On May 13, 2009, The George Washington University
Homeland Security Policy Institute (HSPI) and GW's School of Public Health and
Health Services (SPHHS) co-hosted a Policy and Research Forum entitled,
"Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy: Combating H1N1." The event featured Paul Jarris, MD, MBA,
Executive Director of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
(ASTHO); Robert Kadlec, MD, MTH&H, MA, former Special Assistant to the
President for Homeland Security and Senior Director for Biological Defense
Policy in the White House Homeland Security Council; Jeffrey Levi, PhD,
Executive Director of Trust for America's Health (TFAH), and Associate
Professor in the Department of Health Policy, SPHHS; and Major General Philip
Russell, MD (USA, Ret.), former Senior Advisor in the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public Health Emergency Preparedness at the Department of Health
and Human Services. The event was also
webcast live.
Jarris
led off the discussion by noting that in responding to the outbreak of H1N1, federal,
state, and local governments have coordinated and "come together as one
entity." The communications efforts of
the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) played a crucial role in fostering public trust and confidence
as information was conveyed by the experts-health professionals, with political
figures in a background support role.
Jarris underscored that even through we are only in the first weeks of
what could be a months-long process as the virus evolves, there are lessons to
be learned. These include the need
to: challenge our pandemic planning
assumptions; bolster our domestic surveillance system to enable national
analysis; support vulnerable populations such as migrant workers; and fund
overall public health infrastructure as we prepare for a possible resurgence of
H1N1 in the fall, or for another pandemic in the future. "Without a workforce, we can't do anything,"
he stated, noting the importance of keeping critical infrastructure such as the
banking system running.
Kadlec highlighted the
need for the federal government to apply resources to preparing for a pandemic
or biological attack notwithstanding the myriad of other important national
security issues. Though not always well
understood, public health is part of our national security infrastructure. When considering the economic costs, and
consequences of a pandemic "superimposed" on unstable countries such as Iraq or Afghanistan,
the national security threat to the United States and other nations is
brought into clear relief. According to
Kadlec, we have a unique window of opportunity to make strides in getting
better prepared, such as by thinking in novel ways about vaccine distribution
and other logistics that will determine the success of our strategy for dealing
with pandemics.
Levi stated that while we
are better prepared for pandemics than we were eight years ago, there are still
improvements to be made: "we can't fall
into the trap of complacency because media is done covering it [H1N1]." Needed measures include updating national
preparedness strategy and plans (most federal departments last did this in
2006); improving communications to the American public about real and apparent
risk; and fostering surge capacity in our hospitals. He also cited the need to improve
surveillance capacity, and questioned how well the surveillance efforts of the
intelligence community meshed with those of the health (epidemiological)
community in this case.
Russell wrapped up the
panel by focusing on the importance of vaccines in combating pandemics. He noted the challenges of allocating a
limited supply. Hewing to prioritization
may be difficult as both public and private entities distribute vaccine. Russell also observed that only two licensed
manufacturers of vaccine undertake this activity in the United States, though vaccine may
be pre-purchased from elsewhere.
However, ensuring the developing world also has access to vaccine is an
important moral question with significant political consequences. Russell noted that new technology for vaccine
development is on the horizon, but its implementation is still one or two
decades out; unfortunately, that "technology will not be available until the
next pandemic".
In response to a question
by Rebecca Katz, Assistant Research Professor at SPHHS, Kadlec assessed the
World Health Organization's response to the outbreak as effective, due to the
processes put in place by the organization as well as its veteran
leadership. However, WHO's "Pandemic
Stages" warning system may require re-design so as to better reflect the virulence
of the virus as well as its spread.
A
question from Amir Afkhami, Assistant
Professor at both SPHHS and GW's School
of Medicine and Health
Sciences (SMHS), sparked discussion, citing human behavior in the face of a
pandemic as a "wildcard." "Ultimately,"
said HSPI Director Frank Cilluffo, "we are trying to induce behavioral changes
in the pandemic context." The panel agreed that decisionmakers need to
integrate the study of human behavior as they craft policy, particularly for a
sustained pandemic.
Larissa May, Assistant
Professor at SMHS, asked the panelists to comment on the matter of logistics,
in light of recent experience with H1N1.
In reply, Jarris highlighted the need to "further clarify our thinking"
so that clinicians dealing with patients receive practicable guidance.
Concluding the event,
Cilluffo emphasized the "convergence point between health and security,"
observing that "today's issues require that we come together as an integrated
whole as part of our planning and responses."
The HSPI Policy &
Research Forum (PRF) series is designed to spotlight cutting-edge policy
solutions and innovative strategies to some of the most pressing national and
international concerns. The Forum features leading officials, practitioners and
thinkers in a systematic way designed to better highlight their work and
promote a dialogue on effective solutions to current issues. For more
information on the series, see the PRF website.