Monthly Update
Issue Contributors: Katie Smith, DVM and Louisa Rahilly, DVM DACVECC
Editor: William B Henry DVM, DACVS  
July 2012

To treat or not to treat? The truth about Lyme disease in dogs.

Katie Smith, DVM and Louisa Rahilly, DVM DACVECC


For any practicing veterinarian in the coastal northeast, Lyme disease is a hot topic. We see this on a regular basis and there is a lot of debate in the community about vaccination, testing, treatment, and prognosis. There is a lot of information out there and some of it seems contradictory. So what is the right way to go about Lyme?

        Borrelliaburgdoferi(Bb) was first discovered in the county of Lyme, Connecticut and therefore is not described in the possessive as it was not named after a person. It is a small spirochete that can only be visualized using dark field microscopy. There are 4 genomic species groups, but the only one that occurs in the US is group one, B. bergdorferi sensu stricto.   It cannot survive as a free-living organism and can only be found in the vertebrate host or the arthropod vector, Ixodesscapularis, commonly referred to as the deer tick or the black legged tick. Although this tick occurs almost nationwide, there are only three endemic regions from which the organism has been cultured. 85% of human cases occur in the coastal northeast, while 10% in the upper Midwest and 4% in northern California. As the tick and potential host species inhabit additional areas of the country, however, potential for spread should always be considered. In the north, the reservoir host is mostly small animals, particularly the white footed mouse. Before the tick attaches to the dog, B. bergdorferi expresses the protein Osp A which adheres the organism to the midgut of the tick. With the warmth and presence of a blood meal, Bb switches from the expression of Osp A to Osp C. This allows migration and adherence to the salivary tissue of the tick. Experimentally, this takes 53 hours. The tick must therefore be attached for some time before Bb will be able to be transferred to a dog or person. Once it is in the dog, there is local proliferation. This may produce the classic target lesion that is often seen in people, but often missed in dogs due to their furry covering. The organism then migrates through tissue and blood.1

We have all seen the classic signs of Lyme in our patients: fever, lethargy, anorexia, polyarthritis, and lymphadenopathy. The pathogenesis of Lyme disease in dogs, however, is still somewhat elusive. Koch's postulates have partially been satisfied, but only in young dogs. In an experimental study of putting infected Ixodes ticks on Beagles, the adult dogs seroconverted, but remained asymptomatic. It was only the 6-12 week old puppies that showed clinical signs including decreased appetite, lethargy and arthropathy 2-5 months after exposure. In contrast, people that are exposed to Bbshow an acute illness including flu-like signs, erythema migrans rash, subsequent arthritis and possibly cardiac, neurologic, or chronic skin changes. Only 10% of people remain asymptomatic.

  

The most clinically used method of diagnosis of Lyme disease is serology. Interestingly, in people there can be cross reactivity with certain autoimmune diseases, syphilis, periodontal disease, and leptospira. This, however, has not been documented in dogs.1  There are 4 antibody types to different antigens commonly tested for through commercial laboratories: Osp A, Osp C, Osp F and C6. Osp A is generally found when the organism is within the gut of the tick. After a warm blood meal, Bb changes its expression to OspC and migrates to the salivary tissue in the tick. Although OspA is mostly expressed while in the tick, early in the animal exposure, some OspA may still be present.After entering into the animal, Bb then changes its expression to OspF. However, in the chronic carrier, random and spontaneous mutations and recombinations allow for many antigens to be expressed as the organism goes through its antigenic repertoire to avoid the host immune system. The 4DX Snap test from IDEXXatests for anti-C6 antibodies. C6 is a synthesized protein which mimics an antigen which is only expressed by Bb organism when it is within the host, the variable major protein like sequence (VIsE). IDEXX also offers the Lyme Quant C6,b which gives a quantitative result that can be compared over time. The value does not predict illness as many asymptomatic dogs have very high values.2 Dogs in endemic areas (such as Massachusetts) have rates of 70-90% seropositive, while only 5% of seropositive animals develop clinical signs. There are hypotheses of why some dogs become ill while others do not, but the bottom line is that we do not know why. What we do know is that it is very difficult to document an active infection. What we can do is correlate clinical signs and seroposivity (as a polyarthropathy caused by Lyme will be positive on serology as it has been shown experimentally to take 2-5 months after exposure to develop clinical sings) to help our decisions on when to treat.2,3 Unlike other tick borne diseases, thrombocytopenia is not a common finding on a CBC. If it is present, it is likely due to a co-infection or another disease process. A hyperglobulinemia is seen commonly on chemistry. If an arthrocentesis is performed, the synovial fluid is often grossly turbid with decreased viscosity. Fluid analysis of the synovial fluid reveals an increased protein and cell count with non degenerate neutrophils predominating. The organism is not seen. In experimentally induced infection in dogs, tests show viable organisms in the skin biopsies of previous tick bite sites in untreated dogs and in 10% or more of treated dogs. In clinical medicine, however, cultures and PCRs are rarely positive even when sampling joint fluid, synovium, or kidneys. This phenomenon is a result of the pathology of the disease process: the signs are caused by an immune-mediated response in predisposed individuals.2,3

  

 The treatment of choice for Lyme disease in dogs is doxycycline at 10mg/kg SID or 5 mg/kg BID for 4-6 weeks.  Doxycycline is a bacteriostatic drug that requires an intact cellular immunity in order for it to be effective. It is lipid soluble and crosses cell membranes in order to attack intracellular organisms. It inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30s subunit of the ribosome. It is preferred over amoxicillin as it also has anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases. Although generally well tolerated, there are side effects of doxycycline that should preclude its indiscriminant use. Technically it should be given on an empty stomach, but can cause significant gastrointestinal upset. In cats and humans it has been well documented to cause esophageal erosions leading to potential stricture formation. In young animals, it can cause permanent discoloration of the teeth (although of all of the tetracyclines, it is the least likely to do so). Hypersensitivity reactions have been seen. Elevations of ALT and ALP can occur in 1/3 of patients andcanlead to hepatotoxicity. Finally, it can cause acute renal injury or a Fanconi-like syndrome, especially if the drug has started to degrade.4 Drug resistance is a huge concern in the entire medical profession. Overuse of any antimicrobial will contribute to bacterial resistance. Doxycycline use in non-tick borne related diseasecauses continued exposure of other bacteria to this drug and will contribute to long term resistance patterns. Given the seroprevelance of Lyme in our area and the potential dangers of bacterial resistance, careful consideration that the current clinical signs are caused by Lyme disease before starting antibiotics is warrented.

Although it is considered the second most common canine syndrome, the incidence of Lyme nephritis is actually unknown. It seems to affect Labrador retrievers more than other breeds, but the association between Lyme and the resultant glomerulonephritis has never been a very strong correlation.   These dogs have a severe protein losing nephropathy that is believed to be immune mediated in origin. Koch's postulates have never been fulfilled with this clinical syndrome and the presence of Bb in affected renal tissues either through culture or PCR techniques has never been demonstrated.5Despite this, many experts in the veterinary community believe in a relationship between some cases of protein losing nephropathy (PLN) and Lyme disease. These reported cases are clinically ill dogs presenting mostly in the summer or fall months with a presentation that would range in severity from chronic weight loss and protein losing nephropathy to acute renal failure. They will have variable abnormalities including vasculitis, edema, effusions, hypertension (with possible blindness), and thromboembolic events. Seizures and other neurological signs can be seen secondary to the vasculitis, hypertension, thromboembolic events, uremic encephalopathy, or meningitis.1-3 Dogs with this syndrome often require 24 hour care with careful attention to fluid therapy and aggressive management of hypertension. Treatment with immunosuppressive medications have anecdotally resulted in improvement in some cases, but unfortunately many dogs do not respond. Due to the severity of this possible sequelae, it is recommended that all lyme positive dogs (regardless of clinical signs) be routinely screened for proteinuria.2,3   

        

When we think about other diseases that we routinely vaccinate against (Distemper, Parvovirus) they carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality and are expensive to treat. The most common condition associated with Lyme is that of polyarthritis which is readily treatable with an inexpensive medication. The disease process behind the syndrome of Lyme nephritis is an immune-mediated one. Vaccines are meant to stimulate the immune system so as to create a level of immunoglobulins that may protect the animal from getting that disease. By vaccinating for Lyme, we may actually be adding fuel to the fire. Borrelia has developed a clever way of evading the host immune system by changing its antigen to avoid detection. It is unknown which of these antigens is the offending one that ultimately may result in either the arthropathicornephropathicsyndromes of the disease.2Vaccination for Lyme should be carefully considered and discussed with clients with attention to the potential risks and benefits for each patient given their breed and exposure risks.

 
 

a SNAP-4Dx heartworm, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phygoctyophilum test, IDEXX laboratories, Westbrook Maine.

b Lyme Quant C6 test, IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine.

 

1 Greene CG, Straubinger RK, Levy SA. Borreliosis. In Green, Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat Fourth Edition. Saunders Elsevier; St. Louis, MO: 447-465.

2 Littman MP, Goldstein RE, Labato MA, Lappin MR, Moore GE. ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Statement on Lyme Disease in Dogs: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 422-434.

3 Littman MP. Lyme Disease: Which Test is Best? Proceedings of 2012 the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Forum; 2012 May 30-June 2; New Orleans, LA: 533-535.

4 Booth DM. Antimicrobial drugs. In Booth DM, Small Animal Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Second Edition. Saunders Elsevier; St. Louis, MO: 189-270

5 Hutton TA, Goldstein RE, Njaa BL, Atwater DZ, Change YF, Simpson KW. Search for Borellia burgdoreri in Kidneys of Dogs with Suspected "Lyme Nephritis." J Vet Int Med 2008; 22(4): 860-865

Optimization of Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector Abdominal Computed Tomography in Sedated Canine Patients
Fields, E. L., Robertson, I. D. and Brown, J. C. (2012), OPTIMIZATION OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED MULTIDETECTOR ABDOMINAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN SEDATED CANINE PATIENTS. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2012.01950.

 

A major disadvantage of computed tomography for abdominal screening in dogs has been the need for general anesthesia to prevent motion artifacts. With multidetector helical CT, it is possible to decrease examination time, allowing patients to be scanned under sedation. It is also desirable to decrease tube loading to prolong x-ray tube life. To develop a protocol that will allow for examination of sedated patients with minimal image artifacts, milliamperage (mA) and helical pitch were varied, providing 16 experimental scan protocols. A standard clinical protocol was also tested, providing 17 protocols for evaluation. These protocols were tested, using a standard CT phantom, canine tissues in a water bath, and a canine cadaver. The cadaver images were scored semiquantitatively by three reviewers to determine the protocol with the best combination of speed and minimal image artifact. The optimized protocol was then applied to 27 sedated canine patients of three body weight categories. The images obtained were compared to the standard protocol by two reviewers for presence of motion, streak, and quantum mottle artifacts. There was significantly more streak artifact noted by one observer using the optimized study protocol, but no significant difference in any other category. CONCLUSION: Scanning under sedation was well tolerated in all patients, and sedated CT examination is a promising tool for screening abdominal disease in dogs.

In This Issue
To treat or not to treat? The truth about Lyme disease in dogs.
Optimizatin of Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector Abdominal Computed Tomography in Sedated Canine Patients
CT Corner
Continuing Education
Tech Tip
Newsletter Archive
CT Corner 

With the CT availability in veterinary medicine we learn how to use it more effectively as we go forward. This month the rapid CT scan speeds are enabling scans with only sedation (see ABSTRACT). The pros and cons of CT vs. MRI are discussed as well this month. The CT scan speeds are outlined for the common anatomic locations (see TECH TIP). 


 

Continuing Education Opportunies
The fall/winter lecture topics will be listed in the upcoming August or September issues.  

Tech Tip
Our TECH TIP this month is regarding the speed of our four slice CT can scan our patients. CT and MRI are now becoming available in referral veterinary practices. We chose a CT for several reasons. The CT has a broad range of capability for soft tissue, orthopedic, and spinal disease. An MRI has advantages over CT when diagnosing spinal soft tissue disease such as tumors and spinal cord infarction. An MRI will delineate brain tumors better than a CT in most cases. The two main advantages of CT over MRI are cost and the scan times. CT scan cost 1/3 to 1/2 an MRI scan because of the initial cost for equipment and  maintenance costs are much less. The scan times of a CT are very very fast which lessens the anesthesia time dramatically. The MRI equipment used in veterinary medicine is all previously used in human medicine and being sold to our market and third world countries for human use. The newer, faster 3.0 to 15.0 Tesla MRI's (High Field) cost millions of dollars and have very high maintenance cost. The MRI's used in veterinary medicine are 0.25-1.5 Tesla ( Low Field ) and have very slow scan times and significantly higher maintenance costs than our CT. There are very few 1.5 Tesla units in veterinary medicine, most are 0.5-1.0.  Therefore, veterinary MRI scan times for a CERVICAL SPINE MAY TAKE 30-60 MINUTES. With our four slice CT the SCAN TIME for a CERVICAL SPINE IS 5-20 SECONDS. (SEE LIST OF SCAN TIMES BELOW) Short scan times lessen the anesthesia time. With MRI scans one needs special anesthesia equipment because of the magnet. This requires long gas conduction tubing that results in significant dead space and high risk for very small patients. The current veterinary literature is now discussing the pros and cons of CT vs. MRI and the applications of both diagnostic modalities. We are all in a learning mode for these applications that provide us with much more precise diagnosis.

HELICAL ACQUISITION TIMES PLUS RECONSTRUCTION TIMES. (The range in acquisition times depends on how you want your images ie. slice thickness and desired detail.): ALL CT ACQUISITION TIMES ARE LESS THAN ONE MINUTE!!

   

CERVICAL SPINE = 5 sec to 20sec
BRAIN = 2 sec to 5 sec
NASAL= 2 sec to 5 sec 
THORAX  = 20 sec to 45 sec 
ABDOMEN = 20 sec to 60 sec
URINARY TRACT (for ectopic ureters) = 20 to 60sec
TL SPINE = 20 to 45 sec
LS SPINE = 5 to 15 sec
ELBOWS = Fragmented Coronoids/Elbow Joint Incongrueity (done at the same time) = 10 to 20 sec

AXIAL ACQUISITION:

 

BRAIN= 30 to 60 sec
NASAL = 30 to 60 sec
URINARY TRACT (for ectopic ureters) = 45 - 120 sec

TL Spine = 30-45 sec   

LS spine = 15 to 30sec
ELBOWS= Fragmented Coronoids/Elbow Joint Incongruity (done at the same time) = 20-40 sec

  
Visit Our Newsletter Archive
Read our June newsletter article about Tips and Guides to Skin Mass Resection: Part Two by visiting our newsletter archive!