|
|
|
|
Journey with DWM to
What's Next
|
|
Some economists say "up" and some say "down". The truth is, no one knows the future. But affluent, enlightened investors recognize that DWM strategies perform in up markets and protect in down markets. Regardless of what the future holds, with DWM, savvy investors are ready for what's next. | |
|
|
|
Ask DWM: Investment Strategies for a Declining U.S. Dollar? | |

Yes, the decline in the U.S. Dollar (USD) has gotten a reprieve in the last two weeks.But, don't start breaking out the champagne. The U.S. Dollar (USD) has been declining for almost ten years, and while there may be short-term corrections, this decline is expected to continue.
It wasn't always like this. Back in 2001, with the budget balanced, the Congressional Budget Office forecast ever-larger surpluses indefinitely. That future never came. Washington chose to cut taxes, increase spending and for the first time in history, wage two wars with borrowed funds. Now, instead of surpluses, the federal government owes $9 trillion.
The Federal Reserve, established in 1913, is the banker to the nation's banks; controlling the money supply and, therefore, the value of the currency. And, while the mantra of a strong USD is repeated regularly by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the dollar continues to suffer from U.S. monetary policy. The Fed continues to hold rates at zero and buy bonds. While the money printing is finally scheduled to end next month, the Fed still plans an extended period of low rates. As a result, the Fed is supplying more dollars to the world than the world wants to hold. And it is setting interest rates lower than they should be to balance the demand for dollars with the supply of dollars. Until this changes, the dollar will continue its slide, with minor interruptions of the trend when things get "scary" in the world.
A decline in the dollar leads to inflation and an erosion of purchasing power.Just last week, the Labor Department said in its monthly report that CPI was up .4% in April and 3.2% from a year earlier. This 12 month figure represents the biggest jump since 2008. And, as we have pointed out previously, the calculation of CPI understates the impact of rising gas and food prices, as 40% of the CPI index is based on housing which is currently running negative. The dollar's continuing decline is a major concern.
Investment strategies for a declining dollar include consideration of the following asset classes within your portfolio:
- Commodities include gold, silver, oil, copper, wheat and others. Commodities are priced in terms of the USD, so as the dollar weakens the price of the commodity rises.
- Stocks represent the ownership of real assets and behave as an inflation hedge in the long-term. This holding should include a broad diversification of large-caps, which have significant amount of revenues from abroad, along with international stocks, both in developed and emerging countries.
- Non-Correlated Assets including non-liquid alternatives such as equipment leasing and certain real estate, and liquid alternatives, including tactical portfolios. Tactical portfolios may include "floating rate funds" which rise in tandem with rising interest rates.
- Currencies of other countries, including the Swiss Franc and the Canadian and Australian dollar.
- Other Fixed Income including TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities), international bonds and hi-yield bonds.
Inclusion of these assets within a portfolio will differ for each investor depending on goals, objectives, personal circumstances and risk profile. And, of course, the portfolio will need to be monitored and actively managed. Please give us a call if you would like to discuss this important topic further. |
|
 |
| Quick Links |
|
Detterbeck Wealth Management
www.dwmgmt.com
220 N. Smith Street
Suite 410
Palatine, IL 60067
847.359.6262
Suite 2A
Charleston, SC 29401
843.577.2463 |
Click here to be added to our mailing list!
Please be assured that your e-mail address will only be used for the delivery of your newsletter.
Thanks |
|
|
|
Business: Heading for a McRecovery? | |
April 19th was "National Hiring Day" for McDonald's. They hired 50,000 new workers. The new employees joined 1.7 million others worldwide in McDonald's 32,000 restaurants.While 50,000 in jobs is a nice addition, it's further evidence of job polarization. The opportunities are increasingly concentrated in high-skill, high-wage jobs and in low-skill, low-wage jobs.
Fast food restaurants are a huge industry. The National Restaurant Association says that $168 billion will be spent at QSR (Quick Service Restaurants) in 2011, 70% of that coming through the drive-thru windows.Restaurants like McDonald's and Taco Bell have pioneered operational innovations that rival any factory in the world.
Taco Bell currently operates 5,600 locations in the U.S. Every Taco Bell "Service Champion" memorizes the order script before his first shift. The Food Champions work the food production line and include the Steamers, Stuffers and Expeditors.
McDonald's pioneered the assembly-line style of food preparation. Taco Bell has modified it for its products. Wire baskets with six slots for corn tortillas are dunked in burning oil and removed.A rack allows workers to slide the shells past trays of beef, lettuce and cheese; the tacos taking shape the same way a car does as it rolls through a factory.
A review of the kitchens at Taco Bell today provides a strong counterargument to any notice that the U.S. has lost its manufacturing edge. Every Taco Bell, McDonalds, Burger King and Wendy's is a little factory with a manager who oversees dozens of workers and supervises an assembly line churning out quality-controlled, high-volume product. Taco Bell CEO Greg Creed, a veteran of the detergents and personal products division of Unilever, puts it this way: "At Unilever, we had five factories, now at Taco Bell, I've got 6,000 factories, many of them running 24 hours per day."
Taco Bell has determined that 80% of its business comes during lunch hour and 70% of that was coming from the drive-thru. That means that 56% of its daily business is often being conducted through one window over a 90 minute period. A 2009 survey showed that Taco Bell averaged 164 seconds per vehicle with 93 percent accuracy. Wendy's was faster at 134 seconds, but not as accurate.
McDonald's pioneered the side-by-side ordering with two order stations in 2005. The concept has been limited by the cost and complexity of retrofitting existing locations. The next push appears to be allowing customers to order via the web, which could be used in more crowded retail spaces.
Unfortunately, many would say, Fast Food is a growth industry. Hiring by McDonalds, Taco Bell and others represent, for the most part, low-skill, low-wage jobs. Thus, comes the prospect of a "barbell" shape in job opportunities.High end jobs on one end, and low end jobs, including those at fast food joints, at the other end, but not a lot of jobs in between.
For more information, see www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/11_20/b4228064581642.htm |
|
Housing: Building Equity by Renting |

For many in the U.S., the concept of building equity by renting may seem almost "Un-American." Most of us were told, "Renting is tantamount to flushing money down the toilet."Owning single-family houses represents a long-established tradition in the U.S. and many other English speaking countries. Now, the paradigm may be shifting.
From World War II until 2006, owning a house was a great way to build equity.Houses appreciated 3-5% per year on average. We homeowners with a mortgage not only got a tax deduction for the interest paid, but also appreciation on the entire value of the house, not just our down payment. Starting in 1997, most of the capital gains earned on the house were tax-free. Renting was seemingly only for those who didn't have enough cash to make a down payment to get in the "no-lose" game.It was, until mid-2006.
Since that time, house values nationally have declined for 57 consecutive months. In the last twelve months alone, homes in Detroit have declined in value by 17%, in Chicago by 14%, in Seattle by 12% and nationally by 8%.The Wall Street Journal reported on May 9th that home sales collapsed last year when the tax credit program expired and prices in many markets have been falling since.Stan Humphries, of Zillow's real-estate website, expects prices to fall another 7-9% in the next year. Yale University economist Robert Shiller (of the Case-Shiller Home Index) recently said that, "While it is unlikely, a 30-year decline in home prices (adjusted for inflation) is certainly a possibility." Ugh!
Before 2006, American home builders regularly built as many as 2 million new houses annually. Last year is was about 400,000. Unsure of the economy, many first-time homebuyers are waiting on the sidelines. Four out of ten sales of existing homes are foreclosures. In addition, household formation is currently lower than any time since 1947, with people putting off getting married and starting a family.
The resultant increase in demand for renting has reinvigorated the apartment market. As rising gas prices increase the cost of commuting, there is evidence that urban townhouses are becoming more popular. Higher energy costs also affect heating and air conditioning, which may have the effect of discouraging homebuyers from purchasing large houses with lots of generally unused square footage. The result is that there probably will be less demand for McMansions in the future. And, those owning them today who are looking to downsize, are going to have a smaller group of potential buyers.
Renting has a number of key advantages. The monthly costs can be significantly less than owning. Renters pay one fixed monthly payment-no surprises. Homeowners pay the mortgage, real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance, repairs and renovations. Furthermore, for many homeowners, their home is their only major investment other than their retirement plan(s). When home prices decline or stagnate, homeowners make a zero or a negative return on their home equity. Renters can build equity outside the house by renting. They do this by investing the money they would have tied up in housing into a diversified portfolio of assets that have a better chance of appreciation than residential housing. Renters don't pay closing costs and they don't pay large commissions on sale. Renting is a great way to get familiar with a new area before making a permanent commitment. Lastly, renting is more flexible, with predetermined dates within a lease that allow renters to stay or move out at the renter's discretion (as compared to homeowners that are stuck in a house until the market "recovers" and then can get it sold.)
In addition, if the current US budgetary process results in the elimination of the home mortgage deduction, a key advantage to owning will be gone. This would undoubtedly produce another significant decline in housing values as well.
Certainly, choosing a location and a specific home to own or rent is much more complicated than mere dollars and cents. Homeowners typically take great pride in ownership itself. They buy a house with the intention to live in the house for many years and want to maintain 100% control over what they do to and within the house. Their house is their castle and rental would be out of the question. For many, the personal benefits of ownerships far outweigh the potentially higher monthly costs of ownership versus renting.
As we often say, everyone has unique goals and circumstances. We do believe that in today's housing market, that for some individuals, renting may build more equity than home ownership. It's something to consider these days.
For more information,
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704810504576309532810406782.html |
|
Technology: Internet Companies are Booming |
Last week, Steve Ballmer of Microsoft announced the $8.5 billion purchase of Skype, an internet calling and video service. Microsoft paid a big price; 400 times the company's 2010 operating profit.
Mr. Ballmer sees lots of synergies with the two companies. Skype can leverage its new parent's various platforms, including the Windows 7 mobile operating system and the Xbox gaming platform to create new services for the 170 million customers who use it regularly. And Skype can take advantage of Microsoft's presence in world computing and video chatting and conferencing to increase its business in these areas as well. Naysayers suggest that Skype customers are accustomed to getting their service for free and may be reluctant to pay for new products that Skype rolls out.
Regardless, internet companies are booming. The day before Microsoft announced its deal for Skype, Linked In, a social network for professionals with revenue of $243 million last year, set the terms of its IPO, which would value the company at $3.3 billion. Other firms, like Groupon and Twitter may be going public soon.
The Economist points out that the internet world is being transformed by three powerful forces. First, technological progress has made it much simpler and cheaper to try out new ideas on line. Second, a new breed of rich investors is there to support these efforts. And, third, this boom is more global than the 90s, with Chinese firms causing as much excitement as American ones.
Here are a few details. Apple's App Store, only three years old, offers more than 300,000 apps, of which 20 million are installed each day. Angel investors pumped in over $20 billion last year in young internet firms. Hedge funds, private-equity firms, mutual funds and secondary markets in America have all joined in the financing. China's internet users will rise from 457 million last year to more than 700 million in 2015. China's e-commerce market will quadruple by 2015, from $71 billion to $305 billion.
Some question whether another bubble is in the making. Venture capitalists argue that 2011 is more like 1995 than 1999; many of the current internet companies have proven business models, healthy revenues and real profits.Even so, some of the current valuations of start-ups have come into question.And, in some countries, like China, the internet firms face potential regulatory and political issues from the government which may use their state censorship to stop or curtail the internet activities.
Let's watch this one. We may be experiencing another digital gold rush. Microsoft's purchase of Skype is just one early example.
For more information, http://www.economist.com/node/18680040/print |
|
|
We appreciate your feedback!
Let us know what you think...
|
|
|
|
|
|