is trading at 13 times earnings versus its ten year average of 20 times earnings  over that time frame, and is trading at historically low levels [9 vs 16 times earnings], it becomes more palatable and prudent to buy (a) Pepsico in the face of our  national debt levels seeming insurmountable. 

 

If research leads one to a company that is ensconced within an unavoidable growth market [the graying of America]; enjoys either first or second place in all of its market segments [neurological, heart, spine, diabetes, et. al.]; holds an advantage over competitors as the world's largest at what it does [implantable medical devices]; trades at 9-10 times earnings compared to its historic range of 11- 21 times; pays out [and raised it for 33 years!] a 3% dividend that is equal to an investment grade bond yield, why then would one not feel good about owning some of Medtronics?    

Just the two examples above - as well as many others - might be questioned as prudent investments if one is convinced [that] the world will stop turning.  If somehow innovation and entrepreneurs will cease to exist, then we are in trouble.  If one believes that the human desire for consumption is dead and people will refrain from it long-term [short-term!...who knows??], then neither of these two investments noted above make sense.  However, planning for Financial Armageddon can be just as dangerous an event as the event itself, if it never comes.  Should it actually manifest, what good will bonds, cash or gold do? It seems to be a much more prudent investment mode to follow the proven practice of buying great businesses in solid industries at good prices. Holding/balancing them until a better bargain is found - or their changing fundamentals cause their stock prices to trade at the opposite end of what is today's 'emotion de jour' - just seems to make sense to us. 

 

When depression's alternative emotion of euphoria drives investor's psychological state in the opposite direction, the result is a relentless pursuit of those investments whose soaring prices they believe will never fall. Have you noticed the frenzied back-to-back gold commercials flooding your TV channels?

 

 
Is Your Bank Mum About Its Fees  

 

 A recent survey of 392 bank branches in 21 states by the US Public Interest Research Group found that fewer than half fully disclosed savings and checking account fees to prospective customers, and that a quarter provided no fee information at all.  The federal Truth in Savings Act requires the disclosure of all account-related fees.  Don't sign up for a new bank account unless you fully understand all the charges.  If you switch to a new financial institution, check your first few statements to make sure you aren't charged unexpected fees.  And don't ignore future bank correspondence, which might include details about new fees. 

 

 

 

For a review of your current investment programs from our team of professionals, please give us a call at 336-282-9302

WARNING: The information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it contains.