About|Find us on Facebook View our profile on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter|Subscribe| Donate | Training Schedule | Social Fingerprint® | Archive 
August 2012
1. Gender Equity at Work: Seal Finalized by UN Women & SAI
2. India's Labor 'Time Bomb': How to Cut the Fuse
3. China's Labor Unions - New Tendrils
4. SAI Commits to Clinton Global Initiative
5. SAI Annual Planning Meeting Convenes in NYC
6. CSR & Human Rights in Peru
7. New Statistics: SA8000 Around the World
8. Enroll in Global SA8000 & CSR Training Courses
9. Snapshot: SA8000 Training in Indonesia
10. Highlights & Announcements
Job Openings 
Top 3 News Stories 

 

SA8000: Overtime & Lead Time

Training Courses

 Social Fingerprint® Online Courses 

- Getting Started in Your Company 

-Building Your Internal Social Performance Team

 

Webinars

 

Social Fingerprint® Classroom Course  

Development of a Process-based Social Performance Program 

Denver, CO, USA
November 13, 2012 

 

Professional Development Series

SA8000 Introduction 

Sao Paulo, Brazil

September 3, 2012    

 

Implementing the UN Guiding Principles 

Utrecht, the Netherlands

September 17-18, 2012 

 Sept 3-7, Istanbul, Turkey 

Sept 17-21, Sao Paulo, Brazil 

Sept 24-28, Bangalore, India 

Sept 24-28, Guangzhou, China  

Oct 8-12, Mumbai, India 

 

SA8000 Advanced Auditor Training   


  Events

     

Implementing the UN Guiding Principles 

SAI/ICCO, Sept 17-18  

(Utrech, the Netherlands)  

Social Accountability International (SAI) is a non-profit, multi-stakeholder organization established to advance the human rights of workers by promoting decent work conditions, labor rights, and corporate social responsibility through voluntary standards and capacity building. 

 

SAI is headquartered in the United States with field representation in Brazil, China, Costa Rica, India, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Philippines, Switzerland, and UAE.


SAI- Human Rights at Work

For newsletter inquiries contact:
SAI Communications Manager
Joleen Ong,  
jong@sa-intl.org
topGender Equity at Work: Seal Finalized by UN Women & SAI

SAI & UN Women finalize the Gender Equity Seal to promote fair treatment of men and women in the workplace and supply chain

 

Gender equality is a human right and a business imperative.  Despite a commitment to gender equity on the corporate agenda, however, progress has not matched aspirations.

 

In July 2012, SAI, in partnership with UN Women, finalized the Gender Equity Seal (GES) as a new auditable standard and certification system. The GES leverages SAI's extensive experience in management systems for social performance.

 

GES provides a 'gender lens'- a specialized standard - that can be easily integrated into a company's standard audit whether against an external or company code. It is anticipated that GES will primarily be used on a business to business level with the potential for expansion to a consumer label.

 

In addition to performance criteria, GES details specific criteria for policies, procedures, training and other management systems components. The intent is to provide companies with a clear roadmap to measure and improve their capacity to, and ultimately, demonstrate their progress in, implementing gender equity policies with a view to ultimately earning GES certification.

 

The GES was drafted and refined after extensive public consultation, including a multi-stakeholder survey and one-on-one interviews. There was strong confirmation of the rigor and applicability of GES. Below are a few of the hundreds of comments received in a public survey to elicit people's views on the value of a gender certification system:

 

"This is an important and much awaited initiative. High time that companies inculcate gender equity principles across their supply chain."

 

"The power of GES comes from a widespread application..."

 

"A mechanism to ensure mandatory compliance with such standards on gender equity needs to be developed...."

 

UN Women is now deliberating SAI's recommendations for the roll-out of the certification system on a regional and global scale. Currently, the standard is publicly available and companies can use it to benchmark their existing systems and performance.

 

GES has, as its foundations, the relevant ILO Conventions and international human rights instruments. It includes criteria on equal pay and equal treatment in relation to recruitment, employment and termination of contracts as well as provision of a safe working environment with an effective sexual harassment policy, and flexible, nondiscriminatory work practices.

 

The GES complements other initiatives, such as the Women's Empowerment Principles' Reporting Guidance (modeled on the GRI framework), which was launched at the 4th Annual Women's Empowerment Principles Event in March this year as well as the Calvert Women's Principles.

 

About UN Women: In July 2010, the United Nations General Assembly created UN Women, the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. The creation of UN Women came about as part of the UN reform agenda, bringing together resources and mandates for greater impact. It merges and builds on the important work of four previously distinct parts of the UN system, which focused exclusively on gender equality and women's empowerment. Website: www.unwomen.org   

 

View the GES standard @bit.ly/O5YhkB. For more information, contact SAI Communications Manager Joleen Ong - JOng@sa-intl.org.    

Back to top 


India's Labor 'Time Bomb': How to Cut the Fuse

Interview with SAI India Project Director on recent labor unrest in India, and the need for improved worker-manager dialogue 

 

SAI India Project Director Rishi Sher Singh
The following interview originally appeared in the Huffington Post Business on August 9, 2012, and  was conducted by Dr. John Tepper Marlin:

Last month auto workers at the Maruti Suzuki plant near New Delhi were so angry they killed the plant manager, injured a dozen or more Japanese managers, and set fire to the factory. What was going on in that factory?

I asked Rishi Sher Singh that question two days ago. Singh knows the area and the company. He grew up in New Delhi in a Sikh family -- we spoke the day before the mindless shooting of people attending the Sikh Temple in Wisconsin. Singh has worked in the same industrial area where Maruti Suzuki is located, for a supplier to Maruti.

Singh is now based in Bangalore, where last year he ran 22 workshops to train managers in the implementation of workplace standards and management systems for human resources. He is the India Project Director for the New York-based non-profit organization Social Accountability International (SAI).

He was in New York City for planning meetings with SAI staff (disclosure: I have been married to SAI's president, Alice Tepper Marlin, for 41 years). My questions follow with Singh's answers:

John Tepper Marlin: I was shocked at the violence of the workers on July 18 and by the apparent lack of communication that it indicates between management and workers. Are these reactions merited?

SINGH: Yes to both.

JTM: An automotive analyst in Bangkok believes that the core problem is the "perceived inequality" of India's contract workers, which he calls a "ticking time bomb." Is he right?

SINGH: Yes, that is definitely a key issue, unfairness to contract workers. More broadly, factory managers are not taking enough time to listen to the problems of workers. Stakeholder engagement is very important and there must be a pressure-relief valve for dissent, to prevent it becoming an explosion. Otherwise the pressure builds up.

JTM: What do you think were the major issues that led to the violent worker reaction on July 18?

SINGH: I think there were two major issues: 1) One was harassment. A supervisor called an Indian worker low-caste. The insulted worker responded by slapping the supervisor. The worker was fired. The incident seems to indicate that the plant might have a weak system for handling complaints, especially for filing a report on discrimination and caste-related issues. The insulted worker did not think he had any recourse. What is clearly needed at the plant is a complaint resolution system for harassment and other concerns. 2) The other was wage concerns. Yes, the plant did have a mechanism for addressing wage questions. A big problem is that contract workers are paid as little as one-third of what permanent workers get and the company pays them no medical benefits. This is a countrywide problem, because the law is ambiguous. Contract workers are supposed to be used only for peripheral jobs but they are used for core jobs -- they are in fact often doing the same work as permanent workers. Manufacturers are exploiting a loophole in the law. The use of contract workers has doubled since 2000 to 1.5 million workers, and some states under-report the number of contract workers. The central government should be monitoring the state reports, their completeness and the clarity of reporting on the scope and engagement of contract workers.

JTM: How has the company reacted to the violence?

SINGH: Maruti's Chairman quickly declared a lockout. The police have been keeping workers or outsiders from entering the factory and they are exercising arrest warrants for union leaders -- including the union president, Ram Meher, who has said that the violence was started by company-hired anti-union thugs who attacked workers with weapons.The company and Indian police have denied this. So the facts are still being established.

JTM: Maruti Suzuki says they pay more than 70 percent above minimum wage. Any comment?

SINGH:Yes, in the automotive region where they are located, all wages are relatively high.

JTM: Management says they plan to reduce the share of workers who are contractual to 20 percent. Comment?

SINGH: Yes, that would help.

JTM: Published reports show that management had warning of worker discontent, with three production stoppages in the past year. The lockout means Maruti is producing 1,600 fewer cars per day. Maruti stock fell 8.5 percent in two weeks and Suzuki Motor Corp. stock fell 6.6 percent. What does this mean in the bigger picture?

SINGH: It might be good for Hyundai and Tata Motors, which sell competing cars. But of course it may have a negative impact on foreign investment in India.

JTM: Is this factory unique, or have other factories seen incidents like this?

SINGH: I wish I could say it was a one-off. But in recent years three other factories in the automotive area had strikes for higher pay and improved status for contract workers. Four years ago the managing director of an Italian-owned plant in the area, Graziano Trasmissioni India, was beaten to death by a group of dismissed employees.

JTM: What is the solution?

SINGH: The factories need to reduce tension and manage conflict on an ongoing basis. They need a means of regular communication between workers and management to get to the root causes of their major issues. Any systematic approach to ensuring this is better than none, but of course I am inclined to encourage the use of the SA8000 approach.

JTM: Why is SA8000 special?

SINGH: The key is SA8000's "management systems" approach to human resources, which seeks to ensure routine adherence to the other eight performance criteria of the SA8000 standard. The systematic approach is much admired by managers who have been trained in use of SA8000, specifically because it helps to sustain compliance. The system also incorporates routine stakeholder engagement, which is crucial for understanding the many points of view of those involved in a supply chain.

 

Read the original article on Huffington Post Business @huff.to/MzFEsS. For inquiries, please contact Rishi Sher Singh - Rishi@sa-intl.org. To read more of Dr. Tepper Marlin's work, visit his blog at www.cityeconomist.blogspot.com or follow him on twitter @cityeconomist.    


China's Labor Unions - New Tendrils
Interview with SAI China Lead Trainer about emerging trends in China's labor unions

 

SAI Lead Trainer, Mike Lee
The following interview originally appeared in the Huffington Post Business on August 10, 2012, and  was conducted by Dr. John Tepper Marlin:

In June 2010, a nonviolent eight-day strike of 1,700 workers at the Honda factory in Zhongshan attracted international attention. Within three weeks, it was the third Honda auto parts factory in Guangdong province to suffer a work stoppage, along with plants in Shenzhen and Foshan.

In addition to the issue of inadequate wages, the workers at the Honda plants were pressing to have their own union, because they felt that the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) was not representing them adequately.

On August 4, I was privileged to talk about these questions with Mike Lee, Lead Trainer for Social Accountability International (SAI) in China, shown in photo with SAI's Development Manager, Eliza Wright.

Like Rishi Sher Singh, Lee was in the United States for SAI planning sessions. (See my prior post on workplace developments in India, and note my disclosure that I have been married for 41 years to the president of SAI.)

Lee has his M.Sc. degree in Chemical Engineering from Northeast China Institute of Electric Power Engineering and a B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from Wuhan University. He has conducted more than 50 SA8000 audits. He is based in Shenzhen, near the site of one of the three Honda plants that had work stoppages in 2010.

John Tepper Marlin: Mike, I thought the ACFTU was supposed to be the only union in China. It's the one that Wal-Mart's workers belong to. Why do you think the Chinese government has allowed the Honda union -- and similar ad hoc worker groups in other factories -- to continue?

Mike Lee: It was a puzzle at first. The theory now is that the government is using the existence of the bottom-up worker representation to put pressure on the national union to be more responsive to worker concerns. The government knows that Honda and other big brands can establish factories anywhere they want. Another reason is that although Wal-Mart had established many ACFTU branch unions inside their companies, actually it does not work as expected. The union seemed to be not functioning where there was a mass layoff in Wal-Mart last year.

JTM: A striking Honda worker who was afraid to identify himself is reported as saying: "The trade union is not representing our views; we want our own union that will represent us." What might the do-it-yourself unions have that the official union does not?

LEE: Actually, workers in the Honda strike asked their local government to re-organize the ACFTU local union in Honda's factory. After a series of negotiations, finally, the members of the Honda union were elected by workers directly, but the previous union leader is still there. The new re-organized union in Honda's factory cannot be viewed as a completely independent labor union but worker representation was enforced. Perhaps the Chinese government is trying to find out what works. It wants to make the national union better. Probably the most important task is to improve communication between plant managers and workers and to increase the representation of workers in ACFTU local unions.

JTM: How can a union improve representation of workers?

LEE: SAI has been thinking about this for a long time and has ideas on how to create systematic channels of effective communication between the factory manager and the workforce, and how to encourage workers and unions to become more involved.

JTM: Can you give me an example?

LEE: An example is to establish a mechanism inside factories to handle disputes. SAI's approach in its Social Fingerprint® Program is to establish "Internal Social Performance Teams."

JTM: Doesn't every factory have something like this?

LEE: Apparently not. The Chinese government may be seeking to ensure that the ACFTU is bringing workers' representatives and management to the table together when necessary.

JTM
: It sounds like President Kennedy's idea of a three-way negotiation, with the government bringing management and labor together. Of course, he was interested in the national unions and the major steel companies, whereas these issues are strictly local initiatives. What is the outlook for pop-up unions in China?

LEE: Yes, this is quite similar to President Kennedy's idea of a three-way negotiation. No one knows the outlook of pop-up unions in China, but the government's letting them continue informally at Honda and elsewhere is a good sign. Think of them as pilot projects under observation, and perhaps showing the way for the AFCTU, encouraging them to have a closer relationship with workers in every factory. The latest interesting news in China is that in May 2012, a pilot project of electing union leaders by workers directly at factory level in Shenzhen was successfully implemented. And the ACFTU branch in Shenzhen has announced they will involve more factories this year. This program of pilot elections may be considered a response by the local government and the ACFTU branches to the Honda strikes. This is a first step toward greater independence of the labor unions.

JTM: How does the Honda union operate?

LEE: Once a year, in February or March, or both, the union engages in collective bargaining with management for a wage increment and some assurances on other matters, such as that excessive overtime will be reduced.

JTM: Is the leadership among workers at the Honda plants, and the governments allowing them to continue, having any effect nationally?

LEE: I think so, if workers' requests are mainly focused on increasing their wage level, reducing excessive overtime working hours, and health and safety issues. It is seen as a signal that having workers' representation in the factories is considered healthy by the government. It is good for the worker committees and the workers because it creates confidence that management will be responsive.

JTM: There were strikes in other cities outside Guangdong and the targets are often Japanese-owned and Taiwanese-owned factories. And in India the factory where there was violence was owned by Suzuki, a Japanese firm. Is there any significance to the fact that these factories are foreign-owned?

LEE: People are perhaps more willing to believe that there is a lack of communication when the factory is foreign-owned. Also, perhaps the British and American-owned brands became aware of the problems earlier, because of consumer sentiment. Some U.S. brands have been early users of SAI's Social Fingerprint® Program and the SA8000 certification program.

Read the original article on Huffington Post Business @huff.to/Q0bKzj. For inquiries, please contact Mike Lee at MLee@sa-intl.org. To read more of Dr. Tepper Marlin's work, visit his blog at cityeconomist.blogspot.com or follow him on twitter @cityeconomist

SAI Commits to Clinton Global Initiative
SAI becomes CGI member to drive impact through its global alliance

SAI is pleased to announce its membership in the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), as a 2012 non-profit, complementary member. This highly competitive complementary membership enables SAI to join hundreds of leaders from a wide array of sectors: business, government, NGOs, foundations and civil society.  

 

Through CGI and its members, SAI will specify and fulfill commitments through the CGI model - inspirations, networking, knowledge building and collaboration.   

 

"SAI is delighted to become a member of CGI," said SAI President Alice Tepper Marlin. "It aligns with SAI's approach as a multi-stakeholder organization that brings all voices to the table to drive change in supply chains around the world. We look forward to expanding our network and leveraging our experience with the CGI model." 

 

According to CGI, member commitments represent "bold new ways to address global challenges - implemented through new methods of partnership and designed to maximize impact...CGI counts among its members the heads of many of the most effective nongovernmental organizations working around the world on problems related to climate change, economic stability, global health, and poverty alleviation."   

 

SAI Executive Director Eileen Kaufman participated in the mid-year meeting in July 2012, and will attend the annual meeting in late September 2012.  

 

About the Clinton Global Initiative: Established in 2005 by President Bill Clinton, the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) convenes global leaders to create and implement innovative solutions to the world's most pressing challenges. CGI Annual Meetings have brought together more than 150 heads of state, 20 Nobel Prize laureates, and hundreds of leading CEOs, heads of foundations and NGOs, major philanthropists, and members of the media. To date CGI members have made more than 2,100 commitments, which are already improving the lives of nearly 400 million people in more than 180 countries. When fully funded and implemented, these commitments will be valued at $69.2 billion. For more information, visit  clintonglobalinitiative.org and follow them on Twitter @ClintonGlobal and Facebook at  facebook.com/clintonglobalinitiative.

 

For more information, contact SAI Communications Manager Joleen Ong - JOng@sa-intl.org.  

 

Back to top


SAI Annual Planning Meeting Convenes in NYC 

Activities focused on connecting SAI's diverse staff perspectives to the organization's mission, and looking ahead to the future

Group photo of SAI staff & meeting participants: (clockwise, from top left) Rishi Sher Singh; Eliza Wright; Doug DeRuisseau; Stephanie Wilson; Matt Applebaum; Marie Rose Coulibaly; Richard Cook; Alan Spaulding; Craig Moss; Melanie Bower (SAAS); Jason Turner; Achim Lohrie (Tchibo); Salah Husseini (SAAS); Harrison Xu; Dr. Mary Watson (The New School); Mike Lee; Jane Hwang; Rochelle Zaid (SAAS); Alice Tepper Marlin; Joleen Ong; Lisa Bernstein (SAAS); Christie Daly; Eileen Kaufman.

See more photos from the meeting @on.fb.me/SnrZpA

On July 30-31 SAI convened its Annual Staff Planning meeting at New Yorks's Murphy Labor Institute. The purpose of the meeting was to look back at SAI's 15 years of impact, and ahead to plan for its future through group brainstorming and discussion.  

 

New York headquarters staff were joined by SAI field staff from China and India. SAI WE Trainer Harrison Xu spoke about the issue of 'Left Behind Children' in China, where over 58 million children are 'left behind' by their parents who have migrated to work in China's competitive export-manufacturing industry. Mr. Xu discussed possible ways for SAI and our Corporate Members to address this crisis, benefitting workers and their families beyond factory walls.   

 

SAI Lead Trainer Mike Lee discussed the growing trends in industrial sectors in China, specifically in food processing. In China, increased concerns over food safety have instigated the focus on inspection protocols and monitoring systems. Mr. Lee also discussed ways to enhance the roles of worker representatives and how this can be replicated through SAI training seminars. [See interview, above] 

 

SAI India Project Director Rishi Sher Singh discussed the RAGS Project in India, which focuses on gender discrimination and management systems for improving the work lives of home based workers. Mr. Singh discussed trends in India and possible sectors for expansion, including the dairy industry in India. 


The meeting was masterfully facilitated by Dr. Mary Watson, Associate Dean of the New School for Public Engagement, Milano School of International Affairs, Management and Urban Policy, with support from SAI Communications Manager Joleen Ong. 

 

SAI Advisory Board Chair, Achim Lohrie, Head of Corporate Responsibility at Tchibo GmbH, joined the planning process, as did staff from Social Accountability Accreditation Services. 

   

Outcomes from the meeting will be included for consideration at SAI's upcoming Advisory Board meeting in Bologna, Italy on October 9-11, 2012. This meeting will focus exclusively on the development of SAI's Strategic Plan for 2014-18.      

 

Special thanks to SAI Advisory Board Chair Achim Lohrie for his insightful participation, the New School's Dr. Mary Watson for her facilitation, Minerva Musquiz for facilitation/meeting support, and the CUNY Murphy Institute for the venue. Dr. Watson and Joleen Ong will bring the outcomes of the meeting forward, and facilitate the upcoming Advisory Board meeting in Bologna in October 2012. 

 

View more photos from the Annual Planning meeting @on.fb.me/SnrZpA. For inquiries, please contact SAI Communications Manager Joleen Ong - JOng@sa-intl.org.  

Back to top 


CSR & Human Rights in Peru
SAI partners convene public forum to promote CSR & human rights in the Peruvian workplace 
Snapshots of forum speakers: (from left) Enrique Javier Fernández-Maldonado Mujica, Director of Conflict Resolution and Prevention and CSR, Ministry of Labor of Peru; David José Campana, CSR Consultant, Peru EQUIDAD;   Aurelio Manuel Soto Barba, Regional Director for Labor and Employment Promotion for Metropolitan Lima, Ministry of Labor of Peru.
On June 27, 2012, over 190 participants attended SAI's joint open forum to promote corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Human Rights in the Workplace at the Ministry of Labor in Lima. The forum was organized in collaboration with the Peruvian Ministry of Labor,Peru EQUIDAD: Center for Public Policy and Human Rights, and Peru 2021.

The topic for the forum was timely - CSR has gained increasing importance in Peru as the economy becomes more globalized. The government, private sector, and public sector have made substantial efforts to promote best practices in CSR by businesses operating in their country, particularly in the mining industry. Forum attendees represented a diverse group of stakeholders including academia, government and garment manufacturers.

 

SAI's Latin America Representative Yolanda Brenes presented via teleconference on the SA8000 Standard, SAI's Social Fingerprint® Program, and the importance of Management Systems for sustaining positive change. The opening remarks were delivered by Aurelio Manuel Soto Barba, [pictured right, above] Regional Director for Labor and Employment Promotion for Metropolitan Lima, Ministry of Labor of Peru.

 

Other speakers included David Campana of Peru EQUIDAD [pictured above, center] who spoke about the evolution of CSR and human rights at workplaces in Peru. Enrique Fernandez-Maldonado, [pictured right, above] Director of the Ministry's Office of CSR and Conflict Resolution and Prevention, provided insight into the Ministry's views on CSR. Peru 2021, a coalition of businesses that works toward the promotion of CSR practices, delivered a presentation on CSR from the private sector's perspective. Finally, closing words were delivered by Peru's Vice-Minister of Labor Pablo Checa Ledesma.

 

After a Q&A session, attendees were asked to fill out surveys about the CSR practices implemented at their workplaces, their impressions of the event, and what they were interested in learning at future events. Based on their feedback, SAI plans to co-convene additional open forums with the Ministry, Peru EQUIDAD and Peru 2021, as well as offer training seminars on social certification systems.

 

This article was written by SAI Intern Yu Mei Lay He. For more information, contact SAI Development Manager Eliza Wright - EWright@sa-intl.org.   


New Statistics: SA8000 Around the World 

Over 1.8 million workers employed in SA8000 certified facilities

 

Number of workers, by country: 

 

 

 

# Number Employees:  

1,840,846 

 

# Certified Facilities:

3,083

 

# Countries Represented: 65  

 

# Industries Represented: 65 

 

# Accredited Certification Bodies: 21   

   


Enroll in Global SA8000 & CSR Training Courses   
International Locations & Online Courses Available

Participants at the SA8000 Basic Course in Colombo, Sri Lanka, August 6-10, 2012. [Photo credit: Sanjiv Singh]

SAI Training Schedule: 2012

  

Upcoming:    

Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands    

Date: September 17-18 

 

Location: Bangalore, India    

Date:  September 24-28

 

 SAI training courses are designed to encourage proficiency in social compliance issues and emphasize the implementation of management systems. Learn about a management-system approach to social compliance auditing and supply chain management. These courses are required for all SA8000® and BSCI auditors, and are just as valuable to internal auditors, buyers, managers and workers for auditing to any labor code or standard. The courses are open to all.

 

For more information, contact SAI Training Coordinator, Stephanie Wilson at SWilson@sa-intl.org 

 


Snapshot: SA8000 Training in Indonesia
Participants at the SA8000 Basic Course in Surabaya, Indonesia, July 16-20, 2012. [Photo credit: Badri Gulur
On July 16-20, 2012 SAI carried out its SA8000 Basic Auditor Training course in Surabaya, Indonesia. 23 attendees, mostly from companies and certification bodies, participated in the course, from a wide array of countries: India, Indonesia, Thailand, Turkey, Germany, Malaysia and UAE. SAI Lead Trainer Badri Gulur led the course, with assistance from Yogendra Choudhary. Special thanks to GlobalGroup for organizing a successful training course. 

Check out SAI's Training Schedule for upcoming 2012 courses @sa-intl.org/trainingschedule. For more information, contact SAI Training Coordinator, Stephanie Wilson at SWilson@sa-intl.org.



Highlights & Announcements
SAI staff with Joe MacDonald, a longtime supporter of SAI, at a post-Annual Planning meeting reception in Long Island, New York. [From left: Mike Lee, Eliza Wright, Joe MacDonald, Alice Tepper Marlin, Joleen Ong, Rishi Sher Singh and Harrison Xu.]
Sustainable Apparel Coalition On July 25-27 in Hong Kong, SAI Corporate Programs & Training Director Craig Moss participated in the Social and Labor working group of the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC). SAC is an apparel and footwear industry group, which has just launched the "Higg Index" that measures the environmental performance of apparel products.
 
SAC's Social and Labor working group is developing modules to expand the Higg Index to cover social and labor standards. SAI is contributing its expertise to help the Index to include the appropriate indicators to drive accountability and improvement throughout the supply chain.

Call for Feedback - Global Reporting Initiative Anti-Corruption Reporting Guidance The GRI invites feedback on reporting guidance that will help organizations report their anti-corruption performance. This guidance is part of the next generation of GRI's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines - G4. Read the guidance @bit.ly/O7ocM8 & give feedback @bit.ly/Q00Fyj.

"Rapid Results Boot Camp: The 100 Day Challenge" The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness wrote a blog post that covered the Rapid Results Institute's (RRI) approach to foster change. SAI and RRI are partners, and have integrated the RRI approach into the Social Fingerprint course, 'Building Your Internal Social Performance Team. Read the article @1.usa.gov/R1vk9H.

Tata Steel Annual Report 2011-2012 The India-based multinational steel giant Tata Steel released its 105th 2011-2012 Annual Report. Notably, the report includes a triple bottom line report on financial, social and environmental impacts. Its section on Human Rights includes mention of its use of the SA8000 standard. Read the excerpt of the report @bit.ly/O5Wvjj & read the full report @bit.ly/O7uxXY.