whitelogo2Spring didn't spring for home purchase lending.  
Spring Flowers

HouseButton12012 Q2 U.S Housing Finance 

Re-forecast:  More Down Than Up 

 

Headlines keep telling us of an economy in recovery -- moderate but steady GDP growth, big earnings gains by bigger-than-big corporations, falling unemployment rates, all accompanied by Wall Street gains, minus some minor ups and downs.

  

Yet, the US housing purchase market seems unable to climb out of depression. Put aside all of the positive hype about recovery. 

 

For U.S. housing and home lending, future home purchase potential is seriously weak.

 

Whether we want to believe it or not, the home finance market bears all the hallmarks of a depression- "sustained, long-term downturn in activity." A substantial and sustained "shortfall in the ability of consumers to purchase goods for long periods of time." In purchase lending, loan and dollar volumes flounder as owner-occupied buyers dry up and potential sellers stay put. Credit is limited, incomes are deflating and prices are.....etc., etc. We all know the challenges.

 

Say what you want about excess for-sale inventories, low home prices and low, low mortgage rates, there's a massive roadblock to hopes for even a moderately improved housing recovery this year: the continued inability of many low, moderate, middle and upper-middle class working households to qualify and finance the purchase of a home.  The majority of U.S. households are still short of the wealth, earnings, savings, credit and jobs they need in order to buy a home.

 

Owner occupied home purchase activity is a primary indicator of the true health and dynamism of households, housing markets and communities. Since 2005 total U.S. owner-occupied purchase mortgage volume in units and dollars has fallen for six straight years. Our current 2012 forecast will make it seven straight years of decline.

 

The bottom of a cycle is always a weak and precarious place. Any new economic shock--whether it be a Eurozone downturn (or euro breakup), a growing Global recession, another debt-ceiling insanity, more political dysfunction, or stalled job growth--could

quickly send the U.S. economy into recession again, further depressing chances for recovery in the housing and home lending industries. 

 

We believe that it could easily take another six years before the rate at which U.S. households generate purchase mortgage demand returns to long-term, pre-boom trends. If that's not depression, what is?

 

2012Q2Table
Table 1

U.S. 2012 Purchase Volume: No Strength in the Trends

 

Many industry experts and enthusiasts try to religiously paint a positive picture of current and future lending activity -- using headlines packed with upbeat words like "surge, leap, climb, vault, jump, rebound" whenever this month's or this week's numbers turn positive compared to previous weeks/months. Whenever the numbers turn south, then slightly positive-sounding images like "slip, slide, fade, ebb, taper" become de rigueur.  

 

The truth is that a metric like the MBA's continuously tracked Purchase Application Index has been fluctuating at very low levels for two years and essentially moving sideways like it's still 1995. Any positive trends have been the crawling type, not leaping.

 

PurchIndx3
Base graph from of Calculated Risk.  Go to www.calculatedriskblog.com for full inventory of insightful visuals/opinions on housing and economic conditions

  

Signs of sustainable growth in home purchase lending opportunities are few and far between. The acceleration that would be needed in the second half of 2012 to offset such a weak estimated first half of about $185 billion in purchase fundings is becoming ever more remote on a daily basis. 

 

GDP and Wall Street aside, we see no reason to significantly adjust our 2012 purchase mortgage lending unit and dollar volume projections upward from our Q1 forecast or even last year's October forecasts. Experts don't want to recognize it, but the country is caught in the clutches of a pernicious home purchase demand trap. 

 

Look for purchase financing activity to reach the low 2011 levels, which means a seventh straight year of decline for housing and home purchases. We project that year-over-year purchase loan units will fall 5% and total mortgage dollars will fall by 3.2% after the dust clears.  

 

2001-16 US$

Owner occupied purchase financing will account for about 92% of all purchase lending, but will still fall short of $400 billion. An historically low portion of non-owner occupied loans will help make it go over the $400 billion threshold.

  

Total 2012 purchase dollar volume (owner occupied + non-owner occupied) will be fortunate to reach $415 billion by year's end. To put this into context, the last year in which purchase dollar volume was lower than 2011, and now 2012, was in 1991, a year in which there were also close to 20 million fewer households than there are today.

 

The rate at which U.S. household markets are generating purchase mortgages remains very weak.

 

The rate at which U.S. households generate purchase mortgages (PMGR) has been falling unabated since 2006 and is far below the historical trend. We're close to the bottom point in a typical boom and bust cycle, but it's at the bottom where forces for recovery are weak, unstable and uncertain. Any type of new shock, be it small or moderate, internal or external, economic or political, can easily send an entire economic sector downward again. 

 

2012 Q2 PMGR Traj 

Homeownership levels to continue to fall.


In parallel with abysmally low home buyer activity, the "real" U.S. homeownership rate is much lower than the official rate currently calculated by the Census Bureau. A big unresolved inventory of "shadow homeowners" who are facing serious delinquency or foreclosure remains. Even if they're occupying their home at the present time, they will likely become non-homeowners in 2012 or 2013. Although they're counted as homeowners today, they portend of a persistent, long-term fall in the U.S. homeownership rate.

A recent report by RealtyTrac projects that U.S. foreclosure volumes will be on the increase. The rising number of shadow homeowners means future homeownership levels will continue to be under siege. 
  

 

All in, the available pool of home buying households who are qualified, able, willing and ready to finance the purchase of a home will remain very constrained throughout 2012. Hopefully, we'll see a bit more expansion in those home buying pools going into 2013, but lenders shouldn't be betting the farm on the upside when executing on their 2012 plans or developing their 2013 strategies. 

  

2012 Refinance Volume: Strong Refinance Isn't Recovery

 

Refinances have defined and driven the business of home lending for for four years now.  2012 is clearly yet another refinance transaction volume and fee bonanza for mortgage lenders.

 

Successive waves of heavy refinance demand consistently fall in amplitude and get shorter in duration over time. The "surge" of refinances and re-refinances experienced so far during the current quarter might dissipate in Q3 faster than anyone thinks. HARP 2.0 is the driver that has altered historical refinance dynamics in the short term. If mortgage interest rates start to slowly rise, the friction will dampen the amplitude and shorten the duration of the wave. 

 

Then again, if the Eurozone recession accelerates downward and the flight to the safety of U.S. Treasury Bonds gains speed or if the TWIST strategy works as described to lower long-term rates or if the Eurozone triggers a global stall or a U.S. downturn causes the Federal Reserve to initiate QE3 and goes back to buying 10-year Treasuries or MBS to stave off a slide to recession, the refinance fee(ding) frenzy could extend the duration of the wave and save the day for many lenders. 

 

Then again, there's a chance that HARP will only alter the refinance dynamics of homeowners for a limited period. A stall and/or a recession will wreak new havoc on households and they'll pull back.

 

Refiwaves1
Base Refinance Index Graph from  www.calculatedriskblog.com

 

Even though, we've increased our 2012 total refinance projections from earlier in the year, we believe the industry should be very cautious. We do not envision a sustained explosion of refinance volumes to continue unabated. 

  

The heaviest HARP 2.0 refinance volumes will be concentrated in the "sun and sand" states - CA, NV, FL - where the number of underwater mortgages are the greatest. In many other states, refinance activity will be modest-to-flat-to-slightly lower when compared to 2011 refinances. Obviously, when viewed at the MSA/CBSA, county and local community levels, refinance activity will vary widely.

 

For many mid-sized or regional lenders and servicers, the competitive refinancing potential in their footprints might not equate to big lending opportunities. Over 60% of homeowners with mortgages are serviced (and controlled) by five big lenders. The bulk of the rest are serviced by five more. Depending on how the HARP 2.0 rules and the incentive payments play out, the big servicers have an overwhelming advantage in refinancing their own portfolios of eligible borrowers. 

 

Dynamics of future homeowner refinancing pools and waves. 

 

On the one hand, if Europe falls into severe recession and the U.S. economy stalls, 30-year mortgage rates will likely fall as a result of investor flight-to-safety or due to active intervention (i.e. Twist, Treasury bond purchases, MBS purchases). Lower rates might trigger another round of serial refinancing, but the potential for a stalled economy will have a big negative impact on 80% or more of U.S. households. 

 

On the other hand, if Europe stabilizes and the U.S. economy crawls forward (i.e. at a ponderous 2.2% growth rate), 30-year mortgage rates will slowly rise. Rising rates will choke off the serial refinancers of the past three years. An improving economy would help the struggling 80% of households repair their balance sheets. But then, rising rates coupled with lingering credit issues would thwart many homeowners from refinancing.

 

In either scenario, the available homeowner refinance pools would shrink and there's a good chance that 2012 refinancing waves will dissipate during the second half of this tumultuous refinance year. 

 

Three Industry Oracles

 

For the first time in eight years, we're not alone in the forecasting wilderness of U.S. mortgage finance volumes. The Three Oracles of the Industry, in their June housing finance forecasts, have finally arrived at annual purchase volume projections that are relatively reasonable but slightly more optimistic than ours. However, we believe their full-year refinance projections are overly optimistic. 

 

Oracles0612   

**Note**: The turbulence and diversity of lending that is occurring beneath the surface of the national scene; local communities where lenders should truly be focused, are not addressed by the Oracles. Detailed pictures are hard to paint with big brushes. Their high-level forecasts function as national summaries of the housing finance sector primarily for industry executives, investors, government functions and political players. 

 

In contrast, iEmergent applies its unique bottom-up, demand-based forecasting model starting at census tracts; their ever-changing household profiles and their constantly shifting demand trends. This approach allows us to evaluate the impact of macro forces on local conditions and behaviors. At the same time we aggregate our local projections into state, region and national composite pictures that respect local community differences.
TableBanner1 
2013-2017 ADVANCE FORECAST: 
U.S. Housing Finance Volume Projections, Market Metrics and Market Comparison Tables
 are available
NOW
  
  • Customized to each lender's desired market footprint.
  • Purchase + Refinance forecasts by individual market.
  • Any and all combinations of states, MSA/CBSAs, counties, communities, and neighborhoods.

Now is the time for forward-looking mortgage bankers to start preparing for 2013, 2014 and beyond. 

 
Our Opinion: Stay focused on "community" recovery, not just the recovery of loan transactions and fees. To grow and sustain profit, profitability and performance in the future, concentrate on communities. They are your future.
 
Call (515) 327-0070 or go to www.iemergent.com  
Neighborhood1 

Go Ahead and Back Up.

 A&C2 

Parodies for real life from Abbott & Costello.

                                                                    

dennis

While thinking about the weakness of current home financing conditions and how mortgage bankers are reacting to it, I was reminded of a scene from the 1942 Abbott & Costello plot-less "road film" Pardon My Sarong. 

 

Back then, this particular bus-driving scene was celebrated as a not-so-subtle parody of how so-called very important people behave, and, in particular, how big businesses, governments, and politicians deal with highly stressful yet seemingly simple conditions of change and discontinuity.  

 

From the film:

Bud Abbott and Lou Costello play bus drivers who are lost in L.A. and want to get back to Chicago. The two of them, with Lou Costello at the wheel drive the bus until they come to a small ferry and drive aboard. It's tight quarters for parking. A cop, who is arranging the vehicles on the ferry, yells at Lou. "Will you go ahead and back up?" 

 

Lou yells back, "How can I go ahead and back up?" 

 

As usual, Bud is Type-A and starts to get impatient. He yells at Lou: "Back up!" followed by a slight pause, a hand gesture, and then "Go ahead." 

 

Lou does his patented double-take schtick of incredulity. He clearly thinks Bud is off his rocker. Then comes a torrent of Bud's frustration,  "Will ya' go ahead and back up?" Multiple times.

 

As the ferry begins to leave the pier behind them, Lou questions Bud and the cop, "What kind of bus do you think this is?" 

 

He then follows with, "I'll satisfy the both of yous, I'll go sideways" and promptly drives guns the bus. It promptly runs off the ferry and into deep water. 

 

As the bus sinks to the bottom, Lou trivializes Bud's impatient pomposity. With panache, he elegantly turns on the windshield wipers of the submerged bus before swimming away.

 

Fast forward to the present. 

 

On May 31st, the MBA distributed an email to members promoting the upcoming 99th Annual MBA Conference scheduled for October. 


"WE WORK FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF FAMILIES - AND THEIR DREAMS."      (Go ahead?)

 

"Our industry has a strong legacy and rich history of excellence. (Back up?) One worthy of passing on to future generations of America's homeowners with secure and earnest possibilities (Go ahead?). It's up to us today, right now, to guarantee our industry continues to stand strong. Join us in Chicago to ensure we continue our legacy (Back up?) of investing in the American dream."

 

Earlier this year, the MBA positioned a conference banner on the MBA home page containing promotional links to narratives, details and schedules for the 99th MBA Conference.

  

 MBAConfBanner1(Go ahead?)

 

Join us in Chicago.

 

"For nearly 100 years (Back up?), mortgage bankers have been committed to helping families realize the dream of homeownership. It's what our industry continues to do (Go ahead?). The past several years (Back up?) have created unprecedented challenges, and as we face yet another year with a tremendous amount of uncertainty (Go ahead?) and a plethora of rules set to govern us (Back up?), it's evident that the time has come for us to stand up for our industry. (Go ahead and back up?)

 

"It's our opportunity...to...most importantly, identify the solutions that will restore our industry to its core purpose of investing in the American dream. (Go ahead?)

 

Then comes the final message:

MBAbanner2

 

 (Whoa, Back      Way Up!)

 

 

"Be the catalyst for change that our industry needs." 

(Go ahead a little or a lot?)

 

Why do I keep having the distinct feeling that we're all living in an Abbott & Costello movie?
 
I know I'm picking on the MBA. The "American Dream" metaphor, coupled with what seems to be a non-conciliatory ''Go Ahead and Back Up" stance, is not just some temporary MBA exhortation or promotional tag line. The "dream" and "legacy" metaphors have become ubiquitous in the language, imaging and marketing being used today to re-justify the critical importance of today's banking and mortgage lending industry. 
 
But crucial to whom? And for what reasons?
 
It could be that after seven years of a severe housing depression and more years of struggle likely, American consumers, households, homeowners and communities might have other, more important dreams and attitudes in their heads right now....
 
...dreams and attitudes that might have something to do with the depressed state of housing and home buying demand.
 
The mortgage industry needs to spend less time trying to preserve a past legacy and more time pursuing forward-focused, lender-to-homeowner interactions; actions that clearly demonstrate to wary consumers and communities that mortgage bankers are committed to repairing a flawed housing environment and replacing all the broken pieces.  
 
Short of new "prove-to-me" actions, the legacy of the "American Dream of Homeownership" will end up as a meaningless phrase; tossed into the dustbin of ignominious marketing promotions by skeptical consumers. 
 
That's not how I envision American homeowners and the mortgage lending industry "Backing Up and Going Ahead."  
  
0612 
Think About It
2012:More Down Than Up
2013 Advance Forecast
Go Ahead & Back Up
Professor Stiglitz
Public Job Losses
Household Deleveraging

 

 

 

"The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking."   

 

 

  Albert Einstein

 (1879-1955) 

Theoretical Physicist

 

 

 

 

   

FTBanner1

 

The U.S. Labor Market Is Still In Shambles   

 

By Joseph Stiglitz

 

 

Recipient of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics and Professor at Columbia University

 

 

It is understandable, given the number of times green shoots have been seen since the downturn began in December 2007, that there might be some skepticism about claims the recovery is finally under way. To me the question is what does it imply for policy? 

 

Does it mean we can be more relaxed about the demands for budget cuts emanating from fiscal conservatives? Or that the US Federal Reserve should start paying more attention to inflation, and begin contemplating raising interest rates? Even if this is not one of the many green shoots that soon turn brown, the economy will almost certainly need more stimulus if it is to return to full employment any time soon.

 

This is the inevitable conclusion from looking at the state of the labour market today. It is a shambles. In Friday's US employment report, the proportion of working-age American adults in a job moved up only 0.1 percentage points, to a miserable 58.6 per cent - numbers not seen since the downturn of the early 1980s. There are still 23m Americans who would like a full-time job but who cannot get one. The jobs deficit, the number of extra jobs that would have been required to keep up with new entrants to the labour market, is 15m. Employment has yet to return to its level of December 2008. Male employment is still below what it was in February 2007 - meanwhile, the working-age population has grown considerably. 

 

Let's assume that job creation continues at the rate of 225,000 jobs a month. That is only about 100,000 beyond the number required to provide jobs for the average monthly number of new entrants into the labour force. At that pace, it would take 150 months to reach full employment - 13 years, some time around 2025. The independent Congressional Budget Office is more optimistic, forecasting the return of full employment by 2018. 

 

 

(read MORE)

  

© The Financial Times Limited 2012  

 

  

 
 
"The past went that-a-way. When faced with a totally new situation, we tend always to attach ourselves to the objects, to the flavor of the most recent past. We look at the present through a rear view mirror. We march backwards into the future."

 

 

Marshall McLuhan
Canadian professor of English literature, communications and media philosophy

 1911-1980

 

Coined the phrase:

"The medium is the message." 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 EPIBanner1

 

Public-Sector Job Losses:

 

An Unprecedented Drag on the Recovery

 

 by Josh Bivens

April 5, 2012 

 

Since the recovery from the Great Recession officially began in June 2009, private-sector jobs are up by 2.8 million, but public-sector jobs (the combined employment in federal, state, and local governments) are down by 584,000.

 

The figure below compares trends in public-sector employment in the last four recoveries. The current recovery is the only one that has seen public-sector losses over its first 31 months.

 

If public-sector employment had grown since June 2009 by the average amount it grew in the three previous recoveries (2.8 percent) instead of shrinking by 2.5 percent, there would be 1.2 million more public-sector jobs in the U.S. economy today. In addition, these extra public-sector jobs would have helped preserve about 500,000 private-sector jobs.

 

There is reason to be optimistic, though, as public-sector losses have moderated recently. If the sector begins to actually add jobs in the coming months, the economy would benefit significantly in 2012 and beyond.

    

  

 

 

  

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

 

 

  John Adams (1735 - 1826) 

Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials

 December 1770

 

 

 


fedres2

 
Accounting for the Decline in Mortgage Debt Using Consumer Credit record Data.


by Neil Bhutta
 
Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs
 
Federal Reserve Board
Washington D.C.
 
2012-14

"I use data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Consumer Credit Panel (CCP).

"One of the major advantages of these data for studying the mortgage market is that they cover the vast majority of mortgages -- regardless of lien status, and regardless of whether the loan is held in a bank's portfolio, sold to a...("GSE")...or sold into a private-label security. 

"I use the CCP data to decompose changes in the aggregate...mortgage debt into inflows and outflows. Over a given window of time, inflows comes come from those who increase their mortgage debt, outflows come from those who decrease their mortgage debt, and the sum of inflows and outflows equals the change in outstanding debt during that window

"...for any two-year period, I classify...four mutually exclusive groups -- two inflow groups and two outflow groups.

INFLOWS:
  • Entrants - people who went from a zero to positive mortgage balance 
  • Increasers - those who increased their total mortgage balance over the two-year period.
OUTFLOWS:
  • Exiters - those who went from positive to zero total mortgage balance
  • Decreasers - those who decreased their total mortgage balance of the two-year period.
 Anaylsis Results:

"I take advantage of a panel of individual credit records to better understand why mortgage debt has declined in recent years. I decompose changes in aggregate mortgage debt into inflows and outflows and find that the recent drop in outstanding debt has more to do with shrinking inflows than with expanding outflows, including mortgage defaults.

"...despite some evidence from industry sources on accelerated mortgage debt repayment, I do not find that aggregate outflows have expanded substantially since the period just before the recession beyond what can be traced to distressed borrowers and mortgage defaults.

"The overarching finding of the paper is that the recent drop in mortgage debt has considerably more to do with shrinking "inflows" than with expanded outflows, including mortgage defaults.  

"In fact, even if outflows between 2009:Q3 and 2011:Q3 were at the same level as just prior to the the recession, outstanding mortgage debt still would have declined during the 2009-2011 period because inflows were so weak.

"Overall, the analysis suggests that...one should be cautious when trying to draw conclusions about household borrowing and debt-repayment behavior based solely on such aggregate figures. 

Thus the substantial amount of "deleveraging" seen in the aggregate data reflects, to a large degree, a sharp decline in debt accumulation.


 

 

 

 

 "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."

 

  Albert Einstein

 (1879-1955) 

Theoretical Physicist

 

 

 

 

iEmergent is a market research, forecasting and advisory firm for the financial services, mortgage and real estate industries.  iEmergent provides detailed mortgage and real estate transaction forecasts, homebuyer behavior metrics and market comparison analytics on national and neighborhood markets.  

Dennis Hedlund
iEmergent Group

2650 106th Street Suite 200
Urbandale, IA 50233