Education Secretary Arne Duncan stunned the nation by announcing two-and only two-winners in the first round of Race to the Top. Our congratulations to Delaware and Tennessee, both states with PIE Network members.
There are many takes on what this all means, but no issue has been debated more than the importance of "collaboration" in the application process. Some argue this will lead to scaled back plans, others that it creates new pressures on groups now resisting reform. Before anyone trades innovation for collaboration points, they should consider three things.
First, while two states won in part due to stakeholder buy-in, six states had similarly high scores for stakeholder and local educational agency investment, but did NOT win because their plans weren't substantive enough. Bottom line: the rewards went to the states with the broadest reach for bold plans.
Second, round two is a new race and there are many states in the country itching for come from behind wins. Imagine these game changers: What if Connecticut passes the legislation ConnCAN is pushing, if California's "stakeholders" come to grip with the state's dire finances and sign on to a serious application, or if Washington or Maine finally takes charter schools seriously? If any of those things happen, they might knock other round one finalists out of their rank.
Finally, it's worth noting that while Delaware and Tennessee gained the support of teachers and other stakeholders, state leaders passed strong laws that gave these groups few alternatives: they made reform inevitable. That is a lead worth following.
While the ending to this story called Race to the Top has yet to be written, one thing I know for sure: leading state advocates will continue to make it a page-turner.
Suzanne Tacheny Kubach
Policy Innovators in Education (PIE) Network