
Retirees joining Age Pension list
The Government has two major problems
after the recent financial crises.
1)
How to fight off
the impending recession and
2)
How to ensure
that taxpayers continue to save for future retirement.
With stock market losing
about half, most super members would be receiving their December superannuation
statements with further drop in their fund balance. It is estimated that about
2,000 retirees, every week, would be applying for some age pension. 
These new applicants were
earlier not eligible or were eligible only for a smaller amount. Age pension is
based on income and assets, when assets drop in value, pensioners can use December
superannuation reports in claiming higher pension amount in Centrelink's six
monthly claim forms.
The Rudd government is
conducting a pension & superannuation system review by Dr Henry on how
pensions should be paid and how Australians should boost contributions. Enticing
taxpayers to contribute voluntary after tax money to super or encouraging them
to pump new money to super as a salary sacrifice only to see it disappear to global financial
crisis can be challenging.
Henry review may come up with some answers, such as:
1) Increase the 9% compulsory
superannuation guarantee levy
2) Give incentive to
taxpayers who salary sacrifice (for example no contribution tax).
3) Reduce tax on
contributions and income of the fund
4) Cap the fee an
administrator can charge (currently averaging 1.25%) - please note that
administrator allocates funds to an
investment manager who also charges a fee
5) Increase the
Pension age from 65 currently for males to say 70 (probability of a 65 year old
male making it to 70 years is 4.75 out of 10)
All options have ramifications as the first option will put burden on
employers and the other options will put pressure on the treasury. But one
thing is definite, change to current system is certain and unavoidable.
Co-contributions do not work
If Jack is on average weekly
wage $1147 or $59,644 per year (Aug 08 - ABS report click here to read),
his employer will contribute $5,397 as compulsory 9% superannuation on which
15% would have to be paid as contribution tax or $809 by the super fund.
Jack will not be eligible for
any co-contribution as the wage is above the higher income threshold. One point
to note is that, Jack will have disposal income of only $901 per week after tax
(Annual $46,871 after personal income tax). If Jack is married with non working
spouse and kids that is, he is single earning member of the family, Jack will
have a very low capacity to contribute after tax money to super after rent/mortgage
and other expenses. Further, since his spouse is not working, she would not be
eligible for any co-contribution.
Only 37% of taxpayers earn
average weekly wage, which means that those who are earning less are doing it
tougher and are less likely to make a personal contribution. However, the
commissioner of taxation has announced that it has paid co-contributions to 1,417,126 (1.27 Million for 2007 year) taxpayers or $1,287,987,000
in co-contributions and about half the contributions were for spouses. About
80% of personal contributions were by taxpayers who were above the lower income
threshold, which means less than $ 1500 was paid in fact average payment was
only $908 to each eligible taxpayer. The report is interesting reading, click here to read,
unfortunately no age based statistics is available.
Conclusion

If low income earners are not
making any personal contributions and receiving any super co-contribution, who
is?
In the writers opinion co-contribution
recipients are two groups of taxpayers from two end age groups, namely:
1)
Those taxpayers
who are over 15 years and three months who have low income and are children of
high income earners with high di sposable income.
2)
Semi- retired wealthy
taxpayers who can afford to make personal contributions who are working part
time.
The writer knows no-one who
earns below the low income threshold, who has (can) made a personal
contribution to super.
Low income earners have a problem today - not enough money to meet today expenses. Tomorrow is not even considered, WHY?
You see, Mr Treasurer, today
is more important than tomorrow. Try living on average salary!
|