February 8, 2011Issue 45

Journey with DWM to
What's Next

 

 Some economists say "up" and some say "down". The truth is, no one knows the future. But affluent, enlightened investors recognize that DWM strategies perform in up markets and protect in down markets. Regardless of what the future holds, with DWM, savvy investors are ready for what's next.

Financial Crisis: What Caused the Bubble? Take Your Pick

   blindmen

One of the stranger aspects of human nature is the tendency to see the entire world through a distorted lens. We all remember the six blind men feeling different parts of an elephant and coming to significantly different conclusions.

The origins of the financial crisis are no different. 

The long-awaited Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission report finally was published on January 27th. Unfortunately, instead of solving the mystery and making recommendations for the future, the report became three competing narratives.

The main report, endorsed by the six Democrats, puts most of the blame on the financial industry. This included greed and sloppy risk management at the banks, predatory actions by mortgage bankers, the "enabling" by the rating companies and the explosive growth of securitization and credit-default swaps. The dissenting report written by three Republicans said the blame goes much wider: politicians, regulators, bankers and homebuyers alike grew too relaxed about leverage, helping to create a perfect storm. This version places less of the blame on Wall Street. A firmer rebuttal by the fourth Republican, Peter Wallison, puts the blame squarely on the government policies aimed at increasing home ownership among the poor.

 

The majority report finds fault with two Federal Reserve chairmen, Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke. It criticizes Mr. Greenspan for advocating deregulation and negligence for not "stemming the flow of toxic mortgages." The report details how the Fed "fiddled" while the financial system smoldered and then burned. It also criticizes the Bush administration's "inconsistent response" to the crisis.

 

Ultimately the report said the crisis was an avoidable disaster.However, it was more a description of how the crisis unfolded rather than an explanation of why it erupted or recommendations on how to avoid it in the future. Today, too-big-to-fail institutions are larger than they were two years ago. Without changes, we are almost certain to go through another episode like 2008 in the not-too-distant future.

 

It may be instructive to look "across the pond" at the UK and see their response, captured in the "The Future of Banking Commission." This report provides specific recommendations to the banking industry and the government that regulates it.

 

This report is straightforward, compelling and radical. The report did not seek to add to the pile of literature analyzing the causes of the financial crisis. Rather, its premise is that the financial crisis was just the latest in a long line of crises, including the dot-com boom and bust in the early 2000s. The Commissioners unanimously concluded that the crises are the manifestations of deep-seated failings in the banking system.

 

The Report makes 39 recommendations covering the structure, regulation and culture of the banking industry.The structural recommendations include support for living wills detailing how the collapse of a bank would be managed, how customers would be treated, and the separation of investment advice from the execution of trading. Their separation would go beyond Glass-Steagall or the Volcker Rule.

 

The Commission argues that banks' boards and not regulators should take primary responsibility for the management and stability of their banks. Regulation should be used to increase competition among banks. To improve the culture, the Commissions recommend that there should be a ban on sales commissions for frontline staff and all bankers should be subject to a code of good practice, similar to the codes which apply for the medical and other professions.

 

The Commissioners believe that their proposals could reform the banking industry to become safer and serve its customers properly and efficiently.

 

It would be great if some or all of their recommendations are acted upon not only in the UK but here in America as well. Fingers crossed.

 

For more information, http://www.commission.bnbb.org and

http://www.fcic.gov

In This Issue
Financial Crisis: What Caused the Bubble? Take Your Pick
Jack LaLanne: Founder of the Modern Physical Fitness Movement
Business: Turning the Corner
Ask DWM: What is the Optimium Allocation for Stocks?
Quick Links
Detterbeck Wealth Management
 
www.dwmgmt.com
 
220 N. Smith Street
Suite 410
Palatine, IL 60067
847.359.6262
 
193 King Street
Suite 2A
Charleston, SC 29401 
843.577.2463 
Join Our Mailing List!
 
Click here to be added to our mailing list! 
 
Please be assured that your e-mail address will only be used for the delivery of your newsletter.
 
Thanks 
Jack LaLanne: Founder of the Modern Physical Fitness Movement

 JACK LALANNE  

Jack LaLanne once said, "People don't die of old age, they die of neglect." He was the perfect example of the truth of his own statement.

Mr. LaLanne died two weeks ago at his home in Morro Bay, California. He was 96. 

 

He started working out with weights when they were an oddity. In 1936 he opened the prototype for the fitness spas to come- a gym, juice bar and health food store. Critics thought working out would give people heart attacks and they would lose their sex drive.But Jack persisted.

 

Mr. LaLanne went on television in 1951 with props often limited to a broomsticks, a chair and a rubber cord.He built his audience by first drawing in children who saw his white German Shepherd, Happy. His show continued until the mid-1980s.

 

Expanding on his television popularity, he opened dozens of fitness studios, invented early exercise machines, marketed a Power Juicer and Glamour Stretcher Cord and sold exercise videos and fitness books. 

 

He practiced what he preached. At age 70, he swam a mile and a half through Long Beach Harbor, handcuffed, shackled and towing 70 boats carrying a total of 70 people. He ate two meals a day and shunned snacks. Mr. LaLanne said he performed his exercises until he experienced "muscle fatigue," lifting weights until it was impossible for him to continue. Even into his 90s, he completed at least two hours of workouts followed by a swim each day.

 

Frank Bruni of the New York Times last week postulated that Mr. LaLanne's legacy is more than just health clubs. Mr. Bruni believes that Mr. LaLanne created the notion that "fitness equals character," and that self-actualization begins with the discipline to get and stay in shape.

 

Mark Grief, a founding editor of the literary journal n+1 and author of a widely discussed 2004 essay, "Against Exercise" says, "There seems to be a whole substitute morality, where your obligation is to go to the gym and not ask why." Health Clubs like Equinox reflect this message in their slogans: "It's not fitness. It's life." and "My body. My biography."

 

Mr. LaLanne agreed. In his own way, he was a moralist, proselytizing about diet and exercise. He once compared himself to Billy Graham. He said Mr. Graham was "for the hereafter"; he was "for the here and now." He called his mission a crusade, saying "To me-this one thing-physical culture and nutrition-is the salvation of America." 

 

For more information, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/weekinreview/30bruni.html

Business: Turning the Corner

  us corporate guy

Recovery seems on its way.According to preliminary estimates of fourth quarter output, the economy expanded at a 3.2% annualized pace, up from 2.6% in the third quarter. In addition, as demand grew late in 2010, consumers purchased more than the economy produced. Hence, sales surged ahead at a 7.1% annual rate in the last three months of the year; the best quarterly performance since 1984.

We need to be cautious. However, there are some other positive signs as well.America's trade deficit shrank for the third consecutive month in November. A continuing weakening dollar has supported export growth.

 

The stock market has been on a roll. And, the current profit-reporting season is shaping up to be one of the best ever. According to the Economist, for non-financial firms in the S&P 500, earnings per share are now higher than they have been for a least a decade.The Dow Jones averages were helped by Alcoa generating more than $1 billion of cash from its operations in the fourth quarter and Exxon Mobil reporting a 53% increase in fourth-quarter profits.

 

Citigroup's Carsten Stendevad says that "around 90% of the productivity growth in America has come from cost-cutting, and that is now reaching its limit." Others disagree.Hal Sirkin of BCG suggests that 75-90% of companies still have not introduced "lean systems" to cut costs even further.

 

And, sales are increasing, particularly in emerging markets.So, American firms will continue to expand overseas. With reduced cost structures, corporate America is well placed to turn higher sales directly into higher profits.

 

Early signs for 2011 are very good.However, it is too soon to declare victory. Financial shocks may yet rattle the world in 2011. Rising commodity prices could pose a big threat. And, the weakness in labor markets continues.

 

Even so, corporate America is looking pretty good.

 

For more information, http://www.economist.com/node/18073369/print

Ask DWM? What is the Optimum Allocation for Stocks?

Equities have been on a roll. For most investors, the question lately has been not whether or not to be in stocks, but what portion of their total portfolio should be in equities. 

There's a second question they should be asking: "What should the allocation be within equities?"

It can make a big difference. Take a look:

smaller equity

Just so we are all clear, let's look at some definitions:

Capitalization: Market capitalization represents the aggregate value of a company stock. If a company has 500 million shares outstanding and their current market price is $10 per share, their market "cap" is $5 billion. For U.S. Stocks we have large caps ($9.6 billion and above), mid caps ($2 to $9.6 billion) and small caps (less than $2 billion).

Growth Investing and Value Investing: Often presented as two competing styles of investing. Value investing emphasizes buying shares below their intrinsic value. Growth investing emphasizes buying shares in companies with high growth rates.

International: Includes investments, either directly or through funds or ETFs in foreign stocks or American Depository Receipts. International is typically divided into two categories: Developed countries- such as Western Europe and Japan, and emerging countries- such as China, India, Brazil and dozens of other developing countries.

Understanding the One Year and Five Year Results:

1.       Mid and small cap stocks have outpaced large caps. By their very nature, mid and particularly small cap stocks are riskier than large caps. Large caps stocks historically do best when the economy is expanding broadly and inflation is low.

2.       Growth stocks have outperformed value stocks. Value investors buy stocks that are trading at relatively low valuations and slow growth. Growth stocks are just the opposite. Value investors have not been rewarded as much as growth investors in the U.S. during these uncertain times.

3.       International developed stocks (for example, stocks of Western Europe and Japan) have fared somewhat similarly to US large caps. 

4.       International emerging market stocks, while more risky, have outpaced international developed returns in the current year and, in the last five years, have outpaced all other indices.

 Some Questions to Consider in Allocating within Equities:

1.       What is your risk tolerance? Small caps and emerging market investments are typically the riskiest equity investment styles.

 

2.       Should your investments be in growth, value or a blend?

 

3.       How much should be in international? About 50% of the global market capitalization is in U.S. Companies. The corollary to that is that 50% is not. Approximately 30% of the revenues of the S&P 500 companies are generated outside the U.S. Hence, domestic stocks exclude three-fourths of the global economy.

 

Many investors have "home bias", a tendency to overweight in domestic stocks.They should diversify their equities by investing in international stocks. Other countries-with potentially unique products and customer sets- may weather market upturns and downturns differently than the U.S.

 

4.       How much should be in emerging markets? Emerging markets (think China and India) tend to have higher growth than developed markets. Emerging countries make up 85% of the world's population and 46% of the world's economic output. They're growing faster than developed countries, perhaps 2 to 3 times faster in the next few decades according to IMF. In addition, emerging markets tend to have less-efficient markets, which can lead to higher returns.

Emerging countries typically have young working-age populations, export strength, low levels of debt and growing household income, health resources, natural resources along with prudent fiscal policies. Contrast these characteristics with those of the developed countries!

5.       What are some of the risks in international investing? First, there is political and regulatory risk. Second, there may be difficulty obtaining timely and accurate information. Also, there is currency risk. Finally, trading can be less liquid and access to funds may be restricted or delayed.

Conclusion:

Optimizing the allocation within equities by using the various styles can make a real difference. Results for last year and the last five years demonstrate this. If you would like to discuss your allocation in greater detail, please give us a call.

We appreciate your feedback! 
 
Let us know what you think... 
 
Send feedback and suggestions to: amy@dwmfnclgroup.com