Rabbi's Ramblings...... 

Shalom Congregants and Friends.....    

Saturday, December 17, 9:30 A.M.,  Mincha, Maariv 4:00 P.M

This week's commentary was written by Rabbi Daniel Nevins, Pearl Resnick Dean of The Rabbinical School and dean of the Division of Religious Leadership, JTS  

Male characters and voices dominate biblical literature, yet the near-absence of female characters is particularly striking in Parashat Va-yeishev. Here is the story of Jacob (his wives don't appear) and his 12 sons (his daughter doesn't appear) exploring the world of men-in the field, on the road, in the city, and in prison. These narratives are rough and even violent, and this tone carries over to the two stories in which women do appear: Judah's coarse treatment of Tamar and Joseph's encounter with Potiphar's unnamed wife, who physically accosts him.

The Torah sets up the story of Joseph by observing that he was "well-built and handsome" (Gen. 39:6). But it is not only on the outside that Joseph looks good. His resistance to the seductions of Mrs. Potiphar shows strength of character, as does his pious explanation that he is obliged to keep faith with both Potiphar-his master-and with God. In this story, Mrs. Potiphar lacks character (in both senses of the word); she is merely a foil to showcase the virtue of Joseph. He is no longer the spoiled boy prancing about in his fancy clothes and boasting of his dreamy destiny. Joseph has become a cool and collected man; he is now an efficient manager of other people's concerns.

If Joseph looks exceptionally good in chapter 39, this impression is magnified in contrast to the view that we have just been shown of his brother Judah in chapter 38. Judah repeatedly makes desperate decisions that result in catastrophes. It had been his idea in chapter 37 to sell Joseph into slavery; the traditional commentaries plausibly attribute to Judah the plan of dipping the tunic in the blood of a kid and presenting it to Jacob. In chapter 38, Judah "goes down" from his brothers, and the descent is figurative as well as literal. He subverts the levirate marriage of his daughter-in-law Tamar by denying her access to his youngest son, Shelah, even when the boy comes of age. In this way Judah harms not only Tamar, but also the memory of his first son, his lineage, and his reputation.

If Joseph looks good due to his sexual self-restraint with Mrs. Potiphar, Judah's hiring of a woman whom he assumes to be a prostitute looks terrible. The younger brother Joseph, alone in the world, has learned to master his urges and thus his surroundings. The older brother acts from fear, loneliness, and lust.

Additionally, Judah is faulted for the inconsistency of his actions regarding Tamar. As a widower, he feels justified employing a prostitute, but the moment he hears that his widowed daughter-in-law has "whored" and become pregnant, he condemns her to be burned to death. Ramban is puzzled by the severity of this response and finally concedes that Judah must have been following a local code that is not consistent with the Torah.

Moreover, Tamar conducts herself with extraordinary courage and sensitivity even under the most trying of circumstances. As she is being led to the stake, she manages to inform Judah of his culpability without embarrassing him. She says, "Examine these: whose seal and cord and staff are these?" (Gen. 38:25). In the Talmud (Sotah 10b), Tamar's example is cited to make the point that "it is better for a person to throw himself into a fiery furnace rather than humiliate his neighbor." The Rabbis admire Tamar's willingness to die rather than accuse Judah in public. They also notice a literary cue in Tamar's request that Judah "examine these (hakeir na)." It was with this same expression that Judah and his brothers presented Jacob with Joseph's bloody tunic. Rabbi Hama says, in the name of Rabbi Hanina, "With hakeir na [Judah] informed his father; with hakeir na he was informed [by Tamar]." In the former story, Judah uses the expression to deceive his father; in the latter story, Tamar uses the phrase to disillusion Judah. There is poetic justice at play here.

Rabbi Barukh HaLevi Epstein expands on the Talmud's attention to the literary cue hakeir na, noting (in the footsteps of Bereishit Rabba and Rashi) that both stories involved the prop of a goat (Torah Temimah to Gen. 38:25, note 30). He observes that this is an example of the rabbinic maxim middah k'neged middah (measure for measure). God's justice is demonstrated when a person is punished (or rewarded) in a way that mirrors their initial act. Rabbi Epstein observes that the two stories share an additional connection: in both cases the end result of the ugly incident is positive and even redemptive. Joseph needs to be enslaved in order for Israel to relocate to Egypt and eventually be redeemed. Tamar needs to conceive a child through Judah in order to start the line that will lead through her son Peretz down to King David. Thus two redemptive events are set into motion by shameful incidents. Does the fact that Jacob's family needed to end up in Egypt and that Tamar's descendant would become the quintessential king of Israel excuse the horrible family transgressions that set these events in action?

Let's rephrase the question: if you could accomplish a great result for your people but only by acting in a morally repulsive fashion that would be recorded and read aloud every year in every Jewish community for the rest of our history, would you do it? Probably not. Still, our final judgment of Judah must include his moral growth over the course of the parashah. To his credit, Judah admits error at the last moment and even praises the righteousness of Tamar. As Tikva Frymer-Kensky writes, "Judah applauds Tamar's action, and God rewards it" (Reading the Women of the Bible, 274). This new Judah will continue to act responsibly for the rest of Genesis, and will eventually demonstrate complete repentance in Parashat Va-yiggash when he offers himself as a slave in place of Benjamin. One possible translation of the name Judah, or Yehudah, is "the one who admits error."

Parashat Va-yeishev focuses on the maturation of two brothers, Judah and Joseph. Although women are not the primary focus of this narrative, it is hard to miss the role of Tamar as the catalyst for Judah's moral growth and for his subsequent change in behavior. She refuses to sit by passively as the men of her family act irresponsibly and destructively. Her brave actions transform Judah and, through him, the entire extended family of Israel. It is not too much to claim that Tamar's confrontation with Judah teaches him how to reconcile with Joseph. Tamar emerges from the shadowy morals of our parashah to become a principled guide, a mother, the ancestor of David, and the matriarch of the messianic line.

Community Events...   

Beth David Synagogue... Dec 24... 6:30pm

THE What's Up Band... call for info 

News from Israel...   

Recent quotations, courtesy of CIJR 

"I think that we've invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs, and who were historically part of the Arab community.... For a variety of political reasons we [the West] have sustained this war against Israel now since the 1940s, and it's tragic."--Former speaker of the US House of Representatives and leading Republican presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich, in an interview with the Jewish Channel, describing the Palestinians as an "invented" people who want to destroy Israel. Despite drawing widespread criticism, Gingrich has since stood by his comments, saying "Somebody ought to have the courage to tell the truth. These people are terrorists. It's fundamentally time for somebody to have the guts to stand up and say, 'Enough lying about the Middle East.'" (Ynet News, December 10 & 11.)

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism."--PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, in 1977, confirming that the Palestinian nationalism was concocted as a political weapon against the Jewish state. (American Thinker, December 12.)

"The military council is now weaker than the Brotherhood."--Mohamed Abul Ghar, president of the Egyptian Democratic Party, claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood, "already act[ing] as if it is in power." has become more influential than Egypt's military council. (Independent Media Review and Analysis, December 11.)

"A long time has passed since the Camp David accord was signed, and like the other agreements it needs to be reviewed."--Mahmoud Hussein, secretary-general of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, announcing his party's intent to re-evaluate the country's peace treaty with Israel. Another senior member of the Brotherhood, Kamal al-Halbawi, also emphasized that the "the issue of revising the Camp David Accord will be in the list of the [Brotherhood's] top priorities." (Haaretz, December 9 & Independent Media Review and Analysis, December 13.)

"Today I have reported that the figure exceeds 5,000."--United Nations human rights chief, Navi Pillay, announcing that the death toll in Syrian president Bashar Assad's ongoing crackdown on anti-regime protesters has surpassed 5,000 people. (Jerusalem Post, December 12.)