Family Business Wiki LogoNew Ideas from
Family Business Wiki

Sharing Family Business Knowledge Around the World

 

                  April 2011

Quick Links
 
 
 
 

Can a Family Structure Withstand Attack by a Trojan Horse?

Gregoire Imfeld
  The story of the legendary Trojan horse illustrates a problem that great families still encounter today: how to transmit and preserve private wealth down the generations. After all, as a popular maxim puts it: "The first generation sets up the business, the second expands it and the third ruins it". Is it possible to sidestep this fate?

Clearly, the answer is yes - provided that various aspects of family governance are taken into account. Let us not forget our Greek: the origin of the word "governance" goes back to Plato, who used kubernętikę to refer to the art of the steersman. The words "govern", "government" and "governor" all derive from this root.

Governance implies above all a decentralisation of decision-making, with a variety of different places and people involved in the process. It refers to the setting up of new and more flexible types of regulation, based on a partnership between the participants.  (Read more from Gregoire Imfeld and add comments.)
Family Business Transformation 
Alberto Gimeno-Sandig
Founders are entrepreneurs by definition. If not, companies would not be founded. Entrepreneurs in open economies create value and capture part of this value.

 

With the passages of time, it is not easy for families to sustain the entrepreneurial behavior of their companies.  The founders usually "don't have", are not rich in resources. They are rich in energy and commitment. This means that the pleasure of creating something is important to them and their environment is their main driver.

 

If the companies do well, next generations already "have", they already feel rich. Therefore they tend to evolve from a pleasure to create attitude to a fear to lose attitude. This, logically, affects their businesses.

 

Others evolve their focus into the distribution of wealth. They feel that their success has to be shared with their communities, and focus themselves in the creation of social value. This is the philanthropic approach from witch the Carnegie or the Nobel families are some examples.  (Read more from Alberto Gimeno-Sandig and add comments.)

Family Pay:  Equality or Meritocracy? 
Juliette Johnson
Family compensation can be challenging for family businesses, especially when family members find themselves being paid the same, regardless of their position or responsibilities. What is considered 'fair' is often the cause of significant anxiety and debate.

In a family system, wealth tends to be distributed, either on an equal basis or on a 'needs' basis, according to what is required and the number of offspring. Whereas in a business system, remuneration is usually linked to role and contribution and each individual judged on the basis of merit. These two different and opposing views can create significant complexity within a family business, which will need to be addressed and resolved as early as possible.  (Read more from Juliette Johnson and add comments.)
Greetings!

Families who remain in business together past the founding generation face a host of unique challenges.  Some families simply wait until the challenges are upon them, while other families plan ahead and implement strategies and structures which are specifically designed to enhance the likelihood of long-term family and business success.
  
What are some of these specific strategies and structures?  Just keep reading the rest of this month's newsletter and you'll find out!  
Thought Leader Blog:  Kelin Gersick 

Demographics and Family Governance:  The Vanishing Middle

 

Kelin GersickMany of us spend a lot of our time designing and advocating family governance:  boards of directors, family councils, family offices, family assemblies, foundations, and ad hoc committees to decide what to have for dinner.  There is no doubt that responsible ownership requires the right architecture and process of governance.  But these designs are not theoretical exercises, and all of our structures and plans have one thing in common -- they need bodies to do the work.  People -- family members -- are the ones who will attend the meetings, join the conference calls, review the materials and agendas, take their turn at leadership, do the site visits, attend the conferences and informational sessions, and answer the phone when somebody has a crisis or just needs to get something off her chest.
 
There are a few lucky families that are large enough that finding the volunteers to fill all the governance roles is easy.  Some of them even have to solve the problem of selection and representation.  But many others have a limited pool of candidates, and the work seems to expand faster than the family can grow.  For them the problem is recruitment, and the family labor pool is a critical issue.  (Read more from Kelin Gersick and add comments.)
FBWiki TV:  Lee Hausner 

The Strategies of Successful Legacy Families

 

Lee Hausner

In this video interview, Lee Hausner describes the strategies of successful "legacy families" -- families who have remained healthy and productive for many generations following the initial creation of family wealth.

 

Successful legacy families consistently make "deposits" into four "accounts":  the human, intellectual, financial, and social accounts.  The "human account" includes skills such as:  communication, dealing with conflict, and training the next generation.  The "intellectual account" includes governance, education, career planning, and mentoring.   The "financial account" includes making, managing and investing money, and teaching the next generation about wealth.  The "social account" includes philanthropic activities.

 

When families apply systematic strategies and structures to make these "deposits", they are more likely to have healthy, loving and stable families for generations.  (Click here to see the video.)

Angelo Coco 

The Code of the Reflective Listener

 

Angelo Coco

"Send reinforcements, we're going to advance!"

How more clearly, could the General have worded his message to the Troops? Alas, by the time it went from the Officers through the long chain of command to the Diggers and reached the four thousandth five hundred and first person, at the end of the line, it came out as:  "Send three and fourpence, we're going to a dance!"

 

The following simple sentence can be punctuated in several different ways, and the meaning changes quite dramatically: "What do you think I'll hand over the Business immediately."


The Founding Director & Benevolent Dictator might punctuate it as follows, when communicating with his Family:  "What! Do you think I'll hand over the Business, immediately ?"  The implication here, being that he's not prepared to do so, not at present, anyhow.


An aspiring, enthusiastic heir apparent, might punctuate those words in this way:  "What do you think? I'll hand over the Business, immediately!"  The message here is that he's being asked for confirmation, that he's ready to take over the Business, now that the Owner has determined to pass it on to him.


A casual Observer, with no vested interests might present the words in this manner:  "What do you think I'll hand over? The Business? Immediately?"  The Observer hears two people in discussion, about whether something might be handed over immediately or not.

Because the sentence is spoken, and not written, the punctuation is not visible to any of the three parties, and therefore, the meaning can and is very often open to interpretation. It's for this reason that the intended recipient needs to carefully use their eyes and ears to obtain the context of the message. All of the Tone, Volume, Body Language and gestures assist the Listener and the casual Observer to obtain a better understanding of the context and intended meaning of the sentence.  (Read more from Angelo Coco and add comments.)

 

Cary Tutelman 

Family Business Entrepreneurs and Boards

 

Cary Tutelman

Many family business entrepreneurs have no need for boards. To them a board is a group which gets in the way and tells them what to do. They don't like being told what to do. That is why they are entrepreneurs.

 

An entrepreneur is typically the one with the most power. They tend to make the most important family, ownership and management decisions. One of the most critical things they do is resolve or "balance" the often-competing interests of the family, owners and management. When they are balancing these competing interests, they are performing a board function. Usually, the entrepreneur does this balancing unconsciously. They typically don't see balancing as a board function. In fact, they don't differentiate their family, ownership, management and board roles at all. They just do what they do. It's all one big role to them.

 

This system works well. And it certainly works well for the entrepreneur. However, there are three times to consider changing this system. These are the times of transition.

 

The first time is when an entrepreneur wants to change their role. When this occurs, they are in transition. And when they are in transition, everything is in transition. During this transition, the entrepreneur decides how they want to be involved and how they want others involved.  (Read more from Cary Tutelman and add comments.) 

We'd like to hear what you think of the newsletter and the Wiki.  Let us know the good, the not so good, and everything in between.  Click here to help us do our job better!