San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group, Clinic and Training Center Newsletter
Issue #10
March 20 2007
In This Issue  

Join our list  
Join our mailing list!

Hello members/readers. I spoke with many of you at the beginning of the March Workshop about writing your impressions of your experiences for our monthly newsletter. I hope that you will follow through. Others will benefit from hearing about how the Workshop went, what went well, what didn't, how you were helped in clinical practice and/or in thinking about Control Mastery Theory.

PRESIDENT'S CORNER
 
From Jessica Broitman

Every year I think and say that March is my favorite month and it is due of course to the March Workshop! Well, this year was no exception. I love watching the excitement our theory generates in the participants as Control Mastery theory allows for such a positive therapeutic interaction. I especially enjoyed the lively debates as participants pushed ideas to the limits Read On


MARCH WORKSHOP THANKS
 
From Rob Petitpas

Another successful March Workshop has come and gone. Attendance was up from last year - we had 25 people for the full week and another 30 +/- who dropped in for various classes. Read On


MOVIE NIGHT AT THE MARCH WORKSHOP
 
From Patsy Wood

This year's movie night featured the film, "Sins of the Father," a true story that took place in the South during the civil rights movement during the sixties. The film generate a lively discussion about how the attitudes and behaviors of the chief protagonist in the film might be understood in terms of Control Mastery theory and the changing historical times. Read On


FOR YOUR INFORMATION
 

Each month this section features new and ongoing information of interest to specific and general member/readers. If you would like to add a notice email kathiedunnmft@comcast.net with proofed and fact-checked information. Almost anything is welcome. Read On


Cont'd: President's Corner
 

The education committee did a nice job of offering new and interesting classes. Unfortunately, that did mean that some of our older offerings weren’t able to be included.

I know the Education Committee will be sorting through the evaluations to see what courses were most successful and which to add back. If you weren’t able to teach this year please know that we hope to return you to the schedule next year!

We had a wonderful turn out of interested clinicians from all over the world. It was great to have return visits from Bill Temby and Elayne Lansford, Has Peter and Dag. They joined the teaching staff this year and that was such a welcomed addition.

We also have grown our third generation of Norwegians participants. This is a first for us. Those we have taught are now teaching and boy are they doing a great job.

I had the pleasure of hearing Per present a case and it was pure poetry! Next year we will welcome his student Jan Martin as an intern in the clinic! The work is spreading. We could never do it without your help and support and I thank you.

March is also the month in which we are in the process of selecting new interns for next year. If you know of some one applying please let us know as we will welcome your suggestions. Most of our current interns have asked to stay on so we will have only a few slots for new interns.

There are so many wonderful students who want to study with us, I dream of a time when we can accommodate more!


Cont'd: Thank You
 

As usual, Michael Bader’s class was overflowing. Although space was tight in several sessions, the convivial attitude of those attending made for a hospitable atmosphere in which to learn.

Our European friends (Norway and France) numbered 10. We had folks from Oregon, Florida and New England.

A big thank you to all of our March Workshop teachers and supervisors:

Paul Abrinko, Michael Bader, Susan Badger, Marcia Black, Hans Peter Broch, Jessica Broitman, Marshall Bush, Melanie Clark, John Curtis, Kathy DePaola, Bill Dickman, Jane Dulay, Steve Foreman, Suzanne Gassner, Michael Graves, Harriette Grooh, Alyssa Hirshfeld, Karen Hubble, Zohar Itzhar-Nabarro, Merrie Jaffe, Elayne Lansford, Michael Lowenstein, Jack Maslow, Bill Meehan, Tom Moon, Dag Oulie, Paul Ransohoff, Alan Rappoport, Ginger Rhodes, Hal Sampson, Jan Schreiber, Peter Schumacher, George Silberschatz, Norman Sohn, Stan Steinberg, Bill Temby, Estelle Weiss, Patsy Wood, Denny Zeitlin.

Thanks also to Michael Lowenstein, Michelle Skeen, Harriette Grooh and Bill Meehan for use of their offices for classes during the week.

A special thank you to Leanne Vu at First Republic Bank, for allowing us free use of their conference room – they truly are a customer service oriented bank, like no other.


Cont': Control Master at the Movies
 

Over the course of the film, the 42 year old central character, Tom Cherry, tries to come to terms with the ghosts of his past. These ghosts include the deaths of four young African American girls who were murdered in the bombing of the Birmingham, Alabama church in 1963 as they attended Sunday school.

Tom’s father, Bobby Frank Cherry, then a member of the Ku Klux Klan and a munitions expert when in the Marines, was a prime suspect in the bombings. Tom, then 11 years old, was his father’s chief alibi.

As the film begins Tom returns to his father’s home because he “had nowhere else to go.” His wife has divorced him and he is estranged from his only daughter. On the radio he hears that the FBI has reopened the investigation of his father; Tom naively thinks he can be there to support his father.

But living with his father has unexpected consequences. Tom starts to suffer from painful memories of his childhood past. He remembers witnessing his father’s brutal beating of a black teenager. He has flashbacks of his father’s ferocious attacks on his mother, beating her until she was nearly senseless even when she was dying of cancer.

Tom became a victim of his father’s violence as he got older and tried to intercede to protect his mother. He also has flashback memories of watching the civil rights marches in Birmingham as the police spray innocent marchers with high pressure hoses and randomly beat marchers as they arrested them.

Finally, Tom is embittered when he recalls that his father, upon his mother’s death when Tom was 15, left him and his six younger brothers and sisters in foster care rather than taking care of his family himself. Yet, in spite of his father’s history of incredible brutality, abuse, racism and neglect, Tom still longs for his father’s love and admiration.

Tom hopes to earn this by building his father a new home. To help him in this project, he hires a local carpenter, Garrick, an African American who becomes a good friend. Garrick, around the same age as Tom, is single and has also suffered a series of failed relationships with women.

As Tom experiences the support and kindness of Garrick, it stands in sharp contrast to his father’s selfish indifference towards him. In the meantime, the same FBI agent, Dalton Strong, who dogged Tom during the sixties to get him to tell the truth about his father, is following him again and urging him to testify against his father. This agent did not give up through three failed investigations to bring the men who were involved in the bombing to justice.

It was finally the release of Spike Lee’s film, “Four Little Girls” in the mid-nineties that provided sufficient momentum for the FBI to reopen the case that ended in convictions after 37 years. At first Tom insists he has nothing new to add but as he remembers more about that 1963 time period, he realizes that he wasn’t with his father the night before the bombings.

Tom is also haunted by his mother’s dying words as she admonishes him to not turn out like his dad. He remembers her telling him that his father is a bad man,” the very worst kind of man”, and that the only time he loves Tom is when he is “whipping on someone.” Finally, when his younger brother is killed in a prison fight a few months after Tom comes to stay with his father, Tom is enraged as his father shows no emotion or sense of sadness at this brother’s death.

Ironically it is the FBI agent Dalton who offers his condolences to Tom over the loss of his brother. It is at this point that Tom goes to Birmingham to look up the FBI evidence against his father. In this process Tom realizes how much his father has lied about the extent of his involvement in acts of violence against blacks.

At the same time, Garrick learns of the investigation against Tom’s father and confronts Tom about his role in providing an alibi for his father in the bombing and murders.

Tom finally realizes that he has to testify against his father as he cannot deny the truth any longer. It is his testimony that provides the necessary evidence for his father to finally get indicted in 2000 and convicted in 2002.

The film itself is based on a screenplay that was written from extensive interviews that Tom did with a reporter, Pamela Coloff of the Texas Monthly in 1998. Some aspects of Tom’s story that were not mentioned in the film included the fact that Tom’s only daughter was molested at 12 by her grandfather who was subsequently convicted of the molest. Tom steadfastly stood by his daughter as she brought charges against her grandfather.

When in 1998 Tom and his daughter were subpoenaed by the grand jury to testify in the case of the 1963 bombing, all of his brothers and sisters urged him to refuse to testify against the father and to go to jail for contempt of court. But, Tom and his daughter testified despite thow urgings. In the discussion that followed the film we felt that Tom Cherry’s struggle could be viewed through a Control Mastery lens in a number of ways. First, Tom had an unconscious plan to not grow up like his father. He was both horrified by his father’s violence and cruelty and wanted to honor his mother’s vision of him. He strived to work hard to “do the right thing,” and to be a person with integrity.

He tried to be someone who was kind, not sexist and racist, and one who stood up to take care of his family and loved ones. These longings created enormous stress in Tom as they came in direct conflict with the kind of person his father was. To be close to his father, Tom had to live with a paranoid fear and mistrust of others, to be callous toward others, to be a racist and sexist bully and to be mean spirited.

While therapy was not part of Tom's experience, we felt there were a number of factors that helped him to come to terms with his father’s brutality.

One was the lingering impact of his mother’s dying words to him even though she herself could never protect her son and other children from their father.

Another influence was the generosity and kindness that was offered to him in his friendship with Garrick. We talked about how the power of the civil rights movement in the second half of the 20th century changed how Tom viewed his father and the world he grew up in. The movement embodied fearlessness in the face of terror and it was this that generated hope and momentum for change in terms of race relations in this country.

This freed Tom and Garrick to open up to one another and become friends. We also speculated that the incredible perseverance of the FBI agent, Dalton Strong who refused to give up his efforts to find and convict those responsible for the murders of the four young girls had a positive impact on Tom.

Finally, we suspected that the process of Tom sharing his story with the reporter and then with the television viewing audience in the movie was very important in helping him come to terms with his past and his relationship with his father. This was the case in spite of the fact that in deciding to testify against his father, Tom had to be very different from his siblings who viewed him as a traitor for testifying.

As an aside, we wondered if the film might not have disconfirmed some pathogenic beliefs of family members at large as they saw their story on the screen unfold through Tom’s eyes.

On the eve of the indictment of his father, Tom Cherry was interviewed on NPR by Scott Simon. In his last question to Tom, Scott Simon asked if he still loved his father. Choking back tears Tom replied that he used to worship his father when growing up but now, while he still loved him, he was also hopeful that the families of the four young girls who were murdered that day in 1963 could finally have the ghosts of their daughters put to rest.


Cont'd: FYI
 

--WOMEN'S THERAPY CENTER PRESENTS:

Democracy on the Couch: the Intersection of Politics & Psychology from a Control-Mastery Perspective

Sign In at 9:30 am

$75; members $65; students $30 (plus $7 for mcep credits)

3 CEUs

Psychological theories and practice can only be fully understood in their sociopolitical and cultural context, and politics and culture have important psychological dimensions.

In this workshop, participants will gain greater understanding of the intersection of politics and clinical practice, and how control mastery theory is a useful lens through which to view that intersection. Participants will have the opportunity to discuss their own case material.

For more information call the Women’s Therapy Center at 510-524-4822, ext 2 www.womenstherapy.org

email at: admin@womenstherapy.org

--THERAPY OFFICE SUBLET: North Berkeley/Albany

Lovely office available in Albany on Carmel, off Solano. A few blocks from Berkeley. Spacious and professionally furnished with private entrance. Suitable for adult individuals and couples.

Available full days Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, also Friday from 2pm on.

Looking for one renter to take at least two full days.

Contact: Lynn Watkins at 415-648-8065



Thank you all for your participation and encouragement of this email newsletter for SFPRG. As always, I encourage all of you to prepare an article for publication as it relates to your experience and knowledge of Control Mastery theory. The more the merrier!

Check out the website for information and publications.


Kathie Dunn MFT, Editor
San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group, Clinic and Training Center

Phone: 415-561-6771
Email Marketing by