 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||
William Law, author of In the Eye of History:
Disclosures in the JFK Assassination Medical
Evidence, will be presenting information on a new
interview just completed by a new, White House
witness.
Recently, a personal, oral account of the
assassination of John Kennedy was provided to Law
by an employee of the 1963 White house. This
witness to history has a unique viewpoint and
compelling story.
Here are a few quotes from that interview:
This is one presentation you don't want to miss.
Several years ago, William Law set out on a personal
quest to reach an understanding of the
circumstances underpinning the assassination of John
F. Kennedy. His investigation began with a key
component of the events of November 22, 1963, and
the days that followed: the autopsy on the
president's body at the National Naval Medical
Center, Bethesda, Maryland. He contacted those
who were involved at Bethesda in various aspects of
the aftermath of the assassination. A best selling
book among JFK researchers, In the Eye of History:
Disclosures in the JFK Assassination Medical Evidence
comprises "conversations" with eight individuals who
agreed to talk. Law continues his ground breaking
work with this White House witness.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||
Larry Hancock's new book - Someone Would Have
Talked - will be available at the time of Conference,
for either purchase there or mail order.
Someone Would Have Talked goes beyond proving a conspiracy to murder JFK. Over 14,000 documents, White House diaries, telephone logs, and executive tape recordings detail how the new President managed a cover-up that changed the future of our country. There was a second conspiracy designed to mislead the nation, the world, indeed, history. Someone Would Have Talked is supported not only with the normal references and bibliography but also with an extensive library of exhibits and documents. Exhibits range from contemporary newspaper articles through testimony and telephone transcripts to diaries, investigative reports and memoranda. For the reader, there will be a comprehensive website containing the documents and sources used for the book and noted in the endnotes. Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the
JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of
November Patriots and author of the 2003 research
analysis publication also titled Someone Would Have
Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several
document collections addressing the 112th Army
Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case
Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious
Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution
of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case.
In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell
Legacy Award for his contributions of documents
released under the JFK Act.
You can purchase Someone Would Have Talked at the NID conference and have Larry sign it at the author's table. |
||
|
|
||
If you were responsible for investigating the murder
of the Presient of the United States, would you put
your best trained and most experienced man on it?
Use the latest techniques? Follow protocol to the
letter? So, what did the Dallas Police Department do?
"Nothing is to be touched, picked up, or
moved until it has been photographed, located on a
sketch, and minutely described as to location,
condition, and any other pertinent observation.”
Yes, this sounds like dialogue from the latest CSI movie or perhaps the current standards for police investigating a crime. But in fact, it is a description found in the national standard for crime scene investigation in 1963 - taken from a source published in 1952, well before the Kennedy assassination. Did the Dallas Police Department properly handle the Crime Scene Investigation in the assassination of President Kennedy? Were the techniques of that day and time sufficient to insure identification, collection and preservation of possible physical evidence? If the procedures were in place and they were not followed, why weren't they? Was Dallas Police Department partner to a conspiracy to cover-up the involvement of someone other than Oswald in the shooting? Or is there another explaination? Sherry Guiterrez, court recognized expert in crime
scene investigation and reconstruction will be
presenting information that will answer these and
other questions at NID 2006. Her presentation will be
available on DVD along with Trajectory Analysis and
Bloodspatter Analysis as it relates to the Kennedy
assassination.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you plan
on attending the conference in Dallas but haven't
registered,
please do
so now; we want to prepare the correct
number of goodie bags and registration packets, and
secure seating for the banquet.
Should you prefer to pay at the door, you can still pre-register by sending us an email stating your intention to attend at sherryg@jfklancer.com. |
||
|
|
||
Robert F Kennedy announced late in the race that he
would run for President. He hadn't wanted to - his
brother had been assassinated only five years earlier,
when he was less than three years into his first
term - but the pressure of public opinion was on him.
It was 1968; the war in Vietnam had taken a sharp
turn for the worse, there were race riots all over the
country, and students were staging sit-ins. Kennedy
was considered the only figure who could responsibly
argue the anti-war position, and unite not only the
conflicting factions of his party but others young and
old, black and white, rich and poor. There was an
almost inconceivable degree of hope wrapped up in
him when, on the night of 5 June, 1968, he took a
short cut through the kitchens of the Ambassador
Hotel in Los Angeles and was shot, point blank, in the
head.
With John Kennedy's death, the American people lost a President; with Bobby's, they lost hope. Excerpt from The Observer By Gaby Wood Sunday October 15, 2006 http://observer.guardian.co.uk/screen/story/0,,1 922661,00.html NID 2006 will be focusing on the assassination of
both JFK and Robert Kennedy. The RFK Panel on
Sunday will
include:
|
||
|
|
||
|
We hope you are as excited about the NID 2006
Conference as we are! This is going to be a
conference filled with new material, and is sure to
provide new avenues of research. You can check
out the speakers and schedule
here.
Please pre- register now so we can provide an accurate count for banquet seating and registration packets. We are busy working to insure you have a wonderful experience and look forward to seeing you there. |
||
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
Debra Conway and Sherry Gutierrez
JFK Lancer Productions & Publications
email:
jfknews@jfklancer.com
|
|
