Jamulians Against the Casino Newsletter
 January 2012

Email Government Officials
 
Governor Brown

 
 
Urgent News
 from
Jamulians Against the Casino

As you saw in the Jamul Shopper "20 YEARS and STILL NO CASINO".

The Jamul Indian Village and Lakes Entertainment are taking a new tactic. On November 22nd, 2011, Lakes and the tribe entered into a new contract. Three phases that include taking the 100 acres surrounding the village land into trust.

 

JAC has been contacted by Cheryl Schmit of Stand Up for California, a statewide organization with a focus on gambling issues affecting California, to alert us of a lawsuit regarding trust land. In short, the Secretary of the Interior published a notice on May 13, 2005 to take legal title to a 147-acre tract of land in Michigan for the Gun Lake Band of Indian. In August of 2008, a homeowner who lives near this tract filed a lawsuit against Secretary Salazar of the U.S. Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indain Affairs) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, stating the Secretary's decision to take the land into trust was unlawful because Congress intended to limit the authority of Section 5 of the IRA (Indian Reorganization Act). The IRA states that a tribe must be "under Federal jurisdiction" on the date of the enactment of the IRA, i.e. 1934. The Gun Lake Band was not under Federal jurisdiction in 1934. (Sound familiar? The JIV was not "under Federal jurisdiction in 1934)

 

On January 30, 2009, the Secretary of the Interior took title to the land into trust. Three weeks later, on February 24, 2009 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Carcieri v. Salazar, a decision in which the Court agreed with the Michigan homeowner regarding the intent of Congress in section 5 of the IRA.

 

The Secretary argued to the U.S. District Court should dismiss the lawsuit. On August 20, 2009 the U.S. District Court dismissed the lawsuit but not because the court agreed with the Secretary but because they felt the homeowner did not have "prudential standing" to invoke the jurisdiction of the court to adjudicate.

 

On January 21, 2011 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued Patchak v. Salazar, a decision in which it reversed the U.S. District Court.

 

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari - At the request of the Secretary of the Interior, in August of 2011 the Solicitor General filed a petition that requested the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision. On December 12, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition.

 

This spring the attorneys who represent the Michigan homeowner will file briefs and the U.S. Supreme court will hear one hour of oral argument.

 

So what does this all mean to our community?

If the U.S. Supreme Court agrees with the Secretary of the Interior that homeowners do not have prudential standing to file lawsuits that seek judicial review of the lawfulness of taking land into trust, the practical legal consequence will be that henceforth NO private citizen or citizen organization who or that may be adversely affected by ANY land-into-trust decision may seek judicial review of the lawfulness of the decision.

  

That means should the Jamul Indian Village be allowed to take the additional 100 acres into trust and we as a community, homeowners, land owners and business owners will not have a say on what happens on that land.

 

JAC has been asked by Stand Up for California and other community organizations throughout the state of California to join in submitting a Amici Curiae (amicus brief) in support of Mr. Patchak who will be going in front of the U.S. Supreme Court to fight for our rights as U.S. citizens.

  

It is important for the U.S. Supreme Court to be aware when it decides Salazar v. Patchak of the effect its decision may have of the ability of private citizens and citizen organizations in California to ensure that the Secretary of the Interior does not act unlawfully when he makes land-into-trust decisions that have the consequence of bringing Indian gaming facilities into communities whose residents do not want them. An amicus brief can educate the U.S. Supreme Court about the situation in California in a way that the briefs Mr. Patchak's attorneys file cannot.

  

In order to help defend our rights, we need your help. Please send in your donations as soon as possible to:

 

JAC

P.O. Box 1317

Jamul CA 91935

Another issue that has an effect on our community...
Lory Walls, President of Dehesa Valley Community Council, Inc, received a call from Supervisor Jacob stating "the County of San Diego was negotiating mitigation measures with Sycuan concerning the approximate 1300 acre application to BIA to put this property "in trust".
  
This property will become sovereign land, be taken off the tax rolls and will not be subject to land use planning process or permit process. 
  • Total 3.3 million dollars
  • 2.4 million into trust fund to be spent on projects for Dehesa
  • $800,00 in addition for right hand turn lane at Dehesa and Harbision Canyon Road intersection
  • Work with county to supply money for law enforcement near the reservation
  • Improve the north shore of Lake Emma, to ensure Dehesa Road does not wash out.

Supervisor Jacob did not have a complete proposal as of Dec. 30, 2011 but a date for the Board of Supervisors tohear this proposal is Monday, January 9, 2012.  Board of Supervisors Meeting starts at 9:00 a.m., agenda item will be posted 72 hours before the meeting.

 

Another reason to fight for our rights. Please send in your donations. Thank you.


JAC needs your help. Please send your donations for the JAC legal fund. Write to your local government officials.

 

JAC

PO Box 1317

Jamul CA 91935

Please forward this newsletter to friends and family, and to your neighbors in the community. (use the link below)