Greenlist Bulletin From the Toxics Use Reduction Institute at the University of Massachusetts Lowell
  January 27, 2012
 
  |   
         | 
     
    
         | 
     
    
        
        
        	
            | 
            
            
            
             | 
             | 
            
            
  |   
This is the weekly bulletin of the TURI Library at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. Greenlist Bulletin provide s previews of recent publications and websites relevant to reducing the use of toxic chemicals by industries, businesses, communities, individuals and government. You arewelcome to send a message to jan@turi.org if you would like more information on any of the articles listed here, or if this email is not displaying properly. 
  
 |   
            Today's environmental manager's toolbox: evaluating the EHS attributes of products
  |  Source: Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 2011 Author: Kathryn H. Winnebeck
  In response to the public's interest, companies have expanded their  focus on reducing their environmental footprint through designing  environmentally preferable products. Corporate environmental managers  typically work with product design teams on this effort. 
  This paper  explains three tools available to assist in the assessment of EHS  attributes of products, namely risk assessment, alternatives assessment,  and life cycle assessment. An overview, process appropriate uses, and  limitations of each tool are discussed.  
  Download the article 
  
 |   
             | 
         
         
         | 
     
    
         | 
     
    
        
        Health and environmental effects of nanomaterials remain uncertain: cohesive research plan needed to help avoid potential risks from rapidly evolving technology
  |  Source: The National Academies, January 25, 2012
  Despite  extensive investment in nanotechnology and increasing commercialization  over the last decade, insufficient understanding remains about the  environmental, health, and safety aspects of nanomaterials. Without  a coordinated research plan to help guide efforts to manage and avoid  potential risks, the future of safe and sustainable nanotechnology is  uncertain, says a new report from the National Research Council. The  report presents a strategic approach for developing research and a  scientific infrastructure needed to address potential health and  environmental risks of nanomaterials. Its  effective implementation would require sufficient management and  budgetary authority to direct research across federal agencies.     Nanoscale  engineering manipulates materials at the molecular level to create  structures with unique and useful properties -- materials that are both  very strong and very light, for example. Many  of the products containing nanomaterials on the market now are for skin  care and cosmetics, but nanomaterials are also increasingly being used  in products ranging from medical therapies to food additives to  electronics. In 2009, developers  generated $1 billion from the sale of nanomaterials, and the market for  products that rely on these materials is expected to grow to $3  trillion by 2015.    The  committee that wrote the report found that over the last seven years  there has been considerable effort internationally to identify research  needs for the development and safe use of nanotechnology, including  those of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), which coordinates  U.S. federal investments in nanoscale research and development. However,  there has not been sufficient linkage between research and research  findings and the creation of strategies to prevent and manage any risks. For  instance, little progress has been made on the effects of ingested  nanomaterials on human health and other potential health and  environmental effects of complex nanomaterials that are expected to  enter the market over the next decade. Therefore,  there is the need for a research strategy that is independent of any  one stakeholder group, has human and environmental health as its primary  focus, builds on past efforts, and is flexible in anticipating and  adjusting to emerging challenges, the committee said.   Download the report      |   
        PFCs, chemicals widespread in environment, linked to lowered immune response to childhood vaccinations
  |  Source: Harvard School of Public Health, January 24, 2012
  A new study finds that perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), widely used  in manufactured products such as non-stick cookware, waterproof  clothing, and fast-food packaging, were associated with lowered immune  response to vaccinations in children. It is the first study to document  how PFCs, which can be transferred to children prenatally (via the  mother) and postnatally from exposure in the environment, can adversely  affect vaccine response. The study appears in the January 25, 2012 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
 
 "Routine childhood immunizations are a mainstay of modern disease  prevention. The negative impact on childhood vaccinations from PFCs  should be viewed as a potential threat to public health," said study  lead author Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health at Harvard School of Public Health.   PFCs have thousands of industrial and manufacturing uses. Most  Americans have the chemical compounds in their bodies. Prior studies  have shown that PFC concentrations in mice similar to those found in  people suppressed immune response, but the adverse effects on people had  been poorly documented.   The researchers analyzed data on children recruited at birth at  National Hospital in Torshavn, Faroe Islands during 1999-2001. A total  of 587 participated in follow-up examinations. Children were tested for  immune response to tetanus and diphtheria vaccinations at ages 5 and 7  years. PFCs were measured in maternal pregnancy serum and in the serum  of children at age 5 to determine prenatal and postnatal exposure.   The results showed that PFC exposure was associated with lower  antibody responses to immunizations and an increased risk of antibody  levels in children lower than those needed to provide long-term  protection. (Antibody concentrations in serum are a good indicator of  overall immune functions in children.) A two-fold greater concentration  of three major PFCs was associated with a 49% lower level of serum  antibodies in children at age 7 years.   "We were surprised by the steep negative associations, which suggest  that PFCs may be more toxic to the immune system than current dioxin  exposures," said Grandjean.   The PFC concentrations are similar to or slightly below those  reported in U.S. women, and most serum PFC levels in Faroese children at  age 5 were lower than those measured in U.S. children aged 3 to 5 years  in 2001-2002.       |   
        
        The world's first magnetic soap
  |  Source: Royal Society of Chemistry, January 26, 2012
 
 Researchers have created a liquid surfactant that can be moved by a  magnet. The discovery opens the way to soaps and detergents which could  be directed to a specific point or removed from a mixture by applying an  external magnetic field.    Surfactants, which are ubiquitous in  society in the form of everything from detergents and emulsifiers to  wetting agents, consist of molecules containing a water-soluble anionic  'head' joined to a water-insoluble cationic 'tail'. The molecules then  spontaneously aggregate into particles known as vesicles or micelles.   The  research team, led by Julian Eastoe at the University of Bristol in the  UK, took conventional surfactants and mixed them with an iron salt,  resulting in the exchange of the original anion with the iron-containing  ion. The resulting ionic liquid surfactant was shown to be able to  respond to a magnetic field. Vertically suspended droplets could be  deviated by a small magnet and, more spectacularly, surfactant covered  by a less dense organic solvent could be pulled through the upper layer  of the solvent by a magnet, overcoming both gravity and the surface  tension effects at the interface of the two liquids.
 
 To understand the cause of the magnetic effects, the team probed the  surfactant using small angle neutron scattering, carried out at the  Institut Laue-Langevin neutron source in Grenoble, France.  'This  told us that there was internal organisation in the liquid, that there  were clusters present,' says Eastoe. These clusters consist of micelles  around 10nm across, in which the iron is aggregated in the central core.  'Isolated ions are not of themselves magnetic,' he explains. 'There  needs to be a connection between the units. The proximity of the iron in  the aggregates provides this communication between the iron-containing  parts of the molecule.'    Eastoe says the team is now looking to  develop more responsive and sensitive magnetic surfactants. 'What we  have done is a proof of principle,' he says. 'We want to know if we can  modify and improve chemicals so that they can perform different tricks  and different tasks. We have shown that magnetic soaps and surfactants  are a reality. It opens the way to being able to tell such solutions  where to go, to target them or direct them to specific areas.'    Peter  Griffiths, who researches surfactant chemistry at Cardiff University in  the UK, is impressed by the study. 'Surfactants are some of the most  versatile molecules known to us - indeed they are encountered in huge  quantities by us all everyday - because of their ability to alter the  properties of surfaces and interfaces,' he says. 'Eastoe has shown  another remarkable feature of these fascinating molecules, where  magnetic fields may be used to tune the behaviour of the surfactant at  the air-water interface, indeed overcoming the effects of gravity it  would seem. This study opens the door for a range of new application for  surfactants that could lead to more efficient and greener chemical  process.'   
  |  
 Honeybee deaths linked to seed insecticide exposure
  |  Source: Purdue University, January 11, 2012
  Honeybee populations have been in serious  decline for years, and Purdue University scientists may have identified  one of the factors that cause bee deaths around agricultural fields.
Analyses of bees found dead in and around hives  from several apiaries over two years in Indiana showed the presence of  neonicotinoid insecticides, which are commonly used to coat corn and  soybean seeds before planting. The research showed that those  insecticides were present at high concentrations in waste talc that is  exhausted from farm machinery during planting. The insecticides clothianidin and thiamethoxam  were also consistently found at low levels in soil - up to two years  after treated seed was planted - on nearby dandelion flowers and in corn  pollen gathered by the bees, according to the findings released in the  journal PLoS One this month.   "We know that these insecticides are highly toxic  to bees; we found them in each sample of dead and dying bees," said  Christian Krupke, associate professor of entomology and a co-author of  the findings.   The United States is losing about one-third of  its honeybee hives each year, according to Greg Hunt, a Purdue professor  of behavioral genetics, honeybee specialist and co-author of the  findings. Hunt said no one factor is to blame, though scientists believe  that others such as mites and insecticides are all working against the  bees, which are important for pollinating food crops and wild plants.   Krupke and Hunt received reports that bee deaths  in 2010 and 2011 were occurring at planting time in hives near  agricultural fields. Toxicological screenings performed by Brian Eitzer,  a co-author of the study from the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment  Station, for an array of pesticides showed that the neonicotinoids used  to treat corn and soybean seed were present in each sample of affected  bees. Krupke said other bees at those hives exhibited tremors,  uncoordinated movement and convulsions, all signs of insecticide  poisoning.   Seeds of most annual crops are coated in  neonicotinoid insecticides for protection after planting. All corn seed  and about half of all soybean seed is treated. The coatings are sticky,  and in order to keep seeds flowing freely in the vacuum systems used in  planters, they are mixed with talc. Excess talc used in the process is  released during planting and routine planter cleaning procedures.   "Given the rates of corn planting and talc usage,  we are blowing large amounts of contaminated talc into the environment.  The dust is quite light and appears to be quite mobile," Krupke said. Krupke said the corn pollen that bees were  bringing back to hives later in the year tested positive for  neonicotinoids at levels roughly below 100 parts per billion.   "That's enough to kill bees if sufficient amounts are consumed, but it is not acutely toxic," he said. On the other hand, the exhausted talc showed  extremely high levels of the insecticides - up to about 700,000 times  the lethal contact dose for a bee.   "Whatever was on the seed was being exhausted  into the environment," Krupke said. "This material is so concentrated  that even small amounts landing on flowering plants around a field can  kill foragers or be transported to the hive in contaminated pollen. This  might be why we found these insecticides in pollen that the bees had  collected and brought back to their hives."   Krupke suggested that efforts could be made to limit or eliminate talc emissions during planting.  
  |  
  | 
     
    
        		
        
        
        
            | 
You are welcome to send a message to jan@turi.org
if you would like more information on any of these resources. Also,
please tell us what topics you are particularly interested in
monitoring, and who else should see Greenlist. An online search of the
TURI Library catalog can be done at http://library.turi.org for greater topic coverage.
   
             | 
         
         		
        Greenlist Bulletin is compiled by:
  
            Jan Hutchins
 Manager of the TURI Library
 Toxics Use Reduction Institute
 University of Massachusetts Lowell
 600 Suffolk St., Wannalancit Mills  Lowell MA 01854
 978-934-3390
 978-934-3050 (fax)
 jan@turi.org
    
             |   
         | 	
     
    
        | 
        
         | 
     
     	
     |