
|
PCEC is pleased to release a Policy Position on Detection and Treatment Guidelines
Prostate
cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men; and,
unfortunately, controversies around early detection and treatment guidelines are
on the rise. Over the
past few years, new research regarding the value of prostate cancer screening
via the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test has raised questions about the
PSA's true impact on prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment and survival. However, these studies have produced
conflicting results, leaving consumers and healthcare professionals confused
about their application. Studies that show a screening benefit: The European Randomized Study for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
showed a 20% reduction in prostate cancer mortality in men who underwent
routine screening. The Swedish Goteborg study confirmed a mortality benefit
with a 50% reduction in prostate cancer mortality in men 50-64 who received
routine prostate cancer screening. Studies that show no screening benefit: The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-led Prostate, Lung,
Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) study reported no
mortality benefit. The unclear
and inconsistent interpretation of these studies creates confusion about
prostate cancer screening. Many
men are unclear about whether they should be screened, what the risks are, if
biopsies and treatment are necessary and even the seriousness of the disease. Beyond the
survey debate, there is a lack of clearly defined treatment guidelines for men
diagnosed with prostate cancer. Currently,
men must consider and choose from a variety of treatment options including
watchful waiting, radiation, and surgery or hormone therapy. Choosing the
appropriate treatment method depends on a man's age, general health and
willingness to deal with side-effects. Unfortunately, there is very little long-term data comparing treatment
methods and identifying the best treatment practices for individuals. Tools
to Improve Early Detection and Treatment Guidelines Given the
current environment, new tools are necessary to provide clarity around how and
when detection and treatment are best used. The following mechanisms can lead to a better understanding
of the issues around early detection and treatment guidelines. Research Funding - new research is needed to explore the value of existing
diagnostic tests and treatments. Additionally, there is a strong need for new and improved diagnostic
tests and treatments. Research can
help shed light on which treatments are best for which tumor and for which
patients. However, none of this will be possible without designated funding. Screening Access & Coverage - detection of prostate cancer at
an early stage offers the best opportunity for successful treatment and, until
better tests are identified, it is important for men to have continued access
to screening methods like digital rectal exam and PSA tests. Prostate Health Quality Measures - measures are a way to find out
which healthcare services are likely to result in the desired health
outcome. Evidence-based measures,
as well as the public reporting of a health center's adherence to the measures,
can lead to a better understanding of what the most effective treatment is, as
well as an assurance that all men are receiving the right care. PCEC's
Position on Detection & Treatment Guidelines PCEC
supports initiatives and programs designed to improve early detection and
treatment that are consistent with the following principles: 1. Until
a more accurate and reliable diagnostic tool exists, the PSA test should
remain accessible to all men and they should be encouraged to know their PSA level. 2. Over-diagnosis
and over-treatment of prostate conditions should be addressed through the
development of more accurate and reliable prostate condition diagnostic
tests, as well as
greater doctor-patient communication regarding appropriate diagnostic options
and treatments to determine the right action based on the patient. 3. There
is a need for nationally-recognized quality measures that will encourage uniformity of
the diagnosis and treatment of prostate conditions. Based on
these principles, PCEC supports and encourages: 1. Financial
reimbursement and free or low-cost access to baseline PSA testing (and
subsequent testing and treatment, as appropriate for all men starting at 40
years of age and at 35 for men at high risk for the disease). · PCEC
supports coverage for annual screening for prostate cancer through Medicare and
private insurance starting at age 40 · PCEC
supports provisions regarding guaranteed coverage for patients that are
enrolled in clinical trials provided for within the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act 2. Increased
funds to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of
Defense (DoD) and that National Institutes of Health (NIH) to invest in
prostate cancer screening and treatment studies. · PCEC
supports the inclusion of prostate cancer diagnostic and treatment research and
comparative effectiveness studies by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research
Institute as provided for within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act. 3. The
development of evidence-based quality measures certified by the Agency for
Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) that will dictate appropriate prostate
health management by a primary physicians, urologists and/or oncologists as
well as patient-friendly language to be shared with patients and their families
to increase understanding of the care that they should be receiving. Conclusion PCEC is
aware of the complexities associated with the ongoing debate around prostate
cancer screening and treatment guidelines, but believes more research is
critical to improving patient care for men with prostate cancer. We also believe the landscape of
detection and treatment guidelines, as discussed above, can and will be
improved to better address the needs of patients and their caregivers. We look forward to opportunities to
support these mechanisms as they are put into practice.
|
| |
Prostate Cancer Awareness Week 2010 A Huge Success!
Prostate Cancer Awareness Week is just wrapping up and we wish to thank all of the hospitals, clinics, physician's, nurses, coordinators and countless volunteers, for all of your hard work and dedication. Thanks to all of you for making Prostate Cancer Awareness Week a tremendous success this year!!!!! It's never too early to start planning for September 18 -24, 2011 (PCAW 2011), so please contact PCEC for help planning your next Prostate Health Screening Event!
|
|
Set the Pace!
SET the PACE this fall for your health! With great success, PCEC hosted the 1st Annual SET the PACE Race for Prostate Cancer in Denver, CO. With community support we ran, walked and jogged for prostate cancer and made quite an impact on Denver. Join us as we continue our efforts and raise awareness and education across the nation at the fall PACE Race's: To register visit: http://www.pacerace.org |
|
|
SET the PACE 2010 Dates
PACE Race for Prostate Cancer Kirkland, WA October 10th The F.A.S.T PACE Race Cumming GA October 23rd PACE Race Kirkland, WA October 10th Run For All Ages Boston, MA November 6th US Half Marathon San Francisco, CA November 7th Founders' Day Orlando, FL November 14th
|
|
|
7009 S. Potomac St. Ste. 125 Centennial, CO 80112 866-4PROST8 303.320.3835 fax http://www.prostateconditions.org
|
|
|
Become a Fan to Our Page
Join the Prostate Conditions Education Council on Facebook to keep up to date with current news and events! |
|
| Visit the PACE Race Website
| www.PACErace.org |

| Donate Now. Help save the lives of our fathers, brothers, and husbands with a simple donation.
| Donate Now! |
|
National Council Physicians
| E. David Crawford, M.D.
University of Colorado David G. McLeod, M.D Walter Reed Army
Mark Moyad, M.D. University of
Michigan
Allan W. Partin, M.D., Ph.D. Johns Hopkins
Daniel
Petrylak, M.D.
Columbia-Presbyterian Mack Roach, M.D. University
of Calif. SF
Neal Shore, M.D., FACS Carolina Urologic Research
Center
Frank
Staggers, M.D.
NMA
Nelson
N. Stone, M.D. Mount Sinai
Wendy Poage, MHA President, PCEC
|
|
|