Janet Levine Consulting Header
Summer 2012  
In This Issue
RIgh Size Your Board
Kindred Spirits
Building Capacity Through Coaching
Join Our Mailing List

Learn how to SUCCESSFULLY plan and write grants!
Book Cover - Get Ready Get Set
Buy NOW
Quick Links
The more you know...
Janet Levine Consulting Header
Check out the classes and workshops offered by Janet at
Janet Levine Consulting
 
Greetings! 

 

It was a miserable experience, bringing back memories of a time I prefer to forget. But there I was, in the witness box, testifying at a trial brought by a former staff member against the institution where we used to both work.

  As the lawyer questioned me, although I could not remember any particulars from that long ago, memories swept over me. I remembered how adversarial management and staff were. Rather than talk with each other when there was a problem or potential problem, the default was to immediately file a claim with HR or the union. And co-workers would oh, so politely throw their colleagues under the bus.

  Knowing what I know today, I would have acted very differently than I did when I was working there. Heck, knowing what I know today, I wouldn't have accepted the job even though it gave me an obscene raise. I didn't like the culture of the organization. I didn't fit. And what I know now that I didn't understand before I worked there is that the culture of an organization is its soul. Not its mission. Not the things it does. Rather, what defines the organization is the way it goes about doing things and the attitudes and actions of those involved.

  That I didn't fit with the culture of that particular institution did not make it a bad place-only a bad place for me.

  Corporate culture, however, can also be a bad thing for the organization. It can work to prevent needed change. It can stop innovation. It can allow things to happen without anyone taking ownership. It can create stagnation or worse.

  On the other hand, corporate culture can get everyone reading off the same page. The trick is to make sure that the page is one that makes you feel proud. If it's not, you must begin to change the story of your culture.

   Knowing what your story is and what you would like it to be is an important first step. For nonprofits, there are three legs to this: Who do you want to be for your staff; for your clients; for your contributors. Once you know who you want to be you can begin to act on those desires, generating story lines that as they become the norm create the culture of an organization that makes you proud. 

 
  ***************

 Fundraising capacity not where you want it to be?

  Need help in making Board members comfortable with fundraising?    

 Contact  Janet Levine Consulting for a

free 30-minute meeting 

 


RIGHT SIZE YOUR BOARD

Mitch Dorger is the Principal of Dorger Consulting and Senior Consultant of Win-Win Workplace Solutions. Email Mitch at mitch@dorger.com

 

 

   I recently attended a seminar by the president and CEO of BoardSource, Linda Crompton. As you might imagine, Linda lives and breathes boards of directors and talks all over the country about nonprofit board effectiveness. She said when she talks to people about boards, the most common question she gets is "How big should my board be?" Linda said she always responds to this question by saying, "It depends." (Note 11) That's a good answer, but what are some of the things it depends on?

  The first thing is human nature. After all, a board is nothing more than a group of human beings trying to work together to create the best results for the organization they are charged with directing and protecting. Human beings work best in groups of a certain size. Over the years a number of studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of group decision making.  One such study by the authors of Decide and Deliver: 5 Steps to Breakthrough Performance in Your Organization determined that the optimum size for a decision-making group was seven people and that for each person added above this, the group's decision making effectiveness was reduced by 10%. (Note 3) Another study found that the most effective number was five, but their data showed that the effectiveness of the decision making in groups between five and eight neither increased nor decreased. (Notes 7 and 8) Drawing from these studies, it would seem that the ideal board size as far as human decision making is somewhere between five and eight. But it's not that simple.

   Another factor in determining board size is the depth and complexity of the issues facing the corporation. In a recent panel discussion of board governance, William Hawfield, a founder of The Board Group - a consulting firm which has helped create more than 100 boards for both private and public corporations - recommended that for small to medium size corporations with relatively straightforward missions the board size should be no more than five people. (Note 12) Note that this corresponds to the number recommended in one of the two academic studies mentioned above. (READ MORE) 

 


 

 

KINDRED SPIRITS

 

Brain Saber is the co-founder of Asking Matters, a very cool website that helps people in that most important part of fundraising--Asking.  At the website,  you can take the Asking Style Assessment to find out what kind of asker you are--and how you can fundraise better.  

   

  I'm a Kindred Spirit, which is one of the four styles in the system of Asking Styles we've developed at Asking Matters. We're the introverted ones who aren't primarily analytic and data-focused. We're right brain people - creative, relying on emotions and our intuition primarily. And we're definitely not the social, party guys.   Does this sound like you? I think there are lots of fellow Kindred Spirits out there.

  Key to SuccessThe good news is that we Kindred Spirits are good fundraisers - we just don't go about it in the stereotypical sales fashion. We are more likely to build the personal relationship over a longer period of time. We take a bit more time before asking (maybe an extra meeting?). We might even shoot a bit lower knowing that we can always ask for more in the long run as the relationship builds. Of course asking for less lessens even further the odds of being rejected....which we dread!

  That caution and sensitivity helps ensure that we won't mess things up, and we certainly don't like to mess things up because we take things very personally.

  Recently I was advising a client about an upcoming meeting with a board member. It had been set up weeks back and included two consultants. The client wanted to contact the board member to say that both the board chair and executive director would be joining the consultants. I felt this was a game-changing move that carried some risk and I advised that the board chair and executive director have a follow up visit. That was very typical Kindred Spirit behavior. And in case you are wondering what happened, they did not take my advice....and nothing bad happened! The board member was fine with the revised meeting. (READ MORE)  


BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH COACHING

      In the past several years, there have been a number of studies in the nonprofit sector looking at the effective ways to capacity build. By far, the one tool that gets the highest mark is coaching. Numbers two and three are (in order) consulting and training. And yet, if you look at what the nonprofits actually avail themselves of, training is the number one capacity building tool and, yes, coaching comes in a far third.

  In my private practice, I find this to be, sadly, true. My clients love that I coach-and they mainly want me to consult and provide trainings. Perhaps a lot of this is a communication issue. What, after all, is the real difference between coaching and consulting?

The cardinal rules of coaching, I believe, are:

  1. Meeting my clients where they are.
  2. Guiding them to get where they want to go.

  It's number two that is the unique selling proposition of coaching-and sometimes the sticking point for clients.

Consulting, has the same first cardinal rule, but number two here is telling them how to get where I think they want to go. Note the underlined words. Those provide a comfort zone for my clients-but, frankly, isn't as sustainable a solution as those gotten through coaching.

  Because coaching is more collaborative than consulting, having the clients walking with you is critical-and this is often difficult. Meetings get cancelled or worse, not scheduled. Emails and phone calls go unanswered. It's particularly hard if you are coaching groups, though individuals can also be recalcitrant.

  It's not that they don't want help-it's just that they are busy and like most of us, tend to respond to the urgent and not always pay enough attention to the important.

  As coaches, our challenge is to keep our clients on the right path while ensuring that it is the right path for them.

  How can you do that?   (READ MORE)

 

Have Your Say
Inquiring minds do want to know--what is on your mind?
Send me your article (200-2,000 words) on any topic of interest to those who work for or with nonprofit organizations.
Are your fundraising results down? Board members bored?  Or are thinking about a campaign? Whatever your capacity building needs, Janet Levine Consulting can help. Email or give me a call at 310-990-9151 to schedule a free 30-minute consultation. 

Want more? Read the weekly blog, Too Busy To Fundraise to make sure you are not!

Sincerely,
Janet Levine