FOS Logo 1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the Field
Fields Of Success Newsletter
June 10, 2009    
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Dear From the Field Subscribers,  

Willie McCovey was an outstanding major league baseball player.  He was 18th on the all-time list for home runs, was selected National League Rookie of the Year in 1959 and National League Most Valuable Player in 1969 and elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame.  Willie was noted for his classic swing.  It was the type of swing that baseball coaches could film as an instructional video for teaching players how to become good hitters.  Willie had a sub-par performance year in 1960 when he hit .238, not exactly Hall of Fame performance.
 
After the 1960 baseball season, Willie's team, the San Francisco Giants, obtained Harvey Kuehn through a trade with the Cleveland Indians.  Harvey Kuehn was an outstanding hitter with a lifetime batting average over .300.  He won the American League batting title in 1959 and was frequently among the annual top 10 hitters in the league.
 
Harvey Kuehn was practicing his batting during spring training with the Giants in 1961.  Willie McCovey and the Giant's batting instructor, Lefty O'Doul, were observing Harvey as he took his swings at the baseball.  Lefty shouted to Harvey: 
"You have to stop lunging at the ball when you swing!"
 
Willie, pondering his .238 season and Harvey Kuehn's lifetime .300 record, remarked: 
"I guess I'll have to get some lunging lessons!"
 
How often do we get so immersed in how something is done instead of results?
 

This edition of From the Field focuses on the importance of focusing on results.  

Lunging Lessons: Results versus How 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How many times in meetings and discussions have we spent a great deal of time discussing how something was accomplished?   These time-consuming discussions and disputes over processes and procedures can overshadow outstanding results.  Factors that can lead to these types of discussions and disputes include:
  • Lack of confidence by individuals presenting reports and updates.
  • Identification, close association or ownership of processes by individuals participating in the discussion or attending the meeting.
  • Tendency of some individuals to use meetings as platforms to demonstrate their knowledge of certain processes.
  • Company or organizational culture.

How can we deal with these factors?

Being confident can be a challenge early in our careers or when we join a new organization or assume a new role.  It is natural.  Confidence grows as we establish a performance record or gain knowledge.  An executive who headed an organization to which I belonged helped me overcome the confidence challenge.  In my first 2-3 reports or presentations to the executive, I spent a great deal of time explaining how I achieved the results.  The results that I achieved were outstanding.  I wanted to prove that I had accomplished the ETR factor (Earned the Right).  I wanted to emphasize my competency.  The executive asked me to stop by his office after one of the presentations.  He said to me:
 
Linwood, you do not have to tell me how you achieved the results.  If I did not think you were capable, I would not have hired you.  If you stop delivering results, I will fire you.


He cured my case of Confidence Deficiency Syndrome (CDS).  We should not forget that we are hired because of our competency and that we will thrive if we use our competency to deliver results.

Process owners or subject matter experts are part of the backbone of organizations.  They ensure the consistency that drives efficiency and sustainability.  However, there are times when changes in processes and procedures can drive higher levels of results.  Prior to the 1968 Olympic Games, the standard technique for the high jump was to jump the bar from a sideway position.  Dick Fosbury invented the Fosbury Flop in which jumpers performed a backward flip over the bar.  Jumpers using the Fosbury Flop went on to set world records in the high jump.   Individuals can engage in unending discussions of the pros and cons of different processes and approaches.  However, results speak for themselves.

We are all proud of our knowledge.  Some of us have the tendency to be vocal or very willing to demonstrate our knowledge.  And, this tendency can be reinforced by the culture of the company or the organization.  I tend to classify companies into 2 categories when it comes to how individuals approach the performance of their jobs. 

  • How organizations
  • What organizations

In the How organization, adherence to established processes and procedures is strongly enforced and valued.  Processes are often changed through well-documented processes to change processes.  

In the What organization, strong emphasis is placed on the delivery of results at every level.  Processes tend to be flexible.
 
There are successful How and What organizations.  Competitive environment, tradition and the attributes of senior executives dictate which approach is most effective for the organization.  
 
How can you focus on results, especially when you are the presenter or leader of a project, initiative or effort?
  How can you avoid the trappings of the dominance of the how (process) over the what (results)?  
  • State the results at the beginning of the presentation or report.  As I stated earlier, results speak for themselves.  Rational people do not argue with success.
  • Review the approach or the how at a high level.  Avoid detail that will push the focus into a time-consuming discussion that does not change or overshadows the results.  Provide an appendix to the report covering the approach.  If you are presenting, distribute the explanation of the approach at the end of the meeting or email the details to the participants after the meeting.
  • If you are presenting results that deviated from the standard process, discuss the approach with the process owners before the meeting.  Acknowledge that individual's position as the process expert and explain why the deviation was taken.  You may also consider discussing the process change with the expert during the execution to get his/her input.  People are more prone to accept changes if they had input into the change.  

I once solved a problem that was quite a challenge to the organization.  One of the executives commended me for solving the problem.  Ed asked me how was I able to solve the problem.  My dialogue with Ed was:

Linwood: Ed, do you like sausage?

Ed:  I most certainly do.

Linwood:  Do you know how sausage is made?

Ed: Great job, solving that problem! 
 
 

Linwood Bailey
Principal
Fields of Success
Career Management Partners
Contact Us  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Would you like to discuss how you can become more effective?
 
Do you have other topics or challenges that you would like to discuss? 
 
About Fields of Success 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fields of Success provides insight, solutions and results to assist individuals and organizations with the accomplishment of their goals and objectives.
 
Fields of Success provides value to its customers through the delivery of business and coaching products and services.  The company focuses on satisfying the needs of entry to middle management level corporate professionals.
 
Fields of Success offers the been there factorFields of Success has experienced and migrated through many of the challenges that corporate professionals encounter.   
 
Click here to visit Fields of Success website
 
About From the Field 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fields of Success issues From the Field semi-monthly.  From the Field provides suggestions, ideas and tips focused on helping corporate professionals increase their effectiveness and manage their careers. 
 
Please feel free to forward From the Field to your colleagues, associates and friends by clicking on the Forward email link at the bottom of this newsletter.   
 
 
Contact Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
phone: (574) 273-0358
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~