|
|
|
|
 |
|
Think about it!! | |
The Sage's Hat
The three wisest sages in the land were brought
before the king to see which of them were worthy to become the king's advisor.
After passing many tests of cunning and invention, they were pitted against
each other in a final battle of the wits.
Led blind-folded into a small room, the sages were
seated around a small wooden table as the king described the test for them.
"Upon each of your heads I have placed a hat.
Now you are either wearing a blue hat or a white hat. All I will tell you is
this - at least one of you is wearing a blue hat.
"I will shortly remove your blindfolds, and
the test will begin. The first to correctly announce the colour of his hat
shall be my advisor. Be warned however, he who guesses wrongly shall be
beheaded. If not one of you answers within the hour, you will be sent home and
I will seek elsewhere for wisdom."
With that, the king uncovered the sages' eyes and
sat in the corner and waited. One sage looked around and saw that his
competitors each were wearing blue hats. From the look in their eyes he could
see their thoughts were the same as his, "What is the colour of my
hat?"
For what seemed like hours no one spoke. Finally the
sage stood up and said, with absolute certainty, "The colour of the hat I
am wearing is . . . . . . . "
Answer at the bottom of this column
|
Did you know?
| | |
More than a third of companies are losing money because of outdated office practices and poor management of electronic data.
Studies show that staff of small businesses are failing to share updated versions of documents, with a third of companies saying this costs them time and money. One in four companies say they are wasting at least £2,000 a year due to excessive printing of documents and a similar number find efficiency is being compromised by slow-running email accounts clogged with attachments. Only one in four small businesses has any form of plan for increasing the efficiency of electronic data handling.
Solutions, such as networking computers and keeping all appropriate documents on shared drives, are relatively simple and cheap to set up and certainly not beyond the financial constraints of the vast majority of small businesses, even in these hard times. Very often, the necessary tools are already there, it is simply a question of informing, training and monitoring staff to ensure they make the most effective use of them. The potential cost savings indicated would very quickly make up for such a small investment.
Yet a significant proportion of managers are not addressing these issues. Could you be one of them? Is it perhaps time you reviewed how electronic data is handled in your organization?
|
Featured Tool
| |
Have you ever visited a website knowing roughly what you're looking for, but not completely sure and then been put off by the wealth of options you found there i.e. "spoilt for choice?" Well, no-one has actually told us this has happened on our website, but it has happened to us when we've been trying to find something on other sites, so we thought "why not help people find exactly what they are looking for a lot quicker by asking them some simple questions about what their problem is?"
So that is exactly what we have done. Now, when you visit our homepage, our "expert interview" tool will take you through a very quick set of questions, with easy to select answers. The whole process takes less than a minute to complete and will direct you to our most appropriate solution for you. You can try it by clicking here.
|
| Online Excellence Calculator |
 |
|
Do you want to see how your organisation might perform if assessed against the EFQM Excellence model?
There are many types of self assessment available to organisations wishing to use this widely used excellence framework.
By following this link you can experience just one method of assessing your organisation in a short 10 minute matrix based assessment. | |
Think about it!!
Answer
| |
"..... blue".
At first glance, this problem appears to be
impossible to solve. However, the puzzle clearly states that all three sages sat
stuck on the problem for quite a while and it is this fact that allowed our
sage to give his answer. Why?
First he considered the situation that there was one
blue hat. Even though he knew this was not the case, since he could see two
blue hats, he still pondered what would happen. The person wearing the blue hat
would see two white hats and would therefore say immediately "I am wearing
a blue hat." No real puzzle there, but the important fact is that our sage
realised that the other sages, by virtue of the fact that this answer did not
come out in the first few seconds, must also know that there could not be only
one blue hat, regardless of what colour hats they could see.
Next he considered the situation that there were two
blue hats. This seemed a very real possibility at first - he can see two blue
hats and does not know if the hat he is wearing is white or blue. But if there
are two blue hats, then two people would see one blue and one white hat and
therefore immediately rule out the possibility of three blue hats. As soon as
one of them had worked out, as described above, that there could not be only one
blue hat, then they would realise they were wearing the other blue hat. One of
these two lucky sages who could see the white hat would cry out within a few
minutes, if not sooner.
There could only be one situation which forced all
the three sages to sit in silence for any length of time - three blue hats. Therefore
the hat he was wearing had to be blue.
|
| Newsletter Archive |
| To view our previous newsletters in our archive please click the link above |
 |
If you found this issue interesting and believe a friend or colleague would find the articles useful please click on the button above to send it to them.
| |
|
| Newsletter - September 2010 |
_________________________________
|
Greetings!
I hope you have enjoyed the holiday season and have managed to take a relaxing break or, if not, have one to look forward to in the not too distant future.
Over the summer we have reviewed and improved our website, following feedback from our clients and associates. While there have been no really major changes to the look and feel of the site, which most people seem to think we have got right, we have moved a few things around and renamed some of them, to provide greater clarity and ease of finding just what you are looking for. Do take a look. Click to go to Expert interview | The most significant change is the inclusion of our new "expert interview" tool on our homepage, which is covered in greater detail in our "Featured Tool" article to the left. This is aimed at saving our site visitors valuable time by directing them to the sections of our site most appropriate for their individual needs. If you would like to see if this works for you, just follow the link in the article or click on the icon on our homepage.
Our articles below include - - how to use customer complaints, which, rather than being perceived as something negative, are a very valuable free consultancy resource
- the constraints that following the rules in business might place on innovation and creativity
- the fifth in our Quality Guru Series, featuring Dr. Genichi Taguchi, who believed in the principle that quality is something that should be robustly built in at the design stage of a product, rather than inspected and controlled at the manufacturing stage
|
Customer complaints - a free source of
customer information and consultancy
Do you dread
getting customer complaints? "Who doesn't?" you might say. Well, why not try
looking at them in a whole new light? Customer complaints are actually a
valuable source of customer research and information. In fact, by going to the
trouble of making a complaint, your customer is giving you free consultancy
advice on what you need to do better. Really disgruntled customers will often
not bother to complain, they will simply go elsewhere and/or badmouth you to
their friends and colleagues. So if they have made the effort to tell you why
they are unhappy, they are giving you both the chance to put things right and
the opportunity to refine your products and services so that you keep your
other customers happy. Listen to what they say and use it to build stronger
customer relationships, improve processes and stay competitive. Here are a few
pointers on how to make the most out of customer complaints
Make it easy to complain
The more you
encourage your customers to let you know if they have a problem, the more
opportunities you will have to improve your service to them. Here are some ways
you can make it easy for them -
-
Provide feedback buttons on your website
-
Clearly indicate on all correspondence, invoices etc. who to contact in
the event of a complaint, giving as many forms of contact as possible - phone,
email, website etc.
-
Train your people not to become upset by comments (complaints can be
rude or aggressive at times) but to forward them for a quick response. Also
make sure any positive outcome is fed back to the original recipient of the
complaint, to minimise the demoralising aspect of this job
Encourage openness in sharing complaint information
Create a no
blame culture. Complaints could get stuck or hidden within your organisation if
individuals fear that they will reflect badly on them, leading to criticism
from managers. This could lead to an improvement opportunity being lost and
also to the complaint not being handled as well as it could be. Enforce the
message that customer complaints, if acted upon, are as valuable to your
operation as customer compliments and that, for individuals, they are learning
opportunities. Where possible, in developing any resultant improvement to
processes or ways of working, involve those individuals who were responsible
for the activity that led to the complaint. Ensure any mistakes caused, in
whole or in part, by lack of expertise or experience lead to appropriate
development action.
Create a systematic process for dealing with complaints
Create a
process whereby complaints are dealt with quickly and systematically and
reported back to a relevant manager who can, if needed, take it for discussion
and decision on remedial actions and changes to processes.
Capture the information
Written
complaints (letters or email) can be quickly passed forward for inspection and
action. For verbal complaints (phone or in person), you need to ensure that
complaints are not misreported and the meaning twisted by the emotions of the
recipient. Staff need professional training, so that they know how to establish
they have understood the exact nature of the complaint and there needs to be a
systematic process in place for recording the details.
Encourage staff to be proactive in handling complaints
Customers
value being able to deal with people who are empowered to think and act for
themselves - but, again, ensure they are trained in professional and effective
complaint handling first.
Use the opportunity to turn a disgruntled customer into a loyal one
Do not
become defensive, or jump to hasty conclusions about causes, solutions or the
motive of the complainant.
Respond
quickly. Small problems may not go away if ignored - they may become serious
ones. Find out what you need to do as quickly and economically as
possible.
Do not act
without hearing another side to the story. Most complaints arise from differing
perceptions of the same facts.
Do not
accuse colleagues. Simply state in a low-key way that a complaint has come to
your attention and that you require more information.
Respond
economically and factually. Short is better than long in contentious
situations. Ask quiet questions, emphasise facts and decisions and avoid
explaining motives.
Say what you
will do, and do what you say you will. When responding to a customer, set a
time frame for your response and stick to it.
Use complaints to drive process improvement and competitive edge
By
establishing a systematic recording and assessment of customer complaints, you
can not only apply remedies for process failures, but also gain valuable
information to help you develop and improve your products and services to
maintain a market edge. |
To follow the rules or break them? Which leads to greater success in business?
According to Paul Sloane,
founder of Destination Innovation, in business, unlike in sport, most of the
rules can be broken without penalty. He argues that rule breakers are the ones
that create value and success through innovation. Of course some rules have to
be obeyed. No business would remain successful for very long if it wilfully flouted
the law or treated its employees neglectfully. But what Paul Sloane is talking
about are the rules of convention, custom and practice that encourage us to do
things a certain way because once that way was successful and we have blindly
followed it ever since.
He quotes the example of the
QWERTY keyboard, designed in the 1870's to slow down the speed of typing, by siting
the most commonly used letters away from the index fingers, because the keys of
mechanical typewriters were prone to jamming when typing at very high speeds. So
why are QWERTY keyboards used for computers when a different arrangement would
clearly allow us to type faster? Because it is a rule we use when designing
keyboards and training people to type! Following rules like this blinds us to
other, potentially better, options and stifles creativity and innovation.
Examples of very successful
innovators who have ripped up the rule book are -
- Richard Branson when, on
launching Virgin Atlantic, he did away with First Class, but instead gave first
class service to Business Class passengers, appealing to a much bigger segment
of the market than traditional first class passengers. He realised that if he
could fill his Business Class seats, First Class fare income was unnecessary.
-
Nicolas Hayek who, when the
Swiss watch industry was suffering badly from Japanese competition in the late
1970's, created the immensely successful Swatch and instead of Swiss branded watches
focused on tradition and quality, produced watches that were fun, fashionable
and collectable.
Business is rife with
opportunities to create new ways to provide the goods and services that
customers really want. All you need to do is break the rules and think
laterally.
|
Quality Guru Series
5. Dr. Genichi Taguchi
Dr Genichi Taguchi was raised in the textile town of Tokamachi in Japan, studying textile engineering
with the intention of entering the family kimono
business. However, after being drafted into the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War
II, his experience led him into a wider industrial career, initially with
spells in the Ministry of Public Health and Welfare,
the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
and the pharmaceuticals
industry and eventually the electric communications industry. In 1950 he joined
the Electrical Communications Laboratory (ECL) of the Nippon Telegraph and Telephone
Corporation, just as statistical quality control was beginning to become
popular in Japan
under the influence of W. Edwards Deming (covered in the second of our
Quality Guru series, in our March newsletter). Taguchi spent his twelve years at
ECL in developing methods for enhancing quality and reliability. During this
time he was beginning to consult widely in Japanese industry, with Toyota being an
early adopter of his ideas and in 1954 and 1955 he was also visiting professor
at the Indian Statistical Institute, where he
worked with other leaders in the international field of Total Quality methods
and techniques, enabling him to develop the foundation blocks of what is now
known as Taguchi methods.
Taguchi methods are based on the principle that it
is preferable to design a product that is robust or insensitive to variation in
the manufacturing process, rather than attempt to control all the many
variations during actual manufacture. To put this idea into practice, Dr Genichi Taguchi took the already
established knowledge on experimental design and made it more usable and practical
for quality professionals. His message was concerned with the routine
optimization of product and process prior to manufacture rather than quality
through inspection. He pushed back quality and reliability to the design stage,
where he believed they really belong, broken down into three stages:
-
System design
-
Parameter design
-
Tolerance design
This is fundamentally a prototyping method  , which
can be viewed along a continuum, that enables the designer to identify the optimal
settings to produce a robust product that can survive manufacturing time after
time, piece after piece and provide what the customer wants.
In 1962, on completing his doctorate at Kyushu
University, Dr Genichi
Taguchi left ECL, becoming professor of engineering
at Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo in 1964. After
lecturing in the US in 1980 he collaborated with many international manufacturing
companies such as Bell Labs, Ford Motor Company, Boeing, Xerox and ITT,
helping them to embed his, by then, increasingly popular Taguchi methods. Since 1982, Dr. Genichi Taguchi has been an advisor
to the Japanese
Standards Institute and executive director of the American Supplier
Institute, an international consulting organization. His concepts and methods
have even influenced fields beyond product design and manufacturing, such as sales process engineering. Throughout his
career he has published many books on his work and received numerous accolades,
culminating in his being presented with the Indigo Ribbon by the Emperor of
Japan in 1986, for outstanding contributions to Japanese economics and
industry. Also, in 1995, the Japanese Society of Quality Control made him an honorary
member. |
ley hill solutions aims to be one of Europe's most innovative consultancy organisations specialising in the tools and methods to improve the way your business works and performs. We use internationally recognised standards and frameworks such as ISO9001 and the EFQM Excellence Model to develop solutions that are right for your business.
Please contact us at ley hill solutions if we can be of any assistance.
Sincerely,
Graham Hull ley hill solutions limited |
|
|
|
|
|
The information provided in this newsletter and on our website is as correct and up to date as we can make it. no warranty, express or implied, is given regarding its accuracy. We do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. We shall not be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damage for loss of business or loss of profits) arising from the use of, or inability to use, this site or any information contained it it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of using this site, or any such information. |
|
|
|
|
|