September 8, 2010Issue 38
 
Journey with DWM to
What's Next

 

 Some economists say "up" and some say "down". The truth is, no one knows the future. But affluent, enlightened investors recognize that DWM strategies perform in up markets and protect in down markets. Regardless of what the future holds, with DWM, savvy investors are ready for what's next.

Business: Many Roadside Parks Are Going Extinct
mammoth
The Prehistoric Forest was originally built in 1963. It featured 8 acres of plaster-cast dinosaurs, woolly mammoths, dodo birds and saber-toothed tigers. It is expected to close on Sunday, after one last Labor Day rush.

Mom-and-Pop roadside attractions, like the Prehistoric Forest, are struggling for their meager share of the tourist dollar. They suffer from a weak economy, changes in travel habits, and kids unlikely to be wowed by stationary dinos after watching Avatar in 3-D or spending hours at home with their Wii games.

Brian Butko, a Pittsburgh historian on roadside parks, says their golden age was the 50s and 60s. As a result, many are for sale today, including:
 
  • Prairie Dog Town in Kansas for $450,000. Sales price includes 400 prairie dogs and 37 billboards advertising the attraction. Sellers will also throw in a live six-legged cow to the lucky buyer.
 
  • Deer Forest in Michigan is for sale. You not only get Rudolph, Dasher and his friends. You also get the llamas and pot-bellied pigs.
 
Doug Kirby, publisher of roadsideamerica.com, has confirmed that some of the classic tourist stops have disappeared. Snake farms are in a rut and mermaid springs are evaporating. However, Mr. Kirby's website still lists over 9,000 attractions, including the Pencil Sharpener Museum in Ohio and the Cockroach Hall of Fame in Plano, Texas.

Len and Denise Tieman, the current owners of Prehistoric Forest bought the business in 1995 and feel that they have had a good run. But business has been tough. Two years ago, a falling tree decapitated the woolly mammoth; it's still wrapped in a tarp, awaiting repairs. The still-standing dinosaurs have lost all or most of their paint. Even so, youngsters who visited recently thought it was "pretty cool" or even "awesome".

After the doors close this month, the owners intend to leave the forest as is for at least a year. They insist that their Prehistoric Forest will not become a condo development.
 
For more information, click here.
In This Issue
Business: Many Roadside Parks are Going Extinct
Housing: Let the Housing Market Fall?
Jobs: Slow Recovery Prompts New Proposals
Interest Rates: 60-Year Cycle
Quick Links
Detterbeck Wealth Management
 
www.dwmgmt.com
 
220 N. Smith Street
Suite 410
Palatine, IL 60067
847.359.6262
 
193 King Street
Suite 2A
Charleston, SC 29401 
843.577.2463 
Join Our Mailing List!
 
Click here to be added to our mailing list! 
 
Please be assured that your e-mail address will only be used for the delivery of your newsletter.
 
Thanks 
Housing: Let the Housing Market Fall?
real estate
The above graph from the Irving Housing Blog provides, we think, a fascinating overview of the emotional roller coaster known as the housing market.
 
Housing data has been on a real bad run, particularly since June 30th.  New and Existing Home Sales, Defaults and Foreclosures, even the Case Shiller report have been horrific.
 
And, these results are after 18 months of all sorts of government programs to prop it up. These have included tax credits, mortgage modification programs, low interest rates, government-backed loans and others. The stated goal was to stabilize the market until a resurgent economy created new households that needed places to live.

 
Now that July housing sales have shrunk 29% from July 2009, some economists and analysts suggest that there is a growing sense of exhaustion with government intervention. As a result, they are urging a dose of shock therapy: Let the housing market crash. Their logic is that when prices finally reach bottom, buyers will pour in, creating the elusive stability that the government has spent billions upon billions trying to achieve.
 
While this strategy might help future homeowners, it would undoubtedly hurt current owners. They have already seen, on average, a 30% reduction in their home value and this could mean another 10-20%, which will further reduce their willingness to participate in the consumer spending the economy needs.

 
Furthermore, an unchecked drop of 10 percent or more might prove very discouraging to millions of owners just hanging on. If they decide to stop struggling to make the mortgage payments that is a further complication for the government, which is on the hook for many of these mortgages.
 
Is it any wonder that the NY Times reported on Sunday that Howard Glaser, a former Clinton administration housing official with close ties to policy makers in the current administration, says, "They are deeply worried and don't really know what to do." 
 
While we all would selfishly like prices to start to rise, it may be more realistic to hope that prices reach appropriate levels on a "soft landing". That might mean some further decline from current levels, but it would prevent current homeowners from having to go through the "despair" portion of the graph above.
 
For more information:
  click here.
Jobs: Slow Recovery Prompts New Proposals
 

jobs

The Labor Department announced on Friday that in August the U.S. Economy lost jobs for the third straight month in a row. However, private-sector jobs were up in August- providing hope that the economy might not be tumbling back into recession.
 
The unemployment rate is 9.6%. The recovery seems to be continuing, though at a much slower rate than the three previous recessions in the early 80's, 90's, and 00's.
 
President Barack Obama said the report was "not nearly good enough". Then, on Monday in Milwaukee, the President called for Congress to approve a $50 billion transportation spending bill to jumpstart the economy. And, today, in Cleveland, the President will outline his program to provide an estimated $200 billion in tax incentives for businesses to invest in plant and equipment in 2010 and 2011.
 
This Labor Day, 15 million Americans are out of work. At the Milwaukee rally, Mr. Obama said the transportation package would be the first payment in an effort to fix 150,000 miles of roads, lay or rebuild 4,000 miles of railroad track and refurbish some 150 miles of airport runways. The hope is that these long-term benefits would also produce short-term jobs. However, Mr. Obama declined to estimate how many jobs might be created.
 
Today in Cleveland, the President is expected to propose that companies be allowed to write-off 100% of their new investment in plant and equipment through 2011. He is also expected to  propose an expansion of the research and experimentation tax credit for businesses. This could cut business taxes by nearly $200 billion over two years and might increase investment in business equipment by 5% to 10%. Officials
say that all but $30 billion of the cost to the Treasury should be recovered over the next decade because businesses won't deduct the cost of the equipment over time, as they do now.
 
We know from history that it is the big infrastructure projects that leave behind usable assets that provide the biggest bang for the taxpayer's buck. Even so, It is difficult to assess whether Congress is ready to approve more stimulus money for the infrastructure projects. In addition, business lobbyists have already appeared lukewarm to the tax breaks. First, a spokesman for the U.S. Chamber of Congress said that businesses are not going to invest in new plants and equipment if managers see increased consumer demand. Furthermore, other business groups see a higher priority in extending the Bush income-tax rates for higher earners (over $250,000) that are set to expire at the end of 2010.
 
The Economist suggests that the answer to unemployment is not simply more stimulus or not. They point out that the scale of the housing and financial bust in the US over the last two years has almost certainly caused our labor market to become less efficient- it isn't matching the supply of jobseekers with the demand for workers. This inefficiency would cause our "structural" or "natural" rate of unemployment to rise. The IMF now estimates that the natural US unemployment rate may have risen from 5% to 6-6.75%. Hence, while the debate over stimulus is important, they suggest we need a
comprehensive strategy to combat joblessness. This might include job training and more targeted policies to help the millions stuck in the wrong places with the wrong skills. Interesting.
 
For more information, click here.
Interest Rates: 60-Year Cycle
The following chart from McClellan Financial Publications is quite compelling, to say the least:

60 year graph

Many of us remember 1980. Home mortgage rates were in the double-digits and prime lending rates were near 20%. Now, 30 years later, we are completely on the other side of interest rates; mortgage rates are in the 3-4% range and 10 year treasuries are less than 3%. What's amazing is that there does appear to be almost a 300 year history of interest rates increasing for 30 years and then falling for thirty years.
 
This information is particularly important right now as our economy has brought us to the point where we are concerned about both inflation and deflation. Ugh. Let's review quickly the problems with each.
 
Deflation is the general decline in prices. While that might sound good initially, the real concern is a deflationary spiral. A simple example might be: prices fall, companies make less profit, they lay off workers, jobless workers don't spend money and eventually, the economy grinds to a halt. The scenario is further complicated by the baby boomer generation who need to increase their savings for retirement. Deflation is happening right now; the Consumer Price Index is actually slightly negative over the last two years. If unemployment continues at high levels and the housing market doesn't come back, it is very possible that deflation may continue and even increase. 
 
Inflation, on the other hand, is the measure of the purchasing power of a dollar. If your investment portfolio earns 6% and inflation is 3%, your "real" return is 3%. If your portfolio earns 6% and inflation is 1%, then your real return is 5%. A growing economy typically produces inflation; a stagnating economy typically produces deflation.
 
Government deficits and debt also impact inflation. U.S. Government bonds are the ultimate safe haven. When there are economic troubles here or abroad, investors scramble to purchase government bonds. However, because of the increase in federal deficits, expected to be $1.47 trillion this fiscal year, and increasing debt, the U.S. government has to keep borrowing more money. Once the economy starts to pick up investors will more than likely turn to other investments, which will drive up the interest rate on U.S. government bonds and other interest-bearing instruments. Higher interest rates will increase the cost of government borrowing and could lead to even larger deficits and the need for increased borrowing, further increasing interest rates and leading perhaps to a potential inflationary spiral.
 
No one can predict the future. However, it seems probable that continued deflation is more likely now than a spike in inflation. On the other hand, there will be a time that inflation will start heating up again, perhaps in the next two to five years. Accordingly, investment portfolios must be designed with the flexibility to perform in both deflationary and inflationary periods. In addition, they must be monitored and revised on a regular basis to take advantages of changing market conditions. Here at DWM, we focus on meeting those important criteria. 
 
If you would like to discuss how your portfolio can perform, in both low-interest rate and high-interest rate conditions, please give us a call.
We appreciate your feedback! 
 
Let us know what you think... 
 
Send feedback and suggestions to: amy@dwmfnclgroup.com