February 23, 2010
February 23, 2010

In this issue:

HUD Clarifies Mark-to-Market Rules on CRP and Surplus Cash
HUD Comments on Elimination of A-133 Audit Requirements in CFDA.Gov Website Material
Update on Proposed Changes to Lender Approval Process
PHA Conference Registration now open

HUD CLARIFIES MARK-TO-MARKET RULES ON CRP AND SURPLUS CASH

In the last few weeks we have requested clarification from HUD regarding the inclusion of earned but unpaid CRP in the computation of surplus cash (CSC).  The 2005 Letter in question 7 indicated ".... CRP payments that are due but that have not been paid may be included as obligations on the computation of surplus cash only if, as of fiscal year end, the preconditions for payment had been satisfied."

The question being consistently asked is: "Does the CSC change based on the inclusion of the CRP amounts?  In other words if, by including the CRP as an obligation on the CSC results in negative surplus cash, is the project still eligible to receive the CRP payments?" 

The 2006 letter made a slight clarification by indicating "If, as of the FYE date, the pre-conditions for payment of these CRP installments have been satisfied, reflect the unpaid installments as obligations on the Surplus Cash schedule. Otherwise, do not reflect the unpaid installments as obligations on the Surplus Cash schedule. Also see the 2005 Letter, question #7."

This issue was made even more of a gray area by the 2007 supplemental letter, question 14 which indicated, "The correct treatment is that all unpaid CRP should be listed as obligations, whether or not the preconditions have been satisfied. While CRP may accrue (and will reduce surplus cash by the amount of that accrual) even if the preconditions for payment are not met, it cannot be distributed until a period in which all of the preconditions are met. (Previous instructions to include CRP as obligations only if the preconditions for payment had been satisfied were incorrect.) 

Many practitioners questioned the inclusion of all earned, but unpaid CRP as an obligation in the CSC as  doing so virtually guarantees that such amounts will never be paid as surplus cash must exceed the entire unpaid CRP to pay even one year of CRP. 

Today we received the following response from OAHP:

 

"Thank-you for your Accounting Question addressing the issue of earned but unpaid CRP.
You raise a very good question: Does HUD require owners to include all earned but unpaid CRP as an obligation on the computation of Surplus Cash. The short answer is yes. All earned but unpaid CRP payments must be accounted for on the fiscal year end statement of cash flow:

S1200-417 principal
S1200-195 interest

 

That said it is understandable to interpret this requirement to mean that in the event surplus cash in a particular Fiscal Year End statement were not to exceed the entire accrued unpaid CRP balance then no CRP payments can be made. This is where there is a misinterpretation of the intent of this accrual.  The actual procedure is to allow payment in the current fiscal year of CRP to the extent there is available surplus cash after all other expenses have been paid.  This last statement is correct to the extent that all pre-conditions to payment of CRP have been satisfied.  Of course one of those preconditions is that the annual financial statement reflects positive surplus cash. An accrued balance of unpaid CRP which exceeds the available surplus cash at fiscal year-end would theoretically push surplus cash into a negative balance. However payment of CRP is still allowed to the extent of available surplus cash.

 

Accounting Letter Q&A 2007 #14

This question has been addressed in prior years, but warrants clarification here.  The correct treatment is that all unpaid CRP should be listed as obligations, whether or not the preconditions have been satisfied.  While CRP may accrue (and will reduce surplus cash by the amount of that accrual) even if the preconditions for payment are not met, it cannot be distributed until a period in which all of the preconditions are met.  (Previous instructions to include CRP as obligations only if the preconditions for payment had been satisfied were incorrect.)  Therefore the  property may, when reconciling accounts in the preparation of the annual financial statement, use cash to pay the accrued CRP up to the point where the surplus cash calculation would result in zero..

For example: If the CRP accrual account has a balance of $25,000, and not counting the CRP accrual the FYE surplus cash would be $15,000 then the property will be able to make a CRP payment of $15,000 which would leave an unpaid CRP accrual of $10,000 to carry over to the next fiscal year.  This last statement is correct to the extent that all pre-conditions to payment of CRP have been satisfied. "



HUD COMMENTS ON ELIMINATION of A-133 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS I N CFDA.GOV WEBSITE MATERIAL

Many CPA's have inquired as to the meaning of comments indicating certain programs were made exempt from the audit requirements of OMB Circular A-133.  The following language was included in several of the CFDA numbers related to HUD at the CFDA.gov website:  

14.135- Mortgage Insurance_Rental and Cooperative Housing for Moderate Income Families and Elderly, Market Interest Rate

Post Assistance Requirements (110)

Audits (112):

This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-133. The Department of Housing and Urban Development reserves the right to audit the accounts of either the mortgagee or mortgagor in order to determine their compliance and conformance with HUD regulations and standards.

 

Similar comments have been found in CFDA 14.129 and 14.192.  Other CFDA numbers may have similar language.  HUD Personnel have told us that they are aware of these comments and that they are a MISTAKE. They are working to correct this.  They further reminded us that although the website indicates that no audit is required, that website is non-authoritative.  Further, HUD has no authority to change the requirements of Circular A-133.  The bottom line is - if your client is subject to A-133 audit requirements follow them!  DO NOT rely on extemporaneous comments from other sources.

UPDATE ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO LENDER APPROVAL PROCESS

We have received numerous inquiries today regarding the status FHA proposal to eliminate recertification requirements for loan correspondents.  Today, Vicki Bott from HUD, speaking at the NAMB conference, indicated that a final rule will be available on Monday, March 1st.  However, there is conflicting data regarding whether audits will be required for 2009.  FHA has told numerous CPAs and client that such audits will still be required for 2009.  At this point there is no clear indication of which way HUD will go.  We will have further information available as soon as the Federal Register Notice is posted.

 

In the meantime, AHACPA has prepared a letter to Chairman Dodd and ranking member Shelby of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs committee.  This letter represents a final effort to get some help from the Senate committee who refused this proposal in legislation in 2008.  We recognize that the likelihood is not great that they will take action, however, we feel it is still an option we should pursue.  All AHACPA members are encouraged to send similar letters to the committee leadership or to your own Senator if they serve on that committee.  A list of committee members and their fax numbers is included below.


COMMITTEE INFORMATION

Democrat

Christopher J. Dodd Chairman (D-CT) 202-224-1083

Tim Johnson (D-SD) 202-228-5765

Jack Reed (D-RI) 202-224-4680

Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) 202-228-3027

Evan Bayh (D-IN) 202-228-1377

Robert Menendez (D-NJ) 202-228-2197

Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI) 202-224-2126

Sherrod Brown (D-OH) 202-228-6321

Jon Tester (D-MT) 202-224-8594

Herb Kohl (D-WI) 202-224-9787

Mark Warner (D-VA) 202-224-6295

Jeff Merkley (D-OR) 202-228-3997

Michael Bennet (D-CO) 202-228-5036


Republican

Richard C. Shelby Ranking Member (R-AL) 202-224-3416

Robert F. Bennett (R-UT) 202-224-6331

Jim Bunning (R-KY) 202-228-1373

Mike Crapo (R-ID) 202-228-1375

Bob Corker (R-TN) 202-228-0566

Jim DeMint (R-SC) 202-228-5143

David Vitter (R-LA) 202-228-5061

Mike Johanns (R-NE) 202-228-0436

Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) 202-224-0766

Judd Gregg (R-NH) 202-224-4952


.
11th Annual PHA Financial Conference
When:
June 10, 2010
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

June 11, 2010
8:00 AM  3:00 PM

Add to my calendar
We are pleased to announce AHACPA's HUD PHA Financial Conference.  This course provides you the most comprehensive HUD public housing agency (PHA) financial information and guidance available. This conference is the essential gear-up conference. It provides the most recent HUD PHA accounting, audit, and electronic submission requirements and updates. There isn't another conference or course that delivers as much HUD PHA financial information and guidance as this conference.

Registration Fee:

AHACPA Member - $525
Non-Member - $575

Register before May 10th to received a $50 discount
Register Now!

or Click here to download printable registration form
Where:

Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino
3667 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, NV 89109

Hotel Room Reservations:We have reserved a block of rooms.  The room rate for June 9 - 10 is $99.  The rate for June 11 is $119.  To make a reservation call 866-317-1829, or go to https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mode=welcome_ei_new&eventID=2495487.  Reservations must be made by Monday, May 10 to received the group rate. 



Driving Directions
Who Should Attend:
PHA financial personnel, fee accountants, financial managers, and auditors.

Objective:
To learn HUD accounting, audit, and electronic submission requirements and how to efficiently implement those requirements.

Course Level: Intermediate

Prerequisites/Advanced Preparation:
General HUD accounting or audit experience.
 
Instructional Method:
Group-live with Interactive discussion, guides and practice aids, and case studies.

Length/CPE Credits:
16 CPE credits Governmental Accounting/Auditing
For More Information Contact:

Kathy Christensen or Susan Harris
AHACPA
info@ahacpa.org
(800) 532-0809
 
NASBA

AHACPA is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be addressed to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors, 150 Fourth Avenue North, Suite 700, Nashville, TN, 37219-2417. Web site: www.nasba.org.


Contact Information: For more information regarding refund, complaint and/or program cancellation policies, please contact our office at 800-532-0809.