New MFYCO
                     ...from the HR Perspective
faces
Human Resource UpdateFebruary 2012

 

Multi-Employer Pension Fund Health and New Disclosure

 

 

All companies that sponsor a defined benefit pension plan are now well versed in the double effects that low interest rates and less than stellar asset performance have on contributions, expense and balance sheets. Looking at our plans, we may be thankful that a multi-employer plan to which we contribute seems to have no such consequences.

 

However we would be wrong. While multi-employer pension plans may not have to meet the same funding and financial reporting standards as corporate sponsored pension plans, the multi-employer trustees have a fiduciary duty to keep their plans well.

 

Some multi-employer plans have cut the prospective benefits that they provide. For example, one large plan cut the future benefits an hour's contribution will earn by about 40%. Others are considering similar actions. What compounds the downturn for multi-employer plans is the loss of contributions due to workforce cut-backs and companies ceasing operations.

 

You should check the health of any multi-employer plan to which your company contributes. Request not only the information that you may be required to report in your future financial statements (see following paragraphs), but secure a withdrawal liability calculation at least every third year. Each year, look at the number of companies contributing, the number of contributing participants and the total contributions. Calculate and track the number of contributing companies, the percentage of your participants to the total participants and the percentage of your contributions to the total contributions. If the number of contributing companies decreases, or if the percentages increase, beware of the possible increasing liability to your company if you have to withdraw of if the plan fails.

 

Our friends at the Financial Accounting Standards Board have also noticed the potential problems with multi-employer plans and will require new disclosure in financial statements for years ending after December 1, 2012. At this point, this is only a disclosure requirement, and not an action that will affect your balance sheet. Let's take a brief look at the new requirements: 

  • The total of all contributions made to each plan and a statement of whether your company's contributions represent more than five percent of the total contributions to the plan by all contributing employers.
  • A comment regarding the funded status of each plan including the plan's certified "Zone Status", as required by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. If a plan's Zone Status is not available for the plan, then there must be a disclosure as to whether the plan is less than 65% funded, between 65% and 80% funded, or over 80% funded.
  • A statement of a plan's adoption of funding improvement plan or the plan's consideration of a funding improvement plan is pending implementation.
  • A comment regarding any surcharges the plan has added to the contributions to the plan.
  • A statement of the expiration date of the collective bargaining agreement under which current contributions are determined.
  • A comment regarding any minimum contribution requirement under the related collective bargaining agreement.

If the plan's Form 5500 is not readily available to a user of the financial statement, additional disclosure regarding:

  • the nature of the plan benefits.
  • the extent to which your company could be financially  responsible for the obligations of the plan (could include benefits earned by an employee while working for a different employer).
  • the plan's total plan assets, actuarial present value of the accumulated plan benefits, and total contributions received by the plan.

As you can see, multi-employer plans are in the same boat as corporate sponsored plans, but lack the ability to increase contributions at will. This has resulted in unfunded ratios climbing, benefit decreases and the possibility of benefit curtailments.

 

Unfortunately, the one big thing that it has promulgated is a truly dramatic demand for increased contributions in recent negotiations. Demands for 100%, 200% (and higher) contribution increases are being heard. These increased contributions are required to maintain benefit levels, to restore benefit levels that have been cut, and to add to the plan's health (contribution schedules are being revised so that a contribution increase does not produce the benefit increase it once did.)

 

If you contribute to a multi-employer plan, now is the time to act. We have many years of experience with multi-employer plans and would be happy to assist you in your review and planning.

 

Sincerely,

Michael F. Yates,

President

  

 

If you find value in this newsletter please let us know. Feel free to call me with a comment and/or ask a question at any time (908-689-4200) or send me an email (myates@mfyco.com). We offer this timely information as another benefit of your relationship with our company. If you feel a friend or colleague would benefit from receiving our newsletter, please feel free to forward a copy. 


You can view all of our newsletters by clicking the 'newsletter archives' link at our company website www.mfyco.com.

 

In This Issue
Payroll Tax Cut Extended to the End of 2012
MFYCO Facebook
EEOC Issues Final Rule Extending Title VII
Group Health Insurance Coverage Cost Reporting to Employees Part II
Co-Worker Annoying You?
DOL Issues Revised Final Service Provider Fee Disclosure Rule
eLaws Quick Link
Retirement Plan Limits
Track Government Spending
Terms of Use

JUST OUT 

 

 Payroll Tax Cut Extended to the End of 2012; Revised Payroll Tax Form Now Available to Employers

On February 23, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service released revised Form 941 enabling employers to properly report the newly-extended payroll tax cut benefiting nearly 160 million workers.

Under the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, enacted on February 22, 2012, workers will continue to receive larger paychecks for the rest of this year based on a lower social security tax withholding rate of 4.2 percent, which is two percentage points less than the 6.2 percent rate in effect prior to 2011. This reduced rate, originally in effect for all of 2011, was extended through the end of February by the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, enacted Dec. 23, 2011.

No action is required by workers to continue receiving the payroll tax cut. As before, the lower rate will have no effect on workers' future Social Security benefits.  The reduction in revenues to the Social Security Trust Fund will be made up by transfers from the General Fund.

Due Date For The First Service Provider Fee Disclosure Notice Extended

For calendar year plans, the initial annual disclosure of "plan-level" and "investment level" information must be furnished to participants no later than August 30, 2012.  See the related article in this newsletter for additional information.

 

 
Invitation to MFYCO Facebook
facebook 
Visit our page! 

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Issues Final Rule Extending Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and ADA Recordkeeping Requirements to GINA:

 

In the year 2010 we covered GINA extensively; in February we published Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), in October, GINA Provisions for Group Health Plans and in November, EEOC's Q&A on the final GINA regulations.  Please visit these articles for detailed information regarding GINA.

 

On February 2, 2012 the EEOC issued a final rule extending the existing recordkeeping requirements under Title VII and the ADA to entities covered by Title II of GINA (see below).  The final rule takes effect on April 3, 2012.

 

Standard Recordkeeping Requirements

 

Private employers with 15 or more employees, employment agencies, labor unions and joint labor-management training programs must retain all personnel and employment records

 

Under the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulations, employers must keep all personnel or employment records made or used for one year from the date of making the record or the personnel action involved, whichever occurs later (including, but not limited to, requests for reasonable accommodation, application forms submitted by applicants, and records dealing with hiring, promotion, demotion, transfer, lay-off, or termination, rates of pay, compensation, tenure, selection for training or apprenticeship, or other terms of employment).  If an employee is involuntarily terminated, his/her personnel records must be retained for one year from the date of termination.

 

Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) regulations, employers must also keep all payroll records for three years.  Additionally, employers must keep on file any employee benefit plan (such as pension and insurance plans) and any written seniority or merit system for the full period the plan or system is in effect and for at least one year after its termination.

 

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) recordkeeping requirements applicable to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), employers must keep payroll records for at least three years.  In addition, employers must keep for at least two years all records (including wage rates, job evaluations, seniority and merit systems, and collectively bargaining agreements) that explain the basis for paying different wages to employees of opposite sexes in the same establishment.

 

These requirements apply to all employers covered by Federal anti-discrimination laws, regardless of whether a charge has been filed against the employer.

 

Charge Filed Recordkeeping Requirements

 

When an EEOC charge has been filed against a company, employers should retain personnel or employment records relating to the issues under investigation as a result of the charge, including those related to the charging party or other persons alleged to be aggrieved and to all other employees holding or seeking positions similar to that held or sought by the affected individuals.

 

Once a charge is filed, these records must be kept until the final disposition of the charge or any lawsuit based on the charge.  When a charge is not resolved after investigation, and the charging party has received a notice of right to sue, "final disposition" means the date of expiration of the 90-day statutory period within which the aggrieved person may bring suit or, where suit is brought by the charging party or the EEOC, the date on which the litigation is terminated, including any appeals.


We invite you to share our newsletter. 
(It's a lot to think about!) 
 
 

Group Health Insurance Coverage Cost Reporting to Employees

 

The following article is the second of a four part series discussing the group health insurance coverage cost reporting to employees guidance contained in IRS Notice 2011-28 with the addition of IRS Notice 2012-9's clarifications, modifications and additional guidance.  The combined IRS notices contain 38 questions and answers (Q&A) in total.

 

Part I found in our January 2012 newsletter, covered the Background of the IRS Notices; the General Requirements; the Employers Subject to Reporting Requirements; and the Method of Reporting on the Form W-2.

 

This part (Part II) covers the Aggregate Cost of Applicable Employer-Sponsored Coverage and the Cost of Coverage Required to be Included in the Aggregate Reportable cost.

 

Part III will cover the Methods of Calculating Cost of Coverage and Other Issues Relating to Calculating the Cost of Coverage.

 

Part IV will cover the Additional Guidance added to IRS Notice 2012-9.

 

Part II

 

Aggregate Cost of Applicable Employer-Sponsored Coverage (Q&A #s 11-15)

The Aggregate Cost of Applicable Employer-Sponsored Coverage is the total cost of coverage under all applicable employer-sponsored coverage provided to the employee.  In IRS Notice 2011-28, the cost of coverage under a group health plan is referred to as the reportable cost and the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored coverage is referred to as the aggregate reportable cost. (Q&A 11)

 

Applicable Employer-Sponsored Coverage means, with respect to any employee, coverage under any group health plan made available to the employee by an employer that is excludable from the employee's gross income under §106, or would be so excludable if it were employer-provided coverage except that applicable employer-sponsored coverage does not include:

·      any coverage for long-term care;

·      any coverage (whether through insurance or otherwise) described in Code §9832(c)(1)(other than coverage for on-site medical clinics described in subparagraph (G) thereof);

·      any coverage under a separate policy, certificate, or contract of insurance which provides benefits substantially all of which are for treatment of the mouth (including any organ or structure within the mouth) or for treatment of the eye; and

·      any coverage described in Code §9832(c)(3) the payment for which is not excludable from gross income and for which a deduction under Code §162(1) is not allowable.

 

The types of coverage described in Code §9832(c)(1) (providing that certain "excepted benefits" are not subject to the requirements of chapter 100 of the Code) that are not subject to this reporting requirement are the following:

·      coverage only for accident, or disability income insurance, or any combination thereof;

·      coverage issued as a supplement to liability insurance;

·      liability insurance, including general liability insurance and automobile liability insurance;

·      workers' compensation or similar insurance;

·      automobile medical payment insurance;

·      credit-only insurance;

·      other similar insurance coverage, specified in regulations, under which benefits for medical care are secondary or incidental to other insurance benefits.

 

(See questions 16 through 23 for applicable employer-sponsored coverage that is not to be included in the aggregate reportable cost. (Q&A 12)

 

A Group Health Plan is a plan (including a self-insured plan) of, or contributed to by, an employer (including a self-employed person) or employee organization to provide health care (directly or otherwise) to the employees, former employees, the employer, others associated or formerly associated with the employer in a business relationship, or their families.  For purposes of identifying whether a specific arrangement is a group health plan, taxpayers may rely upon a good faith application of a reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions and applicable guidance, including Code §54.4980B-2, Q&A-1. (Q&A 13)

 

The aggregate reportable cost generally includes both the employer portion paid and the employee portion paid, regardless of whether the employee paid for that cost through pre-tax or after-tax contributions.  See Q19 regarding contributions to a health FSA. (Q&A 14)

 

The aggregate reportable cost includes the cost of coverage under the employer-sponsored group health plan of the employee and any person covered by the plan because of a relationship to the employee, including any portion of the cost that is includible in an employee's gross income.  Thus, the aggregate reportable cost is not reduced by the amount of the cost of coverage included in the employee's gross income. (Q&A 15 with examples)

 

Cost of Coverage Required to be Included in the Aggregate Reportable Cost (Q&A #s

16-23)

Amounts not Included

Except as provided in this and 17 through 23, the cost of coverage under all applicable employer-sponsored coverage must be included in the aggregate reportable cost.  However, the following amounts are not included in the aggregate reportable cost and are not permitted to be reported under Code §6051(a)(14):

1.    the amount contributed to an Archer Medical Savings Account (as defined in Code §220(d)),

2.    the amount contributed to any Health Savings Account (HSA) (as defined in Code §223(d)), and

3.    the amount of any salary reduction election to a flexible spending arrangement (FSA) (within the meaning of §§106(c)(2) and 125). (Q&A 16)

 

Multiemployer Healthcare Plans

For multiemployer healthcare plans the employer that contributes to a multiemployer plan is not required to include the cost of coverage provided to an employee under that multiemployer plan in determining the aggregate reportable cost.  If the only applicable employer-sponsored coverage provided to an employee is provided under a multiemployer plan, the employer is not required to report any amount under Code §6051(a)(14) on the Form W-2 for the employee. (Q&A 17)

 

Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA)

HRAs are not reportable if the amount of the salary reduction (for all qualified benefits) elected by an employee equals or exceeds the amount of the health FSA for the plan year.  However, if the amount of the health FSA for that exceeds the salary reduction elected by the employee for the plan year, then the amount of that employee's health FSA minus the employee's salary reduction election for the health FSA must be included in the aggregate reportable cost and reported under Code §6051(a)(14). (Q&A 18)

 

Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA)

The amount of a health FSA for a cafeteria plan year equals the amount of salary reduction (as defined in Proposed Treas. Reg. §1.125-1(r)), elected by the employee for the plan year, plus the amount of any optional employer flex credits (as defined under Proposed Treas. Reg. §1.125-5(b), expressed as a fixed amount, or as a formula such as matching salary reduction), that the employee elects to apply to the health FSA.  In determining the aggregate reportable cost, the amount of the health FSA is reduced (but not below zero) by the employee's salary reduction election (see Q&A 16.)

 

If the amount of salary reduction (for all qualified benefits) elected by an employee equals or exceeds the amount of the health FSA for the plan year, the employer does not include the amount of the health FSA for that employee in the aggregate reportable cost.  However, if the amount of the health FSA for the plan year, exceeds the salary reduction elected by the employee for the plan year, then the amount of that employee's health FSA minus the employee's salary reduction election for the health FSA must be included in the aggregate reportable cost and reported under § 6051(a)(14).  For purposes of this 19, a health FSA means an FSA (as defined in Proposed Treas. Reg. §1.125-5(a)) that is a medical reimbursement arrangement.  (See IRS Notice 2011-28 Q&A 19 for examples.) (Q&A 19)

 

Dental and Vision Plan Costs

Dental and vision plan costs are not included in the aggregate reportable cost if (1) the plan is being offered under a separate policy, certificate, or contract of insurance and (2) participants must have the right not to elect the dental or vision benefits and if they do elect one or the other benefit, they must pay an additional premium or contribution for that coverage.  If the dental or vision plan is integrated into a group health plan providing major medical or other health benefits, the dental and vision costs are included. (Q&A 20)

 

Self-Insured

The cost of coverage provided under a self-insured group health plan that is not subject to any federal continuation coverage requirements (for example, a church plan with the meaning of Code §4980B(d)(3) that is a self-insured group health plan) are not required to include the aggregate reportable cost under Code §6051(a)(14) on the Form W-2. For this purpose, federal continuation coverage requirements include the COBRA requirements under the Code, the Employee Retiree Income Security Act of 1974 or the Public Health Service Act and the temporary continuation coverage requirement under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.  Employers who do provide coverage under a self-insured group health plan that is subject to Federal continuation coverage requirements must report the cost of coverage on Form W-2. (Q&A 21)

 

Government Sponsored Health Plans

Government health plans set up primarily for members of the military and their families are not required to report the aggregate reportable cost on Forms W-2. (Q&A 22)

 

Highly Compensated and 2% Shareholder-Employee

The cost of applicable employer-sponsored coverage does not include excess reimbursements of highly compensated individuals that are included in gross income under Code §105(h).  An excess reimbursement that is included in income is subtracted from the cost of coverage in determining the aggregate reportable cost.  Similarly, the cost of applicable employer-sponsored coverage does not include the cost of coverage taken into income as the result of an employee being a 2% shareholder-employee of an employer that is an S corporation.  For more information regarding the treatment of the employer payment or reimbursement of health insurance premiums for a 2% shareholder-employee, see IRS Notice 2008-1, 2008-1 C.B. 251. (Q&A 23)

 

Call: 908-689-4200 to contact a
MFYCO professional consulting associate.
happypeople

Co-Worker Annoying You?

(Worth Repeating - Courtesy of Yahoo!)

 

Are you frequently annoyed by your co-workers? You are not alone. Yahoo! Shine partnered with Fitness Magazine to survey over 2,000 women and men, and found that a whopping 79% of employees feel annoyed at their place of work.

 

Workers are annoyed with both the personal behavior and the work habits of their colleagues. Topping the list among men, 41% are turned off by co-workers' body odor. Nearly as many women think their colleagues could do better in the hygiene department, about 38%.

 

Women are most likely to be annoyed when another steals credit for their ideas. This peeve is number one on the list for 41% of all women (and 36% of men). 44% of 18-34 year-olds, both men and women, say this is really ticks them off.

 

About a third of workers (33% of women and 31% of men) are irked by hearing a colleague's loud, personal telephone conversations.

 

According to the survey, the lunchroom is a minefield of annoying behaviors. Men and women are equally aggrieved when someone swipes their food out of the office refrigerator; 27% report this is their biggest complaint. And, if you were thinking of eating that onion pizza or garlicky meatball sub on the job, perhaps you should save it for the weekend. It will seriously gross out 13% of your male and 12% of your female colleagues.

 

So please, think twice before stealing a co-worker's idea or their lunch. Everyone will thank you for it!

 



 What would you like to see in a future issue?

Contact our office with your suggestions.

  email: info@mfyco.com
 
 

DOL Issues Revised Final Service Provider Fee Disclosure Rule

On Friday, February 3, 2012, the Department of Labor (DOL) published the revised final ERISA §408(b)(2) service provider fee disclosure rule that replaces the interim final rule published July 16, 2010.  Although there were some important revisions, the final rule does not substantially revise the Interim Final Rule.

Plans Not Covered

Annuity contracts and custodial accounts issued to affected employees before January 1, 2009 with respect to 403(b) plans or arrangements, where the sponsoring employer ceased making contributions, are not covered. In order for such 403(b) contracts or accounts not to be covered, however, the rights or benefits of the individual contract owners must be enforceable against the insurer or custodian without sponsor involvement, and such contract owners must be fully vested in benefits provided under the annuity or account.

Effective Date Extended

The effective date of the service provider fee disclosure rule has been extended from April 1, 2012 to July 1, 2012. The final rule also extends certain deadlines with respect to participant-level fee disclosure rules under ERISA §404(a).

For calendar year plans, the initial annual disclosure of "plan-level" and "investment level" information must be furnished to participants no later than August 30, 2012 (60 days after the 408b-2 rule effective date).

The first quarterly statement participant-level disclosure reflecting the fees and expenses actually deducted from the participant's account must be furnished no later than 45 days following the end of the quarter during which the initial disclosure was required.  For a calendar year plan, the first quarterly disclosure statement must be provided to participants no later than November 14, 2012, since August 30, 2012 falls during the third calendar quarter.  The disclosure, however, only needs to reflect the third quarter expenses.

New Requirement for Initial Disclosure

The disclosure to the responsible plan fiduciary of indirect compensation paid by third parties to a service provider has been expanded. A requirement has been added for describing the arrangement between the third party paying the indirect compensation and the service provider that results in such payment.

A Change to the Failure to Provide Disclosure

Under the Interim Final Rule, in order for the responsible plan fiduciary to be able to rely on the class exemption from fiduciary breach, the fiduciary (upon discovering that a covered service provider has failed to disclose certain required information) would have had to request such information in writing from the provider. Now, the final rule requires that if the provider fails to comply with the fiduciary's written request within 90 days, the fiduciary must determine whether to terminate or continue the contract or arrangement "...consistent with its duty of prudence under ERISA §404..."  In addition, the responsible plan fiduciary must terminate the services of the covered service provider "...as expeditiously as possible...", but consistent with its duty of prudence under ERISA §404, if the information relates to future services and is not disclosed promptly after the 90-day period.

Changes to the Investment-Related Disclosures

Fiduciary Services.

Two additional disclosures for designated investment alternatives (DIAs) are required at the plan level. (1) The total annual operating expenses of the DIA must be calculated in a manner consistent with the participant-level disclosures of ERISA §404(a) and expressed as a percentage. (2) Disclosure of any other information relating to DIAs that is within the control of, or reasonably available to, the covered service provider is required, if the information is considered investment-related and of a nature which must be provided under the participant-level disclosures.

Record-keeping and/or Brokerage Services.

A covered service provider may now comply with disclosure requirements for investment-related information by distributing current disclosure materials provided by the DIA issuer(s), or by the replication of such materials. For this relief to be effective, however, the issuer of the DIA must be one of the following entities:

*         a registered investment company (mutual fund company);

*         an insurance company qualified to do business in a State;

*         an issuer of a publicly traded security (undefined in the final rule); or

*         a financial institution supervised by a State or Federal agency.

The covered service provider disseminating pass-through information must act in good faith; must not know that the materials are incomplete or inaccurate; and must state that it makes no representations as to the completeness or accuracy of such materials.

DISCLOSURE TIMING AND CHANGES

The original distribution of investment-related information must still be prior to the date of the initial engagement, extension, or renewal.  At least annually, the responsible plan fiduciary must be provided with disclosures of all investment-related information. The deadline for disclosure of changes to investment-related information that has been previously disclosed, however, must still be provided "as soon as practicable, but not later than 60 days from the date on which the covered service provider is informed of such change, unless such disclosure is precluded due to extraordinary circumstances beyond the covered service provider's control, in which case the information must be disclosed as soon as practicable".

ERRORS

Disclosure of errors contained in previously distributed information must be corrected (and disclosed) within 30 days after the covered service provider knows of the error or omission.

DEFINITION OF COMPENSATION

The final rule allows the covered service provider to make a "reasonable and good faith" estimate of compensation or cost if it cannot otherwise readily describe the compensation or cost. In such an event, the covered service provider must explain the methods and assumptions it has used for the estimate. The explanation of compensation or cost for purposes of disclosure may still be expressed by monetary amounts, formulae, percentages, per capita charges, or other reasonable methods.


 
 

 Retirement Plan Limits

 

 

2012

2011

2010

Maximum Annual Defined Benefit

$200,000

$195,000

$195,000

Maximum DC Annual Addition ($$)

$50,000

$49,000

$49,000

Maximum 401(k) Deferrals    

$17,000

$16,500

$16,500

Older EE Catch-Up Contribution

$5,500

$5,500

$5,500

Maximum Plan Compensation

$250,000

$245,000

$245,000

Highly Compensated Threshold

$115,000

$110,000

$110,000

Key Employee in a Top-Heavy Plan

$165,000

$160,000

$160,000

SSA Social Security Wage Base

$110,100

$106,800

$106,800

PBGC Maximum Monthly Guarantee

$4,653.41

$4,500

$4,500

PBGC Maximum Annual Guarantee

$55,840.92

$54,000

$54,000

Maximum DC Annual Addition (%)

100%

100%

100%

Social Security Tax  - Employee

Social Security Tax  - Employer

4.2%*

6.2%

4.2%

6.2%

6.2%

6.2%

Medicare Tax

1.45%

1.45%

1.45%

DC Plan Deduction Limit

25%

25%

25%

Definition of Compensation for DC  

Plan Deduction Limit

Includes Deferrals

*Depending on Congressional action, the Employee Social Security Tax may continue at 4.2% or revert to 6.2% on March 1st.

 
about MFYCO ...

  • Michael F. Yates & Company, Inc. can help you with a variety of services ranging from retirement plans to providing results-oriented survey instruments, training and development programs for your employees. Our products and services are intended to help you maximize the effectiveness of your Human Resources function.
     
  • These products and services incorporate our years of experience so that you receive rapid results and exceptional value. From onsite consulting, to strategic business integration, to Web enablement, we understand how Human Resources can be applied to solve your problems and achieve your goals. As a result, we can help you get the most out of your investment and turn your most precious resource into a competitive advantage.
     
  • We offer Consulting, Retirement Planning, Pension and 401(K) both qualified and non qualified Plans, Welfare Plans, Communications, Computer Systems, Executive Plans, Compensation, Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Other Services. 
     
    We offer a true and honest, Client Partnership.
     

Take the Michael F. Yates & Company, Inc. challenge!

Call us today ... 908-689-4200 



mh group
 How to Track Government Recovery Spending

 

"The Board shall establish and maintain...a user-friendly, public-facing website to foster greater accountability and transparency in the use of covered funds. The website...shall be a portal or gateway to key information relating to the Act and provide connections to other government websites with related information." 

 
 
Michael F. Yates & Company, Inc.
_________________

 
101 Belvidere Avenue
P.O.Box 7
Washington, NJ 07882-0007 
 
908-689-4200

fax: 908-689-6300
 
email: info@mfyco.com


 

 
Our staff and firm are proud
members
of the following professional organizations:

Society of Actuaries
 
American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries

Society for Human Resource Management
  
GAPS (Global Association Pension Services)

WorldatWork

 American Management Association

 

National Federation of Independent Business

Better Business Bureau

 

 


Terms of Use
COP

 


The site ("from the HR perspective" hence herein referred to as MFYCO.com) is made available by Michael F. Yates & Company Incorporated. All content, information and software provided on and through 'from the HR perspective' and MFYCO.com ("Content") may be used solely under the following terms and conditions ("Terms of Use").
YOUR USE OF THIS WEBSITE CONSTITUTES YOUR AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY DISCONTINUE YOUR USE OF THIS SITE.  

 
Mike's Best Friend 
 
"Human Resources  provides the leadership, supportive services, guiding principles, policies, structures and standards needed for a quality organization to survive in today's business environment."
 
 MFYCO PRIVACY POLICY

 
Michael F. Yates & Company, Inc. 
believes strongly in protecting the privacy of its users.


Join Our Mailing List