whitelogo2Midsummer Scene: Purchase still bleak; a burst of refi. 
bleakhot3

All is Well?                    

  

 

Animal House - All Is Well!
"Animal House" - All Is Well!

                                                                  

Last month we compared estimates of 2011 EOY mortgage volume totals to our Q2 re-forecast of 2012 EOY volume. Our Q2 projection asserted that 2012's volume will fail to reach 2011's totals; a sixth straight year of decline.  

 

The Q2 2012 changes implied a slightly downward path compared to the 2012 forecast that we had issued at the end of Q3 2011. What that means is that from October of last year to May of this year, we saw no great compendium of reasons to make us increase our original outlook for U.S. 2012 mortgage lending. In fact, evidence through Q2 indicates that total purchase dollar volume could fall even further before the calendar year ends.

  

As we saw it then and see it now, 2012 will not be a recovery year, certainly not for owner occupied home purchase financing. Not by a long shot. And that's not good. Purchase volume is the best indicator of the real health of housing, communities of households and the home finance industry. Growth in purchase financing is nowhere to be seen.

 

In spite of all the "recovery's here" hype that continuously emanates from all the usual suspects, 2011 plus 2012's first-half activity, offer few reasons for believing that housing and home financing's depression has ended.  

 

The bright burst of refinance volumes due to HARP 2.0 and low-low-low mortgage rates will have positive but limited impact on recovery. At some point this year, the burst will start to fade out in bittersweet fashion. Sweet volumes in the first half have generated high mortgage banking profits, but a bitter future for refinancing lies ahead when mortgage rates eventually rise and the homeowner refinance pool plays out. 

 

As usual, certain mortgage banking leaders responded that they don't agree with our forecasts; no way. Our projections are too depressing. 

 

Well duh!?! We're in the middle of a what has turned out to be the worst housing and home financing depression in 80 years for goodness-sakes!!! 

dennis  

U.S. consumers and households are staying away from selling homes or buying homes; even at these low, low interest rates. Relative to historical trends, today's purchase money activity seemss more like a stampede away as opposed to staying away from selling or buying. 

 

My guess is that like Chip Diller, if you say something repeatedly over a long enough period of time you can get anyone to believe anything, even if there's no evidence to support it and it makes no sense. In spite of all the hype about recovery and now being the best time to buy, it appears that American consumers, households and communities figured out the real score long ago. 

 

According to Fannie Mae's latest Housing Survey, the sentiment of 73% of respondents is that today is probably a good time to buy because of low rates and home prices, but only 17% of homeowners said it's a good time to sell.

 

What do the past three years of evidence tell us about trends in purchase money lending? According to supply-siders, all of the elements of supply are in holy alignment - low rates, available credit, low housing prices, plenty of inventory, more home-buyer traffic, housing values on the rise, economy improving, a little rise in consumer confidence etc., etc. On the demand side, pent-up demand is still penned-up. U.S. housing markets are a long way from busting out into a sustained housing and home financing recovery.  

 

The alignment argument is a false positive. Based on the ever- shrinking pool of available households that are qualified, able, willing and ready to buy and finance a home, a growing share won't be in the hunt during the second half of 2012, most of 2013 and possibly 2014. 

 

The average American seems to be well aware that their home buying prospects have been decoupled from the U.S.'s economic fortunes (see next section below). At the same time, their trust in banking has fallen to all-time negative lows and has remained in negative territory for over three years now. 

 

Another set of experienced mortgage people tell us "there's really no need for us to look ahead to where our markets are going...it's not rocket science...we'll take whatever the markets will give us...top referral sources are all we need...and we have plenty...the situation in our markets will turn to normal soon enough." 

 

"Take" appears to be the operative word in their strategic plans; similar to the oft-repeated strategies of many former NFL football coaches. For instance, take the Detroit Lions' dismal record of 39 wins vs 121 losses during the ten seasons prior to 2011. Many of their long- departed head coaches had used the old "take what they give us" line countless times in pregame interviews and public statements. 

 

After all, each of them sincerely believed they had assembled a team of top athletes. All the team had to do is simply execute against their opponents weaknesses. Unfortunately, their won-lost records indicate they had no idea about what they were being given and were consistently wrong about weaknesses...so in the end, their opponents truly gave it to them.

 

Too many people these days have their heads buried in the "all-is-well" sand; not just in the mortgage lending space, but throughout the economic landscape - just like Chip Diller (Kevin Bacon) in Animal House.  See also All is Well (Reprise), below.  

 

As the evidence piles up and current trends continue, it is probable that all might not be well in mortgage lending for a long time.

 
Decoupled1

HouseButton1

Decoupled!

 

 

Housing and home finance are not on the same page as the U.S. economy. 

    

Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke

 

Economic Outlook and Policy

Before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C. June 7, 2012

  

"The depressed housing market has also been an important drag on the recovery...Despite historically low mortgage rates and high levels of affordability, many prospective homebuyers cannot obtain mortgages..."

 

Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C.July 17, 2012

   

"...a number of factors continue to impede progress in the housing market. On the demand side, many would-be buyers are deterred by worries about their own finances or about the economy more generally. Other prospective homebuyers cannot obtain mortgages due to tight lending standards, impaired creditworthiness, or because their current mortgages are underwater--that is, they owe more than their homes are worth." 

 

Figure 1. Growth in household formations will not be the driver of a rapid home lending recovery that the All-is-Well faction believes it will be. Purchase lending will be very slow to spring back to long-term historical growth rates, let alone recover to the 2002-2005 binge-era level of activity. 

 

2001-16 HHvsPurch$Vol
Figure 1

 

Purchase volume began to decouple from population and household growth starting in early 2006. The real homeownship rate has fallen to levels last seen almost 30 years ago. A low homeownership rate in the future means purchase volumes will continue to lag behind net household growth. 

  

Figure 2. The disconnect between a rising GDP and flat-lined home purchase mortgages is a perfect example of economic decoupling. The historical symbiosis between U.S. economic growth and housing is not in evidence today.

 

2001-16 GDPvsPur $Vol
Figure 2

 

Figure 3. The recovery of Wall Street fortunes (DJIA) has meant little, if anything to housing and home purchase financing activity.

 

DJIAvsOO1
Figure 3

   

Figure 4. Much more troubling for homeownership is the long-term decoupling of home purchase financing from slow job growth and high unemployment. Owner occupied purchase mortgage volumes had already started to decouple from employment levels back in 2006, well in advance of the big job collapse that began in 2008. Mortgage volumes have continued to fall even as employment started to slowly rise in 2010.

 

EMPLvsLoans2
Figure 4
 

State and local government jobs continue to be cut in large numbers. U.S. "U6" unemployment rate might be 8.2%, but the "U16" rate -- unemployment + underemployment + marginally attached -- hovers around 15%. The employment-to-population ratio remains at crisis level. Long-term unemployed persons who become discouraged are leaving the labor force at an increasing rate. The decoupled gap between employment and home purchase volumes won't be closing anytime soon.   

 

Might it be that home financing demand is suppressed because households are short of the wealth, earnings, savings, credit or jobs they need in order to buy a home?

 

The truth is that the rate at which U.S. households generate owner occupied purchase mortgages (PMGR) had begun to decouple from economic, employment, income, wealth and demographic indicators seven years ago.

   

Now we're at the bottom of the cycle where weakness, instability and uncertainty are their most pronounced. Seemingly small or moderate shocks to current conditions, be they internal or external, intentional or inadvertent, economic or political, national or global, can easily send the U.S.housing and home financing sector downward again. 

 

Hysteresis affects on long term prospects.  

 

All four of these decouplings demonstrate the "hysteresis effect" that takes over when established systems are subjected to powerful internal and external shocks -- i.e. the real estate, housing, financial, banking, balance sheet and employment collapse. Forces that had driven the system in the past were upended. Historical relationships, market behaviors and economic forces within the system were radically altered in mostly negative ways. 

 

There are simply no forces, or combinations of forces, that appear capable of igniting a rapid purchase money recovery back to the home lending growth trends of the 1980s to the early 2000s.  And forget about a return to the hyper-growth of 2003-2006 that triggered the housing depression. 

 

Inverse coupling...a troubling sign of struggles ahead. 

 

Figure 8. The traditional purchase volume versus mortgage rate connection -- i.e. when rates fall, mortgage volumes rise, and when rates rise, mortgage volumes fall -- has been dramatically reversed.

 

RatesPurchase2  

 

Home purchase financing became a lagging indicator of post-recession recovery way back in 2006. The steady fall in mortgage rates has proven to be powerless to spur home buying or home purchase financing. Purchase volume has been falling with falling mortgage rates, not 

 

Housing has become an entrenched dragging indicator and it still remains delicately close to stall speed. When rates begin to rise or household conditions fail to improve or the U.S. economy approaches another stall, even a small shock could easily turn into a downward spiral for the housing sector.

 

Figure 9. Fee revenues from heavy refinance/re-refinance demand during the past three years have been crucial to the survival of many independent mortgage banks and mortgage banking units within large depository banks. But refinances are not a forever gift.

 

In the past, waves of refinancing closely followed the fall in mortgage interest rates, just as we'd expect. Except now, as rates continue to fall to unprecedented levels, the amplitude of successive refinance waves have also fallen. The duration of each spike has become shorter too. 

 

RatesRefi2  

 

The number of homeowners in the available refinance pool has steadily dropped and apparently, so have appetites for refinancing or re-refinancing waned for those who remain in the pool. The prospect of a protracted stagnation in home financing is very real. 

 

purchase demand trap (a negative cycle of low demand followed by even lower demand), is close to being coupled with a looming refinance demand trap.  Both traps have been created by low rates, tight credit, household balance sheet problems, strict lending standards, high loan fees, slow growth in housing prices and long loan processing times.  They have become inextricably intertwined. The combination will be hard to break apart going forward.

 

At the very least, expect a large share of U.S. households and homeowners to stand pat and remain where they are while they struggle to improve their balance sheets. 

 

The decouplings indicate that the home financing industry is facing a long road to recovery somewhere, at some time, in almost every community in the country. 

 

This should come as no surprise to anyone in the industry.

WallStreet2
"All Is Well" --  Poem by Arthur Hugh Clough (1809-1861)
 
'Twill all be well: no need of care;
Though how it will, and when, and where,
We cannot see, and can't declare." 

"The wind it blows, the ship it goes,
Though where and whither, no one knows."       

 ...the mantra of financial innovators, job creationists, oligarchs, rentiers, political insiders and the free market's invisible hand under the table......

 

Wall Street1
TableBanner1 
2013-2017 ADVANCE FORECAST:  
2013 U.S. Housing Finance Volume Projections, Market Metrics and Comparison Tables are available 
NOW 
  • Customize-able to each lender's desired market footprint. 
  • Purchase + Refinance forecasts by individual market.
  • Any and all combinations of states, MSA/CBSAs, counties, communities, and neighborhoods.

Now is the time for forward-looking mortgage bankers to start preparing for 2013, 2014 and beyond.

 

Our Opinion: Stay committed to "community" recovery, not just the recovery of loan transactions and fees. To grow and sustain profit, profitability and performance in an uncertain future, focus your efforts on the changing conditions within communities. They are your future.

 

Call (515) 327-0070 or go to www.iemergent.com   

0712
Think About It
All is Well
Decoupled!
All is Well (Reprise)
Real Homeownership
Suburbia-Exurbia
Job Polarization - The Trend is the Cycle

 

 

"In big industries, new ideas are invited to raise their heads so they can be clobbered at once.."

 

 

Marshall McLuhan

1911-1980

 

 

  

 

Gallup1  

 

 
U.S. Homeownership Hits Decade Low
 
by Dennis Jacobe, Chief Economist, Gallup

 

  

PRINCETON, NJ - The 62% of Americans who say they own their own home marks a new low since Gallup began tracking self-reported homeownership in 2001.

 

HomeownerRate2012Q1  

 

For most Americans, it is hard to feel secure enough to make such a commitment when the economy is growing slowly and they see nearly one in five workers underemployed, that is, unemployed or employed part time but willing to work full time.

 

Declining homeownership rates suggest some Americans are beginning to doubt that homeownership remains part of the American dream -- or at least, an attainable part of it. From an economic perspective, U.S. economic growth needs to be much stronger than it has been in order to achieve the hiring necessary to get unemployment rates to the "normal" levels of the past. This doesn't seem likely as long as housing activity remains relatively moribund and homeownership rates are declining.

 

 

 

 

"An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it."

 

 

    Jef Mallett

 author, artist,

creator of syndicated comic strip "Frazz"

 

 

 

 
 
Brookings1


William H. Frey
April 6, 2012

"More than two years after the Great Recession was pronounced dead, there is scant evidence of renewed demographic dynamism in areas that once drove the nation's growth. This is especially the case in the nation's "exurbs"-traditional destinations for new homebuyers at the outer edge of the metropolitan frontier. But it is also the case for what were the fastest growing metropolitan areas, whose demographic pulse stopped beating when the housing market crashed and the recession took hold.

 

BrookingsHousing1

 

"These findings emerge from the Census Bureau's first release of annual sub-national population estimates since the 2010 Census...

  

"The most pronounced revelation concerns the outer suburbs of metropolitan areas-residential zones that have historically exhibited rapid growth, especially in the mid-2000s. Based on a Brookings classification scheme, Figure 1 indicates that the least dense, outer suburban counties-exurbs and emerging suburbs-registered extremely low growth rates in 2010-2011, continuing a downward trajectory established in the late 2000s.

   

"This is a decided flip from mid-decade, when the latter areas bled migrants to the fast developing urban fringe. It reflects the difficult economic straits now facing would-be home-buyers, many in their twenties and early thirties, who tend to be stuck in place in inner suburbs and cities. It also reflects uncertainty about the future of the housing market and broader economy in far-flung metropolitan locations amid rising fuel prices.

  

The outer-suburban slowdown is widespread, reflecting pre-recession overbuilding, and current lack of demand in most parts of the country. Each of the 100 fastest growing outer suburban counties during the 2003-2007 boom period grew more slowly in the four years since, and the majority grew more slowly last year than in each of the previous three years.

  

The housing market crash and Great Recession put the brakes on all that. Now other factors are coming into play, including the rising costs of energy and new levels of fiscal austerity for state and local governments. The fact that outer suburban growth has continued to falter two years after the recession ended calls into question whether today's younger generations will hold the same residential preferences as their forebears. It is possible that the new financial risks they face, along with increased environmental and economic concerns, will change perceptions of where to find their version of the American Dream.  

   

  

 

 

Mark Twain   

 


NBER2

The Trend is the Cycle

 

Job Polarization and Jobless Recoveries 
 

Nir Jaimovich
Duke University & NBER

Henry E. Sie
University of British Columbia
& NBER

March 31, 2012

In the past 30 years, the US labor market has seen the emergence of two new phenomena: "job polarization" and "jobless recoveries." 

 

"Job polarization refers to the increasing concentration of employment in the highest- and lowest-wage occupations, as job opportunities in middle skill occupations disappear.

 

"Jobless recoveries refer to periods following recessions in which rebounds in aggregate output are not accompanied by recoveries in aggregate employment.

"We delineate occupations along two dimensions: "cognitive" versus "manual," and "routine" versus "non-routine."

JobPolar1
Job Polarization Groups

(graph) "We present data by decade...Each bar represents the per cent change in an occupation's group share of total employment. Over time, the share of employment in high-skill (non-routine cognitive) and low-skill (non-routine manual) jobs has been growing. 

"One of the most pervasive aspects of change has been with the skill distribution: employment has become polarized, with employment shifting away from middle-skill occupations towards both the high- and low-skill tails of the distribution. 
 
"...job polarization is not a process that has occurred steadily during the past 30 years.  These data make clear that the decline in routine occupations is concentrated in downturns.
 
"...job polarization is.... a business cycle phenomenon. 
 
"... jobless recoveries are not simply periods of slow or negative employment growth followed by an eventual, abnormally-delayed recovery. 

"These occupations are disappearing.

(read more)

 

 

"Sometimes what's right isn't as important as what's profitable."

 

 

South Park,

Prehistoric Ice Man, 1999

 

Trey Parker and Matt Stone, creators

 

 

iEmergent is a market research, forecasting and advisory firm for the financial services, mortgage and real estate industries.  Providing detailed mortgage and real estate transaction forecasts, homebuyer behavior metrics and market comparison analytics on national and neighborhood markets.  

Contact:

Dennis Hedlund
iEmergent Group

2650 106th Street Suite 200
Urbandale, IA 50233