Logo Banner
Newsletter 2010 / no.4
In This Issue
Community Engagement
Management Conflicts
From Complex to Simple
The Elephant in the Room

Greetings!


Scott and I are pleased to welcome Deb Phenicie to Business Advisors Network.  As an engineer, Deb has years of experience working with communities on critical issues such as water and urban redevelopment as well as environmental issues.

Deb will help take our proven strategy for effective meetings to local communities that often struggle to bring highly complex issues into clear focus.  We have already begun this work this past November in Kentucky and are looking to soon work with communities in the Rockies and in New England.

We have experienced that leaders often delay getting involved in our process because the more they need assistance, the less time they have to think through how we could help them.  In January, we will introduce a bi-weekly private radio program to discuss the challenges of leadership and effective ways to create strategy focus, improve outcomes and implement changes in an organization without bringing disruptions and loss of effectiveness. 

This is planned to be a platform for questions & answers. We hope that these short focused programs will help bring issues into focus in an effective manner.

Deb and Scott join me in wishing you a Happy Holiday Season and a Prosperous 2011!

Alain Bolea
Community Engagement & Action
 
Information for Sale
Information
for Sale

Working with communities over the years I have noticed a common theme.  Whatever situation a group is trying to tackle, they often already have a report prepared by an outside expert that addresses the situation. While the group may acknowledge the validity of the information, it rarely gets implemented.  These reports are often left sitting on a shelf and never used.  So, what happens?  Why aren't the action steps in the report implemented?

When actions are defined by an outside source or there is a rush to action without real group consensus, the action plan languishes and follow-through is limited.  Individuals responsible for implementing the action plan and supporting it need to have a role in determining the strategy; otherwise the commitment to action is superficial at best.
 
Group consensus and support does not occur when an outside party surveys the stakeholders separately and develops the plan independently.  With all of the stakeholders in the room, there is an opportunity for new ideas to emerge, as well as any conflicting perspectives to be resolved.

When the group determines their own action strategy, they discover that they do have the resources they need and they are willing to take responsibility for implementing those actions. 


Deb Phenicie

Management Conflicts
 
In our last newsletter, we asked our readers to let us know what are the issues that keep them up at night.  The dominant answer was Management Conflicts.  

We have found that this is often the fundamental issue of most problems in any organization.  The management team is trying to function without bringing to light and resolving conflicts of opinions, that often become set into personality conflicts where individuals have a hard time working together effectively.  When this type of conflict happens among leaders its negative impact ripples through the entire organization in the form of low initiative, confusion and political preservation.

Often acute in partnerships, we see this syndrome in all forms of organizations: from family businesses, to government agencies, to non-profits. Resolving conflict is very difficult without bringing a new approach to creating common ground. Striving for a harmonious culture of the organization results in much energy spent avoiding talking openly about the fact that there is a conflict.  The conflict goes underground and entire meetings unfold with no one willing to take the risk to bring it up.

The result is that these meetings may maintain a decorum of peace but lead to very little because they do not deal with what really matters: the unresolved divergence of opinions.

Please continue to tell what is on your mind.


From Complex to Simple and Clear
 
The link below will take you to a short presentation made by ecologist Eric Berlow at a TED  conference.  In a few minutes he demonstrates how one can move from analyzing a complex system to a few actionable points.  This mirrors exactly the process that we use with our clients, starting from overwhelming complexity and leading to clear action plans that everyone on the team understands fully.

 

The Elephant in the Room

In any important meeting there is always a point when the real issue....THE one everyone knows lies at the heart and soul of the performance, strategy or other organizational issue....either will or will not be addressed.  If not, the time invested will always be assessed as a waste.  A further consequence is that it reflects poorly on leadership's capability to effectively resolve those deeper problems.  Preparing for and working through that challenging moment is what our approach is fundamentally about.


Elephant in the room
Avoiding the Obvious?


We all know that the reluctance to discuss the "elephant" in the room cannot be explained away just as a matter of individuals being afraid to talk about a delicate matter.  Most of us are very willing to engage in tough conversations if certain conditions are met.  Difficult topics such as the lack of group trust, incompetence, poor follow-through, inappropriate behavior or lack of clear direction can be effectively aired even though many people are indeed reticent to say things that might hurt others' feelings. 


The most significant reason we have found blocking critical group conversation goes to the heart of an organization's culture, its strategy in approaching work, the way work gets done, and its leadership style.  These four areas comprise the glue that keeps the group talking and working effectively, or inhibits it.  When we facilitate group work we pay attention to whether or not participants are comfortable in conversing around these areas.  When THE issue needing to be discussed is being danced around - avoided, minimized, passed over, or explained away as no longer relevant- we stop the action right then and there, and bring attention to the conversation that is missing.


As consultants, we get clues to what's missing and needed to address the big issue because it showed up in either our mindset/performance scan or the vital elements of teamwork scan. Because the issue has already revealed itself in the scans, we can point to the data to draw out what is at stake behind the issue and what are the consequences to the group of it remaining unaddressed.


The important step is for team members to acknowledge the "elephant."  This  gives everyone a new platform from which to better air their real perspectives and feel understood then discover constructive ways to sort through facts, assessments and assumptions around the issue. Once there is acknowledged, shared sense of reality around the issue, true progress can be made....and usually quickly, with good energy and motivation to get back on track.  Then the new, available motivation to work on the remaining tasks of the group is always significantly higher and more productive, with much more satisfaction with the outcomes of the event. 


 
 
Scott Brumburgh


Join Our Mailing List 
Quick Links

© Business Advisors Network 2010