Spectrogram
Newsletter - 29 June 2012
E-mail header
QUICK LINKS
GIULINI'S Don Giovanni
DORATI conducts Tchaikovsky, Albéniz, de Falla
PADA Exclusives
FREE ALBUM
 PASC 134

A FREE 128k MP3

 

Dor�ti

 

Kod�ly
H�ry J�nos Suite 

 

Bart�k
Divertimento for Strings

 

Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra

Antal Dor�ti conductor

 

Rec. 1950  

 

     

 

Download it now - for one week only - it's only free from our Cover Page!

 

 

 

"UPGRADE" to full quality lossless 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC downloads with notes here:

 

PASC 134    

 

 
LATEST REVIEW
Classical Recordings Quarterly

Summer 2012


Download round-up 

By Alan Sanders

 

  

"Cantelli's superlative performance is by turns atmospheric, very beautiful, with chamber-like textures, and then very dramatic and exciting!"

 
PASC 319

 

"Lothar: Schneider Wibbel - Overture" is baldly announced as the first track of a collection of 1941-42 recordings by Carl Schuricht. You have to dig deep in the internet to find that the German composer Mark Lothar (1902-85) wrote his opera "Wibbel the Taylor" in 1938. The overture is a jolly piece, by no means negligible, and is smartly despatched by Schuricht and the highly efficient Berlin German Opera Orchestra, whose horn section is shown off to fine effect in a dramatic rendering of Franck's Le chasseur maudit. These are Deutsche Grammophon recordings in fair sound. The rest of the programme is played by the Orchestra of La Scala, Milan for La Voce del Padrone. A brilliant account of Reznfcek's Donna Diana Overture and a feeble piece for cello (Enzo Martinenghi) and orchestra by Zandonai called Serenata mediovale are but preludes to the main offering, Strauss's Symphonia domestica, the second ever recording of the work after that of Ormandy. Schuricht's tempi are on the whole fairly brisk, and the playing is well-drilled in a satisfying performance of the work marred by a somewhat close acoustic and ill-defined woodwind detail. The disc is an unlikely combination of conductor, works and orchestras, but well worth investigating (PASC320, 77mins).

A collection of "The Polydor Acoustics, Vol. 2" recorded by Bruno Walter with the Berlin State Opera Orchestra in 1923-25, surprisingly contains only one work, Beethoven's Coriolan Overture, that the conductor re-visited in the studio, though live performances of some others have been issued. The Beethoven is given an unusually lyrical performance, with marked rubati, and Mendelssohn's Hebrides Overture undulates gently until a more forceful climax at the end. Schumann's Manfred Overture has an appropriately heroic quality, and Wagner's Faust Overture is strongly played, too. In Berlioz's Benvenuto Cellini Overture Walter tries hard to convey the ardent nature of the piece, but is really defeated by the primitive recording process. Cherubini's Der Wassertr�ger ("The Water Carrier") Overture rounds off an interesting programme in which Ward Marston has done his best to provide decent sound for its time (PASC322, 61mins).

Oskar Frieds Grammophon/Polydor recording of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, with the Berlin State Opera Orchestra, from 1928 is relatively familiar from previous transfers. The basic sound, nasal, seedy, with sharp-sounding strings and ill-defined woodwind, was never easy on the ear, and Andrew Rose has been no more successful that others in creating a pleasant quality. Frieds performance is pacy, direct and surprisingly objective in style. A fairly swift (for its time) Adagio benefits particularly from his clear-cut conducting. The Bruno Kittel Choir sings very well, and the soloists are all satisfactory (PASC317, 62mins).

Pristine continue their exploration of Guido Cantelli's concerts with the NBC Symphony Orchestra with a programme from 27 December, 1952. The "Sinfonia" from Bach's Christmai Oratorio suffers from a very harsh recording, though Cherubinis Symphony in D, which follows, is a little better, but still rather boomy. This symphony is not a deathless masterpiece, but the last work played, Strauss's Tod und Verkl�rung, is worth the price of the disc by itself, for Cantelli's superlative performance is by turns atmospheric, very beautiful, with chamber-like textures, and then very dramatic and exciting. Fortunately the sound is better in this work (PASC319, 58mins).

EMI's coupling of Poulenc's Gloria and Organ Concerto, recorded in 1961 with Georges Pretre conducting the French National Radio Orchestra, has seen several issues, but Pristine's new version is different. In the original recording of the Concerto the strings were tuned slightly sharper than the organ, and with modern software at his disposal Andrew Rose has been able to correct these pitch problems (except where the organ and orchestra play together, of course). The soprano Rosanna Carteri and the French Radio Chorus sing in the Gloria, and Maurice Duruffle is the soloist in the Concerto. To these authoritative performances is added two 1937 Boite � Musique recordings by Poulenc and another composer, Georges Auric, of their two piano arrangement of Satie's ballet, Parade. Only part of the work is played in fact, and without Satie's eccentric scoring, including revolver, hooter, siren and typewriter, much of the music's point is lost. As fill-up Auric and Poulenc play two of Satie's Trois morceaux en forme de poire (PASC324, 65mins).

The classic 1927-29 HMV recordings by Jacques Thibaud and Alfred Cortot of Faure's Sonata No. 1, the Franck Sonata and Debussy's Sonata have also been reissued many times, and here I shall lazily use (without permission) words that I wrote elsewhere in a 1989 review of a previous reissue.

The French duo remind us that Faure's music has a very considerable toughness of character, and Cortot in particular brings this quality out by the rhythmic strength of his playing, and by ensuring that each note in the piano part is given its full value and importance - Faure was an economical composer and every detail of his scoring tells effectively. The expressive, almost passionate quality of the music is also superbly realised, yet Thibaud and Cortot know how to balance the Sonata's emotional content with its classicism and Gallic restraint.

Debussy's startlingly original, pathetic, ironic Sonata, the last work of a mortally ill genius in despair at the events of the first world war, is brilliantly caught by Thibaud and Cortot, who respond with great sensitivity to the work's rapid changes of pulse and mood. In the Franck Sonata Thibaud's portamento, slowish vibrato and warmth of tone suit the piece to perfection, and again he and Cortot illuminate the work with their insight into the composer's world. These two players spent their formative years in a musical environment which all three composers inhabited and their performances are immensely satisfying and highly authoritative. (PACM080, 66mins)

 

LATEST REVIEW
Classical Recordings Quarterly

Summer 2012


Opera round-up 

By Bruce Latham

 

  

"There is a lot of enjoyment to be had from this release and it is certainly recommended"

 
PACO 068

 

A pot-pourri of classic (and one not-so-classic) opera and operetta recordings come from Pristine Audio. Karajan's "Gala" Decca set of Johann Strauss's Die Fledermaus was released in 1960 to launch the new Decca SET LP label (SET201/03). It boasted sumptuous presentation and production, with a velveteen box top and a host of 'guests' interpolated in the Act 2 party scene. Decca wisely isolated this gala interlude and the ballet (as printed in the Cranz score) by splitting Act 2 into bands, so you could skip the gala and/or ballet should you wish. Andrew Rose has followed suit here and put the gala sequence and ballet on to a separate disc so that Act 2 can run uninterrupted. Of the gala "guests", Giulietta Simionato and Ettore Bastianini provide most amusement as they deliver "Anything You Can Do" from Irving Berlin's Annie Get Your Gun in American-English. The gala interlude has been transferred from the original SET Decca originals, but the main performance is taken from the first Decca LP re-issue (SXL6015/16), and there is nothing wrong with that. All of the main cast members are top-class artists. Hilde Gueden and Waldemar Kmentt are absolutely fine as Rosalinde and Eisenstein, and Erika Koth makes a pert Adele. The playing of the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra is faultless. The stereo sound is spacious and compares favourably with the Decca originals. As a fill-up to the gala disc, Andrew Rose has added some mono Karajan recordings with the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra from the early 1940s - the overtures to Die Fledermaus and Zigeunerbaron and a couple of Strauss waltzes. These form an attractive bonus and do not sound their age. There is a lot of enjoyment to be had from this release (PAC0068/70; three discs; 3hrs 10mins) and it is certainly recommended, but there is a little more sparkle in the earlier Karajan recording with Elisabeth Schwarzkopf and in the first Hilde Gueden Decca set under Clemens Krauss.

The not-so-classic performance in this release is Puccini's Turandot from the New York Met in 1961, conducted by the then 78-year-old Leopold Stokowski (PAC0071; two discs; 118mins). The cast features Birgit Nilsson and Franco Corelli, both in splendid voice, but the main attraction for me is Anna Moffo singing Li�. She was only 29 when she appeared in this production and did not record the part commercially. Stokowski, who was suffering from a broken hip at the time, certainly whips up excitement in his forces, but his conducting is not so vivid as either Tullio Serafin or Francesco Molinari-Pradelli on the EMI releases with Maria Callas and Nilsson again. The mono sound is perfectly clear and adequate for its age, and is better and brighter than on a previous Melodram LP issue (� MEL448). This recording could be added to any collection purely for Moffo, and possibly Stokowski, but I prefer Nilsson and Corelli in the HMV studio version.

We move on to what can definitely be described as the classic 1952 recording of Wagner's Tristan und Isolde under Wilhelm Furtw�ngler (PACO067; four discs, 4hrs 15mins). Originally issued on HMV LPs in 1953 (ALP1030/5) the mono sound is so good that it certainly doesn't seem 60 years old. Andrew Rose mentions in the notes that he has "cleaned up" the originals (which is fair enough) and extended the extreme top and bass - but you cannot add fundamental frequencies to an already existing pre-recorded
sound source. However, you can, with the help of, say, a graphic equaliser, increase the existing upper and lower levels of the frequency range. This can give the same impression of an extended frequency range. The result here is not entirely satisfactory. The extra 'top' has made the voices less warm sounding than the original and forte strings tend to be over-strident. The overall sound also suffers from too much added artificial reverberation in so-called ambient stereo mode. The performances are exemplary, however, and do not need any endorsement from me. With a line-up including Kirsten Flagstad, Ludwig Suthaus and Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, and a pre-eminent conductor, what more could anyone want? Unfortunately, I cannot whole-heartedly recommend this release because of its disappointing sound. If you want this performance then it would be better to look elsewhere.

Pristine Audio's final offering is a 1942 Met performance of Donizetti's comic masterpiece L'elisir d'amore (PAC0072; 120mins), conducted by Ettore Panizza. The heroine, Adina, is sung by the Brazilian soprano Bid� Say�o, and she is partnered by Bruno Landi as Nemorino. Salvatore Baccaloni takes the role of Dulcamara and Francesco Valentino is Belcore. The singing is tip-top in this wonderful work. Say�o sounds suitably soubrettish; Bruno Landi has a sweet voice but he can sound ardent enough when called for. Baccaloni plays around as usual, much to the audience's delight, whilst Valentino is content to stay on the sidelines. Panizza's conducting is sometimes rather too upbeat, but he holds his ensembles together well. There are a number of small cuts in the score, with a larger chunk missing in the concerted passage in Act 2 (called Act 3 in this Met production) before the Adina/ Dulcamara duet. This last exclusion was common practice in many performances of the time. The mono sound is clear but not free from varying but continuous harmonic distortion, particularly on the first disc. Considering the source material was glass-based lacquer discs, Ward Marston has made a pretty decent transfer. The dynamic range is very good with a limited frequency spectrum, which is to be expected from a recording of this era.

 

RECENT REVIEW
MusicWeb International

28 June 2012


L'elisir d'amore 

by G�ran Forsling 

 

"A flawed performance saved by the tenor and the soprano. "

 
PACO 072

 

http://www.pristineclassical.com/LargeWorks/Vocal/PACO072.php
The name Ettore (originally H�ctor) Panizza is not very well known today, though he was held in high esteem seventy and more years ago. Richard Strauss admired him deeply. He was born in 1875 in Buenos Aires, where his father was a cellist at the Teatro Col�n. His father also became his first teacher. He later went to Italy and the Milan Conservatory. It was also in Italy that he commenced his conducting career. Up to the beginning of the war he also appeared regularly at Covent Garden. During and after the war he worked at La Scala, until 1932 when he moved to the US. Between 1934 and 1942 he was the principal conductor of the Italian repertoire at the Metropolitan Opera, succeeding Tullio Serafin in that capacity.
 
The reason why he is largely forgotten is no doubt that he made few if any commercial recordings. Fortunately there are a number of live broadcasts from the Metropolitan that have been preserved, among them a terrific Otello, from 1938 with Martinelli, Tibbett and Elisabeth Rethberg (see review). The present L'elisir d'amore may not be in that class but it has still many good things on offer. Good sound is not one of those things but it isn't really bad either. The transfers by Ward Marston are from a set of 5 double-faced 16 inch glass base lacquer-coated discs taken off the air in Providence, Rhode Island. The sound is rather aggressive, but it is a clean sound that lets us hear a lot of instrumental detail. Orchestral tuttis tend to be hard on the ear. The orchestra play well but the Metropolitan chorus of this period was not always the most homogenous of bodies. Panizza was no friend of leisurely tempos but he never rushes the music and he is pliable towards the singers and allows them space to inflect their solos.
 
Three Metropolitan mainstays and a fourth singer whose name is little known are heard in the leading roles. Salvatore Baccaloni (b. 1900) was widely regarded as one of the foremost buffo basses of the 20th century. He had a magnificent voice and immense comic talent but I believe that he should be seen as well as heard to make real impact. He is expressive, he knows how to colour the voice, his enunciation is impeccable, he has that special sense for timing but - and this is a strong 'but': he often becomes a little too much, there is too much business. He was, though, a great favourite at the Metropolitan, where he appeared more than four hundred times during more than twenty years. Francesco (Frank) Valentino (b. 1907) was not far behind, with close to three hundred performances during twenty-one seasons. He was Marcello in Toscanini's famous 1946 recording of La boh�me, but not a particularly good one. His throaty tone and rather unsubtle singing here has little of bel canto feeling, but I admit that his brusque manners suit his character, sergeant Belcore.
 
The third mainstay is the Brazilian soprano Bidu Say�o. She was born in 1902, made her debut at the Metropolitan in 1937 and stayed there until 1952, taking part in well over two hundred performances. She was granted an uncommonly long life, passing away as recently as 1999. Ms Say�o was one of the loveliest lyric sopranos of the era, testified not least by this and other live broadcasts from the Metropolitan. Here she is a youthful and sprightly Adina, nuanced and with apt coloratura (try CD 2 tr. 16!). Even better are the duets with Nemorino, where the two singers inspire each other to great things. Nemorino, some readers say, that's the odd man out, isn't it? Bruno Landi, never heard of him!
 
Well, the loss is definitely the listeners'. Here is a tenore di grazia, nimble, nuanced, beautiful tone, honeyed delivery but with brilliant top notes in reserve for the big moments. Cesare Valletti on the old Cetra recording from 1952 is the touchstone for many, Nicolai Gedda's 1964 recording another, and isolated recordings of the famous Una furtiva lagrima by Tito Schipa, Ferruccio Tagliavini and Leopold Simoneau are versions to return to. Bruno Landi may not be quite in their league but he is not far behind. Readers being tempted by my panegyrics will feel disappointed when hearing the opening of his entrance aria Quanto e bella (CD 1 tr. 4), where he sounds small voiced and undernourished, but I suppose he is entering backstage. After a few bars he is up front and can be enjoyed in all his glory. Una furtiva (CD 2 tr.14) is certainly delicious.
 
A few words about the singer. Landi was born in 1900, the same year as Baccaloni. He made his debut in 1925, as the Duke in Rigoletto, and sang for the next ten years in Italy. In 1935 he went to South America, where he was immensely popular. He returned to Italy and now sang at La Scala. In 1938 he made his Metropolitan debut, again in Rigoletto, and remained there until 1946, returning in 1951 for a single appearance in Il barbiere di Siviglia. According to the Metropolitan Opera Data Base he sang in 56 performances in a handful of operas. Besides the two already mentioned he appeared in La boh�me, La traviata, Don Pasquale and L'Elisir d'amore. There are a couple of other live recordings with him.
 
Let me, just for the record, point out that Giannetta is sung by Mona Paulee, who had made her Metropolitan debut in this same role a few weeks earlier and continued to sing cameo roles until May 1946 in a total of 158 performances. Her biggest role wasSiebelin Faust, which she sang only once, probably as understudy for someone who had to cancel. There is another 'soloist' as well, and a true legend: Milton Cross, the announcer for the NBC broadcasts from the very first one in 1931 until his death in 1975. During these 43 years he missed only two broadcasts!
 
Everybody needs at least a couple of good recordings of this delectable opera. The Cetra set with Valletti, The Decca recording with Di Stefano at his freshest, the EMI recording with Gedda, a later Decca with Pavarotti and the Sony (originally CBS) with Domingo. The present issue can't compete on sonic grounds and neither Valentino nor Baccaloni are ideal but Say�o and Landi are. A flawed performance saved by the tenor and the soprano. 

 

LINK 

          
Join Our Mailing List
CONTENTS
Editorial         So what exactly is an MP3 and a FLAC?
Giulini             His magnificent stereo 1959 Don Giovanni
Dor�ti              Tchaikovsky 5, Alb�niz and de Falla
PADA              Medtner plays his own piano music

So what exactly is an MP3 and a FLAC?

Not to mention 16-bits, 24-bits and the rest...     



This week

Carlo Maria Giulini's recording of Mozart's Don Giovanni was one of a number of major operatic recordings made with the arrival of stereo in the late 1950s and 1960s - and surely rates among the absolute best. Unlike their rivals at Decca, EMI's engineers and producers elected to concentrate purely on the music rather than bringing in "location" sound effects for this particular production, but what they did record was particularly good, and in a production like this I don't miss the sonic frippery.

As one of EMI's Great Recordings of the Century I was astonished, when first contemplating a transfer from a set of near-mint LPs, to discover that the recording is not available on CD any more. Yes, you can get it as an MP3, but even the redoubtable Arkiv Music offers this alone - no uncompressed full-quality release can be had anywhere other than in the second-hand market it seems.

Reason enough, then, to have a listen and make a few initial tests with an LP transfer. I'm pleased to report great success - as is often the case with material of this vintage the effect is akin to lifting a veil from the loudspeakers when XR remastering works its magic. If it wasn't for a low-level background of tape hiss one might imagine this was a modern, digital recording, and not one made in the autumn of 1959, it really is that good.

We can thank HMV for providing such good LP pressings that the detail now revealed was there all along - vinyl may have its technical shortcomings but it is capable of out-performing master tapes on a number of fronts, and this remastering goes to show just how good it can be as a source.

Also from LPs this week we have a couple of Dor�ti releases - his 1952 mono Tchaikovsky 5th, which despite showing its age in the original has come along in leaps and bounds almost to rival the accompanying 1957 stereo Alb�niz and de Falla recordings. All of these were made with the Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra, and each was early in its respective sequence of issues for Mercury Records - 9th in the MG50000 mono series for the earlier recording, 8th in the SR90000 series for the stereo.

The recordings, though made just 5 years apart, do amply demonstrate how fast and far things progressed technically in the fifties. The Spanish music has an extension at the top and bottom end that simply wasn't there in 1952 for the Tchaikovsky, as well as the clarity and definition of stereo to help it. These later recordings are currently available - but only as part of a 5 CD box set from Mercury. As far as we're aware, the Tchaikovsky remains in the vaults.


Finally a reminder again that there will be no new release or newsletter next week. There will also be a break here with no releases or newsletters on 24 and 31 August.

Increasing hard drive prices coupled with ever-increasing content will see a price rise for our Digital Music Collection drives from the start of August. Precise details are still to be settled but I expect an increase of around 10% over current prices.



A refresher course on MP3, FLAC and the rest

I've been meaning to write this column for a while, and if you're au fait with the technical stuff about what and MP3 is (and why) and the differences between 16-bit and 24-bit audio and what a FLAC is 9or don't really care!) then please skip further down to our new releases. If you're not 100% clear but are interested in some of the technical background, I hope that the next few paragraphs may help...


First of all I want to talk about MP3, the most common format for compressed music files, alongside proprietary systems such as Sony's ATRAC, Microsoft's WMA and Apple's AAC systems.

I first came across the idea of compressed digital music files whilst working at the BBC. For many years we'd used tape cartridges for radio jingles and theme music. Each "cart" looked a lot like the 8-track cartridge system developed in the 1960s by Lear (of LearJet fame) which was briefly popular in cars before losing out to cassette tapes in the seventies. Then in the 1990s along came a new device from Sony, the MiniDisc, which was soon adopted in my workplace as a much smaller, higher quality and more flexible alternative to the old carts and their bulky record and replay machines.

I distinctly recall the scepticism which greeted this new-fangled format. We knew it didn't have the storage capacity of a proper CD disc (how could it, at that small size?!) and as a group of studio engineers, we were highly suspicious of the claims of fidelity made of it. None of us had heard of MP3 (developed in Germany in the late 1980s) or anything else like this before, and we were sure we'd easily hear problems with the sound quality. How wrong we were! None of our highly-trained and experienced ears could find anything "wrong" with Sony's sound, which used their own MP3-like system, ATRAC, operating at 292kbps - pretty close to the very highest quality bit-rate allowable for MP3s.

So, putting aside the difficult minor technical differences between ATRAC, MP3 and the others for the purposes of this discussion, what exactly is going on and what do those bit-rate numbers actually mean? Simply put, the number is indicative of how much information has been retained from the original recording. Assuming we start with a regular, uncompressed CD audio file, we begin with a data rate of 1411.2 thousand* bits per second or kbps. (*Actually we're talking about multiples of 1024, not 1000, but that's computers for you.)  That's five times as much sound information on a CD than the MiniDisc saves - yet we couldn't hear the difference. Why not?

Well it turns out that a lot of what is encoded in a CD is in fact silence, or near enough. Then there's stuff that's so quiet it's effectively drowned out by the louder frequencies. In other words, there's an awful lot of nothing being faithfully notated by an uncompressed digital music recording. If all that nothing is discarded somehow, without touching the something you do want to hear, you can start to reduce the file size considerably.

The only sounds which contain something of everything, making compression just about impossible, would be random "white" noise and the like, where all frequencies are present at random levels all the time. Music isn't generally like this - it usually has a lot of discreet frequencies with yawning great gaps between them. There are though some important caveats, and it's these which give the game away when you listen to a compressed music file. I'll come to this in a moment, but first...

Bit-rates for compressed files are very important. The lower the bit rate, the more the data has been "squeezed" and the less of it is left, with the result that the sound quality is reduced, ultimately to a point at where it's clearly audible to anyone that something is not quite right.

I should at this point make it clear that digital music data compression is not the same as the volume compression used to make pop singles sound louder, or ride the gain of very loud passages in some classical recordings over the years. The compression in an MP3 won't alter the dynamics of a recording, nor will it introduce background hiss, both of which are key to its initial impact being so positive to a bunch of sound engineers used to tape hiss, treble loss and wow and flutter being the main shortcomings of cassette tape, for example. You have to listen for other problems if you're looking to identify a poorly-encoded MP3.

Now coming back to that white noise. It turns out that there are some common musical sounds which do contain something very akin to white noise, something any lossy compression routine struggles with, and it's most commonly heard in cymbals and other metal percussion instruments. To accurately reproduce these you really need all the bit rate you can get - i.e. full CD quality. As soon as you get onto MP3 bit-rates you're making a real mess of the hi-hat in a rock track - it smears, sounds like mushy, loses its clarity, how else can I put it? It doesn't sound right, basically, especially once you start to drop the bit rate and squeeze it down into a smaller file size. (Ironically, this actually makes MP3 less suitable for pop music than for a lot of classical music - but don't say I told you this...)

At the very highest bit-rates, though, you'll be extremely hard pushed to distinguish between MP3 and the original, especially outside of certain genres of well-recorded, hi-hat-heavy jazz and pop music. MP3s were particularly useful when digital storage was small and expensive and Internet connections slow by comparison to what most of us are now used to enjoying. And our sales figures suggest they're very much yesterday's thing - most of our downloads are FLAC, and increasingly at 24-bit quality.


A FLAC file is normally considerably bigger than an MP3 - yet it's still smaller than the original master. For example, the Overture to this week's Don Giovanni release indicates an average bit-rate of 741kbps as a 16-bit FLAC - whilst even the 24-bit version is only slightly more storage-hungry than a CD, with an average bit-rate of 1534kbps compared to CD's 1411kbps.

FLAC is one of a number of "non-lossy" data compression techniques, developed to make music files smaller without sacrificing a single bit of quality or information. Just as computer software can be squashed into a smaller space in a "ZIP" file, yet reconstituted back to exactly what it began as, so a music file can be made into a FLAC which, upon decoding, is bit-for-bit identical to its original. It takes some clever maths to do this, looking for specific patterns of zeros and ones in the data stream and bundling them together. If this is difficult to imagine then remember we do this ourselves all the time: just as we write the number "one thousand" as "1000" (four digits) rather than "1111111111111..." (i.e. a thousand digits) to make numbers manageable on the page, there are also perfectly accurate "shorthand" ways of annotating the numbers which make up a FLAC file.

With a FLAC you have a smaller file than the original (useful for Internet transfer and storage), yet which sacrifices nothing at all in sound quality over that original. And if you have FLAC rather than MP3, you also have something that can be compressed if necessary (for an iPod with limited storage, perhaps) without getting into the perils of double-compression (it can sound very nasty if you try, for example, to convert an MP3 into Apple's AAC format or Microsoft's WMA - or indeed into a smaller MP3 - because data is lost twice over in the two compressions, as it won't be the same data that's discarded each time).

So we like FLAC here at Pristine. It's not proprietary and is currently the lossless format in widest use, though it's still not as universal as the MP3, and Apple in particular have been adverse to adopting it. (Then again, they're not overwhelming in their welcome for MP3 and usually prefer to do their own thing.)


But what about those 16-bit and 24-bit FLAC file options, and how does this correspond to the bit rates we've just looked at?

Well now we're looking at bit depth, which is a different matter to bit rate altogether. Every few weeks I get an e-mail by someone asking whether they're likely to hear a big difference between our 16-bit and our 24-bit FLACs. I usually step back at this point from making a definitive statement, and suggest the correspondent listens to a couple of examples for themselves to make their own mind up, as we're getting to quite subtle audio territory here, whatever other salesmen might have told you.

The bit depth of a recording is effectively the determinant of the dynamic range of that recording - and 16-bit, CD-quality recordings already have a very wide dynamic range available to them. If we start both 16-bit and 24-bit recordings at the same top volume level and call it 0dB and start counting backwards into ever quieter territory, then the former has its complete silence down at -96dB, whilst the latter has its quietest level at (a theoretical) -144dB. (By comparison a non-Dolby master tape goes down to around -62dB before it drowns in hiss, and an optimal LP might manage around -65dB.)

We're counting backwards largely because in digital audio there's literally nowhere to go after zero decibels at the top end - you run out of numbers and get into horrible distortion if you try and overload a digital system - zero here is very much "absolute" and the loudest waveform a digital recording is capable of containing.

Traditionally 16-bit digital recordings didn't stray too close to this top level - we always left in considerable headroom, and this might actually have reduced the available dynamic range by 10-15dB. Still plenty more than tape, but a 16-bit recording made in the 80s or 90s might only be using 13 or 14 of the then-available 16 bits of data in order to make sure you never got in danger of overloading a digital recording.

Meanwhile the electronics used in making recordings creates limits - you can't actually attain 24-bit resolution in a recording or replay system, because even "perfect" electrical circuits have inherent noise from all those electrons flying around - thus the 144dB of 24-bit music data is limited to about 120dB by microphones, amplifiers and converters even of the very highest possible quality. We don't really need 24-bit recording quality then, but it turns out they're easier to deal with in computers than 21-bit or 22-bit recordings, hence the standard

By this stage your head may be spinning a bit. So let's emphasise the single, simple idea you need to understand, and it is exceptionally simple: a 24-bit recording can go (a lot) quieter than a 16-bit one.

And that's essentially all there is to it. I've heard all kinds of nonsense spouted about the different sound of different bit depths (including one idiot moaning about the "granular" sound of a 16-bit recording who clearly hadn't the slightest idea about basic principles of digital audio). 24-bits simply mean there are more numbers available to notate the volume level of a waveform at a specific point in time, and the only advantage of this is that it gives us the ability to encode quieter sound than 16-bit audio allows. There's nothing more to it than that in recording and replay.


In my restoration and remastering work I routinely operate at a special 32-bit resolution (and occasionally 64-bits too). I can't hear it, but this resolution gives me a huge mathematical headroom for the complex algorithms used to remove clicks, hiss, and other nasties. This ensures that absolutely nothing I do will introduce its own audible noise to the recording by virtue of mathematical rounding errors and the like - a very real risk if I were to work with 16-bit audio only, where the noise floor could be constantly raised by simply not having enough numbers to crunch.

The end result of my work is always a 32-bit master file. When this is converted into 24-bit FLAC then it's true that a certain amount of data is discarded - but unlike an MP3 this is data which is literally never audible - it's mathematically-generated noise and rubbish that's so quiet it's far below our ability ever to reproduce it alongside what we do want to hear. Thus it can be truthfully stated that a 24-bit FLAC offers precisely what I hear when I replay my 32-bit master. Remember, the finest reproduction system that theoretical physics allows us to build will still only delve down to the 20th or 21st quietest bit or thereabouts.

Having made a 24-bit FLAC I then convert the my 32-bit file to 16-bit resolution for CDs, 16-bit FLACs and conversion to MP3. Doing this does involve throwing away some (exceptionally quiet but within the realms of the reproduceable) sound, but through the use of clever "dithering" techniques we can mitigate some of this damage (that's a whole separate topic I'll avoid for now), with the aim of making it exceptionally difficult to hear any differences between the original and the 16-bit version.

For the majority of people I suspect that the 16-bit FLAC is ideal. The file size isn't too big, transfer times aren't too long, and the sound quality is potentially superb. But sometimes you want to know you're not in any danger of missing anything, which I'm sure helps to account for the increased interest in our 24-bit downloads. They simply can't get any better.


[You'll notice I've made no mention of sampling rates here. I carried out an investigation into higher sampling rates (which simply increase the highest frequencies that can be recorded and reproduced) some time ago, and I remain to be convinced that 96kHz recordings are anything other than a marketing scam, selling us vast swathes of empty space and electrical buzzing that we simply cannot hear, and very little music. But that's my opinion, and for the purposes of this article, it's not the subject under discussion.]

 

Andrew Rose
29 June 2012
    

 

"Without question one of the supreme recordings of the  

Twentieth century"  

 

Sounding better than ever before in this
new transfer and XR remastering

 

  

PACO 078 MOZART            

Don Giovanni              

  

Recorded 1959, stereo                                 

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer:  Andrew Rose   

  

   

Eberhard W�chter - Don Giovanni
Joan Sutherland - Donna Anna 
Luigi Alva  - Don Ottavio 
Gottlob Frick - Commendatore 
Elisabeth Schwarzkopf   - Donna Elvira 
Giuseppe Taddei  - Leporello 
Piero Cappuccilli  - Masetto 
Graziella Sciutti - Zerlina 
 Philharmonia Orchestra & Chorus
Chorus Master Roberto Benaglio 
Harpsichord Professor Heinrich Schmidt 

Carlo Maria Giulini conductor

 
    

Web page: PACO 078  

    

  

  

Short notes  

  

"The whole project has a dynamism and wicked sense of humour that could only be obtained with a team possessing this blend of talent, comparative youth and experience... One of the greatest musical and dramatic experiences available on disc, then, and one that I personally will always treasure"

- Gwyn Parry-Jones, MusicWeb International, 2002 
   

It was with astonishment that we learned that this landmark recording of Mozart's Don Giovanni, made at Abbey Road Studios in late 1959 and released in 1961 in glorious stereo, was no longer available in any format other than MP3.

This bizarre commercial decision seemed to beg action, and here we present W�chter, Sutherland, Frick, Schwarzkopf and the rest of a stunning line-up under the masterful baton of Carlo Maria Giulini in stunning sound that must surely rank it at the very top of our opera releases for sonic quality.
  

    

Notes On this recording   

  

With this recording astonishingly out of print (except for MP3 copies) I was delighted to find that a set of near-mint HMV LPs delivered superb sound quality for remastering purposes. The discs themselves played slightly sharper than electrical readings suggest was the true pitch sung - and has thus been corrected from 448Hz to 442.6Hz.  

 

Other than that I've sought to bring greater clarity and accuracy to the sound through 32-bit XR remastering, which has revealed truly superb sound quality from start to finish of this timeless recording.

  

Andrew Rose     

  

  

  

Review 2002 EMI CD reissue   


It seems incredible now that Carlo Maria Giulini was the third choice of conductor for this famed recording. First choice was Beecham, and when that fell through, Walter Legge, the producer, engaged Klemperer, who, though weakened by illnesses and accidents, began working on the recording, only to withdraw after three days because of pericarditis. Legge sent an SOS to the then relatively unknown Giulini, who responded positively, though, as the booklet tells us, with some trepidation. The rest is indeed history, as the whole ensemble proceeded to work like a dream, and produce what in this case is without question one of the supreme recordings of the twentieth century, and will surely never be surpassed on disc.

Credit must go to Legge for two things in particular; firstly for assembling the peerless cast, and secondly for overseeing the technical aspects so faultlessly. The beauty of the singers is that, as befits the nature of the opera, they were either young (Alva, W�chter, Sutherland and Cappuccilli in their thirties, Sciutti in her twenties) or in their absolute vocal and dramatic prime (Schwarzkopf, Taddei and Frick). Giulini himself was just 45, and the whole project has a dynamism and wicked sense of humour that could only be obtained with a team possessing this blend of talent, comparative youth and experience.

To anyone who knows her only in 19th century Italian repertoire, Sutherland is a revelation here. She sings Donna Anna's arias with rare delicacy and elegance, plus the expected technical brilliance, while Schwarzkopf is simply perfection as Donna Elvira, transforming her from what can sometimes be a mournful nag into a woman of great dignity and strength of character. The young Sciutti was an inspired choice as Zerlina, giving her a delightfully disingenuous quality that is as endearing as it is entertaining.

The men are equally good; W�chter was an exceptional Don, and in his vocal colouring contrives to reflect brilliantly all the different ways the character presents himself to those he wishes to manipulate, be they male or female. Alva makes an appropriately sweet-toned and rather deadpan Don Ottavio (though he is a touch rhythmically slack in places), and Cappuccilli makes an hilarious Masetto, aflame with righteous indignation and sexual jealousy. Frick is in his best cavernous voice as the Commendatore, reminding us of the great recorded Hagen he was to become soon after this.

A cast 'to die for', then, no doubt about that. Yet there are plenty of opera sets that fail to ignite despite the starriest of line-ups. It's the pacing of the whole thing that is so superb, and here the continuo player, Heinrich Schmidt, makes a huge contribution. He gets the passages of recitativo secco bowling along at a terrific rate, emphasising the knockabout humour. In particular, the exchanges between Don Giovanni and Leporello are outstanding, the master's twitting of the servant having, for modern ears, unmistakable echoes of Blackadder and Baldrick.

The orchestral playing is what finally lifts the performance to the sublime level it achieves. Giulini draws the most sensitive, stylish and dramatically aware playing from the Philharmonia, especially from the strings, who produce a warmth and beauty of tone that is very special. This serves to underline how this opera came to mean so very much - arguably more than any other 18th century stage work - to the Romantics of the 19th century.

The recording captures all of this faithfully, with a balance that manages to make the singers sound just a little larger than life without losing the correct perspective. One of the greatest musical and dramatic experiences available on disc, then, and one that I personally will always treasure.

Gwyn Parry-Jones, MusicWeb International December 2002

  

  

  

     

MP3 Sample    Don Giovanni a cenar teco m'invitasti

Listen 

  

  

Download purchase links:

Stereo MP3 

Stereo 16-bit FLAC 

Stereo 24-bit FLAC       

  

CD purchase links and all other information:

PACO 078 - webpage at Pristine Classical   

  

 

Dor�ti in fiery form in these recordings of Russian and Spanish music

 

Mercury Living Presence sound brought up to date with XR remastering

  

  

PASC350 DORATI       

conducts Tchaikovsky, Alb�niz, de Falla      

  

Recorded 1952/57

 

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer:  Andrew Rose    

  

  

   

TCHAIKOVSKY Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64 

ALBENIZ (orch. Arb�s)  Iberia

DE FALLA La Vida Breve - Interlude and Dance   



Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra
Antal Dor�ti conductor
 
Presented in Stereo (Alb�niz, de Falla) and Ambient Stereo (Tchaikovsky)


Web page: PASC 350   

  

   

 

Short notes      

"Dorati grasps the fiery work with both hands, throwing none of it away. Right from the crisp "till ready" of the Allegro of the first movement it is clear that this is going to be an alert performance and the alertness does in fact continue until the very end...The recording is vivid, matching the performance ideally"

- Gramophone, 1954, on Dor�ti's Tchaikovsky


Three fiery performances from Dor�ti and the Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra bring life and vigour into the music of first Tchaikovsky, in a 1952 recording of his Symphony No. 5, then the two Spanish composers Alb�niz and de Falla, in recordings made in stereo in 1957.

All of these Mercury recordings have benefited greatly from Pristine's XR remastering technology - most especially in that Tchaikovsky from the earlier days of tape and LP technology, which shines here as never before!

   

  

  

Notes  on this recording  

These recordings, made just five years apart, demonstrate in their original forms the advances in recording technology that took place between 1952 and 1957. The Tchaikovsky, in mono and with limited frequency extension, sounded as if from another era. But it's the same orchestra and conductor, and I've attempted to convey this in the remastering of all three works, with significant benefits to the earlier LP's sound, which is now considerably improved and realistic, though some very high frequency "fuzz" is occasionally audible.

The two stereo recordings were much more successful, and here I've been able to make the very most of the full extension both at the top end and in the very deep bass, to convey the wonderfully evocative and dramatically Spanish intent of the conductor.

  

Andrew Rose          

  

 

Review  Tchaikovsky  

Dorati grasps the fiery work with both hands, throwing none of it away. Right from the crisp "till ready " of the allegro of the first movement it is clear that this is going to be an alert performance and the alertness does in fact continue until the very end. Sometimes, arguably, a bit too much so: in the slow movement, after the pizzicato chords, when the violins take over the horn's original tune-is this not pushing on a bit too vigorously ?

The orchestra responds to Dorati with some very alive playing. The violas in particular are unusually strong-this was noticeable, too, in the same orchestra's recording of the Mozart G minor Symphony, reviewed here this month ; could it be anything to do with the microphone placing ? "A single Telefunken microphone hung about 15 feet directly over the conductor's podium" is the recipe; it does seem strategically placed for the violas. (Not, in passing, for the bassoons- their last notes to the first movement of the Tchaikovsky are quite lost.)

The recording is vivid, matching the performance ideally. With the opening of the slow movement re-made, I would have little difficulty in believing this to be the best available version... 

  

M.M., The Gramophone, June 1954, excerpt

  

  

  

Review  Alb�niz & de Falla    

I started here with the Vida Breve extracts -the atmospheric Interlude and the gay First Dance. Excellent playing, and very life-like recording in both mono and stereo versions. A slight lift of the eyebrows at what struck me as an exaggerated broadening of the tempo at the heavy string theme in the Dance, but on the whole very good indeed.

And then, having dug out the Argenta version for comparison, I settled down to the Arb�s orchestrations of five of the Iberia suite-Evocaci�n, El Corpus en Sevilla, Triana, El Puerto and El Albaicin. Critics seem to spend most of their time sighing "If only..." In this case, faced with first-rate playing by the Minneapolis Orchestra and fine recording by Mercury, one's constant thoughts are "If only Antal Dorati weren't in such an almighty hurry all the time..." and "If only Argenta could have had the advantage of this orchestra and the best modern recording..."

  

L.S., The Gramophone, April 1960, excerpt

  

 

    


MP3 Sample
  Alb�niz  -  Iberia, 2nd mvt

Listen

 

Download purchase links:

Ambient Stereo & Stereo MP3

Ambient Stereo & Stereo 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo & Stereo 24-bit FLAC

 

  

CD purchase links and all other information:

PASC 350 - webpage at Pristine Classical   

  

 
 
Medtner plays Medtner


Medtner
Medtner
PADA Exclusives
Streamed MP3s you can also download
     

  

 

Medtner
Skazki
(Fairy Tales)  


Nikolai Medtner
piano

HMV studio recordings
Abbey Road Studio 3
April-May 1936


 

Transfer and Ambient Stereo processing by Dr. John Duffy

Further remastering by Andrew Rose 

  

 

Over 500 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue. 

 

 

Subscribe to PADA Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.